Htp96
Verified Creator
We are the Vietnamese non-profit crypto community that helps Vietnamese people
X (Twitter) : @htp96_community
Open Trade
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
7.8 Years
105 Following
23.4K+ Followers
12.8K+ Liked
1.0K+ Shared
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
PINNED
Below is the information I want to share with you HTP96 about Binance commissions
Currently, you can receive a commission of up to 50%, instead of the default level as before. If you want to transfer the referral to me, just read this article for about 1 minute and it's done.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
@Fogo Official is often seen as a 'data pumping campaign,' but from a builder's perspective, I view it as an incentive design layer to compress the bootstrap network effect.
The root issue is the cost of attracting users and liquidity is rising, while the attention cycle is short. $FOGO emerged to force users and capital at the same time, offering high rewards for early participation and creating a growth reflex loop.
Many people mistake this for marketing. In reality, it lies within the tokenomics and product usage behavior.
Once, my team and I deployed a DeFi product on L2, and we tested two approaches: organic growth and FOGO-style launch.
FOGO helps TVL and volume increase very quickly in the first 1-2 weeks, but when incentives decrease, most liquidity leaves if the product hasn't achieved sufficient PMF.
Therefore, if FOGO is used as a campaign, it is a short-term trend.
My observation: time-compressing mechanisms that reach critical mass will not disappear but will require increasingly sophisticated designs.
@Fogo Official #fogo $FOGO
The root issue is the cost of attracting users and liquidity is rising, while the attention cycle is short. $FOGO emerged to force users and capital at the same time, offering high rewards for early participation and creating a growth reflex loop.
Many people mistake this for marketing. In reality, it lies within the tokenomics and product usage behavior.
Once, my team and I deployed a DeFi product on L2, and we tested two approaches: organic growth and FOGO-style launch.
FOGO helps TVL and volume increase very quickly in the first 1-2 weeks, but when incentives decrease, most liquidity leaves if the product hasn't achieved sufficient PMF.
Therefore, if FOGO is used as a campaign, it is a short-term trend.
My observation: time-compressing mechanisms that reach critical mass will not disappear but will require increasingly sophisticated designs.
@Fogo Official #fogo $FOGO
Over 30% of the supply locked: Ethereum staking wave reaches record amidst price hitting cycle low
The staking rate of Ethereum has just reached a new historical peak: more than 30.5% of the total ETH supply is currently locked in the network.
Meanwhile, the price
is still hovering around 1,950 USD — a familiar paradox between long-term confidence and short-term market sentiment.
Since the beginning of 2023, the staking rate has increased almost linearly, from about 15% to over 30%.
Despite the bear market, crashes, or short recoveries, staking participants continue to lock more ETH. They do not react to price fluctuations — they act based on their belief in the infrastructure.
Meanwhile, the price
is still hovering around 1,950 USD — a familiar paradox between long-term confidence and short-term market sentiment.
Since the beginning of 2023, the staking rate has increased almost linearly, from about 15% to over 30%.
Despite the bear market, crashes, or short recoveries, staking participants continue to lock more ETH. They do not react to price fluctuations — they act based on their belief in the infrastructure.
Bitcoin falls below the 200-week EMA: A rare bear signal or an opportunity to shape a new cycle?
In the entire 16-year history of Bitcoin
there have only been about 637 days, less than 2 years, where the price was below the 200-week EMA.
This is not just a technical indicator, but also the psychological boundary between bull markets and rare bear phases.
These rare instances are all associated with major shocks: the bear market of 2014–2015 after the collapse of Mt. Gox, the 2018–2019 cycle following the 2017 bubble, and the 2022–2023 period when the ecosystem collapsed in a chain reaction with Terraform Labs and FTX. Each time, market confidence was severely tested.
there have only been about 637 days, less than 2 years, where the price was below the 200-week EMA.
This is not just a technical indicator, but also the psychological boundary between bull markets and rare bear phases.
These rare instances are all associated with major shocks: the bear market of 2014–2015 after the collapse of Mt. Gox, the 2018–2019 cycle following the 2017 bubble, and the 2022–2023 period when the ecosystem collapsed in a chain reaction with Terraform Labs and FTX. Each time, market confidence was severely tested.
Ethereum falls below the global liquidity threshold, historic signal indicates the potential for a cycle bottom
$ETH has fallen below the area referred to as the 'global liquidity level', a rare signal that often appears at critical moments in the market cycle.
In my observation, this is one of the signs that the market is approaching a more attractive valuation area for long-term investors.
Since 2018, this phenomenon has occurred only 8 times, and most coincide with bottom areas or just before strong recoveries of Ethereum.
In my observation, this is one of the signs that the market is approaching a more attractive valuation area for long-term investors.
Since 2018, this phenomenon has occurred only 8 times, and most coincide with bottom areas or just before strong recoveries of Ethereum.
Growth potential of $VANRY in the bull market of 2026
I no longer see the bull market as a 'price switch'. After a few cycles, it is easy to see that the market only amplifies what already exists: if an ecosystem has real usage, the bull will turn it into a big narrative; if not, the bull only creates short waves and then withdraws liquidity.
With @Vanarchain , the question is not whether there will be a rise in the bull of 2026, but what will drive that rise.
Vanar is choosing a quite different position on the infrastructure map: not directly competing with L1 for liquidity, not optimizing fees like L2s, but trying to become the backend layer for AI workflows, data, and digital entertainment. If this positioning is correct, the demand for the token will not come from farming or short-term incentives, but from repeated economic activities — subscriptions, data processing, micropayments, or content access.
With @Vanarchain , the question is not whether there will be a rise in the bull of 2026, but what will drive that rise.
Vanar is choosing a quite different position on the infrastructure map: not directly competing with L1 for liquidity, not optimizing fees like L2s, but trying to become the backend layer for AI workflows, data, and digital entertainment. If this positioning is correct, the demand for the token will not come from farming or short-term incentives, but from repeated economic activities — subscriptions, data processing, micropayments, or content access.
Bitcoin Q1 declines sharply according to historical cycles, the market enters a period of re-accumulation
We have reached the halfway point of Q1, and the average performance of $BTC is currently about 68% lower than in previous strong growth phases.
This reflects the cautious sentiment that is dominating the market as new capital has not truly returned, while profit-taking pressure from the previous cycle still persists.
Looking back at history, Q1 of the years 2022, 2018, and 2014 all recorded a downward trend after the market peaked in the previous year.
This reflects the cautious sentiment that is dominating the market as new capital has not truly returned, while profit-taking pressure from the previous cycle still persists.
Looking back at history, Q1 of the years 2022, 2018, and 2014 all recorded a downward trend after the market peaked in the previous year.
Does FOGO depend on a bull market to grow?
This is the first time I've noticed @Fogo Official not in a bull market, but during a rather quiet market phase. At that time, I was trying to gather all the Web3 tools I use daily, and the general feeling was... fragmented. Some data here, some data there, access scattered across each dApp.
This makes me wonder: if a project like FOGO focuses on the experience layer and connectivity, do they really need a bull market to grow?
This makes me wonder: if a project like FOGO focuses on the experience layer and connectivity, do they really need a bull market to grow?
Bitcoin bounces back from the $65,000 mark, focus shifts to CPI data
$BTC has bounced back after testing the ~$65,147 area.
My short selling orders have performed quite well this week, and my ultimate target remains around $64,500.
My view on Bitcoin remains negative until evidence to the contrary appears. If the DXY index rises, 80% of my short positions will be closed.
Today I'm not too excited to open more trades because this is the day the CPI index is announced, and I already have some pretty stable positions.
My short selling orders have performed quite well this week, and my ultimate target remains around $64,500.
My view on Bitcoin remains negative until evidence to the contrary appears. If the DXY index rises, 80% of my short positions will be closed.
Today I'm not too excited to open more trades because this is the day the CPI index is announced, and I already have some pretty stable positions.
Why is Vanar Chain called an "AI-native blockchain"?
The first time I saw the term “AI-native blockchain” associated with @Vanarchain , my first reaction was skepticism. Web3 loves to add new prefixes to create narratives.
But upon closer inspection, I think what they mean is not about running AI models on-chain, but about how the infrastructure is designed to serve workflows that involve AI participation.
Most current chains treat AI as an application running on top. Data resides off-chain, inference occurs outside the chain, and the blockchain only stores the final results. This is sufficient, but it lacks a reliable layer throughout.
Vanar positions itself as a platform where data, identity, and access for AI agents can be managed consistently. Not to turn the blockchain into an AI computer, but to create an environment where agents can interact, sign transactions, and access resources in a verifiable way.
It sounds reasonable in theory. But the real question is: is the demand for on-chain AI agents already large enough, or is this still just a positioning ahead of market demand?
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
The first time I saw the term “AI-native blockchain” associated with @Vanarchain , my first reaction was skepticism. Web3 loves to add new prefixes to create narratives.
But upon closer inspection, I think what they mean is not about running AI models on-chain, but about how the infrastructure is designed to serve workflows that involve AI participation.
Most current chains treat AI as an application running on top. Data resides off-chain, inference occurs outside the chain, and the blockchain only stores the final results. This is sufficient, but it lacks a reliable layer throughout.
Vanar positions itself as a platform where data, identity, and access for AI agents can be managed consistently. Not to turn the blockchain into an AI computer, but to create an environment where agents can interact, sign transactions, and access resources in a verifiable way.
It sounds reasonable in theory. But the real question is: is the demand for on-chain AI agents already large enough, or is this still just a positioning ahead of market demand?
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
What problem is FOGO solving in the Web3 ecosystem?
I came across @Fogo Official while testing some on-chain tools for personal workflow. It's not a big issue, just the feeling that everything still feels fragmented: wallets in one place, data in another, and identity dependent on each application.
FOGO seems to be touching on that annoying point: the fragmentation of the user experience in Web3.
Instead of making users repeat the same action across multiple dApps and chains, the current ecosystem makes each interaction a reset of trust. Connecting wallets, signing transactions, granting permissions… over and over again.
If $FOGO addresses this layer of experience — identity, data, access — then the value lies in reducing friction, not adding features. Web3 is not lacking in tools. It lacks seamlessness.
However, this problem is not just technical. User habits, open standards, and the acceptance of new dApps are the real barriers.
@Fogo Official #fogo
I came across @Fogo Official while testing some on-chain tools for personal workflow. It's not a big issue, just the feeling that everything still feels fragmented: wallets in one place, data in another, and identity dependent on each application.
FOGO seems to be touching on that annoying point: the fragmentation of the user experience in Web3.
Instead of making users repeat the same action across multiple dApps and chains, the current ecosystem makes each interaction a reset of trust. Connecting wallets, signing transactions, granting permissions… over and over again.
If $FOGO addresses this layer of experience — identity, data, access — then the value lies in reducing friction, not adding features. Web3 is not lacking in tools. It lacks seamlessness.
However, this problem is not just technical. User habits, open standards, and the acceptance of new dApps are the real barriers.
@Fogo Official #fogo
Deep Negative Funding Like Mid-2024: Is Bitcoin Near a Local Bottom?
The last time this structure appeared was in mid-2024 (the first red circle on the chart). At that time, $BTC fluctuated around the 60,000–70,000 USD range and the funding rate on derivative exchanges turned distinctly negative – meaning that the short side began to pay fees to the long side.
I remember that period very clearly. The market sentiment at that time was extremely cautious. Spot money slowed down, macro narratives were still very unstable, and most traders leaned towards a scenario of deeper corrections. But this negative consensus created an unbalanced structure.
I remember that period very clearly. The market sentiment at that time was extremely cautious. Spot money slowed down, macro narratives were still very unstable, and most traders leaned towards a scenario of deeper corrections. But this negative consensus created an unbalanced structure.
Is Vanar directly competing with Ethereum's L2s?
The question @Vanarchain is whether it is directly competing with Ethereum's L2s? sounds simple, but for me, it depends on how we define 'competition'.
If competition is understood as vying for the same group of developers, the same liquidity line, and the same pure DeFi use case, then the answer may not be completely yes.
Most Ethereum L2s are designed with a very clear goal: to expand Ethereum's processing capability, maintain EVM compatibility, inherit security, and attract the existing DeFi/NFT ecosystem. They optimize for lower fees, higher throughput, but still maintain the core assumption: the more activities that take place on-chain, the better.
If competition is understood as vying for the same group of developers, the same liquidity line, and the same pure DeFi use case, then the answer may not be completely yes.
Most Ethereum L2s are designed with a very clear goal: to expand Ethereum's processing capability, maintain EVM compatibility, inherit security, and attract the existing DeFi/NFT ecosystem. They optimize for lower fees, higher throughput, but still maintain the core assumption: the more activities that take place on-chain, the better.
Fear & Greed Index Drops to Level 9: Is the Crypto Market Nearing the Cycle Bottom?
The Fear & Greed Index of the crypto market has dropped sharply to a level of 9 – the “extreme fear” zone, reflecting a negative sentiment that envelops almost the entire market.
When the index falls into the single-digit range, it often indicates that investors are being driven by fears of losses, macro bad news, or short-term liquidation pressures.
In this context, most behaviors in the market are no longer strategic but tend toward emotional reactions: selling to reduce risk, narrowing positions, standing aside to observe. Therefore, many strong sell-offs often occur when the index is in the extremely low range.
When the index falls into the single-digit range, it often indicates that investors are being driven by fears of losses, macro bad news, or short-term liquidation pressures.
In this context, most behaviors in the market are no longer strategic but tend toward emotional reactions: selling to reduce risk, narrowing positions, standing aside to observe. Therefore, many strong sell-offs often occur when the index is in the extremely low range.
Vanar can become the backend for Web2 applications
@Vanarchain can become the backend for Web2 applications with me not being about technical compatibility, but about the level of intervention in the user experience.
If a Web2 application forces users to understand wallets, gas, or tokens, then no matter what the backend is, it is no longer Web2. Therefore, to truly become a backend, blockchain must be almost 'invisible'. Most behaviors still occur in the traditional model, while the chain only appears when it needs to record rights, assets, or distribute value.
In my view, the architecture that clearly separates off-chain and on-chain of Vanar $VANRY goes in this direction. Developers can keep a familiar stack for the main logic part, and only use blockchain as the final layer of validation and settlement. That significantly reduces friction.
However, the backend for Web2 is not just a technology issue, but also about stability, cost, and the ability to scale in the long term.
If Vanar can prove that blockchain can operate as foundational infrastructure, without complicating the product, then that possibility exists. If not, it will only remain a narrative.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
@Vanarchain can become the backend for Web2 applications with me not being about technical compatibility, but about the level of intervention in the user experience.
If a Web2 application forces users to understand wallets, gas, or tokens, then no matter what the backend is, it is no longer Web2. Therefore, to truly become a backend, blockchain must be almost 'invisible'. Most behaviors still occur in the traditional model, while the chain only appears when it needs to record rights, assets, or distribute value.
In my view, the architecture that clearly separates off-chain and on-chain of Vanar $VANRY goes in this direction. Developers can keep a familiar stack for the main logic part, and only use blockchain as the final layer of validation and settlement. That significantly reduces friction.
However, the backend for Web2 is not just a technology issue, but also about stability, cost, and the ability to scale in the long term.
If Vanar can prove that blockchain can operate as foundational infrastructure, without complicating the product, then that possibility exists. If not, it will only remain a narrative.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
What is the difference between Plasma and Solana in payment stablecoin?
Today I tried to place @Plasma next to Solana, but not to compare TPS or market cap.
The question I am interested in is: if we are talking about payment stablecoin, how do these two differ in design layers?
Solana is very fast. That is clear. Stablecoins on Solana run smoothly, with thick liquidity, and a bustling ecosystem. If I were a startup needing to quickly deploy a crypto payment app, Solana is almost a safe choice because everything is already available.
But Solana was not created just for payment. It was created for throughput. DeFi, meme, bot, NFT, all share the same highway. When the market is hot, the network is hot too. Payment does not have any special priority.
The question I am interested in is: if we are talking about payment stablecoin, how do these two differ in design layers?
Solana is very fast. That is clear. Stablecoins on Solana run smoothly, with thick liquidity, and a bustling ecosystem. If I were a startup needing to quickly deploy a crypto payment app, Solana is almost a safe choice because everything is already available.
But Solana was not created just for payment. It was created for throughput. DeFi, meme, bot, NFT, all share the same highway. When the market is hot, the network is hot too. Payment does not have any special priority.
What advantages does Plasma have if stablecoins become the backbone of crypto?
What if most transactions in crypto eventually revolve around stablecoins? Not memes, not farming. Just money coming in and out, payments, capital circulation.
If stablecoins truly become the 'backbone', then the requirements will be different. No one wants the foundation of the financial system to operate in a way that is sometimes fast and sometimes slow, sometimes cheap and sometimes expensive. It must be consistent.
And it must be predictable. At that point, @Plasma has an advantage because it is designed around stablecoins from the very beginning.
Not having to share space with too many other use cases. Less conflict, less dependence on speculative behavior.
Major chains may still handle stablecoins well. But they always have to balance many things at once. Plasma $XPL does not. It accepts a narrower focus in exchange for stability.
In my opinion, if stablecoins truly become the backbone, will the market prioritize that concentration, or will it still want a versatile infrastructure for all needs?
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
What if most transactions in crypto eventually revolve around stablecoins? Not memes, not farming. Just money coming in and out, payments, capital circulation.
If stablecoins truly become the 'backbone', then the requirements will be different. No one wants the foundation of the financial system to operate in a way that is sometimes fast and sometimes slow, sometimes cheap and sometimes expensive. It must be consistent.
And it must be predictable. At that point, @Plasma has an advantage because it is designed around stablecoins from the very beginning.
Not having to share space with too many other use cases. Less conflict, less dependence on speculative behavior.
Major chains may still handle stablecoins well. But they always have to balance many things at once. Plasma $XPL does not. It accepts a narrower focus in exchange for stability.
In my opinion, if stablecoins truly become the backbone, will the market prioritize that concentration, or will it still want a versatile infrastructure for all needs?
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
BTC Realized Loss exceeds $2.3B — Signal of capitulation or foundation for new volatility?
🔥 BTC Realized Loss exceeds $2.3B — Signal of capitulation or foundation for new volatility?
On-chain data has just recorded one of the strongest stress signals of the current cycle. The Bitcoin Realized Loss (7DMA) has surpassed the $2.3 billion mark — a value range that historically tends to appear only during panic sell-offs or final trend shakeouts.
Realized Loss reflects the total value of losses 'locked in' when investors sell below their cost basis. When this index surges, it indicates that psychological pressure is peaking and a large number of short-term positions are forced to exit.
On-chain data has just recorded one of the strongest stress signals of the current cycle. The Bitcoin Realized Loss (7DMA) has surpassed the $2.3 billion mark — a value range that historically tends to appear only during panic sell-offs or final trend shakeouts.
Realized Loss reflects the total value of losses 'locked in' when investors sell below their cost basis. When this index surges, it indicates that psychological pressure is peaking and a large number of short-term positions are forced to exit.
CME Gap Resurfaces: Is BTC Facing a New Downtrend Cycle?
In 2022, I remember very clearly a detail that not many people paid attention to at the time: the CME gap on the weekly chart of
. At that time, the market still had hope for a recovery.
But this gap appeared at a sensitive position and later became a milestone that marked the beginning of a prolonged downtrend.
Looking back, I realize that it was not just a simple technical 'gap', but a signal of a larger supply-demand imbalance.
. At that time, the market still had hope for a recovery.
But this gap appeared at a sensitive position and later became a milestone that marked the beginning of a prolonged downtrend.
Looking back, I realize that it was not just a simple technical 'gap', but a signal of a larger supply-demand imbalance.
Login to explore more contents