Red envelope giveaway 🧧🧧 Red envelope giveaway 🧧🧧 🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧 Follow me & split a $2888 BTC prize pool! 🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧 Follow me & split a $2888 BTC prize pool!
Red envelope giveaway 🧧🧧 Red envelope giveaway 🧧🧧 🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧 Follow me & split a $2888 BTC prize pool! 🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧 Follow me & split a $2888 BTC prize pool!
Follow me and split $8888 worth of BTC!🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧 Follow me and split $8888 worth of BTC!🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧 Follow me and split $8888 worth of BTC!🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧 Follow me and split $8888 worth of BTC!🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧 BTC BTC BTC
🚀600usdt,$BTC 🧧 🚀Thank you for your company🚀 Follow, forward, and comment aa to receive BTC red envelopes Follow and forward comment aa to receive BTC red envelopes #Alpha brushing tips
🚀600usdt,$BTC 🧧 🚀Thank you for your company🚀 Follow, forward, and comment aa to receive BTC red envelopes Follow and forward comment aa to receive BTC red envelopes #Alpha brushing tips
🚀600usdt,$BTC 🧧 🚀Thank you for your company🚀 Follow, forward, and comment aa to receive BTC red envelopes Follow and forward comment aa to receive BTC red envelopes #Alpha brushing tips
Recently, Musk used a powerful metaphor to describe the development of artificial intelligence—“AI is a supersonic tsunami.” In his view, AI is not a slow-moving technological wave but a force that is almost unstoppable and far exceeds human expectations in speed; once it takes shape, it will reshape the entire world in a very short time.
The term “supersonic” refers to the speed of technological evolution surpassing the adaptive limits of traditional industries, institutions, and society. From the explosion of computing power and self-evolving models to AI entering the fields of finance, healthcare, military, and content creation, the changes are not linear but exponentially accelerating. Many people are still trying to understand “what AI can do,” while reality has already moved to “what AI is taking over.”
The term “tsunami” emphasizes its irreversibility. Musk has repeatedly pointed out that the real risk lies not in individual applications but in systemic shocks: employment structures being rewritten, power and information becoming highly concentrated, and human decision-making gradually being replaced by algorithms. Without clear safety boundaries and value alignment, the consequences may not be merely local errors but total loss of control.
Therefore, in his view, humanity cannot just be excited or panicked in the face of AI; it must simultaneously advance regulation, safety research, and long-term governance mechanisms. Because when this “supersonic tsunami” truly arrives, the choice will no longer be in human hands but belongs only to those who have prepared in advance. #加密市场观察
🧧【Only 1000 more people needed to reach the 30k follower milestone!】🧧
Family, every new follow is my biggest motivation to create content 💪 Daily news in the crypto world, exclusive market analysis, it's only going to get more intense! ✅️✅️
Just one more needed from you! Click to follow, let’s rush across the finish line together, 30k benefits are being urgently prepared 🚀 #btc #ETH #币安广场30k冲刺 $BTC {future}(BTCUSDT)
🧧【Only 1000 more people needed to reach the 30k follower milestone!】🧧
Family, every new follow is my biggest motivation to create content 💪 Daily news in the crypto world, exclusive market analysis, it's only going to get more intense! ✅️✅️
Just one more needed from you! Click to follow, let’s rush across the finish line together, 30k benefits are being urgently prepared 🚀 #btc #ETH #币安广场30k冲刺 $BTC {future}(BTCUSDT)
#dusk 【Air Force Becomes Fuel Again】 The current price of dusk is around 0.155, and the recent surge has made it a rising star in the privacy sector. With the recent surge, the short-selling crowd has also increased significantly. Looking at (Figure 1), the recent funding rate has consistently been negative 1-2, which indicates that. Yesterday, we also mentioned that the funding rate may not easily come down without relative balance, as many contract tokens this year are in this state— the more shorted, the more explosive the rise, with large fluctuations. Looking at (Figure 2), today's incremental strength has strongly broken through the upper trend line and the drawn neckline resistance level, directly reaching the Fibonacci 0.5 resistance level around the price of 0.178, and currently experiencing a pullback. Observing the current long-short ratio and strong performance, it remains to be seen whether it can adjust and break through the 0.5 position. The next target resistance level is around the price of 0.618, approximately 0.21. $DUSK
Title: Controversy Surrounding Tesla Attack Allegations: Responsibility, Rule of Law, and Public Stance
Recently, Elon Musk publicly stated that if investigations confirm that Alex Soros and George Soros funded attacks against Tesla dealerships, then the responsible parties will face imprisonment. This stern statement quickly sparked significant controversy in public opinion and raised a more core question: Do the public support holding accountability under the law in such incidents?
From the perspective of the rule of law, the key is not the identity or background of those involved, but whether "facts and evidence exist." If any individual or organization is proven to have directly or indirectly funded violence, destruction, or terrorist acts, then investigation, prosecution, and sentencing in accordance with the law align with the fundamental principles of a modern rule of law society. Under this premise, accountability itself is reasonable and a necessary means to maintain public safety and social order.
However, at the same time, the controversy also focuses on whether the allegations are based on solid evidence. In judicial procedures, the presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle. The statements of public figures may draw attention and promote investigations, but they cannot replace independent and fair judicial decisions. If one presumes guilt before the facts are clear, it could not only infringe on individual rights but also undermine the credibility of the law.
For some supporters, Musk's statement represents a "zero tolerance" attitude towards violent acts, especially against the backdrop of frequent threats to business and employee safety; this tough stance is seen as a necessary warning signal. Opponents, however, worry that such statements may exacerbate political divisions and politicize legal issues.
Overall, whether or not to "support" this stance depends on one premise: **As long as there is solid evidence, accountability should be pursued under the law; until there is evidence, no one should be presumed guilty.** What is truly worth supporting is not punishment directed at a specific name or camp, but the principles of transparent investigations, independent judiciary, and equality before the law.