Khalillafd99

𝐒𝐐𝐔𝐀𝐑𝐄 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘
𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆
😍𝐋𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐁𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐆 🎁
𝐒𝐔𝐑𝐏𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐄 😍😍😍
𝐂𝐋𝐀𝐈𝐌 𝐈𝐓𝐬 𝐁𝐈𝐆

Diamond No.3 is LIVE TODAY at 3 PM sharp‼️500U🎁 BIG RED BOX drops randomly 🧧
Focus on TRADING — join the crew, vibe to dope music, watch real-time trades, and build Binance Square's live trading community TOGETHER!
Hit that FOLLOW button now so you don’t miss the action — let’s crush the charts together! 🚀#共建币安广场

Do you think the KOLs you follow don't take ads?
You can't be that naive, can you???

Well, they actually don't take ads.
Because they have long since received their KOL rounds. They post a couple of "genuine heartfelt research posts" while casually working for their own bag of chips.

80% of the advertising resources in the entire market have long been divided among a few groups:
One group is the early adopters with significant followings, and another group is the agencies running the orders behind the scenes.
When project budgets come in, they first go to familiar orders, collaboration orders, and major agency accounts, leaving ordinary retail KOLs with basically just scraps.
You post thirty high-quality long articles and can't even get a trial code, while they post one "friend project, non-commercial collaboration" and already have tens of thousands of U or a small bag of tokens in their accounts.

Those who monopolize traffic and budgets will turn around and teach you a lesson:
"You can't rush account growth; you need to output long-term, have patience, and sincerely accompany users."

It sounds like sharing experience, but in fact, it's telling a brutally harsh truth:
Every piece of "methodology" they speak of comes from those who are already at the peak of traffic, drawing a pie for those at the bottom of the tower.

If you look further down, in the narrative of "long-termism," there are a few premises they never mention:
1. When they started, they were still in a phase of rapid growth, and anything they posted had traffic benefits.
2. They have networks, resources, project parties, and institutional endorsements behind them.
3. They themselves are early players on the chain, having ridden a few bull markets, and their assets allow them to "take their time."

And what about you?
You are likely one of those ordinary people they refer to as needing to "persist in creation":
Mediocre qualifications, average insights, and the things you write have neither information gaps nor emotional tension.
Compared to AI and professional teams, you're 800 Guo Jingming behind.
Every piece of content you post is just an inconspicuous speck of dust in the eyes of the algorithm, part of a heap of information garbage.

The vast majority of people are not suited to walk the path of "content changing destiny."
It's not because you aren't hardworking enough, but because this track is itself a highly centralized casino:
The chips are concentrated in the hands of a few,
The rules are written in the contracts of platforms and capital,
You only brought a few hundred bucks to the table, yet fantasize about flipping the game with a few bets.
#加密市场回调

Do you think the KOLs you follow don't take ads?
You can't be that naive, can you???

Well, they actually don't take ads.
Because they have long since received their KOL rounds. They post a couple of "genuine heartfelt research posts" while casually working for their own bag of chips.

80% of the advertising resources in the entire market have long been divided among a few groups:
One group is the early adopters with significant followings, and another group is the agencies running the orders behind the scenes.
When project budgets come in, they first go to familiar orders, collaboration orders, and major agency accounts, leaving ordinary retail KOLs with basically just scraps.
You post thirty high-quality long articles and can't even get a trial code, while they post one "friend project, non-commercial collaboration" and already have tens of thousands of U or a small bag of tokens in their accounts.

Those who monopolize traffic and budgets will turn around and teach you a lesson:
"You can't rush account growth; you need to output long-term, have patience, and sincerely accompany users."

It sounds like sharing experience, but in fact, it's telling a brutally harsh truth:
Every piece of "methodology" they speak of comes from those who are already at the peak of traffic, drawing a pie for those at the bottom of the tower.

If you look further down, in the narrative of "long-termism," there are a few premises they never mention:
1. When they started, they were still in a phase of rapid growth, and anything they posted had traffic benefits.
2. They have networks, resources, project parties, and institutional endorsements behind them.
3. They themselves are early players on the chain, having ridden a few bull markets, and their assets allow them to "take their time."

And what about you?
You are likely one of those ordinary people they refer to as needing to "persist in creation":
Mediocre qualifications, average insights, and the things you write have neither information gaps nor emotional tension.
Compared to AI and professional teams, you're 800 Guo Jingming behind.
Every piece of content you post is just an inconspicuous speck of dust in the eyes of the algorithm, part of a heap of information garbage.

The vast majority of people are not suited to walk the path of "content changing destiny."
It's not because you aren't hardworking enough, but because this track is itself a highly centralized casino:
The chips are concentrated in the hands of a few,
The rules are written in the contracts of platforms and capital,
You only brought a few hundred bucks to the table, yet fantasize about flipping the game with a few bets.
#加密市场回调