ObaAgon

I only post on Binance Square, X, and the TG group. All other platforms charge under false pretenses, please be cautious!
Please recognize my account name ObaAgon, there are too many impersonators!
—————————————————————
Explanation:
Bullish: 'Define high point'. Bullish directional energy. Bullish main behavior dynamics;
Bearish: 'Define low point'. Bearish directional energy. Bearish main behavior dynamics;
Starting with the defined high point. Bullish directional dynamics, dynamics will have time dynamics, regardless of how bullish actions are made. Ultimately, it is for defining the high point.
So if the bulls do not enter at the highest point, how can it be called a high point?
—————————————————————
'Event-driven, event occurrence rate is only 30%'
For example, event bulls: Event bulls have event news, most people do not know that news events are going to happen, so before the event detonates, there will only be a short squeeze, and when the event occurs, there will be a direct spike. Event bulls only represent events, not bullish actions; simply stating event bulls means only events without bullish actions, which leads to only bearish actions.
During the short squeeze process before the event occurs, if the event does not happen, the price may have already been declining throughout this process.
—————————————————————
'A high point' does not represent a high price.
'A low point' does not represent a low price.
In terms of low points, the text is different from low prices.
For example: low price low point, high price low point. Price and point are different things.
—————————————————————
'Build high point' 'Build low point'
Bearish builders establishing low points is a dynamic process. Only the bearish can achieve the lowest point price; ordinary people do not have the capability to absorb large liquidity orders. Therefore, the establishment of a low point occurs after the bearish start placing orders; during this order placement period, a price low point will be produced. Before the bearish leaves, a low point will appear before moving to a high point. As time passes and comes to an end, the K-line price will show a V shape, moving from the top of V to the bottom of V and back to the tail of V, producing a process called building a low point.

#BTC

BTC started mentioning the need to build a high point from the article on the 28th, and the establishment of that high point was concluded with the event in the early hours of the 29th.

Now we can see that the highest point was at one o'clock in the early hours of the 29th, and it has been declining since then.

In the future, the main force will announce its plans in advance, please refer to the self-introduction explanation above.
$BTC
#crypto

Brothers of pi, this wallet address has 850,000 pi left.
Then there are 19,000,000 pi in spot sell orders.

Is it necessary to notify the piscan source for correction?
#pi
#pinetwork

Wow, is this news true or false?
Is there any big scoop to eat?

Is this related to their pi quantity situation?

Will anything happen?
Are there any big shots who have any insider information to verify, only 10u left, can't be eaten anymore.
#pinetwork
#pi

※Breaking※
January 28
Everyone, please pay attention, the annualized rate for USDT staking on Binance has skyrocketed to APY 20%.

Is something big about to happen?
$BTC

Dear Pi enthusiasts,
Today, January 27, I observed a somewhat curious phenomenon and would like to ask for your opinions.

On a certain platform, the total depth of Pi's spot sell orders appears to be about 18 million Pi (there are a lot of sell orders), but some tracking tools or pages related to piscan show that the balance of a public wallet address on one platform (like GALAY...PX EQU) is only around 1.92 million Pi.

This confuses me a bit:
Is this 1.92 million part of a hot wallet from a certain entity? Or is it just a single address, not the total holding of the entire entity?

Why can the sell order depth be much greater than this number? Is it accumulated from many users placing scattered orders? Or does the system have some special display mechanism?

Do normal spot sell orders require the account to have enough Pi to place them? It's not possible to just rely on 'inputting numbers' to place unlimited sell orders, right?

Thinking further:
If many people together buy Pi from that platform, transfer it to other exchanges to sell, then transfer back to buy, and withdraw again... continuously moving bricks to deplete Pi, what would happen?

Would withdrawals be directly suspended?
Or would liquidity be supplemented from other sources (for example, buying back)?
Or would the price ultimately find a new balance by itself?
Are there any similar precedents to reference?

I know the responsibility of exchanges is mainly to 'make sure user balances can be withdrawn when requested', but if liquidity is really drained, how would it be handled in practice?

Purely curious discussion, no FUD intended~
Can someone knowledgeable in this area clarify? Thank you!
#pi
#pinetwork

Brothers, stop thinking that you are very good at trading contracts. Clawdbot can also lose a million when trading coins; maybe if you find Zhou Gong, you might have a chance to win against AI. $BTC

The United States Senate Committee on Agriculture was originally scheduled to vote on the cryptocurrency market structure bill at "3:00 PM Eastern Time on January 27th."
UTC+8 time is around 4:00 AM on January 27th.

"However, the bill's discussion and voting have been postponed due to a winter storm."

The latest official announcement from the United States Senate Committee on Agriculture shows it has been rescheduled to January 29, 2026, at 10:30 AM (Eastern Time)
UTC+8 time is 11:30 PM on January 29th.

This seems like a very important vote and should be closely monitored!
$BTC

The fact that the Pi exchange has 18 million Pi listed for sale, while the exchange only holds 3.3 million, was presented to AI, and the result was:

This may be because the exchange is suspected of manipulating the price of Pi by placing a large number of false or inadequately backed sell orders (sell wall) to create selling pressure, driving down the market price, causing retail investors to panic and sell, allowing the exchange or related parties to accumulate more Pi at a lower price. However, in reality, the on-chain wallet balance of the exchange (as shown by the Stellar address balance on CMC) is far lower than the total amount of these sell orders, as the liquidity of Pi completely relies on user deposits (Pioneers migrating and depositing), and the Pi Core Team has never provided additional liquidity to the exchange.
#pi

I want to ask the PI big shots a question:
The total holding of PI in a certain exchange is only 3.3 million pi (as shown in the attached picture). May I ask, why does the total amount of PI sell orders on this exchange reach 18 million pi?

There are only 3.3 million pi left. If everyone buys it all and transfers to other exchanges, will there still be 18 million sell orders left?
#pi

Some analysts say that the upgrade to Steller V25 will lead to an increase in liquidity, which will create selling pressure. I would like to share my views:

My view is that the upgrade to V25 cannot support the claim of increasing liquidity by 134 million, because regardless of whether there is an upgrade, the monthly migration is the same and does not involve more migration, but rather less, as can be seen in the attached data.

Moreover, the assertion that using the upgrade V25 will increase market liquidity is fundamentally a claim to deliberately pressure prices.
The question is, can this liquidity be freely mapped out by PCT? Obviously not.

There still needs to be daily user migration, rather than a one-time massive supply of 134 million, which is simply not the case.

Also, note that the total amount of coins held on exchanges has significantly decreased, reducing by tens of millions of Pi.

Furthermore, the total amount of coins held by a certain exchange has already dropped to over three million.
#pi
#pinetwork

When investors trade stocks or cryptocurrencies, one of the most common things they do is keep urging people to buy, buy, buy, buy, buy, buy, with nothing else but shouting to buy.

I want to ask a question, if you keep shouting for people to buy every day for a year, but the price hasn't risen and keeps falling, could this be because you think everyone isn't buying? Or is it because the market has run out of money to buy?

What to do? Should I blame myself for not having a strong dad? Or should I blame the market for lacking strength?
$BTC
#pi

Guess what, everyone? Will Musk acquire Binance?
Will he or won't he, and why? Please leave a comment and let us know.

If he wants to acquire Binance, then Binance is not a publicly traded company, and we do not use BNB market capitalization for calculations.
Moreover, BNB circulates freely like the US dollar, just like the relationship between the US government and the Federal Reserve. Acquiring the US government does not equate to acquiring the Federal Reserve of the US dollar; therefore, Musk's acquisition of Binance will not account for all cryptocurrencies, only the operations and systems.
$BNB

Previously mentioned in a post on January 9 that a notification for voting would be launched on the 22nd.

Just now, on the 22nd, the voting link has been launched, but due to excessive traffic, it has crashed, and PCT is quickly making repairs. The voting time will last until the 29th.

The voting content includes the v23 protocol, supernodes, open mainnet schedule, PiDEX/AMM, etc., so there are 7 days.

Therefore, as an investor, regardless of whether the news is true or false, it does not mean that one's judgment of false is correct.

In fact, telling others that it is false is itself false. Because one cannot verify that it is false. Now that it is seen as true, however, if one believes it is false and this is a big market trend, then one has already missed out. This prophecy has happened again.
#pi

This time in a certain exchange lottery, I drew a free BTC airdrop margin position.

I remember the last time I drew a margin position, there was a subsequent massive increase...

Does this time hint at something?
$BTC

Most technical indicator users do not realize that so-called technical indicators are just a way to capture liquidity.
$BTC

Japan's Sanae Takaichi officially announced the dissolution of the House of Representatives at a press conference at 6 PM.

It seems that this is an insider short-selling action.
#BTC

The news has been found, and this is of an insider nature hype.
At 7 AM, it was announced that Takashi Sakamoto will announce the decision on whether to dissolve the House of Representatives at 6 PM Japan time, and a press conference will be held at 6 PM.

Therefore, this is just insider hype, and this may not even be the final decision; it has just been hyped up, which has caused Japan's largest BTC treasury MTP to be sold off, resulting in an 8% drop, thereby affecting liquidity and changing the BTC price.
$BTC

Pi mentioned earlier on the 18th that it would go to a low point, and now it has dropped to 0.15. However, there is a question I want to ask all the experts for their comments on what is happening.

Looking at all KYB exchanges, the three largest exchanges have seen Pi drop to 0.15.

Interestingly, there is one exchange that is often manipulated by whale borrowers; this exchange has a total holding of only nine million Pi, yet has sold off thirteen million Pi.

All other exchanges hold over ten times more, but this exchange holds the least amount while being able to sell the largest amount. Can the experts provide their insights on what is happening here?

As for all KYB exchanges, as explained earlier, the prices in all places are privately negotiated contract prices.

Therefore, we can see that only MEXC can be said to be most considerate of Pi, as it not only did not crash to 0.15 but also gradually dropped to 0.18 relying on reasonable prices.

Everyone, please click on the attached exchange prices to take a closer look. Historically, in September when there were crashes, MEXC also saw the least drop.

From the perspective of three instances of violent downward spikes in history, it must be said that MEXC takes the best care of Pi, which is why I just moved some bricks.

Which places are manipulating, and which are genuinely supporting? Experts, please provide your comments.

This is really excessive, right?
#pi

Pi mentioned on the 18th that it is going to establish an important low point.

Then today, the 19th, BTC just dropped, and Pi crashed to 0.15.
#pi