Miti喵

After visiting Sanxingdui, I've thought for a whole day, how could such a massive civilization just suddenly disappear? From the information gathered, it doesn't seem like a war; as of now, there are no other relics with bronze masks like this one.

After contemplating, I personally think it may be due to a collapse of faith, leading to a large amount of burial. However, the artifacts inside are really too abstract, like a steering wheel, an angry little pig... I felt a very abstract feeling after I went in.

Regarding the hypothesis of the collapse of faith (personal speculation), ancient people began to believe in some theological culture, but as everyone knows, that area in Sichuan frequently experiences floods and earthquakes. I believe that during the tenure of a certain high priest, despite serious sacrifices, a great flood or earthquake still occurred, which led to

"Why did such things happen despite my diligent sacrifices!" Ultimately resulting in the collapse of faith.

I do not fully understand this part of history; these are my personal thoughts, and differing opinions are welcome for discussion.

This kind of thing actually happens often in the cryptocurrency world as well, where many people's faith in a particular coin can also suddenly collapse.

Later, some people from the Sanxingdui civilization migrated, some took losses, and went to places suitable for living. In the cryptocurrency world, some people resist losses and perish, some take losses, and some learn more survival skills.

In the cryptocurrency world, you can quickly experience any similar events from human sociology; these experiences can lead to rapid growth.

No wonder the Epstein files rarely involve the Chinese side; after an in-person meeting, the Chinese diplomat made a sharp comment!
In the recently declassified "Epstein files," I wonder if everyone has noticed that amidst so much content and explosive material, there is very little involving the Chinese side. With the latest email exposure, the truth is gradually coming to light. The key clue is hidden in a private email sent by Epstein during his lifetime.
It is disclosed that he was invited to attend a closed-door meeting of the Trilateral Commission. At that time, Epstein attended as a "financial advisor." He brought along a blonde assistant from California who was fluent in English, French, and Chinese. During the meeting, Epstein sat near several Chinese diplomats. These Chinese representatives initially had a friendly demeanor, smiling and seemingly having no guard against this Wall Street insider. However, when they conversed privately in dialect, they reminded each other to "beware of that 'Jew dog' Epstein." Of course, the Chinese side thought that there were no Americans around who could understand. Little did they know that the seemingly decorative blonde assistant could accurately understand Chinese dialects and later relayed this remark to Epstein.
Epstein was caught between laughter and tears and later wrote this experience as a memoir to send to friends. Although this episode was minor, it was highly symbolic. It revealed a fact: while the Chinese representatives maintained polite interaction in public, their internal judgment of Epstein was very sharp and precise. This also explains why in the following years, whether in public diplomatic files, media reports, or in Epstein's own itinerary records, it is nearly impossible to find substantial exchanges between him and the Chinese side.
Epstein claimed that his interactions with Chinese diplomats were once very pleasant, but he did not expect that the Chinese side privately held such an evaluation of him. It must be said that when it comes to judging people, the Chinese side is still relatively clear-headed and on point.

There are significant misconceptions about consumption in the country. A few days ago, I experienced something while traveling in Yunnan where I bought a tea cake for about 1000 RMB. At that moment, it felt a bit expensive for someone who doesn't drink tea regularly.

On the way back, I thought about the Oriental Leaves I usually drink. I didn't realize until I calculated that if I compared the brewing frequency and tea quantity of the tea cake to Oriental Leaves, then Oriental Leaves would be approximately equivalent to a tea cake priced at about 1300. This refers not to quality but to the equivalent price after conversion.

Many people in the country have this consumption mindset; they are not hesitant to spend small amounts of money but feel reluctant when it comes to spending more. However, many products actually have the best cost-effectiveness at the median price point. Low prices may feel cheaper but often do not lead to consideration of the ultimate cost-effectiveness. Often, low-priced goods are actually the least cost-effective.

This is similar to new traders; with 1000u, the pain of a 1000u margin call is hardly felt. Conversely, because they deposit a small amount, they accept leverage of 20 times or more, leading to liquidation. However, if they deposit tens of thousands of U at once, they tend to avoid risk and try leverage within 5 times.

Because of this small amount, many do not consider the traps of cost-effectiveness, which many people in the country have not thought about. In fact, the threshold for the most cost-effective options is often not low-end products.

$XAU $PAXG Gold, silver, whether capital or retail investors have entered the game. As for who is at the helm, it's hard to say!
{future}(PAXGUSDT)

{future}(XAUUSDT)
#黄金白银反弹