modified ai
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
6.2 Months
*🔍 Exploring Crypto | 📊 Market Insights | 📰 Latest News & Exchange Updates | 🚀 Join me for daily crypto analysis &trends 📈
53 Following
6.1K+ Followers
630 Liked
41 Shared
All
Quotes
Live
The future depends on execution: expanding scenarios, scaling nodes, and ecosystem diversification could strengthen Walrus’s pricing model.#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #WriteToEarnUpgrade #CPIWatch
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #WriteToEarnUpgrade #CPIWatch
RWA won’t succeed on chains that ignore regulation. Assets must be traceable, risks manageable, and rules enforceable. Dusk reserved structural space for this future before the market demanded it.$DUSK #dusk @Dusk
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USNonFarmPayrollReport #WriteToEarnUpgrade
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USNonFarmPayrollReport #WriteToEarnUpgrade
A Practical Observation Before the Analysis
Most Web3 applications still depend on centralized storage at some critical point. Ownership may be decentralized, and execution may be on-chain, but if data availability relies on a single server, the system’s resilience is only partial. This gap between decentralized computation and centralized storage remains one of the least resolved structural problems in Web3.
Walrus positions itself inside this gap. Rather than presenting itself as a breakthrough or a universal solution, it attempts to align storage infrastructure with real application needs—particularly within AI and real-world asset (RWA) use cases—by tightly integrating technology, ecosystem access, and business incentives.
This analysis focuses not on surface metrics or narratives, but on how those three layers interact, where the design is coherent, and where risks remain.
The Core Problem: Storage That Scales With Real Usage
Decentralized storage protocols often face a trade-off. Either they remain technically independent but struggle with adoption, or they integrate into an ecosystem at the cost of autonomy and long-term flexibility. In practice, many projects end up with strong technology but weak demand, or strong distribution but fragile infrastructure.
Walrus approaches this problem by embedding itself deeply into the Sui ecosystem while retaining control over its core storage logic. This is not a neutral choice—it accelerates adoption, but it also introduces dependency.
How Walrus Approaches the Problem
Technology aligned to ecosystem constraints
Walrus uses an off-chain storage layer paired with an on-chain coordination layer on Sui. Non-core functions such as ordering, payments, and coordination are handled by Sui’s consensus and object model, while storage itself remains external. This reduces friction for developers already building on Sui and shortens integration time significantly.
The trade-off is clear: Walrus benefits from Sui’s throughput and tooling, but inherits its congestion risks and upgrade cycles.
Independent control over core storage logic
At the storage layer, Walrus retains autonomy through its RedStuff erasure coding system. This design is optimized for specific workloads rather than maximum redundancy. For AI use cases, redundancy is reduced to lower costs and recovery time. For RWA use cases, the focus shifts toward availability guarantees and auditability.
This separation—ecosystem-dependent coordination, ecosystem-independent storage logic—is the project’s central architectural bet.
One Clear Strength
Walrus shows discipline in narrowing its focus. Instead of trying to serve all storage needs, it concentrates on AI and RWA scenarios where data persistence, compliance, and recurring usage matter. This allows pricing, redundancy models, and service design to match real operational requirements rather than abstract ideals.
As a result, storage is treated as infrastructure, not speculation. Revenue comes from usage, compliance services, and long-term data retention rather than one-off demand spikes.
One Clear Risk
The same focus creates structural concentration risk. A large share of Walrus’s activity and revenue is tied to the Sui ecosystem. Network congestion, governance changes, or competitive storage solutions within the same ecosystem could directly affect service reliability and demand.
Additionally, the current node network remains relatively small and geographically concentrated, which limits resilience and may slow global expansion if not addressed.
Business and Technology: A Feedback Loop, Not a Shortcut
Walrus reinvests a portion of operational revenue into storage optimization, compliance tooling, and cross-ecosystem research. This creates a slow but measurable feedback loop: better performance attracts more serious users, which in turn funds further iteration.
However, this is not a short cycle. Infrastructure improvements take time to reflect in adoption, and cross-ecosystem expansion is costly and uncertain. The project’s sustainability depends on whether revenue growth can consistently outpace the cost of that expansion.
The WAL token is designed to sit inside this loop—as a payment mechanism, an incentive tool, and a partial value-capture layer—but it also introduces sensitivity to market volatility. Token price movements can indirectly affect operator incentives and long-term planning.
Accepting Uncertainty
Walrus does not remove the fundamental challenges of decentralized storage. It reorganizes them. Ecosystem dependence is traded for faster adoption. Lower redundancy is traded for efficiency. Focused scenarios are traded for broader optionality.
Whether these trade-offs hold under scale, regulatory change, or ecosystem competition is not yet proven. The project is still early in its lifecycle, and many of its most important assumptions—node expansion, cross-chain deployment, enterprise-level demand—will take years to validate.
A Conditional Outlook
If Walrus succeeds in reducing ecosystem concentration, expanding its node network, and maintaining alignment between revenue and technical investment, it could evolve into a specialized but durable piece of Web3 infrastructure.
If it cannot, it may remain effective within a narrow context without breaking into broader relevance.
At this stage, Walrus is best understood not as a guaranteed outcome, but as a structured attempt to solve a real problem through measured trade-offs. Its long-term value will depend less on narrative momentum and more on how well those trade-offs age over time.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #WriteToEarnUpgrade #CPIWatch
Walrus positions itself inside this gap. Rather than presenting itself as a breakthrough or a universal solution, it attempts to align storage infrastructure with real application needs—particularly within AI and real-world asset (RWA) use cases—by tightly integrating technology, ecosystem access, and business incentives.
This analysis focuses not on surface metrics or narratives, but on how those three layers interact, where the design is coherent, and where risks remain.
The Core Problem: Storage That Scales With Real Usage
Decentralized storage protocols often face a trade-off. Either they remain technically independent but struggle with adoption, or they integrate into an ecosystem at the cost of autonomy and long-term flexibility. In practice, many projects end up with strong technology but weak demand, or strong distribution but fragile infrastructure.
Walrus approaches this problem by embedding itself deeply into the Sui ecosystem while retaining control over its core storage logic. This is not a neutral choice—it accelerates adoption, but it also introduces dependency.
How Walrus Approaches the Problem
Technology aligned to ecosystem constraints
Walrus uses an off-chain storage layer paired with an on-chain coordination layer on Sui. Non-core functions such as ordering, payments, and coordination are handled by Sui’s consensus and object model, while storage itself remains external. This reduces friction for developers already building on Sui and shortens integration time significantly.
The trade-off is clear: Walrus benefits from Sui’s throughput and tooling, but inherits its congestion risks and upgrade cycles.
Independent control over core storage logic
At the storage layer, Walrus retains autonomy through its RedStuff erasure coding system. This design is optimized for specific workloads rather than maximum redundancy. For AI use cases, redundancy is reduced to lower costs and recovery time. For RWA use cases, the focus shifts toward availability guarantees and auditability.
This separation—ecosystem-dependent coordination, ecosystem-independent storage logic—is the project’s central architectural bet.
One Clear Strength
Walrus shows discipline in narrowing its focus. Instead of trying to serve all storage needs, it concentrates on AI and RWA scenarios where data persistence, compliance, and recurring usage matter. This allows pricing, redundancy models, and service design to match real operational requirements rather than abstract ideals.
As a result, storage is treated as infrastructure, not speculation. Revenue comes from usage, compliance services, and long-term data retention rather than one-off demand spikes.
One Clear Risk
The same focus creates structural concentration risk. A large share of Walrus’s activity and revenue is tied to the Sui ecosystem. Network congestion, governance changes, or competitive storage solutions within the same ecosystem could directly affect service reliability and demand.
Additionally, the current node network remains relatively small and geographically concentrated, which limits resilience and may slow global expansion if not addressed.
Business and Technology: A Feedback Loop, Not a Shortcut
Walrus reinvests a portion of operational revenue into storage optimization, compliance tooling, and cross-ecosystem research. This creates a slow but measurable feedback loop: better performance attracts more serious users, which in turn funds further iteration.
However, this is not a short cycle. Infrastructure improvements take time to reflect in adoption, and cross-ecosystem expansion is costly and uncertain. The project’s sustainability depends on whether revenue growth can consistently outpace the cost of that expansion.
The WAL token is designed to sit inside this loop—as a payment mechanism, an incentive tool, and a partial value-capture layer—but it also introduces sensitivity to market volatility. Token price movements can indirectly affect operator incentives and long-term planning.
Accepting Uncertainty
Walrus does not remove the fundamental challenges of decentralized storage. It reorganizes them. Ecosystem dependence is traded for faster adoption. Lower redundancy is traded for efficiency. Focused scenarios are traded for broader optionality.
Whether these trade-offs hold under scale, regulatory change, or ecosystem competition is not yet proven. The project is still early in its lifecycle, and many of its most important assumptions—node expansion, cross-chain deployment, enterprise-level demand—will take years to validate.
A Conditional Outlook
If Walrus succeeds in reducing ecosystem concentration, expanding its node network, and maintaining alignment between revenue and technical investment, it could evolve into a specialized but durable piece of Web3 infrastructure.
If it cannot, it may remain effective within a narrow context without breaking into broader relevance.
At this stage, Walrus is best understood not as a guaranteed outcome, but as a structured attempt to solve a real problem through measured trade-offs. Its long-term value will depend less on narrative momentum and more on how well those trade-offs age over time.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #WriteToEarnUpgrade #CPIWatch
Finding a Middle Ground Between Privacy and Real Finance: Reflections After Dusk’s Mainnet
LaunchReal-world finance has always operated on a simple principle: confidentiality does not mean a lack of oversight, and transparency does not require public exposure. Yet in DeFi, users have long been forced to choose between privacy and participation.
That trade-off has shaped much of my own history in crypto. Early DeFi offered open access and yield, but every action was permanently visible. Privacy coins solved visibility, but introduced new risks: weak liquidity, regulatory pressure, and limited paths back into real financial markets. Institutional products existed, but with entry thresholds and structures that made them inaccessible for most participants.
Dusk approaches this problem from a different angle. Rather than maximizing anonymity, it designs for confidentiality with accountability. Its mainnet, launched in early 2026, uses encrypted transactions and zero-knowledge proofs so balances and transfers remain private by default, while correctness can still be verified. On top of this base layer, Dusk enables tokenized real-world assets through regulated issuance partners, allowing users to interact with bond-like and money-market instruments directly on-chain without exposing their financial positions publicly.
After testing the mainnet, the experience feels closer to traditional finance in function, but closer to crypto in efficiency. Transfers finalize quickly, fees are low, and RWA positions are recorded privately through encrypted smart contracts. For the first time, earning relatively stable yields on-chain does not automatically mean broadcasting portfolio size or activity.
The clear positive is alignment: privacy, compliance, and real asset exposure are designed together rather than bolted on later. The clear risk is maturity. The network is young, liquidity is still developing, and regulatory interpretations—especially around privacy-preserving infrastructure—remain uncertain. Slippage, limited pool depth, and evolving rules are real constraints today, not abstract ones.
Nothing here is guaranteed. Adoption will take time, and the system will be tested by market stress, regulation, and user behavior. For now, I’m participating gradually, observing how the ecosystem behaves under real usage rather than narratives.
If institutional RWAs continue moving on-chain and if privacy-preserving compliance proves sustainable, Dusk may become a meaningful bridge between traditional finance and DeFi. If not, it will still serve as a useful experiment in how these systems can be designed more realistically. Either way, the outcome will only be clear with time.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USNonFarmPayrollReport #WriteToEarnUpgrade
That trade-off has shaped much of my own history in crypto. Early DeFi offered open access and yield, but every action was permanently visible. Privacy coins solved visibility, but introduced new risks: weak liquidity, regulatory pressure, and limited paths back into real financial markets. Institutional products existed, but with entry thresholds and structures that made them inaccessible for most participants.
Dusk approaches this problem from a different angle. Rather than maximizing anonymity, it designs for confidentiality with accountability. Its mainnet, launched in early 2026, uses encrypted transactions and zero-knowledge proofs so balances and transfers remain private by default, while correctness can still be verified. On top of this base layer, Dusk enables tokenized real-world assets through regulated issuance partners, allowing users to interact with bond-like and money-market instruments directly on-chain without exposing their financial positions publicly.
After testing the mainnet, the experience feels closer to traditional finance in function, but closer to crypto in efficiency. Transfers finalize quickly, fees are low, and RWA positions are recorded privately through encrypted smart contracts. For the first time, earning relatively stable yields on-chain does not automatically mean broadcasting portfolio size or activity.
The clear positive is alignment: privacy, compliance, and real asset exposure are designed together rather than bolted on later. The clear risk is maturity. The network is young, liquidity is still developing, and regulatory interpretations—especially around privacy-preserving infrastructure—remain uncertain. Slippage, limited pool depth, and evolving rules are real constraints today, not abstract ones.
Nothing here is guaranteed. Adoption will take time, and the system will be tested by market stress, regulation, and user behavior. For now, I’m participating gradually, observing how the ecosystem behaves under real usage rather than narratives.
If institutional RWAs continue moving on-chain and if privacy-preserving compliance proves sustainable, Dusk may become a meaningful bridge between traditional finance and DeFi. If not, it will still serve as a useful experiment in how these systems can be designed more realistically. Either way, the outcome will only be clear with time.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USNonFarmPayrollReport #WriteToEarnUpgrade
$ICP is moving cleanly in a strong uptrend, printing higher highs with only shallow pullbacks. Buyers remain firmly in control, and price is holding its strength after a sharp push — a structure that often leads to further continuation.
Entry: 3.95 – 4.05
SL: 3.75
TPs: 4.30 → 4.60 → 5.00
Simple structure, strong momentum. Let the trend do the work.
Trade here 👇
#icp #MarketRebound #WriteToEarnUpgrade #CPIWatch #USJobsData
Entry: 3.95 – 4.05
SL: 3.75
TPs: 4.30 → 4.60 → 5.00
Simple structure, strong momentum. Let the trend do the work.
Trade here 👇
#icp #MarketRebound #WriteToEarnUpgrade #CPIWatch #USJobsData
$BLUR saw a sharp rejection after its recent spike, but the overall structure still looks promising. The price is currently at $0.03936, up 24.40%. Despite the pullback, the key moving averages remain in a bullish order.
Here’s a potential trade setup:
· Consider a LONG entry between $0.0380 – $0.0395
· Take Profit Targets:
· TP1: $0.0420
· TP2: $0.0455
· TP3: $0.0490
· Set a Stop Loss at $0.0358
The trend stays constructive as long as the price holds above the $0.038 zone. Consolidation around these levels could set the stage for another attempt to break toward the recent high near $0.044.
Trade here 👇
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USNonFarmPayrollReport #BTCVSGOLD #WriteToEarnUpgrade
Here’s a potential trade setup:
· Consider a LONG entry between $0.0380 – $0.0395
· Take Profit Targets:
· TP1: $0.0420
· TP2: $0.0455
· TP3: $0.0490
· Set a Stop Loss at $0.0358
The trend stays constructive as long as the price holds above the $0.038 zone. Consolidation around these levels could set the stage for another attempt to break toward the recent high near $0.044.
Trade here 👇
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USNonFarmPayrollReport #BTCVSGOLD #WriteToEarnUpgrade
$OPEN is moving step by step making higher lows and holding its structure.....
This kind of slow grind usually comes before a sharper move when sellers get exhausted.
Entry zone: 0.172 – 0.175
Stop loss: 0.165 (below recent support)
TP1: 0.185
TP2: 0.205
TP3: 0.235
click below and open low leverage long trade$OPEN
#open #MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USDemocraticPartyBlueVault #USJobsData
This kind of slow grind usually comes before a sharper move when sellers get exhausted.
Entry zone: 0.172 – 0.175
Stop loss: 0.165 (below recent support)
TP1: 0.185
TP2: 0.205
TP3: 0.235
click below and open low leverage long trade$OPEN
#open #MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USDemocraticPartyBlueVault #USJobsData
congratulations to all my friends that traded on my $DASH Trading post.
Trade plan executed cleanly. Entry respected, risk managed, and all take-profits hit. Consistency wins.
Enjoy your profits.
#DASH #MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USDemocraticPartyBlueVault #USJobsData
Trade plan executed cleanly. Entry respected, risk managed, and all take-profits hit. Consistency wins.
Enjoy your profits.
#DASH #MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USDemocraticPartyBlueVault #USJobsData
$DASH USDT Analysis
Trend: Bullish
S/R: Sup 63.80-65.90 | Res 71.65-71.88
Setup: Pullback long
Entry: 64.00 - 65.90
SL: 57.50
TP1: 71.70
TP2: 74.00
TP3: 78.50
Reason: Retest of breakout/EMA(7) as support in bullish structure.
Trade here👇
{future}(DASHUSDT)
#DASH
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #CPIWatch #WriteToEarnUpgrade
Trend: Bullish
S/R: Sup 63.80-65.90 | Res 71.65-71.88
Setup: Pullback long
Entry: 64.00 - 65.90
SL: 57.50
TP1: 71.70
TP2: 74.00
TP3: 78.50
Reason: Retest of breakout/EMA(7) as support in bullish structure.
Trade here👇
{future}(DASHUSDT)
#DASH
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #CPIWatch #WriteToEarnUpgrade
🚨 ETHEREUM NETWORK ACTIVITY HITS A NEW ALL-TIME HIGH 🚨
Ethereum just added 393,000+ new wallets in a single day, pushing average daily wallet creation to the highest level ever recorded over the past week. 📈
This surge signals growing adoption, rising on-chain demand, and increasing network usage. 🔥
More users, more activity, stronger fundamentals. 👀⚡
Is $ETH gearing up for its next major move? 🚀💎
#ETH #MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USNonFarmPayrollReport #WriteToEarnUpgrade
Ethereum just added 393,000+ new wallets in a single day, pushing average daily wallet creation to the highest level ever recorded over the past week. 📈
This surge signals growing adoption, rising on-chain demand, and increasing network usage. 🔥
More users, more activity, stronger fundamentals. 👀⚡
Is $ETH gearing up for its next major move? 🚀💎
#ETH #MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USNonFarmPayrollReport #WriteToEarnUpgrade
$ETH sellers are stepping in after a failed continuation near the highs.
Short ETHEREUM
Entry: 3,310 – 3,345
Stop Loss: 3,380
Targets: 3,270 → 3,225 → 3,170
$ETH pushed aggressively into the 3,360–3,370 zone but was met with strong sell-side absorption. The rejection was sharp, and price has since stalled below the prior expansion area.
Momentum is rolling over, with lower highs forming on intraday rebounds. This suggests market structure is shifting from expansion to distribution at premium levels.
Unless $ETH reclaims and holds above 3,380, downside continuation toward lower demand zones remains favored.
Trade ETH👇
#ETH #MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USDemocraticPartyBlueVault #WriteToEarnUpgrade
Short ETHEREUM
Entry: 3,310 – 3,345
Stop Loss: 3,380
Targets: 3,270 → 3,225 → 3,170
$ETH pushed aggressively into the 3,360–3,370 zone but was met with strong sell-side absorption. The rejection was sharp, and price has since stalled below the prior expansion area.
Momentum is rolling over, with lower highs forming on intraday rebounds. This suggests market structure is shifting from expansion to distribution at premium levels.
Unless $ETH reclaims and holds above 3,380, downside continuation toward lower demand zones remains favored.
Trade ETH👇
#ETH #MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USDemocraticPartyBlueVault #WriteToEarnUpgrade
$WIF is setting up nicely on the 1D chart and looks ready for a push higher. Momentum is building, and the structure supports a long move from here 🔥
Long Setup
Entry: 0.40 – 0.42
DCA: 0.37 – 0.38
Targets
TP1: 0.43
TP2: 0.44
TP3: 0.45+
Stop Loss: 0.35
If you’re taking this trade, keep leverage low and manage risk properly.
Click below to open a long position 👇
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #WriteToEarnUpgrade #CPIWatch #BTCVSGOLD
Long Setup
Entry: 0.40 – 0.42
DCA: 0.37 – 0.38
Targets
TP1: 0.43
TP2: 0.44
TP3: 0.45+
Stop Loss: 0.35
If you’re taking this trade, keep leverage low and manage risk properly.
Click below to open a long position 👇
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #WriteToEarnUpgrade #CPIWatch #BTCVSGOLD
$LTC USDT Perpetual - Technical Analysis Snapshot
Trend: Bullish. Price is making higher highs and lows above a supportive cluster of key moving averages.
Setup:
· Entry Zone: 78.90 - 79.10
· Stop Loss (SL): 78.00
· Take Profit (TP) Targets:
· TP1: 79.58
· TP2: 80.50
· TP3: 81.00+
Technical Reason: Anticipating a continuation higher following a pullback to the confluence support of aligned moving averages (EMA7, EMA25, EMA99).
Trade here👇
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USJobsData #CPIWatch #LTC
Trend: Bullish. Price is making higher highs and lows above a supportive cluster of key moving averages.
Setup:
· Entry Zone: 78.90 - 79.10
· Stop Loss (SL): 78.00
· Take Profit (TP) Targets:
· TP1: 79.58
· TP2: 80.50
· TP3: 81.00+
Technical Reason: Anticipating a continuation higher following a pullback to the confluence support of aligned moving averages (EMA7, EMA25, EMA99).
Trade here👇
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USJobsData #CPIWatch #LTC
$ZEC USDT (Perp) - Technical Setup
Trend: Bullish
Higher highs and higher lows established above rising EMAs.
Entry Zone: 404.00–408.00
Retest of EMA confluence and recent support.
Stop Loss: 381.00
Below the 24h low and swing structure.
Take Profit Targets:
TP1: 418.50
TP2: 425.50
TP3: 432.00
Technical Reason:
Price holding above rising EMA cluster (7, 25, 99) after forming a higher low, supporting continued bullish structure.
Trade here👇
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USJobsData #CPIWatch #BTCVSGOLD
Trend: Bullish
Higher highs and higher lows established above rising EMAs.
Entry Zone: 404.00–408.00
Retest of EMA confluence and recent support.
Stop Loss: 381.00
Below the 24h low and swing structure.
Take Profit Targets:
TP1: 418.50
TP2: 425.50
TP3: 432.00
Technical Reason:
Price holding above rising EMA cluster (7, 25, 99) after forming a higher low, supporting continued bullish structure.
Trade here👇
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USJobsData #CPIWatch #BTCVSGOLD
$ASTER USDT | Technical Analysis
Trend: Bullish. Higher highs and higher lows observed on the daily chart, with price trading above the key EMA(7), EMA(25), and EMA(99).
Trade Setup (Hypothetical):
· Entry Zone: 0.7480 – 0.7320
· Stop Loss: 0.6900
· Take Profit Targets:
· TP1: 0.7750
· TP2: 0.7950
· TP3: 0.8150
Technical Reason: Price is holding above a rising cluster of key EMAs, suggesting the moving averages are acting as dynamic support and the pullback may present a potential long opportunity within the broader uptrend.
Trade here👇
#Aster #MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USJobsData #WriteToEarnUpgrade
Trend: Bullish. Higher highs and higher lows observed on the daily chart, with price trading above the key EMA(7), EMA(25), and EMA(99).
Trade Setup (Hypothetical):
· Entry Zone: 0.7480 – 0.7320
· Stop Loss: 0.6900
· Take Profit Targets:
· TP1: 0.7750
· TP2: 0.7950
· TP3: 0.8150
Technical Reason: Price is holding above a rising cluster of key EMAs, suggesting the moving averages are acting as dynamic support and the pullback may present a potential long opportunity within the broader uptrend.
Trade here👇
#Aster #MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #USJobsData #WriteToEarnUpgrade
$DASH USDT Analysis
Trend: Bullish
S/R: Sup 63.80-65.90 | Res 71.65-71.88
Setup: Pullback long
Entry: 64.00 - 65.90
SL: 57.50
TP1: 71.70
TP2: 74.00
TP3: 78.50
Reason: Retest of breakout/EMA(7) as support in bullish structure.
Trade here👇
#DASH
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #CPIWatch #WriteToEarnUpgrade
Trend: Bullish
S/R: Sup 63.80-65.90 | Res 71.65-71.88
Setup: Pullback long
Entry: 64.00 - 65.90
SL: 57.50
TP1: 71.70
TP2: 74.00
TP3: 78.50
Reason: Retest of breakout/EMA(7) as support in bullish structure.
Trade here👇
#DASH
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase #CPIWatch #WriteToEarnUpgrade
$GIGGLE has started to look strong again. After a long phase of consolidation, price has flipped structure and printed a clean impulsive move, showing clear bullish momentum.
As long as price holds above 65, the bullish bias remains valid.
The 66–68 zone offers a favorable area to look for continuation toward higher levels.
🎯 Targets remain:
TP1: 72
TP2: 78
TP3: 90
Momentum is in favor of the bulls unless structure breaks back below support.
trade here👇
As long as price holds above 65, the bullish bias remains valid.
The 66–68 zone offers a favorable area to look for continuation toward higher levels.
🎯 Targets remain:
TP1: 72
TP2: 78
TP3: 90
Momentum is in favor of the bulls unless structure breaks back below support.
trade here👇
$RONIN has finally broken out after a long period of consolidation. Structure has flipped bullish, and buyers are stepping in aggressively, showing clear impulsive strength. As long as price holds above 0.145, the bullish bias remains intact.
Entry: 0.150 – 0.158
Stop Loss: 0.139
Targets:
TP1: 0.175
TP2: 0.195
TP3: 0.220
Momentum is on the buyers’ side — pullbacks into the zone offer the best risk-to-reward while structure stays bullish.
trade here👇
Entry: 0.150 – 0.158
Stop Loss: 0.139
Targets:
TP1: 0.175
TP2: 0.195
TP3: 0.220
Momentum is on the buyers’ side — pullbacks into the zone offer the best risk-to-reward while structure stays bullish.
trade here👇
Login to explore more contents