Ayesh_e_gul

Welcome to Write to Earn Bootcamp. This is a short series of practical guides to help you get more out of Binance Square’s “Write to Earn” program — up to 50% commission on eligible trades driven by your content. 
Let’s start with Lesson 1: Token Tags.
Token tags (e.g., $BTC ) are more than labels! It’s the secret to reaching people who care about your content. “Write to Earn” commission only lands in your wallet when users place an eligible trade after clicking the token tag or chart mentioned in your post. Tagging mindlessly won’t earn you clicks.
Read this guide if you want to maximize your reach, your content, and most importantly — your commission rewards on Binance Square.

3 Tagging Rules You Need to Save
1. Keep tags tight. Add up to 3 tokens that your post is actually about. Over-tagging can and will confuse readers and weaken your reach.
2. Match tags to your content. If you tag a token, make sure to mention it and discuss it. Misaligned tags = fewer clicks, lower trust, and less engagement from your readers.
3. Pair the right charts. Thinking of adding a chart to show a token’s price trend? Make sure they match your token tags and the key points in your post. Consistency makes your post easier to follow and more clickable.

Now here are some examples of what not to do:

*The content is for display purposes only and does not constitute endorsement of any actions
Use these tips on your next post and keep testing. Consistent tagging can make a real difference over time.
Want more lessons like this? Drop a comment with what you’re trying to improve. We’ll cover it next!

When people talk about bringing real-world assets onto the blockchain, one question always comes up: how does it actually work in practice? On the Dusk network, the life cycle of a security token is designed to mirror the needs of real financial systems while taking advantage of what decentralized technology can do best. It’s not just about creating a token and sending it around. It’s about building a full journey, from issuance to daily use, with privacy, compliance, and trust built in from the start.
The story usually begins with an issuer. This could be an organization that wants to represent an asset on-chain, such as shares, bonds, or other regulated instruments. On Dusk, the creation of a security token is not a purely technical action; it is a rule-driven process. The issuer defines the logic of the token through smart contracts, including who is allowed to hold it, under what conditions it can be transferred, and what kind of checks are required. This is where Dusk’s idea of “compliance by design” first shows its value. Instead of relying on off-chain processes and manual checks, many of the rules are encoded directly into the token’s behavior.
Before any token is distributed, there is the question of eligibility. In traditional finance, this usually involves identity checks and regulatory requirements. On Dusk, these checks can be performed using privacy-preserving techniques. Thanks to zero-knowledge proofs and hidden state smart contracts, a participant can prove that they meet the requirements without exposing all their personal data to the network. The blockchain only sees that the conditions are satisfied, not the sensitive details behind them. This is a crucial step, because it allows the system to respect both legal obligations and user privacy at the same time.
Once the token is issued and the initial participants are approved, the token enters its active phase: circulation. This is where the day-to-day life of a security token happens. Transfers, settlements, and other actions are all handled by smart contracts that enforce the rules set at issuance. If a transfer is not allowed, the contract simply won’t execute it. If additional checks are needed, they can be triggered automatically. This removes a lot of uncertainty and friction from the process, because the rules are not just written in documents, they are part of the system itself.
Privacy continues to play a role during this phase. In many financial contexts, it’s not desirable for everyone to see who holds what, or how much. On Dusk, sensitive state can remain hidden while still being verifiable. This means that ownership and balances can be protected from public view, yet the network can still be sure that everything adds up and that no rules are being broken. For users and institutions alike, this creates a more comfortable environment, one that feels closer to how financial systems work in the real world, but with the added benefits of automation and transparency where it matters.
Another important part of the life cycle is corporate actions and updates. In traditional systems, things like dividend distributions, voting, or changes to the terms of an asset often involve complex coordination between many parties. On Dusk, these processes can be managed by smart contracts as well. Because the rules and permissions are already part of the token’s logic, these actions can be executed in a consistent and predictable way. At the same time, privacy-preserving mechanisms can ensure that sensitive information, such as individual voting choices, does not have to be exposed to everyone.
Over time, some tokens will change hands many times, some will be held for long periods, and some may be partially redeemed or transformed. Throughout all these stages, the Dusk network acts as a neutral, automated coordinator. It doesn’t need to “understand” the business meaning of every action; it just needs to verify that the cryptographic proofs are valid and that the smart contract rules are followed. This separation between business logic and verification is one of the reasons the system can scale to complex use cases without becoming unmanageable.
Eventually, a security token reaches the end of its life cycle. This could happen because the underlying asset matures, is redeemed, or is otherwise retired. On Dusk, this final phase is also handled in a structured way. The smart contract can define what it means for the token to be closed, how remaining obligations are settled, and how the final state is recorded. Once again, the network can verify that everything happened according to the rules, without necessarily revealing all the private details of who received what.
What’s interesting about this whole process is how little manual intervention is needed once the system is set up. That doesn’t mean humans are removed from the loop, but it does mean that many routine checks and operations can be handled automatically, in a way that is consistent and auditable. For issuers, this reduces operational complexity. For users, it increases confidence that the system will behave as expected. And for the broader ecosystem, it shows how blockchain can support real financial workflows, not just experimental ones.
Another lesson from this life cycle is the importance of community and standards. A network like Dusk is not just a piece of technology; it’s a shared environment where builders, issuers, and users agree on certain principles. Things like respecting privacy, encoding rules transparently, and designing for long-term use are not accidents. They are choices that shape how the system evolves and what kinds of applications can thrive on it.
In the end, the life cycle of a security token on the Dusk network is less about a single transaction and more about a complete journey. From careful issuance, through compliant and private circulation, to an orderly conclusion, each step is designed to balance trust, efficiency, and respect for users. It’s a good example of how blockchain can move beyond simple transfers and become a foundation for more mature, real-world financial systems. And for the community watching this space grow, it’s a reminder that thoughtful infrastructure can make complex things feel surprisingly natural.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK
{future}(DUSKUSDT)

When people talk about blockchains, they often focus on speed, fees, or price. But underneath all of that is a quieter and more important question: how does a network decide who gets to use its resources, and how does it do that fairly? For Plasma, a blockchain built specifically for stablecoin payments, this question sits right at the center of its design. Plasma is not trying to be everything for everyone. It is trying to be reliable infrastructure for moving value, and that means its allocation mechanisms must balance scalability, security, and fairness from the start.
In simple terms, allocation mechanisms decide how the network’s capacity is shared. This includes who gets to produce blocks, how transactions are prioritized, how fees are handled, and how incentives are distributed to those who keep the system running. On many blockchains, these systems grow in messy ways over time. Plasma has the advantage of being built with a very clear purpose: stablecoin settlement at scale. Because of that, its approach to resource allocation is more focused and more intentional.
One of the most visible parts of Plasma’s design is its stablecoin-first philosophy. Unlike general-purpose chains that treat all transactions the same, Plasma is optimized around the idea that most activity on the network will be payments using stablecoins. This changes how block space and execution resources are used. Instead of allowing a small number of complex transactions to crowd out simple payments, Plasma’s system is designed to keep everyday transfers fast and predictable. In practice, this means the network’s capacity is allocated in a way that protects the basic function of moving money, even as the ecosystem grows.
Scalability is a big part of this story. Plasma uses a high-performance consensus system designed to finalize transactions in less than a second. This is not just about speed for its own sake. Fast finality allows the network to process many transactions quickly and to keep queues short. When a network can confirm blocks rapidly, it does not need to fight over limited space as much. This naturally reduces pressure on allocation and makes it easier to keep fees low and behavior predictable.
But scalability alone is not enough. If a network can process many transactions but is easy to attack or manipulate, it does not help anyone. This is where security enters the picture. Plasma anchors its security model to Bitcoin, which provides a very strong and well-tested foundation. From an allocation point of view, this matters because it sets clear rules about what is valid and what is not. Validators cannot simply rewrite history or favor certain users without risking their stake and their position in the system. This creates a strong incentive to follow the rules and to allocate resources honestly.
The role of validators is central here. Plasma uses a Proof-of-Stake system, which means validators must lock up XPL to participate in block production and consensus. This staking requirement is a form of resource allocation in itself. It ensures that those who have more responsibility for the network also have more at risk if something goes wrong. Over time, as delegation becomes more widely used, regular holders will also be able to take part in this system by assigning their stake to validators they trust. This spreads both responsibility and rewards across a wider group, rather than concentrating them in a small set of actors.
Fairness in allocation is not only about who produces blocks. It is also about how users experience the network. On many chains, fees can change wildly depending on congestion. This creates a system where those who can pay more get priority, and everyone else has to wait. Plasma takes a different approach for its core use case. With gasless stablecoin transfers and stablecoin-first fee logic, the network is designed so that basic payments are not pushed aside by speculation or sudden bursts of activity. This does not mean resources are unlimited, but it does mean they are managed with a clear social goal in mind: keeping everyday transfers accessible.
Another important part of Plasma’s allocation model is its approach to long-term sustainability. Like most Proof-of-Stake networks, Plasma uses controlled inflation to reward validators. But this is balanced by a fee-burning mechanism, where base fees are removed from circulation. From a resource perspective, this creates a system that does not endlessly grow more expensive to use. As activity increases, some of the economic pressure is absorbed by the burn mechanism, rather than being passed entirely to users. This helps keep the network usable even as it becomes more popular.
What makes all of this interesting is that Plasma’s allocation mechanisms are not just technical. They reflect a certain philosophy about what the network is for. Plasma is not built to be a playground for every possible application. It is built to be a piece of financial infrastructure. In that context, predictability, neutrality, and reliability matter more than chasing short-term demand for block space. The way resources are distributed on the network is meant to serve that long-term role.
From a community point of view, this also shapes expectations. The Plasma ecosystem is not about racing for attention or competing for limited slots in each block. It is about building a system that quietly does its job well. Developers know what kind of environment they are building in. Users know what kind of experience they can expect. Validators know what is required of them. This shared understanding reduces conflict over resources and makes governance discussions more grounded.
Of course, no allocation system is ever finished. As Plasma grows, new kinds of usage will appear, and the network will need to adapt. The important part is that the foundation is designed with clear priorities. Scalability is there to make growth possible. Security is there to make trust durable. Fairness is there to make the system usable by more than just a small group of insiders.
In the end, Plasma’s approach to allocation is not about clever tricks or complex rules. It is about aligning incentives so that the network naturally does what it is supposed to do: move stable value quickly, safely, and fairly. When these invisible systems work well, most people never think about them. They just see a payment go through, and that is exactly the point.
For a blockchain that wants to become real financial infrastructure, that kind of quiet reliability may be its most important feature.
@Plasma #Plasma #plasma $XPL
{future}(XPLUSDT)

You don’t need capital to get started in crypto. What you do need is a bit of time, consistency, and knowing where to look. With roughly 1–2 hours a day, it’s very possible to stack a few dollars daily and let it add up over time.

Here’s how beginners are actually doing it 👇

1. Get Paid to Learn (Yes, This Is Real)

Some exchanges literally pay users for learning the basics of crypto. Short videos, a couple of questions, and rewards land straight in your wallet.

Where to look: Binance, KuCoin, CoinMarketCap

How it works: Watch → answer → earn

What it pays: Usually $2–$4 when new campaigns drop

Time needed: About 10 minutes

The catch? These campaigns don’t last long. If you see one live, jump in.

2. Daily Platform Tasks (Easy but Overlooked)

Most big platforms reward users for small actions that take almost no effort:
– Daily check-ins

– Simple test trades

– Polls, surveys, or feature testing

This won’t make you rich overnight, but it’s steady.

Typical daily value: $1–$2 if you stay consistent

3. Airdrops: Free Tokens for Early Users

New crypto projects love rewarding early attention. If you’re willing to sign up early and do basic tasks, airdrops can quietly add up.

Places worth checking: Galxe, Zealy, Layer3, QuestN

Tasks are usually things like joining Discord, following pages, or completing a beginner mission.

Daily average (spread out): $1–$3

Some airdrops later end up being worth way more.

4. Quick Quizzes That Actually Pay

Sites like CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko run quizzes tied to new projects. They’re simple, beginner-friendly, and don’t take long.

Answer a few questions → earn tokens

Pay per quiz: $1–$3

Best part: You’re learning while earning.

5. Sharing Links Without Being Spammy

You don’t need a huge audience. Even one or two friends signing up through your referral can generate small daily commissions.

Platforms: X, Telegram, TikTok

Potential daily return: $1–$2 from light sharing

The key is keeping it casual and helpful — not pushing links everywhere.

A Realistic Daily Breakdown
– Learn & Earn + quizzes: $2–$4

– Tasks + airdrops: $2–$5

– Referrals/content sharing: $2–$4

Total: around $6–$13 per day, starting from zero.

It’s not magic. It’s just consistency and knowing where free money hides.

$BTC $BNB $SOL

#Crypto #learnAndEarn #Airdrops #SideIncome #BeginnerCrypto