usiranstandoff
Hot
Latest
😱Why Rising Geopolitical Tension Matters for 👑Crypto Markets in February 2026👇🤫
👉February 2026 has placed crypto markets at the intersection of macro caution and geopolitical uncertainty as tensions between the United States and Iran continue to draw global attention. While crypto often feels detached from traditional geopolitics, markets respond less to political narratives and more to risk perception. Rising geopolitical tension increases uncertainty across financial systems, encouraging investors to reduce exposure and preserve capital. This shift does not require direct conflict. The mere possibility of escalation is enough to influence positioning, liquidity, and sentiment, especially in already fragile market conditions.
👉The primary channel through which the US Iran standoff affects crypto is macro pressure rather than direct impact. Iran’s role in global energy dynamics means any instability raises concerns around oil supply and inflation. Higher inflation expectations place pressure on central banks to maintain restrictive financial conditions, limiting liquidity for speculative assets. Crypto, still largely treated as a high risk asset by institutions, feels this pressure through reduced inflows and lower leverage tolerance. As uncertainty rises, markets price probability rather than outcomes, leading to defensive behavior before any confirmed escalation occurs.
👉Importantly, this phase reflects a sentiment shock rather than structural damage to crypto itself. Blockchain networks continue to function, on chain activity remains intact, and long term fundamentals have not changed. What has shifted is confidence and risk appetite. Historically, geopolitical stress tends to amplify existing market trends rather than create new ones. For disciplined participants, the focus shifts from prediction to risk management, patience, and observation. Markets eventually move past headlines, but positioning during uncertainty often defines outcomes when clarity returns.
#usiranstandoff
$BNB
$XRP
$GIGGLE
👉February 2026 has placed crypto markets at the intersection of macro caution and geopolitical uncertainty as tensions between the United States and Iran continue to draw global attention. While crypto often feels detached from traditional geopolitics, markets respond less to political narratives and more to risk perception. Rising geopolitical tension increases uncertainty across financial systems, encouraging investors to reduce exposure and preserve capital. This shift does not require direct conflict. The mere possibility of escalation is enough to influence positioning, liquidity, and sentiment, especially in already fragile market conditions.
👉The primary channel through which the US Iran standoff affects crypto is macro pressure rather than direct impact. Iran’s role in global energy dynamics means any instability raises concerns around oil supply and inflation. Higher inflation expectations place pressure on central banks to maintain restrictive financial conditions, limiting liquidity for speculative assets. Crypto, still largely treated as a high risk asset by institutions, feels this pressure through reduced inflows and lower leverage tolerance. As uncertainty rises, markets price probability rather than outcomes, leading to defensive behavior before any confirmed escalation occurs.
👉Importantly, this phase reflects a sentiment shock rather than structural damage to crypto itself. Blockchain networks continue to function, on chain activity remains intact, and long term fundamentals have not changed. What has shifted is confidence and risk appetite. Historically, geopolitical stress tends to amplify existing market trends rather than create new ones. For disciplined participants, the focus shifts from prediction to risk management, patience, and observation. Markets eventually move past headlines, but positioning during uncertainty often defines outcomes when clarity returns.
#usiranstandoff
$BNB
$XRP
$GIGGLE
$ZEC ✅ Trading at level from where if 🛑closed Above the marked level then definately we will see the ⛔ next 244 levels only if close above 237 USDC ✅ sp take your trade after closing above 237 on 15 min time fram ✅ $XRP $PIPPIN #WhaleDeRiskETH #BinanceBitcoinSAFUFund #USIranStandoff #WhenWillBTCRebound
Why Rising Geopolitical Tension Matters for Crypto Markets in February 2026
February 2026 has placed crypto markets at the intersection of macro caution and geopolitical uncertainty as tensions between the United States and Iran continue to draw global attention. While crypto often feels detached from traditional geopolitics, markets respond less to political narratives and more to risk perception. Rising geopolitical tension increases uncertainty across financial systems, encouraging investors to reduce exposure and preserve capital. This shift does not require direct conflict. The mere possibility of escalation is enough to influence positioning, liquidity, and sentiment, especially in already fragile market conditions.
The primary channel through which the US Iran standoff affects crypto is macro pressure rather than direct impact. Iran’s role in global energy dynamics means any instability raises concerns around oil supply and inflation. Higher inflation expectations place pressure on central banks to maintain restrictive financial conditions, limiting liquidity for speculative assets. Crypto, still largely treated as a high risk asset by institutions, feels this pressure through reduced inflows and lower leverage tolerance. As uncertainty rises, markets price probability rather than outcomes, leading to defensive behavior before any confirmed escalation occurs.
Importantly, this phase reflects a sentiment shock rather than structural damage to crypto itself. Blockchain networks continue to function, on chain activity remains intact, and long term fundamentals have not changed. What has shifted is confidence and risk appetite. Historically, geopolitical stress tends to amplify existing market trends rather than create new ones. For disciplined participants, the focus shifts from prediction to risk management, patience, and observation. Markets eventually move past headlines, but positioning during uncertainty often defines outcomes when clarity returns.
#usiranstandoff
February 2026 has placed crypto markets at the intersection of macro caution and geopolitical uncertainty as tensions between the United States and Iran continue to draw global attention. While crypto often feels detached from traditional geopolitics, markets respond less to political narratives and more to risk perception. Rising geopolitical tension increases uncertainty across financial systems, encouraging investors to reduce exposure and preserve capital. This shift does not require direct conflict. The mere possibility of escalation is enough to influence positioning, liquidity, and sentiment, especially in already fragile market conditions.
The primary channel through which the US Iran standoff affects crypto is macro pressure rather than direct impact. Iran’s role in global energy dynamics means any instability raises concerns around oil supply and inflation. Higher inflation expectations place pressure on central banks to maintain restrictive financial conditions, limiting liquidity for speculative assets. Crypto, still largely treated as a high risk asset by institutions, feels this pressure through reduced inflows and lower leverage tolerance. As uncertainty rises, markets price probability rather than outcomes, leading to defensive behavior before any confirmed escalation occurs.
Importantly, this phase reflects a sentiment shock rather than structural damage to crypto itself. Blockchain networks continue to function, on chain activity remains intact, and long term fundamentals have not changed. What has shifted is confidence and risk appetite. Historically, geopolitical stress tends to amplify existing market trends rather than create new ones. For disciplined participants, the focus shifts from prediction to risk management, patience, and observation. Markets eventually move past headlines, but positioning during uncertainty often defines outcomes when clarity returns.
#usiranstandoff
行情监控:
Deeply cultivate the cryptocurrency circle, let's follow each other and wait for the bull market.
US: Ghislaine Maxwell appeared before a House committee on Monday but invoked her 5th Amendment righ
That is correct. Yesterday, **Monday, February 9, 2026**, Ghislaine Maxwell appeared virtually before the **House Oversight Committee** from a federal prison in Texas and invoked her Fifth Amendment rights.
The appearance was the result of a long-standing subpoena from Committee Chairman **James Comer (R-Ky.)**, who is investigating the broader network surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and how his decade-long abuse of minors went unpunished for so long.
### Key Takeaways from the Deposition
* **The Refusal:** Despite being convicted and currently serving a 20-year sentence, Maxwell followed her legal team’s advice and remained silent. Her attorney, David Oscar Markus, argued that testifying could jeopardize her ongoing legal appeals (specifically a pending habeas petition).
* **The "Clemency" Offer:** In a move that drew sharp criticism from Democrats, Maxwell’s attorney stated that she would be willing to "speak fully and honestly" if **President Trump** granted her clemency. He further claimed she could testify to the "innocence" of both Donald Trump and Bill Clinton regarding their past ties to Epstein.
* **Political Reaction:**
* **Republicans:** Chairman Comer expressed deep disappointment, stating the committee had many questions regarding co-conspirators.
* **Democrats:** Representative Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) accused Maxwell of "self-preservation" and suggested she was seeking a pardon from the Trump administration.
* **Context of the Timing:** The deposition coincided with the Department of Justice beginning to allow lawmakers to review over **3 million unredacted files** related to the Epstein investigation, following the passage of the *Epstein Files Transparency Act*.
Maxwell remains incarcerated at the Federal Prison Camp in Bryan, Texas. While she did not provide new names or details yesterday, the pressure from Congress to identify other high-profile individuals involved in Epstein's circle continues.
Would you like me to look into the specific questions lawmakers had prepared or more details on the recently released Epstein files?#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $BTC
$ETH
$BNB
The appearance was the result of a long-standing subpoena from Committee Chairman **James Comer (R-Ky.)**, who is investigating the broader network surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and how his decade-long abuse of minors went unpunished for so long.
### Key Takeaways from the Deposition
* **The Refusal:** Despite being convicted and currently serving a 20-year sentence, Maxwell followed her legal team’s advice and remained silent. Her attorney, David Oscar Markus, argued that testifying could jeopardize her ongoing legal appeals (specifically a pending habeas petition).
* **The "Clemency" Offer:** In a move that drew sharp criticism from Democrats, Maxwell’s attorney stated that she would be willing to "speak fully and honestly" if **President Trump** granted her clemency. He further claimed she could testify to the "innocence" of both Donald Trump and Bill Clinton regarding their past ties to Epstein.
* **Political Reaction:**
* **Republicans:** Chairman Comer expressed deep disappointment, stating the committee had many questions regarding co-conspirators.
* **Democrats:** Representative Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) accused Maxwell of "self-preservation" and suggested she was seeking a pardon from the Trump administration.
* **Context of the Timing:** The deposition coincided with the Department of Justice beginning to allow lawmakers to review over **3 million unredacted files** related to the Epstein investigation, following the passage of the *Epstein Files Transparency Act*.
Maxwell remains incarcerated at the Federal Prison Camp in Bryan, Texas. While she did not provide new names or details yesterday, the pressure from Congress to identify other high-profile individuals involved in Epstein's circle continues.
Would you like me to look into the specific questions lawmakers had prepared or more details on the recently released Epstein files?#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $BTC
$ETH
$BNB
Square-Creator-ee4ae8825749bdd5adc1:
that is not her...
India-US Trade Deal: Goldman Sachs has upgraded India’s 2026 GDP growth forecast to 6.9%, citing the
That’s a spot-on observation. The upgrade by Goldman Sachs marks a significant shift in India's 2026 economic outlook, largely driven by the **historic India-US Interim Trade Agreement** announced in early February 2026.
## The Growth Forecast: 6.9%
Goldman Sachs Research upgraded its real GDP growth forecast for India for the calendar year **2026 to 6.9%** (up from 6.7%). This revision is rooted in several critical factors stemming from the new trade deal:
* **Export Competitiveness:** The reduction in US tariffs is expected to provide an incremental boost of roughly **0.2 percentage points** to the GDP.
* **Reduced Uncertainty:** By settling trade tensions, the deal is expected to "unlock" the private investment cycle, as businesses now have a clearer long-term horizon for trade with the US.
* **Best-in-Class Growth:** At 6.9%, India is projected to remain one of the fastest-growing major economies, even outperforming several regional peers like Vietnam and China.
---
## Breakdown of the India-US Trade Deal
The "deal" isn't just a minor adjustment; it’s a strategic reset. Here are the core components that led to the Goldman Sachs upgrade:
### 1. Significant Tariff Reductions
The effective US tariff on Indian goods has plummeted from nearly **50%** (which included punitive duties) to a reciprocal rate of **18%**.
* **Reciprocal Tariffs:** Lowered from 25% to **18%**.
* **Removal of Punitive Duties:** The US withdrew a **25% additional levy** that had been imposed in August 2025 due to India's continued purchase of Russian oil.
### 2. Strategic Energy Pivot
In a major diplomatic shift, India committed to **halting or significantly reducing its purchase of Russian crude oil**, pivoting instead toward US energy sources. India intends to purchase over **$500 billion** in US energy, technology, and agricultural products over the next five years.
### 3. Sector-Specific Impact
| Sector | Impact of the Deal |
| --- | --- |
| **Textiles & Apparel** | Immediate boost in orders due to thinner margins becoming viable under 18% tariffs. |
| **Gems & Jewellery** | Significant relief as the "reciprocal" pressure eases; seen as a key winner. |
| **Agriculture** | India opened its market to US tree nuts, fruits, and wine, but successfully maintained a "negative list" (no GM crops, dairy, or staples). |
| **Technology** | Increased cooperation on GPUs and data centers; India removed its Digital Services Tax (DST) as part of the framework. |
---
## Why 18% Matters
The 18% figure is strategic. It places India in a more favorable position than many of its competitors:
* **Vietnam & Bangladesh:** Face roughly 20% tariffs.
* **China:** Faces significantly higher tariffs (30%–35%+).
> **A Note on the Rupee:** While the deal has eased pressure on the INR—making it one of the best-performing emerging market currencies in early February—Goldman Sachs notes that the RBI is likely to use this strength to build up FX reserves rather than letting the currency appreciate sharply.
Would you like me to look into the specific **agricultural "negative list"** India secured, or perhaps how this deal impacts the **Nifty 50's** performance in the technology and textile sectors?#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $BNB
$ETH
$BTC
## The Growth Forecast: 6.9%
Goldman Sachs Research upgraded its real GDP growth forecast for India for the calendar year **2026 to 6.9%** (up from 6.7%). This revision is rooted in several critical factors stemming from the new trade deal:
* **Export Competitiveness:** The reduction in US tariffs is expected to provide an incremental boost of roughly **0.2 percentage points** to the GDP.
* **Reduced Uncertainty:** By settling trade tensions, the deal is expected to "unlock" the private investment cycle, as businesses now have a clearer long-term horizon for trade with the US.
* **Best-in-Class Growth:** At 6.9%, India is projected to remain one of the fastest-growing major economies, even outperforming several regional peers like Vietnam and China.
---
## Breakdown of the India-US Trade Deal
The "deal" isn't just a minor adjustment; it’s a strategic reset. Here are the core components that led to the Goldman Sachs upgrade:
### 1. Significant Tariff Reductions
The effective US tariff on Indian goods has plummeted from nearly **50%** (which included punitive duties) to a reciprocal rate of **18%**.
* **Reciprocal Tariffs:** Lowered from 25% to **18%**.
* **Removal of Punitive Duties:** The US withdrew a **25% additional levy** that had been imposed in August 2025 due to India's continued purchase of Russian oil.
### 2. Strategic Energy Pivot
In a major diplomatic shift, India committed to **halting or significantly reducing its purchase of Russian crude oil**, pivoting instead toward US energy sources. India intends to purchase over **$500 billion** in US energy, technology, and agricultural products over the next five years.
### 3. Sector-Specific Impact
| Sector | Impact of the Deal |
| --- | --- |
| **Textiles & Apparel** | Immediate boost in orders due to thinner margins becoming viable under 18% tariffs. |
| **Gems & Jewellery** | Significant relief as the "reciprocal" pressure eases; seen as a key winner. |
| **Agriculture** | India opened its market to US tree nuts, fruits, and wine, but successfully maintained a "negative list" (no GM crops, dairy, or staples). |
| **Technology** | Increased cooperation on GPUs and data centers; India removed its Digital Services Tax (DST) as part of the framework. |
---
## Why 18% Matters
The 18% figure is strategic. It places India in a more favorable position than many of its competitors:
* **Vietnam & Bangladesh:** Face roughly 20% tariffs.
* **China:** Faces significantly higher tariffs (30%–35%+).
> **A Note on the Rupee:** While the deal has eased pressure on the INR—making it one of the best-performing emerging market currencies in early February—Goldman Sachs notes that the RBI is likely to use this strength to build up FX reserves rather than letting the currency appreciate sharply.
Would you like me to look into the specific **agricultural "negative list"** India secured, or perhaps how this deal impacts the **Nifty 50's** performance in the technology and textile sectors?#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $BNB
$ETH
$BTC
UK: Buckingham Palace has announced it will "support" a police probe into former Prince Andrew
In a significant shift of tone, Buckingham Palace officially announced on **February 9, 2026**, that it "stands ready" to support a police probe into the conduct of the King’s brother, now known as **Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor**.
This statement follows the release of millions of documents by the U.S. Department of Justice related to the late Jeffrey Epstein, which have triggered fresh allegations of criminal misconduct against the former prince.
### The Core Allegations
Thames Valley Police confirmed they are "assessing" reports following a formal complaint by the anti-monarchy group **Republic**. The probe focuses on two primary areas:
* **Breach of Official Secrets:** Emails suggest that in 2010, while serving as the UK's international trade envoy, Andrew may have forwarded confidential government reports and itineraries to Jeffrey Epstein.
* **Misconduct in Public Office:** Allegations involve the potential abuse of his position to share sensitive state information with a convicted sex offender.
* **New Trafficking Claim:** A U.S.-based attorney recently alleged that Epstein flew a woman to the UK specifically to have sex with Andrew at his former home, Royal Lodge, in 2010.
---
### The Palace’s Stance
The statement from Buckingham Palace is being viewed by royal commentators as an "unprecedented" distancing of the monarchy from the former Duke of York. Key points included:
> "The King has made clear... his profound concern at allegations which continue to come to light in respect of Mr. Mountbatten-Windsor’s conduct."
* **Cooperation:** The Palace stated it will cooperate fully if approached by Thames Valley Police.
* **Individual Responsibility:** The statement clarified that "specific claims" are for Andrew to address personally, effectively leaving him to defend himself without the shield of the institution.
* **Solidarity with Victims:** The Palace reiterated King Charles and Queen Camilla’s "thoughts and sympathies" for the victims of abuse.
### Broader Context
The fallout from the "Epstein Files" has reached the highest levels of the UK government. Prime Minister **Keir Starmer** is facing intense political pressure and calls for resignation following his decision to appoint **Peter Mandelson**—who also had links to Epstein—as the U.S. Ambassador.
Andrew, who was stripped of his royal titles and military affiliations in 2022, has consistently denied any wrongdoing. He recently moved from Royal Lodge to a private residence on the Sandringham estate, funded personally by the King.
**Would you like me to look into the specific details of the leaked emails or the current status of the political crisis facing Keir Starmer?**#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $USDC
$XRP
$BNB
This statement follows the release of millions of documents by the U.S. Department of Justice related to the late Jeffrey Epstein, which have triggered fresh allegations of criminal misconduct against the former prince.
### The Core Allegations
Thames Valley Police confirmed they are "assessing" reports following a formal complaint by the anti-monarchy group **Republic**. The probe focuses on two primary areas:
* **Breach of Official Secrets:** Emails suggest that in 2010, while serving as the UK's international trade envoy, Andrew may have forwarded confidential government reports and itineraries to Jeffrey Epstein.
* **Misconduct in Public Office:** Allegations involve the potential abuse of his position to share sensitive state information with a convicted sex offender.
* **New Trafficking Claim:** A U.S.-based attorney recently alleged that Epstein flew a woman to the UK specifically to have sex with Andrew at his former home, Royal Lodge, in 2010.
---
### The Palace’s Stance
The statement from Buckingham Palace is being viewed by royal commentators as an "unprecedented" distancing of the monarchy from the former Duke of York. Key points included:
> "The King has made clear... his profound concern at allegations which continue to come to light in respect of Mr. Mountbatten-Windsor’s conduct."
* **Cooperation:** The Palace stated it will cooperate fully if approached by Thames Valley Police.
* **Individual Responsibility:** The statement clarified that "specific claims" are for Andrew to address personally, effectively leaving him to defend himself without the shield of the institution.
* **Solidarity with Victims:** The Palace reiterated King Charles and Queen Camilla’s "thoughts and sympathies" for the victims of abuse.
### Broader Context
The fallout from the "Epstein Files" has reached the highest levels of the UK government. Prime Minister **Keir Starmer** is facing intense political pressure and calls for resignation following his decision to appoint **Peter Mandelson**—who also had links to Epstein—as the U.S. Ambassador.
Andrew, who was stripped of his royal titles and military affiliations in 2022, has consistently denied any wrongdoing. He recently moved from Royal Lodge to a private residence on the Sandringham estate, funded personally by the King.
**Would you like me to look into the specific details of the leaked emails or the current status of the political crisis facing Keir Starmer?**#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $USDC
$XRP
$BNB
$XRP
#USIranStandoff The **#USIranStandoff** has reached a critical and highly volatile stage as of February 2026. Following a brief but intense "12-day war" in June 2025 involving joint U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, the situation has shifted into a high-stakes "negotiation under pressure" phase.
## Current Military & Diplomatic Climate
The standoff is currently characterized by a "dual-track" approach from Washington: simultaneous maximum military pressure and tentative diplomatic engagement.
* **The "Armada" Presence:** The **USS Abraham Lincoln** carrier strike group is currently stationed in the Arabian Sea. This deployment is a direct response to Iran’s crackdown on domestic protests and serves as a visible "ultimatum" during talks.
* **Muscat Indirect Talks:** On **February 6, 2026**, indirect talks were held in Oman. In a rare move, the U.S. delegation (which included Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff) was joined by **Admiral Brad Cooper**, head of CENTCOM, in full dress uniform—a signal that military options remain on the table.
* **Economic Squeeze:** Immediately following the February talks, the U.S. Treasury Department imposed new sanctions on Iran’s "shadow fleet" to further drain the regime's oil revenue.
---
## Core Points of Contention
While both sides have returned to the table, their "red lines" remain largely incompatible:
| Issue | U.S. / Israeli Position | Iranian Position |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Nuclear** | Demand for "zero enrichment" and export of all 60% enriched stockpiles. | Insists on the "right to enrich" for peaceful purposes; may consider a temporary pause. |
| **Missiles** | Demands limits on ballistic missile development and testing. | Claims the missile program is non-negotiable and strictly for defense. |
| **Proxies** | Cessation of funding for groups like Hezbollah and regional militias. | Rejects including regional influence in nuclear-specific negotiations. |
| **Domestic** | High pressure regarding the "bloody crackdown" on 2025/2026 protesters. |
#USIranStandoff The **#USIranStandoff** has reached a critical and highly volatile stage as of February 2026. Following a brief but intense "12-day war" in June 2025 involving joint U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, the situation has shifted into a high-stakes "negotiation under pressure" phase.
## Current Military & Diplomatic Climate
The standoff is currently characterized by a "dual-track" approach from Washington: simultaneous maximum military pressure and tentative diplomatic engagement.
* **The "Armada" Presence:** The **USS Abraham Lincoln** carrier strike group is currently stationed in the Arabian Sea. This deployment is a direct response to Iran’s crackdown on domestic protests and serves as a visible "ultimatum" during talks.
* **Muscat Indirect Talks:** On **February 6, 2026**, indirect talks were held in Oman. In a rare move, the U.S. delegation (which included Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff) was joined by **Admiral Brad Cooper**, head of CENTCOM, in full dress uniform—a signal that military options remain on the table.
* **Economic Squeeze:** Immediately following the February talks, the U.S. Treasury Department imposed new sanctions on Iran’s "shadow fleet" to further drain the regime's oil revenue.
---
## Core Points of Contention
While both sides have returned to the table, their "red lines" remain largely incompatible:
| Issue | U.S. / Israeli Position | Iranian Position |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Nuclear** | Demand for "zero enrichment" and export of all 60% enriched stockpiles. | Insists on the "right to enrich" for peaceful purposes; may consider a temporary pause. |
| **Missiles** | Demands limits on ballistic missile development and testing. | Claims the missile program is non-negotiable and strictly for defense. |
| **Proxies** | Cessation of funding for groups like Hezbollah and regional militias. | Rejects including regional influence in nuclear-specific negotiations. |
| **Domestic** | High pressure regarding the "bloody crackdown" on 2025/2026 protesters. |
Norway: The Norwegian ambassador has resigned due to scrutiny over past contacts with Epstein.
In a significant development for Norwegian diplomacy, **Mona Juul**, Norway’s ambassador to Jordan (also accredited to Iraq), resigned on **February 8, 2026**. Her departure follows intense scrutiny over her past ties to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, revealed in a massive new release of documents.
### Key Details of the Resignation
* **The Cause:** Juul's resignation was triggered by revelations that Epstein had reportedly left **$10 million** in his will to her two children. Juul and her husband, fellow diplomat **Terje Rød-Larsen**, were key figures in the 1990s Oslo Accords and had a long-standing association with Epstein.
* **Official Stance:** Norwegian Foreign Minister **Espen Barth Eide** described Juul’s contact with Epstein as a "serious failure of judgment" that made it impossible for her to maintain the trust required for her post.
* **Criminal Investigation:** Beyond her resignation, Norway’s economic crime authority (**Økokrim**) has opened an investigation into both Juul and Rød-Larsen on suspicion of **aggravated corruption**, specifically looking into whether benefits were received in connection with their official roles.
---
### Wider Fallout in Norway
The "Epstein Files Transparency Act" (signed in late 2025) has led to a cascade of investigations across the Norwegian elite:
* **Thorbjørn Jagland:** The former Prime Minister and Nobel Committee chair is under investigation for corruption related to his own ties with Epstein.
* **Crown Princess Mette-Marit:** On February 6, 2026, the Crown Princess issued a public apology to those she "disappointed" after new documents detailed her past relationship with Epstein more extensively.
* **International Peace Institute (IPI):** The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is reviewing all past grants to this think tank, which was led by Rød-Larsen during the period of his contact with Epstein.
> "The situation makes it difficult to restore the trust that the role requires." — *Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide*
**Would you like me to look into the specific details regarding the $10 million bequest or the ongoing Økokrim investigation?**#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $USDC
$XRP
$BNB
### Key Details of the Resignation
* **The Cause:** Juul's resignation was triggered by revelations that Epstein had reportedly left **$10 million** in his will to her two children. Juul and her husband, fellow diplomat **Terje Rød-Larsen**, were key figures in the 1990s Oslo Accords and had a long-standing association with Epstein.
* **Official Stance:** Norwegian Foreign Minister **Espen Barth Eide** described Juul’s contact with Epstein as a "serious failure of judgment" that made it impossible for her to maintain the trust required for her post.
* **Criminal Investigation:** Beyond her resignation, Norway’s economic crime authority (**Økokrim**) has opened an investigation into both Juul and Rød-Larsen on suspicion of **aggravated corruption**, specifically looking into whether benefits were received in connection with their official roles.
---
### Wider Fallout in Norway
The "Epstein Files Transparency Act" (signed in late 2025) has led to a cascade of investigations across the Norwegian elite:
* **Thorbjørn Jagland:** The former Prime Minister and Nobel Committee chair is under investigation for corruption related to his own ties with Epstein.
* **Crown Princess Mette-Marit:** On February 6, 2026, the Crown Princess issued a public apology to those she "disappointed" after new documents detailed her past relationship with Epstein more extensively.
* **International Peace Institute (IPI):** The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is reviewing all past grants to this think tank, which was led by Rød-Larsen during the period of his contact with Epstein.
> "The situation makes it difficult to restore the trust that the role requires." — *Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide*
**Would you like me to look into the specific details regarding the $10 million bequest or the ongoing Økokrim investigation?**#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $USDC
$XRP
$BNB
#usiranstandoff
US–Iran Standoff is once again shaking global markets and investor sentiment. Rising geopolitical tension between Washington and Tehran has increased uncertainty across energy, stock, and crypto markets. Oil prices often react first, as the Middle East plays a key role in global supply chains. Risk assets tend to face short-term pressure, while safe-haven assets like gold and Bitcoin attract renewed interest. Traders are closely watching diplomatic signals, military movements, and economic sanctions for the next move. In such environments, volatility becomes the norm, not the exception. Smart investors focus on risk management, diversification, and staying informed rather than reacting emotionally to headlines.
#USIranStandoff #coin #US #iran
$BTC
US–Iran Standoff is once again shaking global markets and investor sentiment. Rising geopolitical tension between Washington and Tehran has increased uncertainty across energy, stock, and crypto markets. Oil prices often react first, as the Middle East plays a key role in global supply chains. Risk assets tend to face short-term pressure, while safe-haven assets like gold and Bitcoin attract renewed interest. Traders are closely watching diplomatic signals, military movements, and economic sanctions for the next move. In such environments, volatility becomes the norm, not the exception. Smart investors focus on risk management, diversification, and staying informed rather than reacting emotionally to headlines.
#USIranStandoff #coin #US #iran
$BTC
Badminton Reforms: The BWF has announced structural changes, including an 11-day format for the World Championships to prioritize player recovery.#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $USDC
$XRP
$BNB
$XRP
$BNB
National Deworming Day: A major health initiative focused on children's well-being.#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $USDC $
$ETH $
$
$BTC
$ETH $
$
$BTC
Parliament Session: In India, the Budget Session is facing major disruptions. Opposition parties are
The 2026 Budget Session in India has indeed reached a fever pitch. Today, February 10, 2026, the opposition led by the Congress formally submitted a **notice of a no-confidence motion against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla**.
This is a rare and significant parliamentary move, as such motions are typically directed at the government (Council of Ministers), not the Speaker.
### Core Grievances
The opposition, under the "INDIA" bloc, has cited several reasons for this "extraordinary step":
* **Denial of Speaking Time:** The primary trigger was the allegation that Leader of the Opposition (LoP) Rahul Gandhi was repeatedly disallowed from speaking, specifically during the debate on the *Motion of Thanks to the President's Address*.
* **The China-Border Issue:** Conflict arose when Rahul Gandhi attempted to quote from an unpublished memoir of former Army Chief General M.M. Naravane regarding the 2020 India-China standoff. The Speaker ruled against the use of "unpublished literature."
* **Partisan Conduct:** Opposition leaders have labeled the Speaker’s conduct as "blatantly partisan," citing the suspension of **eight opposition MPs** and the Speaker’s decision to allow BJP MP Nishikant Dubey to make allegedly "objectionable" remarks without similar pushback.
* **The PM’s Presence:** Tensions spiked after the Speaker reportedly suggested he advised PM Narendra Modi not to attend the House to avoid "unpleasant incidents" from opposition members—a statement the opposition claims was meant to shield the PM from debate.
### Status of the Motion
* **Support:** The notice was submitted at 1:14 PM today under **Rule 94C** of the Rules of Procedure. It reportedly carries the signatures of **118–119 MPs**, well above the minimum requirement of 50 for the motion to be considered.
* **Trinamool Congress (TMC) Stance:** While the TMC expressed support for the sentiment, they initially hesitated to sign, suggesting the opposition should first send a formal appeal to the Speaker before escalating to a no-confidence motion.
* **Institutional Propriety:** Notably, **Rahul Gandhi did not sign the notice himself.** Sources close to him stated that as the Leader of the Opposition, it would be against "parliamentary traditions and propriety" for him to sign a motion for the Speaker's removal.
### What Happens Next?
The notice is now with the Lok Sabha Secretary-General. The Speaker must eventually read the notice to the House. If at least 50 members rise in support, the motion will be admitted, and a discussion must be scheduled (typically within 10 days). However, given the government's current majority, the motion is unlikely to result in removal but serves as a powerful symbolic protest.
Would you like me to look into the specific constitutional rules that govern how a Speaker is actually removed from office?#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $USDC
$XRP
$BNB
This is a rare and significant parliamentary move, as such motions are typically directed at the government (Council of Ministers), not the Speaker.
### Core Grievances
The opposition, under the "INDIA" bloc, has cited several reasons for this "extraordinary step":
* **Denial of Speaking Time:** The primary trigger was the allegation that Leader of the Opposition (LoP) Rahul Gandhi was repeatedly disallowed from speaking, specifically during the debate on the *Motion of Thanks to the President's Address*.
* **The China-Border Issue:** Conflict arose when Rahul Gandhi attempted to quote from an unpublished memoir of former Army Chief General M.M. Naravane regarding the 2020 India-China standoff. The Speaker ruled against the use of "unpublished literature."
* **Partisan Conduct:** Opposition leaders have labeled the Speaker’s conduct as "blatantly partisan," citing the suspension of **eight opposition MPs** and the Speaker’s decision to allow BJP MP Nishikant Dubey to make allegedly "objectionable" remarks without similar pushback.
* **The PM’s Presence:** Tensions spiked after the Speaker reportedly suggested he advised PM Narendra Modi not to attend the House to avoid "unpleasant incidents" from opposition members—a statement the opposition claims was meant to shield the PM from debate.
### Status of the Motion
* **Support:** The notice was submitted at 1:14 PM today under **Rule 94C** of the Rules of Procedure. It reportedly carries the signatures of **118–119 MPs**, well above the minimum requirement of 50 for the motion to be considered.
* **Trinamool Congress (TMC) Stance:** While the TMC expressed support for the sentiment, they initially hesitated to sign, suggesting the opposition should first send a formal appeal to the Speaker before escalating to a no-confidence motion.
* **Institutional Propriety:** Notably, **Rahul Gandhi did not sign the notice himself.** Sources close to him stated that as the Leader of the Opposition, it would be against "parliamentary traditions and propriety" for him to sign a motion for the Speaker's removal.
### What Happens Next?
The notice is now with the Lok Sabha Secretary-General. The Speaker must eventually read the notice to the House. If at least 50 members rise in support, the motion will be admitted, and a discussion must be scheduled (typically within 10 days). However, given the government's current majority, the motion is unlikely to result in removal but serves as a powerful symbolic protest.
Would you like me to look into the specific constitutional rules that govern how a Speaker is actually removed from office?#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $USDC
$XRP
$BNB
Trump & Canada Trade Row: President Donald Trump has threatened to block the opening of a major new
The trade relationship between the U.S. and Canada has hit a significant flashpoint. As of **February 2026**, President Donald Trump has escalated his trade war with America's northern neighbor, specifically targeting the nearly completed **Gordie Howe International Bridge**.
Below is a breakdown of the current situation and the stakes involved.
---
## 🌉 The Bridge Blockade
On **February 9, 2026**, President Trump used Truth Social to threaten to block the opening of the Gordie Howe International Bridge—a **$6.4 billion** project connecting Detroit, Michigan, to Windsor, Ontario.
### Key Points of the Dispute:
* **Ownership Demands:** Trump argued that the U.S. should own **"at least one half"** of the bridge. Currently, the bridge is being financed entirely by the Canadian government under a 2012 agreement, though it is intended to be jointly owned by Canada and the State of Michigan.
* **"Unfair" Construction:** The President claimed the bridge was built with "virtually no U.S. content," criticizing a previous waiver that allowed the project to bypass the *Buy American Act*.
* **The Ultimatum:** Trump stated he would not allow the bridge to open until the U.S. is "fully compensated for everything we have given" Canada and until Ottawa treats the U.S. with "Fairness and Respect."
## 🇨🇦 The "51st State" Rhetoric
The bridge threat follows a series of comments where Trump suggested Canada should consider becoming the **51st U.S. state**.
* **The Context:** These remarks are largely seen as a rhetorical tool to highlight Canada's economic dependence on the U.S. and to pressure Canadian Prime Minister **Mark Carney**.
* **Canada’s Response:** Canadian officials, including Industry Minister Anita Anand, have flatly rejected the idea, stating, **"Canada will never be the 51st state."**
---
## 📈 Escalating Trade War (2025–2026)
The bridge dispute is part of a much larger economic "rupture" occurring in 2026:
| Issue | Status (Feb 2026) |
| --- | --- |
| **China Trade Deal** | Trump has threatened **100% tariffs** on all Canadian goods if Canada proceeds with a new trade agreement with China. |
| **Bombardier & Aviation** | The administration has threatened a **50% tariff** on Canadian-made aircraft (like Bombardier jets) until Canada certifies certain U.S.-made Gulfstream planes. |
| **Dairy & Alcohol** | Trump continues to cite Canadian dairy supply management and Ontario’s liquor stocking policies as "prohibitive" to U.S. interests. |
| **Pivoting to India** | In response to U.S. pressure, Prime Minister Carney is aggressively seeking "trade diversification," with a major state visit to **India** scheduled for March 2026. |
---
### Economic Impact
The Gordie Howe International Bridge is designed to be the busiest trade crossing in North America. Experts and Michigan lawmakers warn that blocking it could:
1. **Stall the Auto Industry:** The Detroit-Windsor corridor is vital for just-in-time manufacturing.
2. **Increase Costs:** A University of Windsor study estimates the bridge would save truckers **$2.3 billion** over 30 years by cutting crossing times by 20 minutes.
> **Note:** Despite the President's threats, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security officially designated the bridge as a "port of entry" on **January 30, 2026**, suggesting a disconnect between executive rhetoric and agency-level planning.
**Would you like me to look into the specific legal mechanisms the President might use to halt a project that is already designated as an official port of entry?**#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $USDC
$XRP
$BNB
Below is a breakdown of the current situation and the stakes involved.
---
## 🌉 The Bridge Blockade
On **February 9, 2026**, President Trump used Truth Social to threaten to block the opening of the Gordie Howe International Bridge—a **$6.4 billion** project connecting Detroit, Michigan, to Windsor, Ontario.
### Key Points of the Dispute:
* **Ownership Demands:** Trump argued that the U.S. should own **"at least one half"** of the bridge. Currently, the bridge is being financed entirely by the Canadian government under a 2012 agreement, though it is intended to be jointly owned by Canada and the State of Michigan.
* **"Unfair" Construction:** The President claimed the bridge was built with "virtually no U.S. content," criticizing a previous waiver that allowed the project to bypass the *Buy American Act*.
* **The Ultimatum:** Trump stated he would not allow the bridge to open until the U.S. is "fully compensated for everything we have given" Canada and until Ottawa treats the U.S. with "Fairness and Respect."
## 🇨🇦 The "51st State" Rhetoric
The bridge threat follows a series of comments where Trump suggested Canada should consider becoming the **51st U.S. state**.
* **The Context:** These remarks are largely seen as a rhetorical tool to highlight Canada's economic dependence on the U.S. and to pressure Canadian Prime Minister **Mark Carney**.
* **Canada’s Response:** Canadian officials, including Industry Minister Anita Anand, have flatly rejected the idea, stating, **"Canada will never be the 51st state."**
---
## 📈 Escalating Trade War (2025–2026)
The bridge dispute is part of a much larger economic "rupture" occurring in 2026:
| Issue | Status (Feb 2026) |
| --- | --- |
| **China Trade Deal** | Trump has threatened **100% tariffs** on all Canadian goods if Canada proceeds with a new trade agreement with China. |
| **Bombardier & Aviation** | The administration has threatened a **50% tariff** on Canadian-made aircraft (like Bombardier jets) until Canada certifies certain U.S.-made Gulfstream planes. |
| **Dairy & Alcohol** | Trump continues to cite Canadian dairy supply management and Ontario’s liquor stocking policies as "prohibitive" to U.S. interests. |
| **Pivoting to India** | In response to U.S. pressure, Prime Minister Carney is aggressively seeking "trade diversification," with a major state visit to **India** scheduled for March 2026. |
---
### Economic Impact
The Gordie Howe International Bridge is designed to be the busiest trade crossing in North America. Experts and Michigan lawmakers warn that blocking it could:
1. **Stall the Auto Industry:** The Detroit-Windsor corridor is vital for just-in-time manufacturing.
2. **Increase Costs:** A University of Windsor study estimates the bridge would save truckers **$2.3 billion** over 30 years by cutting crossing times by 20 minutes.
> **Note:** Despite the President's threats, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security officially designated the bridge as a "port of entry" on **January 30, 2026**, suggesting a disconnect between executive rhetoric and agency-level planning.
**Would you like me to look into the specific legal mechanisms the President might use to halt a project that is already designated as an official port of entry?**#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $USDC
$XRP
$BNB
Hello everyone
Scan QR to join or use referral code,do follow my account for more information ,free rewards and tips and tricks how to earn#USIranStandoff
My Referral 978131366
Do support
Do visit my post and earn easygoing
Scan QR to join or use referral code,do follow my account for more information ,free rewards and tips and tricks how to earn#USIranStandoff
My Referral 978131366
Do support
Do visit my post and earn easygoing
B
OWL
Price
0.018166
#USIranStandoff The **#USIranStandoff** has reached a critical and highly volatile stage as of February 2026. Following a brief but intense "12-day war" in June 2025 involving joint U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, the situation has shifted into a high-stakes "negotiation under pressure" phase.
## Current Military & Diplomatic Climate
The standoff is currently characterized by a "dual-track" approach from Washington: simultaneous maximum military pressure and tentative diplomatic engagement.
* **The "Armada" Presence:** The **USS Abraham Lincoln** carrier strike group is currently stationed in the Arabian Sea. This deployment is a direct response to Iran’s crackdown on domestic protests and serves as a visible "ultimatum" during talks.
* **Muscat Indirect Talks:** On **February 6, 2026**, indirect talks were held in Oman. In a rare move, the U.S. delegation (which included Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff) was joined by **Admiral Brad Cooper**, head of CENTCOM, in full dress uniform—a signal that military options remain on the table.
* **Economic Squeeze:** Immediately following the February talks, the U.S. Treasury Department imposed new sanctions on Iran’s "shadow fleet" to further drain the regime's oil revenue.
---
## Core Points of Contention
While both sides have returned to the table, their "red lines" remain largely incompatible:
| Issue | U.S. / Israeli Position | Iranian Position |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Nuclear** | Demand for "zero enrichment" and export of all 60% enriched stockpiles. | Insists on the "right to enrich" for peaceful purposes; may consider a temporary pause. |
| **Missiles** | Demands limits on ballistic missile development and testing. | Claims the missile program is non-negotiable and strictly for defense. |
| **Proxies** | Cessation of funding for groups like Hezbollah and regional militias. | Rejects including regional influence in nuclear-specific negotiations. |
| **Domestic** | High pressure regarding the "bloody crackdown" on 2025/2026 protesters. | Views U.S. supp
**$BNB
## Current Military & Diplomatic Climate
The standoff is currently characterized by a "dual-track" approach from Washington: simultaneous maximum military pressure and tentative diplomatic engagement.
* **The "Armada" Presence:** The **USS Abraham Lincoln** carrier strike group is currently stationed in the Arabian Sea. This deployment is a direct response to Iran’s crackdown on domestic protests and serves as a visible "ultimatum" during talks.
* **Muscat Indirect Talks:** On **February 6, 2026**, indirect talks were held in Oman. In a rare move, the U.S. delegation (which included Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff) was joined by **Admiral Brad Cooper**, head of CENTCOM, in full dress uniform—a signal that military options remain on the table.
* **Economic Squeeze:** Immediately following the February talks, the U.S. Treasury Department imposed new sanctions on Iran’s "shadow fleet" to further drain the regime's oil revenue.
---
## Core Points of Contention
While both sides have returned to the table, their "red lines" remain largely incompatible:
| Issue | U.S. / Israeli Position | Iranian Position |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Nuclear** | Demand for "zero enrichment" and export of all 60% enriched stockpiles. | Insists on the "right to enrich" for peaceful purposes; may consider a temporary pause. |
| **Missiles** | Demands limits on ballistic missile development and testing. | Claims the missile program is non-negotiable and strictly for defense. |
| **Proxies** | Cessation of funding for groups like Hezbollah and regional militias. | Rejects including regional influence in nuclear-specific negotiations. |
| **Domestic** | High pressure regarding the "bloody crackdown" on 2025/2026 protesters. | Views U.S. supp
**$BNB
📈 Kaplan’s Bullish Gold Outlook
Thomas Kaplan — chairman of NovaGold Resources and founder of The Electrum Group, a resource-focused investment firm — remains extremely bullish on gold over the long term. He believes there are “every reason in the world to buy gold.”
AOL
Kaplan has stated that gold is a currency that cannot be debased at will (unlike fiat money), and this quality underpins his confidence that gold prices will continue rising as monetary systems face strain.
AOL
🟡 Long-Term Price Targets
Kaplan has suggested that fair value for gold over the long run could reach the “tens of thousands of dollars” per ounce, reflecting what he sees as the eventual outcome of ongoing currency debasement and systemic fiscal stress.
AOL
In past public interviews and commentary, he has even discussed the possibility that gold might exceed $10,000 per ounce in a scenario of deep currency decline and shift in monetary paradigms.
The Observer
Other commentary tied to his broader philosophical position implies that levels like $3,000–$5,000 an ounce — or much higher — would not be surprising given the macro trends he watches.
ITM Trading +1
📊 Why Kaplan Sees a Surge Coming
Kaplan’s bullish forecasts are rooted in several interconnected beliefs:
1. Fiat Currency Vulnerability
Kaplan argues that fiat currencies lose value over time because they can be printed at will — whereas gold cannot — making precious metals a superior store of value.
AOL
#WhenWillBTCRebound #USIranStandoff
#usa #Trump2024 #BTCMiningDifficultyDrop
@Chalaa oro
Thomas Kaplan — chairman of NovaGold Resources and founder of The Electrum Group, a resource-focused investment firm — remains extremely bullish on gold over the long term. He believes there are “every reason in the world to buy gold.”
AOL
Kaplan has stated that gold is a currency that cannot be debased at will (unlike fiat money), and this quality underpins his confidence that gold prices will continue rising as monetary systems face strain.
AOL
🟡 Long-Term Price Targets
Kaplan has suggested that fair value for gold over the long run could reach the “tens of thousands of dollars” per ounce, reflecting what he sees as the eventual outcome of ongoing currency debasement and systemic fiscal stress.
AOL
In past public interviews and commentary, he has even discussed the possibility that gold might exceed $10,000 per ounce in a scenario of deep currency decline and shift in monetary paradigms.
The Observer
Other commentary tied to his broader philosophical position implies that levels like $3,000–$5,000 an ounce — or much higher — would not be surprising given the macro trends he watches.
ITM Trading +1
📊 Why Kaplan Sees a Surge Coming
Kaplan’s bullish forecasts are rooted in several interconnected beliefs:
1. Fiat Currency Vulnerability
Kaplan argues that fiat currencies lose value over time because they can be printed at will — whereas gold cannot — making precious metals a superior store of value.
AOL
#WhenWillBTCRebound #USIranStandoff
#usa #Trump2024 #BTCMiningDifficultyDrop
@Chalaa oro
📊 Key Levels of $ETH
(Short & Simple)
🔼 Resistance (Sell zone): 3,520 – 3,560
🔽 Support (Buy zone): 3,440 – 3,400
📈 Bullish above: 3,560 → Target 3,600+
📉 Bearish below: 3,400 → Drop toward 3,350
#WhaleDeRiskETH #USIranStandoff #WhenWillBTCRebound
(Short & Simple)
🔼 Resistance (Sell zone): 3,520 – 3,560
🔽 Support (Buy zone): 3,440 – 3,400
📈 Bullish above: 3,560 → Target 3,600+
📉 Bearish below: 3,400 → Drop toward 3,350
#WhaleDeRiskETH #USIranStandoff #WhenWillBTCRebound
Hong Kong’s Jimmy Lai Sentenced: In a major international headline, pro-democracy media tycoon Jimmy Lai has been sentenced to 20 years in prison by a Hong Kong court. This has sparked significant pushback from the US, UK, and Australia, though China has defended the ruling as a domestic legal matter.#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $USDC
$XRP
$BNB
$XRP
$BNB
SpaceX's Moon City: Elon Musk has shifted focus, stating that SpaceX is now prioritizing a "self-growing city" on the Moon over immediate Mars colonization.#WarshFedPolicyOutlook #WhenWillBTCRebound #RiskAssetsMarketShock #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge #USIranStandoff $BTC $ETH
$BNB
$BNB
Login to explore more contents