Coinpedia Fintech News

The post Harvard Dumps Bitcoin for Ethereum appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Harvard Management Company reduced its position in the iShares Bitcoin Trust by about 21 percent in the fourth quarter of 2025, holding 5.35 million shares valued at roughly $265.8 million. During the same period, the endowment initiated a new $86.8 million stake in the iShares Ethereum Trust, marking its first reported exposure to an Ethereum‑based ETF. As of December 31, 2025, Harvard’s combined Bitcoin and Ether ETF holdings totaled $352.6 million, reflecting a rebalancing within its digital asset allocations.

The post Top 3 Cheap Cryptocurrencies With 700% Upside Potential appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

At the start of 2026, the crypto market is shifting away from pure speculation and toward utility. Investors are no longer chasing viral trends; they are looking for new crypto projects with working products and visible growth potential.

As major altcoins struggle to expand, a new wave of cheap crypto protocols is gaining attention. One decentralized project, in particular, is drawing analyst interest. With signs of a broader market upswing forming, the early-entry window for such utility-driven assets may not stay open for long.

Shiba Inu (SHIB)

Shiba Inu (SHIB) is currently trading around $0.0000069. It remains a major player in the meme coin segment, with a market capitalization holding near the $4 billion level. However, SHIB has evolved beyond its original meme status. The team has developed a broader ecosystem centered around Shibarium, a Layer-2 scaling solution designed to reduce transaction fees and expand SHIB’s utility within decentralized applications.

From a technical standpoint, SHIB is facing strong resistance near $0.0000091, a level that has acted as a ceiling for several months. If the price breaks above this zone with sustained volume, a move toward the $0.000012 range could become possible. For now, SHIB remains in consolidation mode, as investors watch to see whether Shibarium can attract additional developers and projects to strengthen ecosystem activity and long-term demand.

Cardano (ADA)

ADA is trading at approximately $0.26, with a market capitalization near $9.6 billion. Cardano is known for its methodical development process, relying on a peer-reviewed research model to ensure that upgrades are carefully tested before deployment. 

This approach has attracted long-term investors who prioritize security and sustainability over rapid iteration. However, the network is sometimes criticized for progressing more slowly than competing smart contract platforms.

Technically, ADA is currently facing resistance in the $0.30 to $0.34 range. Reclaiming and holding this zone as support would be necessary to reestablish stronger bullish momentum. If the breakout fails, ADA could remain range-bound between $0.25 and $0.28 in the near term. 

Mutuum Finance (MUTM)

Mutuum Finance (MUTM) is an emerging protocol designed to modernize on-chain lending and borrowing. It is building a non-custodial hub where users can earn interest on their tokens or borrow against collateral without relying on a bank. 

The project has raised over $20.5 million and attracted more than 19,000 holders. Unlike many early-stage concepts, Mutuum Finance has already deployed its V1 protocol on testnet, allowing users to interact with core lending mechanics.

The MUTM token is currently in Phase 7 of its structured distribution, priced at $0.04, below the confirmed launch price of $0.06. Of the total 4 billion supply, 45.5% is allocated to early participants. Since starting at $0.01, the token has increased by 300% through predefined pricing stages tied to development milestones. 

Within the protocol design, liquidity pools are structured to generate variable APY based on utilization, for example, stablecoin pools may target estimated yields in the 8–12% range depending on borrowing demand, providing a functional yield component alongside token distribution progress.

Reasons why Analysts Favour MUTM

Analysts are of the opinion that MUTM could be outperforming SHIB and ADA in 2026 since it is still in its early phase of growth. Shiba Inu and Cardano already have huge market caps. To make them twofold in their worth, new billions of dollars of money are required. 

Mutuum Finance is significantly less valued and therefore it can expand more rapidly. SHIB and ADA are also grappling with flat price action, and MUTM is experiencing a steady rise of price during the presale.

Take an example of a $400 investment. A position of $400 in SHIB or ADA could increase in case the market improves, but the potential growth is limited by their huge size. In MUTM, a $400 investment in the present price is benefited by a 50% discount. 

That $400 would be worth $600 by the time it goes to the launch price of $0.06. The protocol acquires users everyday and analysts think the price may go to $0.40 to $0.60, transforming that starting fund of $400 into a potential $5,000.

Protocol Launch and Professional Security

The hype of Mutuum Finance is supported by the recent V1 protocol release on the Sepolia testnet. This is an indication that the technology works. Now users will be able to test the lending pools and the yield-bearing mtTokens in a live environment. This technical delivery has made the present stage sell very fast.

Mutuum has not only completed a complete manual audit with Halborn Security with respect to investor safety. It is one of the most credible brands in the crypto world. The project also has a high 90/100 trust score with CertiK and has a public bug bounty. Elite security combined with a working product will give Mutuum Finance a leading top crypto position among those willing to achieve high growth opportunities in 2026.

For more information about Mutuum Finance (MUTM) visit the links below:

Website: https://www.mutuum.com

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mutuumfinance

The post Does Rising Hashrate Signal a Recovery in Bitcoin Price or Are Miners Still Capitulating? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

The Bitcoin price is trading at $68,820, and a fresh debate over miner behavior and hashrate strength is now shaping the recovery narrative. With BTC price today hovering near recent lows, a public clash broke out between two of the most renowned analysts, “cryptorand’ and ‘alicharts’ over whether on-chain signals are flashing a bottom or signaling more downside.

Bullish Case: Hashrate and Panic Selling

One side of the argument from cryptorand is coming straightforwardly. He believes that historically, every major market bottom has coincided with three signals: a strong or recovering BTC hashrate, the end of miner capitulation, and widespread retail panic selling. According to this view, he announced that all three conditions are either visible or developing right now.

In particular, this analyst focused more on rising hashrate as the key driver of his analysis. As this shows, the network health and miner conviction are strong and rising, as he described. 

Meanwhile, retail sentiment appears deeply shaken, a classic component of prior cycle troughs. From that angle, the current environment doesn’t look like a collapse, and it looks like a setup phase.

Every major Bitcoin bottom in history has been accompanied by: Strong/recovering hashrate Miner capitulation ending Retail panic sellingWe have all three right now…this is not the end. This is the setup! pic.twitter.com/fL30GNeHBk

— Rand (@cryptorand) February 16, 2026

The logic is rooted in past observations. Where evidently previous bottoms formed when weaker hands exited, miners endured pressure, and the network itself remained resilient beneath the surface. Based on this, the analyst has argued that the same structure may now be unfolding again.

Bitcoin Price Bearish Counterpoint: Capitulation Isn’t Done

At the same time, a competing narrative from the analyst alicharts points to ongoing miner distribution and ETF outflows. The claim is that capitulation has not ended.

Miners, according to this view, are still selling into weakness. If true, that implies sustained pressure on supply. The Bitcoin Miner reserve metric becomes critical here. Persistent outflows from miner wallets would signal that forced selling hasn’t fully cleared.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin ETFs also selling adds another layer of complexity. Institutional flows can amplify directional momentum, especially when they align with broader risk-off dynamics. That means Bitcoin price action isn’t just a function of retail fear, infact it’s influenced by capital rotation at scale.

So while hashrate strength may look constructive, but ongoing distribution tempers the optimism.

Hashrate vs. Supply Pressure

From a technical perspective, the Bitcoin price chart sits at an inflection point. The $68,820 level reflects a market that hasn’t yet decisively reclaimed upside momentum nor broken into a new wave of capitulation.

Still, the chart suggests a tug-of-war. On the one hand, rising BTC hashrate implies operational commitment from miners, potentially signaling long-term confidence in Bitcoin’s crypto fundamentals. 

On the other, continued miner selling and ETF outflows imply liquidity still needs to be absorbed before stabilization can take hold. That tension is what defines the current phase.

The bullish argument hinges on history repeating itself, that network resilience eventually overpowers short-term selling. On the contrary, the bearish case leans on real-time flows, arguing that as long as distribution persists, relief rallies could struggle to sustain traction.

In this standoff of opinions between cryptorand and alicharts, neither side is relying solely on speculation. Both point to measurable data: hashrate trends, miner reserve behavior, ETF activity, and visible retail panic.

Whether the Bitcoin price stabilizes from here or extends lower may ultimately depend on which force exhausts first, capitulating supply or sidelined demand waiting for confirmation.

The post Animoca Brands Secures Dubai VASP License from VARA appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Animoca Brands announced that it has received a Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license from Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA). This approval allows the company to legally offer crypto-related services in Dubai, except within the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC).

VARA was set up in 2022 under Dubai Law No. 4 of 2022 to regulate crypto and digital asset activities in Dubai. The license is an important step for Animoca Brands as it expands its presence in one of the fastest-growing crypto markets.

How the License Expands Operations

With the new VASP license, Animoca Brands can offer broker-dealer services and manage crypto investments. This means the company can help clients buy and sell digital assets and provide investment services under official regulatory approval.

The company will operate from Dubai and focus mainly on institutional and qualified investors worldwide. With clear regulatory approval, Animoca can now grow its crypto financial services in the Middle East while following local rules.

This move also supports Animoca Brands’ wider business, which includes platforms like Moca Network, Open Campus, Anichess, and The Sandbox. In addition, the company has invested in over 600 companies and digital assets, making it one of the largest investors in the blockchain industry.

Dubai’s clear crypto regulations have attracted many global crypto firms. By securing approval from VARA, Animoca joins other major companies setting up regulated operations in the region.

Crypto Market Impact

Animoca Brands’ approval highlights Dubai’s growing role as a global crypto hub. With licensed broker and investment services now available, institutional investors may find it easier to access regulated crypto opportunities through Dubai.

The development also shows a wider industry shift toward working under clear regulations. As more countries introduce crypto rules, major companies are applying for licenses to operate legally and attract larger investors.

For the broader market, this approval shows that regulated crypto services are expanding beyond the United States and Europe. The Middle East, especially Dubai, is becoming a strong center for blockchain businesses and digital asset services.

Overall, the VASP license strengthens Animoca Brands’ position in the region and reflects the continued growth and maturity of the global crypto industry.

The post Ledger and Trezor Users Targeted by Offline Phishing Scam appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Security researchers have uncovered a new phishing campaign in which fraudsters send physical mail to owners of Ledger and Trezor wallets, impersonating official support. The letters use convincing logos and messaging to push users toward fraudulent websites that ask for recovery seed phrases, which are private keys that grant full control of crypto assets. This offline tactic aims to bypass usual email and SMS filters. Experts strongly advise never sharing or entering seed phrases online and to always verify support contact details through official company channels to avoid theft.

The post Bitcoin’s Drop to $60K Is Not a Normal Correction: Dan Tapiero Explains What’s Next appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Bitcoin has dropped nearly 50% from its October 2025 high above $126,000, and according to veteran investor Dan Tapiero, this is not a repeat of past cycles.

Speaking on The Wolf of All Streets with Scott Melker, the 50T Funds founder said he initially expected a standard 20-30% correction from around $125K down to the $90-100K range. The slide into the $60K zone went well beyond that.

What makes this selloff different, Tapiero explained, is that speculative money is no longer flowing just into crypto. It’s being pulled into AI, robotics, silver, gold, and crypto-related public equities all at once.

Venture Tokens Down 90%, Then Another 90%

The worst damage has been outside Bitcoin. Tapiero said most venture-backed tokens have been wiped out, and the bleeding hasn’t stopped.

“All of the venture tokens, they’re all down 90 plus percent. And they found ways to go down 90% after being down 90%,” he said.

But it’s not just weak projects failing.

Even tokens tied to real businesses with strong revenue are falling because there’s no clear way for that revenue to flow back to token holders. Until that problem is solved, Tapiero said, the capital flight from altcoins will continue.

Institutions Now Drive the Market

Over 100 companies now hold BTC or ETH. Around 5-10% of total supply sits with institutional players, a major shift from prior cycles.

But Tapiero noted that institutional investors also demand more. They want clarity on governance, token economics, and value. And when they sell, they sell fast. The same ETF inflows that lifted Bitcoin through 2025 are now working in reverse.

Also Read: Grayscale Names Top Crypto Recovery Picks After 50% Bitcoin Crash: ETH, SOL, LINK & More

Stablecoins Hit $33 Trillion in Volume

While prices dropped, stablecoins processed $33 trillion in volume in 2025. Tapiero pointed out that 99% are dollar-denominated, with over half on Ethereum.

Non-dollar stablecoins barely exist yet, which he sees as a major growth opportunity ahead.

No Quick Recovery Expected

Tapiero’s base case is not a sharp bounce. He expects months of sideways price action with no clear catalyst.

“If you approach this space with any sort of shorter term view, you’re dead,” he said.

He believes the low may already be in, but the kind of clear capitulation signal seen during FTX in 2022 hasn’t shown up yet in this cycle.

The post Russia Processes $650M in Crypto Daily as New Regulations Advance appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Russia’s Ministry of Finance estimates that the country’s cryptocurrency market processes around 50 billion rubles per day, roughly $650 million. Every year, that exceeds 10 trillion rubles, or about $130.5 billion.

Deputy Finance Minister Ivan Chebeskov shared this data during the Alfa Talk conference. He said most of this crypto trading happens outside government regulation, which raises concerns for authorities.

Chebeskov warned that unregulated crypto activity poses financial risks and prevents the government from collecting potential tax revenue.

Government Pushes for Crypto Rules

The Russian government and the Bank of Russia are working to pass a crypto regulation bill during the State Duma’s spring session.

Vladimir Chistyukhin, First Deputy Chairman of the Central Bank, confirmed that officials want to approve the bill soon. The new law would allow licensed financial institutions to offer crypto services legally.

Under the proposal, existing exchanges and brokerage firms could provide spot crypto trading, not just derivatives.

The Moscow Exchange (MOEX), which already offers futures contracts for Bitcoin and Ether, plans to expand into futures for Solana, XRP, and TRON. It may also enter the spot crypto market once regulations are in place.

Both qualified and retail investors would be allowed to participate, though retail investors may face limits. Crypto exchange offices would need special licenses, and authorities plan to penalize unlicensed operators.

Russian Capital Moving to Foreign Exchanges

The Bank of Russia reported that Russian users held about 933 billion rubles (around $11.9 billion) on foreign crypto exchanges as of mid-2025. These platforms are not regulated in Russia.

Sergey Shvetsov, Chairman of the Moscow Exchange’s Supervisory Board, said Russian investors pay about $15 billion each year in trading commissions to global crypto exchanges. He added that global crypto platforms generate around $50 billion annually in commissions, with Russian traders accounting for a large share.

Russia Leads Europe in Crypto Activity

Blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis ranks Russia as the largest crypto market in Europe. Between July 2024 and June 2025, Russia received about $376.3 billion in crypto inflows, surpassing the United Kingdom and other European countries.

With such large volumes, Russian authorities want to bring crypto trading under domestic control, increase tax collection, and reduce reliance on unregulated platforms.

The post OKX Secures EU Approval to Grow Crypto Payments appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

OKX has secured a Payment Institution license from Malta’s financial regulator, giving it full regulatory approval to offer stablecoin payment services across the European Union under the bloc’s Markets in Crypto‑Assets (MiCA) and Payment Services Directive (PSD2) frameworks. This license lets OKX expand OKX Pay and the OKX Card, supporting stablecoins like USDC and USDG in compliant transactions throughout the EU. The move strengthens OKX’s regulated presence ahead of tighter European crypto rules taking effect in 2026 and positions the exchange to bring stablecoins into everyday payments and card spending.

The post Bittensor (TAO) Price Spikes on Upbit Listing, Then Stalls: Breakout or Just Repricing appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

While the broader crypto market remained under pressure, Bittensor (TAO) initially came into the spotlight today. Following the listing announcement by South Korea’s largest exchange, Upbit, TAO price rallied toward $207 and briefly made it one of the strongest performers among major assets. However, the strength proved temporary. Within hours of tapping the psychological $200 region, price rotated lower and settled near $190, suggesting the move was driven more by positioning around the announcement than by sustained spot demand. The reaction raises a familiar question for traders: was this adoption, or simply liquidity redistribution?

Upbit Opens Korean Markets for Bittensor (TAO)

South Korea’s largest exchange, Upbit, confirmed the listing of Bittensor trading scheduled for February 16 at 16:00 KST, introducing three spot pairs – KRW, BTC, and USDT. Deposits and withdrawals were enabled shortly after the notice, but only through the native Bittensor network, with EVM transfers explicitly unsupported to avoid cross-chain routing errors.

South Korea's largest cryptocurrency exchange Upbit will list TAO trading pairs with KRW, BTC, and USDT. Bittensor is a peer-to-peer artificial intelligence network and an open market for distributed intelligence. https://t.co/QvC5XBxENI

— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) February 16, 2026

At launch, the exchange implemented temporary protection measures typical for new listings, briefly limiting aggressive order execution during the first minutes of trading while liquidity formed. The mechanism allowed order books to stabilize before full market participation opened. The listing significantly expanded regional accessibility, particularly to Korea’s high-volume retail market, which quickly triggered a repricing move across global exchanges as arbitrage traders aligned premiums between markets.

TAO Price Rally Sweeps Liquidity Above $200

Amid the listing confirmation, TAO price reacted sharply as buyers rushed into the new Korean market access narrative, pushing price sharply toward the $200-$210 region within a few minutes. The move looked impulsive at first glance, but follow-through never developed. Instead of continuation, the rally stalled right after sweeping the round-number liquidity resting above $200, a level that had repeatedly acted as a magnet for stop orders.

Once those stops were cleared, momentum faded quickly. Price rotated back below $200 and slipped toward the mid-$190s, showing that the spike functioned more as a liquidity grab than the start of a trend expansion. Bittensor token price chart still reflects a lack of direction. The rejection formed another lower high relative to the prior swing, keeping the short-term bias neutral-to-bearish despite the news catalyst. Immediate support now sits near $182–$185, where recent demand previously appeared, while sustained acceptance above $205 is required to convert the listing reaction into a real breakout rather than a temporary volatility event.

Final Thoughts

The market now sits between two clear zones, resistance near $200–210 and support developing around $180–185. After a liquidity sweep, assets typically consolidate while participants determine fair value under the new liquidity conditions. Holding above the mid-$180s would suggest the listing created genuine demand absorption, potentially allowing another attempt at reclaiming $200. Failure to maintain that region, however, could turn the listing spike into a distribution top and extend the corrective structure.

The post Ripple News: SBI CEO Denies $10B XRP Holdings Claim appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Ripple news: SBI Holdings CEO Yoshitaka Kitao has stepped in to correct misleading claims that the company holds $10 billion worth of XRP, clarifying that its real exposure comes from a significant equity stake in Ripple Labs.

His response comes as Ripple’s native token XRP price is trading around$1.46, and seeing a 4% weekly gain.

Ripple News: SBI CEO Rejects $10B XRP Holdings Rumor

The confusion started after an X user named Ledger Man praised Ripple-backed SBI Holdings for expanding its crypto presence in Singapore through the acquisition of Coinhako.

However, what truly grabbed attention was the claim that SBI Holdings owns $10 billion worth of XRP.

Yoshitaka Kitao responded directly to the post and corrected the numbers. He made it clear that SBI does not hold $10 billion in XRP tokens. Instead, the company owns about a 9% equity stake in Ripple Labs.

Not 10 bil. in XRP.but around 9% of Ripple Lab. So our hidden asset could bemuch bigger,

— 北尾吉孝 (@yoshitaka_kitao) February 15, 2026

This is an important difference. SBI’s exposure is not through direct XRP holdings, but through its ownership in Ripple itself. The clarification shifts the focus away from token holdings and toward the long-term SBI-Ripple partnership.

SBI’s Current Ripple Holding

Ripple has an important role in cross-border payments and decentralized finance (DeFi). As of now, the company’s valuation is close to $50 billion. This follows a $500 million funding round and its expansion into stablecoins and digital asset custody services.

As per this valuation, SBI’s 9% equity stake in Ripple gives it an estimated exposure of around $4.5 billion.

SBI Ripple Partnership Strengthens Institutional Confidence in XRP

The SBI Ripple partnership has been one of the strongest collaborations driving XRP adoption globally. SBI Holdings has actively supported Ripple’s expansion, especially across Asian markets where demand for faster cross-border payments continues to grow.

Kitao also suggested that SBI’s Ripple stake could be more valuable in the future. 

As of now, XRP price is trading around $1.49, reflecting a drop of 6% today, while showing a 4% rise in a week.

The post Metaplanet Sees Profit Surge of 1,694% from Bitcoin Holdings appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Japan‑listed Bitcoin treasury firm Metaplanet reported FY2025 revenue of ¥8.905 billion, a 738% increase year on year, with operating profit jumping 1,694% to ¥6.287 billion. Over the year, the company expanded its Bitcoin holdings from 1,762 BTC to 35,102 BTC. Despite this growth, it recorded an unrealized valuation loss of around ¥102.2 billion, highlighting both the rapid expansion and the volatility of managing a large crypto treasury.

The post Why Wallets Expand Provider Lists: UX, Liquidity Routing, Expectations appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

When wallet provider selection expands in 2026, this is not about chasing “variety.” Wallets are buying better UX, higher trust, and more resilient revenue.

Crypto Wallets Provider Expansion: Why One Provider Is No Longer Enough

A few years ago, integrating a single swap provider felt like a growth hack: quick to ship, easy to monetize, low overhead. Your users saw swaps as a bonus, not a core journey.

By 2026, that world is gone. Users are used to CEX‑level speed and reliability, but they want it inside anonymous crypto wallets. They don’t forgive slow quotes, failed swaps, or missing pairs. When your entire swap stack depends on one liquidity source, a technical glitch or a thin order book is no longer “provider trouble” — it’s a direct hit to your brand. 

As liquidity fragmented across chains, L2s, long‑tail tokens, and regional favorites, the “one pipe in, one pipe out” model started to break. One provider might be strong on majors but weak on exotics. Another might handle one chain well and consistently underperform on another. Every time that weakness surfaces, your user just sees one thing: “my wallet failed.”

This is not just about “can you have multiple crypto wallets”, but the moment you realize that multi‑provider architecture is a risk‑management tool.

User Expectations and the UX Pressure

Your users don’t care how many providers you integrate. They care that swaps:

Quote instantly

Don’t force KYC mid‑flow

Succeed almost every time

Instant quotes are the new baseline. If your quote spinner hangs or errors out, users assume “wallet is broken” — even if the problem is three layers down in your routing stack.

When users buy crypto, a KYC in the middle is non‑negotiable for non‑custodial products. A surprise “create an account” step inside a swap flow undercuts your core promise: “you own your keys, you control the experience.”

Success rate is the invisible killer. One bad swap is annoying. A pattern of failed trades trains users to route around your wallet for any serious move. In practice, that looks like:

Users jumping to a DEX front‑end “just in case”

More support tickets (“my swap failed, where is my money?”)

Erosion of trust in every other feature you ship

External DEX hand‑offs make this worse. Sending users out of your app to complete a swap feels like a UX downgrade in 2026. They have to:

Switch context and UI

Approve new contracts and permissions

Handle chains, gas, and slippage themselves

You lose control over the journey, but you still own the blame when it goes wrong.

Multi‑provider routing directly reduces this friction. When you can fail over between providers, choose the best route per pair and chain, and avoid known weak spots, you make “swap just works” the default, not the exception.

Liquidity Routing

One‑provider integrations are easy to start with and hard to scale. They typically come with:

Limited liquidity on long‑tail assets

Gaps on specific networks

Higher failure rates when markets move fast

We will pass on the “how multi-chain liquidity routing works” question and move on to the notion that multi‑provider routing fixes the issues above by design. And this is what you need to ask:

Which providers cover which chains and assets best?

How do we route orders between them to maximize success rate?

How do we hide that complexity from the user?

A lot of serious non‑custodial wallets now build their own swap aggregators. They connect to multiple DEX aggregators, CEX liquidity, and instant swap services, then orchestrate which one gets each trade.

SafePal is a good illustration of this shift. They don’t just plug into one API and call it a day. They run a swap meta‑aggregator across 200+ blockchains and multiple providers, including 1inch, and let the routing logic pick the best path under the hood. For the user, it’s just “SafePal swap.” For the product team, it’s an execution layer they can tune, observe, and extend.

When you treat providers as infrastructure, not widgets, you can:

Hedge provider‑specific outages with automatic failover

Combine sources to get depth on rare pairs

Segment routes: one provider for majors, another for illiquid long tail, another for specific L2s

That makes multi‑provider setups less of a “nice feature” and more of a core stability strategy.

How Crypto Wallets Pick Providers in 2026

If you’re still choosing swap partners on revshare alone, you’re playing an old game. Product teams in 2026 run a very different checklist.

The questions sound like this:

ReliabilityWhat’s the real‑world success rate per asset, per chain, per market condition? How often do we see stuck or reverted swaps?

UX ownershipCan we fully own the UI and copy, or are we locked into someone else’s flows and branding? Can we hide complexity and keep everything “in‑wallet”?

Support loadHow many tickets per 1 000 swaps does this provider generate? How fast do they help resolve edge cases and disputes?

Post‑swap experienceAre funds delivered consistently to the correct chain and address? How predictable are settlement times? What happens when things go wrong?

BD and Partnerships still care about economics, but Product will kill any deal that wrecks UX or creates a support nightmare.

SafePal’s meta‑aggregator approach shows where this is heading: providers are evaluated as plug‑in components to a routing system, not as “the one front‑end partner.” They’re interchangeable infrastructure pieces with measurable performance, not shiny logos to put on your landing page.

Wallet Provider Selection in a Multi‑Provider Stack

Once you move to a multi‑provider mindset, you don’t ask “who is our provider?” You ask “who are the right components for our routing matrix?”

SimpleSwap often appears in these conversations as a non‑custodial, registration‑free provider with coverage of roughly 1,500 crypto assets, which helps plug a clear gap in the matrix: it extends asset coverage and keeps the “send → receive” story straightforward for users and support teams. That combination is especially useful when you need long‑tail coverage beyond the usual majors and want your flows to stay easy to explain when something goes wrong.

From a wallet perspective, that makes SimpleSwap less of a “we plugged in a new feature” story and more of “we added a routing option that aligns with our non‑custodial UX and expands what pairs can actually succeed.”

Monetization and Retention in a Multi‑Provider World

Here’s what changes when you expand your provider list: your success rate goes up, and everything built on top of swaps gets healthier.

Higher success rate means:

Fewer frustrated users abandoning mid‑flow

More completed swaps per active user

More predictable swap revenue over time

That feeds directly into:

DAU/MAUUsers come back when they know they can reliably rebalance or move into stables without a fight.

Session depthA completed swap often leads to follow‑on actions: transfers, staking, on‑chain participation.

LTVThe more often users trust you to execute, the more value you capture over their lifetime.

Multi‑provider routing is a big part of keeping that success rate high across market conditions. If one venue is overloaded or mispricing, you shift volume away. If one source is weak on a local token or regional chain, you route around it.

As teams get better at reading those metrics, short‑term fee maximization stops being the goal. You’re not trying to extract the largest cut from each trade; you’re trying to maintain a high‑trust loop where:

Fees feel fair and transparent

Execution feels boringly reliable

Users don’t even think about leaving your wallet to “get a better deal”

That’s how swaps turn into a steady, compounding revenue line instead of a spiky, campaign‑driven one.

Trust, Non‑Custodial UX, and Invisible Infrastructure

By 2026, users have strong opinions about KYC and custody. They’ve seen enough blocked withdrawals, frozen accounts, and geo‑restricted features to be wary.

What they want from a non‑custodial wallet is simple:

No surprise sign‑ups mid‑flow

No hidden custody risk behind a “swap” button

Clear, honest communication when something goes wrong

Multi‑provider setups help here too — but only if you choose partners that respect those expectations.

Non‑custodial, registration‑free providers give you flows where:

Users start and finish a swap without creating an external account.

Assets land straight in the wallet they already use.

You don’t have to explain why KYC suddenly appeared in the middle of a “trustless” experience.

SimpleSwap’s positioning — non‑custodial, no signup required for most swaps, direct delivery to a user’s address — fits squarely into this category. That’s why product teams often look at it not as “another exchange,” but as an infrastructure component that keeps their non‑custodial story consistent.

In 2026, the winners are building invisible infrastructure. Users don’t want to think about routing, aggregators, or provider lists. They want to tap swap, see a clear quote, confirm, and get their assets. If everything behind that feels invisible and trustworthy, you’ve done your job.

Trust becomes measurable:

Swap‑related incident rate

Time‑to‑resolution on disputes

How often users complain about “lost” or delayed swaps

Whether users keep escalating issues, or accept your explanations

Multi‑provider routing, plus careful provider selection, is how you keep those numbers moving in the right direction.

Regional and Product Signals

You see the clearest evidence of this shift in LATAM and APAC. In these regions, crypto is not just a speculative play but a tool for remittances, everyday payments, and hedging against inflation.

Mobile‑first wallets dominate there. Users open a wallet app expecting:

To see their balances

To move value in and out quickly

To swap into whatever asset solves their immediate problem

Swap is often the entry point: the first “advanced” thing a new user does. Multi‑provider stacks accelerate adoption because they dramatically reduce the chance of the first swap failing. If someone’s first swap in your app fails, they may never try again.

After 2026: Multi‑Provider as the Baseline

Multi‑provider architectures are on track to become the default, not the differentiator. In a couple of years, “we have multiple providers” on its own won’t impress anyone. They’ll assume you do.

What will matter is how you use that stack:

How deep the smart liquidity routing is

How intent‑aware your flows become

How little friction the user feels despite all the complexity under the hood

You’ll see more:

Deeper routingMulti‑hop, cross‑chain paths that factor in liquidity, fees, volatility, and risk, but present a single, understandable quote.

Intent‑based swapsUsers express goals (“get me into stables,” “rotate into this ecosystem,” “reduce exposure to that token”) and your routing engine maps that to the right providers and paths.

Frictionless failure handlingBetter pre‑checks, clearer error states, smarter retries, and safer defaults so that even when something breaks, the user feels informed and in control.

At that point, having a provider list is just plumbing. You don’t win by saying “we support swaps.” You win by how you execute every swap:

How often it works on the first try

How fast and clear it feels

How well it respects your non‑custodial promises

That’s the reference point product teams will use in roadmap meetings: not “do we have a swap?” but “how does our execution stack, our routing strategy, and our provider mix support the user’s trust and our long‑term LTV?”

The post Willy Woo: Bitcoin vs Gold 12-Year Trend Broken, Quantum Risk to Blame appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Bitcoin should be crushing gold right now, but it’s not. And according to on-chain analyst Willy Woo, the reason comes down to one word: quantum.

Woo posted a thread on X today alongside a chart tracking how BTC has performed against gold since 2010. For 12 straight years, Bitcoin steadily gained ground on gold in a clear upward trend. That trend just broke.

Woo marks two moments on the chart where things shifted – the first time quantum risk was brought up on Bitcoin’s core developer mailing list, and the Quantum Bitcoin Summit.

“BTC should be valued a LOT HIGHER relative to gold. Should be. IT’S NOT,” Woo wrote. “The valuation trend broke down once QUANTUM came into awareness.”

4 Million Lost BTC Could Come Back Into Play

Here’s where it gets uncomfortable. Quantum computers, once powerful enough, could crack the cryptographic keys protecting around 4 million Bitcoin sitting in lost wallets – coins that nobody currently has access to.

Woo put that number in context. Since MicroStrategy kicked off its buying spree in 2020, every company and spot ETF combined has only scooped up 2.8 million BTC total. So 4 million lost coins is bigger than 8 years of corporate accumulation.

He gives just a 25% chance that the Bitcoin network would hard fork to freeze those coins before they’re recovered.

“The market has started pricing in the return of these lost coins ahead of time,” Woo said.

He estimates Q-Day – the point when quantum computers become a real threat – is still 5 to 15 years out. But markets don’t wait for the event and price it in early.

Also Read: Is Bitcoin Safe From Quantum Computing? CoinShares Data Says Yes For Now

Gold Keeps Climbing, but What About Bitcoin?

The timing makes it worse. Woo argues we’re at the tail end of a long-term debt cycle, exactly the kind of environment where big money and sovereign nations pile into hard assets.

“It’s the end of the long term debt cycle, it’s where macro investors and sovereigns run to hard assets like gold,” Woo said. “Hence gold moons without BTC.”

Not Everyone Agrees

Crypto investor Jean Michel Libera fired back, calling Woo’s argument a mix-up between technical fears and actual market forces. He argued the BTC/Gold gap is just normal consolidation after hitting resistance, driven by liquidity cycles and not quantum panic.

Woo pointed to satoshi-era whales offloading Bitcoin over the last 12 months as proof that the capital flows tell a different story than simple consolidation.

The post Pi Network Price Slides Post Mainnet Event: Where PI Price Goes Now? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Pi Network price today trading under pressure as the broader crypto market cooled and traders reduced exposure across speculative assets. The token had rallied ahead of its long-awaited mainnet milestone, but instead of continuation, price reversed sharply once the mainnet event went live. The reaction immediately changed market tone, momentum disappeared and supply surfaced quickly.

The move suggests the market was trading expectations earlier, not the outcome itself. Now attention turns to a more important question: did the mainnet strengthen fundamentals, or simply provide exit liquidity for early positioning?

Mainnet Event: Expectations Vs Market Reality

The mainnet event was expected to expand real network utility. Migration of users to the open network, wallet usability, and broader transaction capability were meant to increase circulating activity and support valuation through real participation rather than speculation. However, the immediate market reaction showed a mismatch between expectation and execution timing. Participants anticipated instant ecosystem expansion, more transfers, visible economic activity, and aggressive demand once accessibility improved. 

Instead, adoption appeared gradual. However, liquidity did not surge immediately and trading interest did not accelerate fast enough to absorb pre-event positioning. As Pi network price had already climbed before the event, the absence of immediate demand created a supply imbalance. Traders who accumulated during anticipation began closing positions into strength, triggering a classic sell-the-news rotation. The decline was therefore not caused by negative development, but by expectations arriving earlier than utility. In short, the event confirmed the network transition, but the market wanted instant economic activity, and when that did not materialize instantly, positioning unwound.

PI Network Price Faces Rejection Near $0.20 Resistance

Following the mainnet event, Pi token price reverses from the $0.20 hurdle, and it now acts as a confirmed resistance level. The token tested it during peak optimism and failed to hold above it, leading to a rapid downside move of roughly 10% today. Such sharp rejection typically marks distribution rather than random volatility. The token approaches a psychological level with breakout anticipation but cannot maintain acceptance above it, sellers tend to dominate subsequent sessions.

The failure to build structure above resistance shifts short-term control to supply. Buyers must now prove demand exists at lower levels around $0.1600-$0.1700 before attempting another rise. After the drop, Pi Network price began stabilizing beneath the breakout zone. This behavior resembles a post-event reset rather than trend collapse. The current structure indicates traders are waiting for organic demand rather than reacting emotionally. If accumulation develops, the rejection could form a base. If not, PI token may remain range-bound until participation expands. If PI price regains traction and closes above $0.20, then the bullish structure remains intact and a rally toward $0.2500 could be seen in the near term.

The post Bitcoin Price Prediction: Is BTC Near a Bottom or Heading Toward $50K? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Bitcoin has fallen more than 50% from its recent cycle high, and market sentiment remains cautious. Several analysts believe BTC is still in a broader downtrend, while others see early signs of a possible bottom formation.

Below is a clear breakdown of what analysts are saying, how low Bitcoin could go, and what signals matter most right now.

Why Is Bitcoin Still Under Pressure?

Bitcoin continues to face selling pressure for several reasons:

Repeated monthly drops of more than 20%, which are common in bear markets

Weak price momentum since mid-2025

Long-term holders are reducing exposure

Defensive positioning in the options market

Heavy overhead supply from investors waiting to break even

Data from Glassnode shows that since Bitcoin lost the $82,000 level, traders have focused more on protection rather than betting on price gains. At the same time, CryptoQuant’s Bull Score Index is at zero, reflecting extremely bearish conditions.

Nearly 9.31 million BTC — about 46% of the circulating supply — is currently held at prices above today’s level. Many of these investors may sell once Bitcoin rebounds to their entry price, creating strong resistance.

How and When Could Bitcoin Form a Bottom?

Historically, Bitcoin does not form bottoms quickly. Bear markets often include:

Short-term relief rallies

Sharp pullbacks

Months of sideways consolidation

Analysts suggest that a sustainable bottom requires time. Coins need to move from short-term traders to long-term investors. This gradual shift usually happens through repeated support tests and price stabilization.

Currently, many short-term holders are sitting on losses. This increases the risk of volatility before a final bottom is confirmed.

Are There Signs of a Relief Rally?

Some analysts believe early bottom signals are appearing. Key factors include:

Extreme fear across the market

Negative headlines dominate sentiment

Oversold RSI levels on Bitcoin and Ethereum

Rising global liquidity from Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury actions

Historically, similar conditions have triggered short-term relief rallies. However, relief rallies do not always mean the bear market is over.

How Low Could Bitcoin Go?

One key level to watch is Bitcoin’s Realized Price, currently near $54,900.

In previous bear markets, Bitcoin has dropped 20% to 30% below its realized price before forming a final bottom. If this pattern repeats, BTC could temporarily fall toward the low-$50,000 range.

Further downside risk remains if:

Market leverage stays elevated

ETF outflows continue

Network activity remains weak

A sharp decline toward $50,000 followed by strong panic selling could signal a final capitulation phase.

Is Bitcoin Near the Bottom?

Bitcoin appears to be in a transition phase. Structural weaknesses remain, but conditions are building for a short-term rebound.

The true bottom may not depend on a single price level. Instead, it will likely form over time through consolidation, reduced selling pressure, and gradual absorption of supply.

For now, the key levels to watch are $54,900 and the $50,000 support zone.

The post Hyperliquid (HYPE) Price Eyes 10% Pullback—Is a Short Squeeze Set Up in Play? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Hyperliquid (HYPE) has drawn strong market attention in recent days, but the price action tells a more cautious story. Despite rising interest, HYPE continues to trade in a steeply descending trend, losing more than 25% since the start of the month. The token now appears vulnerable to another 10% pullback in the near term as it approaches a critical support zone.

This phase could prove decisive for the broader HYPE price outlook. If sellers maintain control, the ongoing downtrend may accelerate. However, the bearish pressure could quickly fade if bulls step in with conviction. A sustained move back above the $30 level before the week closes would signal renewed strength and potentially invalidate the short-term bearish structure. Until then, HYPE remains at a key technical crossroads.

So what’s next? Will the HYPE price break above $35 and reach $40 or drop below $25?

As reflected on the daily chart, the HYPE price recently broke out of a falling wedge and rallied toward the local resistance near $35. However, repeated failures to secure a close above this zone triggered visible exhaustion, leading to a sharp rejection. Momentum has started to fade, with RSI slipping into a descending parallel channel, signaling weakening bullish control. This setup raises the risk of a move toward the local support band between $27 and $28, with a deeper test near $25 if selling pressure persists. 

Notably, the decline appears driven more by waning bullish participation than aggressive selling, as volumes have steadily dried up. This lack of conviction suggests the current move is corrective rather than a full trend reversal. If HYPE holds the support zone and volume revives, a rebound remains possible, potentially setting the stage for another attempt toward the higher resistance range.

The post XRP Price Prediction: Tokentus Investment Head Sees XRP Reaching $9 Soon appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

XRP, the fourth-largest cryptocurrency in the world, is back in focus after a bold XRP price prediction from Michel Oliver, head of Tokentus Investment AG. He said XRP could reach between $7 and $9 in the next bull market. 

This comes as the XRP price shows solid recovery and growing institutional interest, despite recent price pressure.

Michel Oliver XRP Price Prediction $9

Speaking in a recent interview on the German financial media platform Der Aktionär TV, Michel Oliver said XRP could climb as high as $9 in the next major crypto bull cycle.

One of the main reasons behind the Michel Oliver XRP price prediction is the steady growth in XRP institutional adoption. Also growing partnerships with banks, fintech companies, and payment providers across Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.

Many institutions are using XRP and Ripple’s technology to improve cross-border payments by reducing transaction time and costs. He also pointed out that improving regulatory clarity in several regions has helped improve trust among large investors.

$XRP eyes $9 as it climbs back above $1.40.The quiet recovery could be the start of a major move.Don't blink. $XRP #Crypto pic.twitter.com/zvCyjNMzKs

— Benjamin Hernandez (@benjamin_hcap) February 15, 2026

Oliver believes the next bull cycle will reward projects with real-world use cases. If institutional adoption continues and payment integration expands, XRP could benefit from stronger long-term demand.

XRP Outperforming Bitcoin and Ethereum

Another key reason behind the Michel Oliver XRP price prediction is XRP’s strong recovery performance. Since the February market downturn, XRP has recovered nearly 19%, outperforming Bitcoin and Ethereum, which recovered only around 6%.On a weekly basis, XRP is up nearly 4%, while Bitcoin and Ethereum are down about 1.5% and 3.2%, respectively.

This recovery shows strong investor interest and rising XRP demand during market uncertainty. As more institutions and investors adopt XRP, the overall demand is expected to increase further.

XRP Price Prediction

As of now, the XRP price is trading around $1.46, down nearly 11% today. On the weekly chart, XRP remains in a corrective phase after completing a five-wave impulsive move to the upside.

The marked (1) to (5) structure signals the end of a full bullish cycle, with wave (5) peaking near the $3.50 region. Since that top, XRP has formed lower highs and lower lows, reflecting sustained medium-term bearish pressure.

Currently, the key support zone sits around $1.40. If buyers manage to defend this level, a relief rally toward the $2.50–$3.00 range could unfold. However, for a confirmed trend reversal, XRP must reclaim the $2.10 level with strong buying volume.

Meanwhile, the weekly RSI is hovering in the mid-30s. This indicates weak momentum but also suggests that selling pressure may be gradually slowing down.

The post Binance Denies $1B Iran Transaction Claims, Rejects Sanctions Allegations appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Crypto exchange Binance has denied claims that it processed more than $1 billion in transactions linked to Iranian entities. The company also rejected allegations that it fired employees who raised compliance concerns.

The record must be clear. No sanctions violations were found, no investigators were fired for raising concerns, and Binance continues to meet its regulatory commitments. We’ve asked for corrections to recent reporting. pic.twitter.com/glA9bdGaw1

— Richard Teng (@_RichardTeng) February 16, 2026

The accusations come from a February 13 investigative report. The report claimed Binance’s internal investigators flagged over $1 billion in transfers between March 2024 and August 2025. Most of the transactions reportedly involved Tether (USDT) on the Tron blockchain.

Report Alleges Internal Compliance Concerns

According to the report, several members of Binance’s compliance investigations team were dismissed after raising concerns internally. Some of these employees reportedly had law enforcement backgrounds.

The report also suggested that more compliance staff left the company in recent months. However, it did not clearly explain the reasons behind those departures.

Binance Responds: No Sanctions Breaches

Binance leadership has strongly denied the allegations.

Co-CEO Richard Teng said the company found no sanctions violations. He also stated that Binance did not fire investigators for raising compliance concerns.

In its official response, Binance said it conducted a detailed internal review with support from external legal counsel. The company said the review found no evidence of sanctions breaches linked to the reported transactions.

Binance added that it follows whistleblower protection laws across multiple jurisdictions. The company rejected claims that employees were punished for reporting compliance issues.

Binance’s $4.3 Billion Settlement

The controversy comes after Binance’s 2023 $4.3 billion settlement with U.S. authorities over anti-money laundering and sanctions violations.

Since that settlement, Binance has operated under tighter regulatory oversight. The company says it has improved its sanctions screening systems, transaction monitoring tools, and internal controls.

Because of this history, any new sanctions-related claims attract strong attention from regulators and investors.

Stablecoins and Regulatory Scrutiny

OFAC Sanctions Eight Houthi-Linked Crypto Addresses On April 2, 2025, OFAC sanctioned eight crypto addresses tied to a Houthi financing network backed by Iran’s IRGC-QF.All eight sanctioned addresses are on the Tron network, with most activity in USDT. Elliptic’s… pic.twitter.com/wK1HrynHIF

— Elliptic (@elliptic) April 7, 2025

The case also highlights ongoing regulatory concerns around stablecoins, especially USDT transactions on the Tron network.

In the past, blockchain analytics firms have reported that sanctioned actors used stablecoins to move funds outside traditional financial systems. U.S. authorities, including the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), have sanctioned other crypto platforms over similar issues.

No New Enforcement Action Yet

So far, no new enforcement action has been announced against Binance. At this stage, the issue remains a dispute between investigative reporting and Binance’s public denial. The situation adds to ongoing discussions about compliance, transparency, and regulation in the global crypto industry.

The post ETH Whale Wakes Up After 10 Years, Turns $443 Into $2.8M appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

A wallet that received 1,430 ETH during the 2015 Ethereum presale has become active after more than 10 years of dormancy. The tokens were originally purchased for just $443 at roughly $0.31 per ETH and are now valued at about $2.81 million at current market prices near $1,965. The holder first attempted a 1 ETH test transaction to Gemini, which initially failed due to gas settings, before successfully transferring 1,428 ETH. The move highlights both the scale of early crypto returns and the importance of careful transaction management after long inactivity.

The post Ethereum Price Recovery Stalls as On-Chain Data Turn Bearish: Sell-Side Pressure Building? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Ethereum price slipped back below the $2,000 mark as the crypto market turned defensive, with major assets easing after failing to sustain their recent recovery attempts. The drop unfolded gradually rather than through panic selling bids kept thinning across the session until $2,000 support finally gave way, pushing ETH price down close to 5% intraday.

Beneath the surface, the weakness had already been forming. Spot demand stalled near resistance, large holders began shifting coins toward exchanges, and derivatives positioning slowly tilted bearish. By the time Ethereum price broke support, the move reflected positioning more than surprise, the market had already prepared for it.

Large Holder Deposit Raises Sell-Side Liquidity

On-chain data shows Garrett Jin moved roughly 261,024 ETH ($545M) to Binance, a type of transfer traders typically monitor because exchange deposits increase available supply. Such flows do not always mean immediate selling, but they frequently precede hedging or distribution. The timing is notable, the transfer appeared as ETH struggled to hold the $2,100–$2,200 region, and shortly after, bids weakened across spot markets.

BREAKING:OG WHALE, GARRETT JIN, DUMPING HIS CRYPTO AHEAD OF TRUMP’S SPEECH TODAYHE JUST DUMPED $350 MILLION WORTH OF $BTC AND $545 MILLION WORTH OF $ETHWHAT IS GOING ON?? https://t.co/gvDAdDroAT pic.twitter.com/LuCaraXqLk

— ardizor (@ardizor) February 15, 2026

Following the deposit, ETH price didn’t drop sharply, yet upside follow-through disappeared and each recovery attempt stalled-near $2100. This is typical distribution behaviour, price weakens from anticipation, not execution.

On-Chain Metrics Show Cooling Demand and Active Selling

On-chain metrics activity also reflects a slowdown in conviction rather than panic. Binance data shows daily volume near 486K ETH, while the 30-day volume Z-score sits around −0.39. Negative readings indicate trading activity is below its monthly average. 

Historically, this condition appears during consolidation or redistribution phases rather than trend expansion. In practical terms, fewer aggressive buyers are stepping in to defend support levels. Instead of capitulation, ETH is drifting lower as participation fades often a precursor to larger directional moves once liquidity concentrates. 

The taker buy/sell ratio has dropped to 0.97, its lowest level in months. Values below 1.0 mean market sell orders dominate market buys, showing sellers are actively hitting bids rather than passively waiting. This matters because derivatives traders typically lead short-term momentum. Readings below equilibrium usually accompany hedging or short positioning, which suppresses upside attempts and increases volatility during breakdowns.

Ethereum Price Structure Shows Post-Breakdown Consolidation: What’s Next?

Ethereum price structure showcasing sideways movement in the past few sessions. After losing its prior range support zone of $2500, ETH price did not accelerate downward, instead it transitioned into a tight sideways band below the $2,000 mark. The previous support area around $2,020–$2,080 has clearly flipped into supply. Each recovery attempt pushes into that zone and stalls quickly, showing trapped longs are exiting while short-term traders fade strength. Acceptance below a reclaimed level matters more than the break itself, and ETH has now spent several sessions trading underneath it confirming the market recognizes lower value.

ETH’s short-term moving averages are compressing above price and acting as dynamic resistance, keeping rebounds shallow. Meanwhile, volatility has contracted, signaling equilibrium formation rather than trend continuation. As long as ETH price remains capped under the former range, the structure favors continuation pressure. A decisive close back above $2,080 would invalidate the breakdown and shift momentum neutral-to-bullish. On the other hand, a break below the $1800 support mark may push ETH toward $1500 in the next sessions.