Salman49

And the entire market is drawing the wrong conclusion.

Friday, 7pm Seoul. Bithumb runs a promo where winners get 2,000 Korean won.

About $1.40. One employee types “BTC” instead of “KRW.” 695 users receive 2,000 Bitcoin each. 620,000 BTC conjured from a single input field with zero validation.

Nearly 3% of all Bitcoin that will ever exist. Credited from nothing.

Bithumb held 175 BTC on its own books. 42,619 for customers.

The system manufactured 14x more than the exchange possessed and the trading engine accepted every phantom coin as real.

Users saw billions on screen and sold. 1,786 BTC dumped into the order book.

Price cratered 17% to 81.1 million won while every other exchange traded normally. Detected in 20 minutes.

99.7% reversed same day.

Remaining 0.3% covered from corporate funds. 110% compensation pledged.

On-chain reserves never moved. CryptoQuant data stable at ~42,304 BTC.

Crypto Twitter wants this to be FTX 2.0. It isn’t close. FTX was intentional fraud, $8 billion misappropriated, solvency crisis. Bithumb was a fat-finger on a marketing script disconnected from custody infrastructure.

But here’s what should actually terrify you.
South Korea has seen this exact transmission before. April 2018, Samsung Securities. Employee enters a dividend as shares instead of won. 2.81 billion ghost shares issued. $105 billion. 30x the company’s market cap. 16 employees sold 5 million shares before it was caught 37 minutes later. Samsung Securities lost 12% of its value permanently.

Same country. Same denomination error. Same regulatory escalation. Eight years apart.

The critical difference nobody is seeing: Samsung’s ghost shares entered the Korea Exchange settlement system. External contagion. Structural damage. Bithumb’s ghost Bitcoin never left the internal ledger. No blockchain settlement. No external propagation. The exchange reversed it unilaterally because crypto CEXs are their own clearinghouse.

That distinction separates a contained incident from a systemic crisis. And it simultaneously reveals the real vulnerability everyone should be talking about.

Every centralized exchange operates an internal ledger. Your “balance” is a database entry. It becomes real Bitcoin only when you withdraw and it settles on-chain. Bithumb’s system had no validation preventing a promo script from crediting assets that don’t exist. No constraint checking credited balances against actual reserves. Phantom coins entered a live order book and traded against real money from real people.
That architecture is not unique to Bithumb. It is how every centralized exchange on earth works.

Rep. Na Kyung-won of South Korea’s People Power Party said it plainly: “If an exchange functions by merely shifting figures within its internal ledger without any corresponding movement on the blockchain, it is effectively selling coins it does not possess.”

She is describing every CEX you have ever used.

Bithumb didn’t create 620,000 fake Bitcoin.

Bitcoin’s supply is mathematically fixed at 21 million and the blockchain was never touched.

What Bithumb proved is that the ledger sitting between you and the blockchain has no native constraint preventing it from showing you assets that don’t exist. The only safeguards are operational controls.

And on Friday in Seoul, those controls didn’t exist on the one input field that mattered.

Blockchains are trustless. The exchanges sitting on top of them are not.

And the distance between your exchange balance and on-chain reality is the most underpriced risk in crypto right now.