Why is Vanar Chain called an "AI-native blockchain"?

The first time I saw the term “AI-native blockchain” associated with @Vanarchain , my first reaction was skepticism. Web3 loves to add new prefixes to create narratives.

But upon closer inspection, I think what they mean is not about running AI models on-chain, but about how the infrastructure is designed to serve workflows that involve AI participation.

Most current chains treat AI as an application running on top. Data resides off-chain, inference occurs outside the chain, and the blockchain only stores the final results. This is sufficient, but it lacks a reliable layer throughout.

Vanar positions itself as a platform where data, identity, and access for AI agents can be managed consistently. Not to turn the blockchain into an AI computer, but to create an environment where agents can interact, sign transactions, and access resources in a verifiable way.

It sounds reasonable in theory. But the real question is: is the demand for on-chain AI agents already large enough, or is this still just a positioning ahead of market demand?

@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY