Jason Rivers
4 Following
27 Followers
26 Liked
0 Shared
All
Quotes
[Zero-Risk Research] Rabbit Project: 4-Hour Check-in Yield Analysis – Is It a Wool Feast or a Capital Trap?
The Rabbit project claims to have launched a new airdrop.
As someone who has consistently followed on-chain data and low-cost customer acquisition strategies, I've deeply analyzed the gameplay logic of this project and am sharing it with the community for your own risk assessment.
1. Core gameplay logic:
Low barrier to entry: Each check-in costs approximately 0.04u in Gas fees, earning 300-1000 tokens. Incentive mechanism: Once token holdings reach 10,000, interest begins accruing (at least 2% daily). This design essentially locks users' tokens through 'compound interest expectations,' reducing sell pressure.
As someone who has consistently followed on-chain data and low-cost customer acquisition strategies, I've deeply analyzed the gameplay logic of this project and am sharing it with the community for your own risk assessment.
1. Core gameplay logic:
Low barrier to entry: Each check-in costs approximately 0.04u in Gas fees, earning 300-1000 tokens. Incentive mechanism: Once token holdings reach 10,000, interest begins accruing (at least 2% daily). This design essentially locks users' tokens through 'compound interest expectations,' reducing sell pressure.
感兴趣的宝子们可以试试：
https://rabbitdifi.com/?ref=0xE174e4455325f081FC06f29bA25C0BbE17C05eD9
https://rabbitdifi.com/?ref=0xE174e4455325f081FC06f29bA25C0BbE17C05eD9
【Zero-Risk Research】
Rabbit Project's 4-Hour Check-in Reward Analysis: Is It a Wool Feast or a Capital Trap?
The Rabbit project claims to have launched a new airdrop round. As someone who has consistently followed on-chain data and low-cost user acquisition strategies, I've deeply analyzed the project's mechanics and am sharing insights with the community for your own risk assessment.
1. Core Gameplay Logic:
Low Entry Barrier: Each check-in costs approximately 0.04u in Gas fees, earning 300–1000 tokens.
Incentive Mechanism: Once token holdings reach 10,000, interest begins accruing (daily rate starting at 2%). This design essentially locks users' tokens through the expectation of compound interest, reducing sell pressure.
Virality Driver: Referral rewards are tied to withdrawal 'energy points,' a typical social network-driven liquidity acquisition model.
2. Profit Projection and Feasibility:
Listing Expectation: The official announcement states exchange listing on April 1st; currently, off-exchange or psychological pricing is around 0.01.
Cost vs. Return: With check-ins every 4 hours, the cost per account is extremely low, making it suitable for 'zero-risk' investors. However, note the 'energy points' restriction in withdrawal rules—this may extend the monetization timeline for pure single-account operations.
3. Risk Warnings (Critical):
Capital Risk: Although check-in fees are low, cumulative Gas costs still add up. Never deposit large amounts of funds into the project wallet.
Compliance Risk: While batch operations are industry-standard practice, it's recommended to use IP isolation during interactions to avoid being targeted en masse by the project team.
Logical Consistency: Daily returns of 2%–10% are unsustainable in the long term. We advise treating this as a 'quick-in, quick-out' zero-risk project—do not develop blind faith.
What do you think about projects that rely on check-ins to maintain activity? Can they truly deliver on April 1st? Share your thoughts in the comments—we’ll avoid pitfalls and grab gains together.
#Rabbit #空投 #DeFi #ZeroRisk
Rabbit Project's 4-Hour Check-in Reward Analysis: Is It a Wool Feast or a Capital Trap?
The Rabbit project claims to have launched a new airdrop round. As someone who has consistently followed on-chain data and low-cost user acquisition strategies, I've deeply analyzed the project's mechanics and am sharing insights with the community for your own risk assessment.
1. Core Gameplay Logic:
Low Entry Barrier: Each check-in costs approximately 0.04u in Gas fees, earning 300–1000 tokens.
Incentive Mechanism: Once token holdings reach 10,000, interest begins accruing (daily rate starting at 2%). This design essentially locks users' tokens through the expectation of compound interest, reducing sell pressure.
Virality Driver: Referral rewards are tied to withdrawal 'energy points,' a typical social network-driven liquidity acquisition model.
2. Profit Projection and Feasibility:
Listing Expectation: The official announcement states exchange listing on April 1st; currently, off-exchange or psychological pricing is around 0.01.
Cost vs. Return: With check-ins every 4 hours, the cost per account is extremely low, making it suitable for 'zero-risk' investors. However, note the 'energy points' restriction in withdrawal rules—this may extend the monetization timeline for pure single-account operations.
3. Risk Warnings (Critical):
Capital Risk: Although check-in fees are low, cumulative Gas costs still add up. Never deposit large amounts of funds into the project wallet.
Compliance Risk: While batch operations are industry-standard practice, it's recommended to use IP isolation during interactions to avoid being targeted en masse by the project team.
Logical Consistency: Daily returns of 2%–10% are unsustainable in the long term. We advise treating this as a 'quick-in, quick-out' zero-risk project—do not develop blind faith.
What do you think about projects that rely on check-ins to maintain activity? Can they truly deliver on April 1st? Share your thoughts in the comments—we’ll avoid pitfalls and grab gains together.
#Rabbit #空投 #DeFi #ZeroRisk
【Zero-Risk Research】
Rabbit Project's 4-Hour Check-in Reward Analysis: Is It a Wool Feast or a Capital Trap?
The Rabbit project claims to have launched a new airdrop round. As someone who has consistently followed on-chain data and low-cost user acquisition strategies, I've deeply analyzed the project's mechanics and am sharing insights with the community for your own risk assessment.
1. Core Gameplay Logic:
Low Entry Barrier: Each check-in costs approximately 0.04u in Gas fees, earning 300–1000 tokens.
Incentive Mechanism: Once token holdings reach 10,000, interest begins accruing (daily rate starting at 2%). This design essentially locks users' tokens through the expectation of compound interest, reducing sell pressure.
Virality Driver: Referral rewards are tied to withdrawal 'energy points,' a typical social network-driven liquidity acquisition model.
2. Profit Projection and Feasibility:
Listing Expectation: The official announcement states exchange listing on April 1st; currently, off-exchange or psychological pricing is around 0.01.
Cost vs. Return: With check-ins every 4 hours, the cost per account is extremely low, making it suitable for 'zero-risk' investors. However, note the 'energy points' restriction in withdrawal rules—this may extend the monetization timeline for pure single-account operations.
3. Risk Warnings (Critical):
Capital Risk: Although check-in fees are low, cumulative Gas costs still add up. Never deposit large amounts of funds into the project wallet.
Compliance Risk: While batch operations are industry-standard practice, it's recommended to use IP isolation during interactions to avoid being targeted en masse by the project team.
Logical Consistency: Daily returns of 2%–10% are unsustainable in the long term. We advise treating this as a 'quick-in, quick-out' zero-risk project—do not develop blind faith.
What do you think about projects that rely on check-ins to maintain activity? Can they truly deliver on April 1st? Share your thoughts in the comments—we’ll avoid pitfalls and grab gains together.
#Rabbit #空投 #DeFi #ZeroRisk
Rabbit Project's 4-Hour Check-in Reward Analysis: Is It a Wool Feast or a Capital Trap?
The Rabbit project claims to have launched a new airdrop round. As someone who has consistently followed on-chain data and low-cost user acquisition strategies, I've deeply analyzed the project's mechanics and am sharing insights with the community for your own risk assessment.
1. Core Gameplay Logic:
Low Entry Barrier: Each check-in costs approximately 0.04u in Gas fees, earning 300–1000 tokens.
Incentive Mechanism: Once token holdings reach 10,000, interest begins accruing (daily rate starting at 2%). This design essentially locks users' tokens through the expectation of compound interest, reducing sell pressure.
Virality Driver: Referral rewards are tied to withdrawal 'energy points,' a typical social network-driven liquidity acquisition model.
2. Profit Projection and Feasibility:
Listing Expectation: The official announcement states exchange listing on April 1st; currently, off-exchange or psychological pricing is around 0.01.
Cost vs. Return: With check-ins every 4 hours, the cost per account is extremely low, making it suitable for 'zero-risk' investors. However, note the 'energy points' restriction in withdrawal rules—this may extend the monetization timeline for pure single-account operations.
3. Risk Warnings (Critical):
Capital Risk: Although check-in fees are low, cumulative Gas costs still add up. Never deposit large amounts of funds into the project wallet.
Compliance Risk: While batch operations are industry-standard practice, it's recommended to use IP isolation during interactions to avoid being targeted en masse by the project team.
Logical Consistency: Daily returns of 2%–10% are unsustainable in the long term. We advise treating this as a 'quick-in, quick-out' zero-risk project—do not develop blind faith.
What do you think about projects that rely on check-ins to maintain activity? Can they truly deliver on April 1st? Share your thoughts in the comments—we’ll avoid pitfalls and grab gains together.
#Rabbit #空投 #DeFi #ZeroRisk
币安人生USDT
Perp
50X
Opening Long
Unrealized PNL
+3.04USDT
币安人生USDT
Perp
50X
Opening Long
Unrealized PNL
+9.07USDT
#boundless $ZKC
Yesterday while browsing the square, I saw a project talking about 'computing power outsourcing', and I thought it was another complicated technical term. But when I clicked in, I found that I could actually understand it.
It's called Boundless, and what it does is quite down-to-earth. In one sentence, it can be described as: 'an outsourcing factory that helps blockchain do the computing work.'
We all know that on-chain activities require self-computation, which can be slow and expensive. Boundless's approach is similar to how companies outsource tasks in the real world: the main chain only checks the results, while the specific calculations are handed over to the 'external factory.'
For example:
It’s like I have a bunch of complex Excel files to process. In the past, I had to run them on my own computer, which would take forever;
Now I can just delegate this to an outsourcing platform like Boundless, and it completes the work for me, giving me a certificate that says:
'Bro, I really calculated it, no lies, the result is safe.'
This way, I save effort and money.
Moreover, the coolest part about Boundless is:
This system of 'calculating and providing proof' is not only for its own use;
Other projects and chains can also directly integrate it, just like a universal plugin.
It sounds quite geeky, but the logic is actually very relatable:
Everyone wants things to be faster, cheaper, and safer — that's what Boundless aims to solve.
Their token is called $ZKC , which is roughly used to pay the 'outsourcing nodes' that help with the calculations and verify results.
This way, computing power has a new purpose, not just for mining and consuming electricity, but actually doing valuable calculations.
I am someone who knows a bit about technology but loves to tinker around.
I find this project quite interesting; it’s not misleading or flashy, but genuinely helping Web3 become more 'usable.'
Perhaps in a few years, when we play games, use AI, or even create content, the computing power behind it will be supported by projects like Boundless.
I’m a bit excited.
Yesterday while browsing the square, I saw a project talking about 'computing power outsourcing', and I thought it was another complicated technical term. But when I clicked in, I found that I could actually understand it.
It's called Boundless, and what it does is quite down-to-earth. In one sentence, it can be described as: 'an outsourcing factory that helps blockchain do the computing work.'
We all know that on-chain activities require self-computation, which can be slow and expensive. Boundless's approach is similar to how companies outsource tasks in the real world: the main chain only checks the results, while the specific calculations are handed over to the 'external factory.'
For example:
It’s like I have a bunch of complex Excel files to process. In the past, I had to run them on my own computer, which would take forever;
Now I can just delegate this to an outsourcing platform like Boundless, and it completes the work for me, giving me a certificate that says:
'Bro, I really calculated it, no lies, the result is safe.'
This way, I save effort and money.
Moreover, the coolest part about Boundless is:
This system of 'calculating and providing proof' is not only for its own use;
Other projects and chains can also directly integrate it, just like a universal plugin.
It sounds quite geeky, but the logic is actually very relatable:
Everyone wants things to be faster, cheaper, and safer — that's what Boundless aims to solve.
Their token is called $ZKC , which is roughly used to pay the 'outsourcing nodes' that help with the calculations and verify results.
This way, computing power has a new purpose, not just for mining and consuming electricity, but actually doing valuable calculations.
I am someone who knows a bit about technology but loves to tinker around.
I find this project quite interesting; it’s not misleading or flashy, but genuinely helping Web3 become more 'usable.'
Perhaps in a few years, when we play games, use AI, or even create content, the computing power behind it will be supported by projects like Boundless.
I’m a bit excited.
#holoworldai $HOLO
To be honest, I am the kind of person who writes a bit of content every day, occasionally shoots videos, but always feels that "the more I create, the more tired I become."
There are many AI tools, but they are either too expensive or too complicated; not to mention monetizing on platforms, after writing for half a day, I can't even earn the price of a cup of coffee.
A few days ago, I came across Holoworld AI in the square. At first, I didn't pay much attention, but later I took a serious look and found this thing quite interesting—
What it wants to do is to allow ordinary creators like me to use AI tools to create, earn some money, and even let our "digital avatars" come to life in the Web3 world.
After watching the introduction, the core is just three things:
1. There is an "AI-native studio" that can help you generate images, text, and videos, acting as your own creative assistant.
2. There is a "fair token distribution/profit-sharing mechanism" where if a creator's content really takes off, they can directly participate in the profit-sharing without relying on advertising.
3. They are doing "AI agents on-chain," which means your AI character can participate in transactions, governance, and even help you earn money.
Suddenly, a phrase popped into my head—"Content is not a work, but an asset."
In the past, every post I wrote was done once it was published; but if one day, my words, AI character, and creative logic could all be bound as on-chain assets, that would feel quite fresh.
To be honest, I am the kind of person who writes a bit of content every day, occasionally shoots videos, but always feels that "the more I create, the more tired I become."
There are many AI tools, but they are either too expensive or too complicated; not to mention monetizing on platforms, after writing for half a day, I can't even earn the price of a cup of coffee.
A few days ago, I came across Holoworld AI in the square. At first, I didn't pay much attention, but later I took a serious look and found this thing quite interesting—
What it wants to do is to allow ordinary creators like me to use AI tools to create, earn some money, and even let our "digital avatars" come to life in the Web3 world.
After watching the introduction, the core is just three things:
1. There is an "AI-native studio" that can help you generate images, text, and videos, acting as your own creative assistant.
2. There is a "fair token distribution/profit-sharing mechanism" where if a creator's content really takes off, they can directly participate in the profit-sharing without relying on advertising.
3. They are doing "AI agents on-chain," which means your AI character can participate in transactions, governance, and even help you earn money.
Suddenly, a phrase popped into my head—"Content is not a work, but an asset."
In the past, every post I wrote was done once it was published; but if one day, my words, AI character, and creative logic could all be bound as on-chain assets, that would feel quite fresh.
Login to explore more contents