🇺🇸 The Supreme Court’s tariffs decision could be delayed until as late as June.
The Supreme Court usually reserves its "blockbuster" cases for the final weeks of the session in June. Legal analysts and market strategists are now adjusting their timelines, as the delay suggests the justices are engaged in deep, potentially contentious deliberations. • The "Blockbuster" Theory: Analysts from J.P. Morgan and other firms noted that the tariff case is on par with the Affordable Care Act in terms of its impact. Holding the decision until June would follow the historical pattern for cases that fundamentally reshape U.S. law. • Economic Limbo: The lack of a ruling keeps billions of dollars in "tariff risk" on corporate balance sheets. Retailers like Costco and manufacturers like Stanley Black & Decker are currently in a "wait-and-see" mode, as a strike-down could lead to trillions in refunds. • Trump’s "Screwed" Warning: President Trump has continued to pile pressure on the Court via Truth Social, stating that if the "National Security bonanza" is struck down, the country is "SCREWED." The delay may be a sign that the Court is carefully weighing the President's claim that these tariffs are essential for national security. 📉 MARKET & GLOBAL IMPACT • Prediction Markets: On platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, the odds that the Supreme Court will side with Trump have dropped to roughly 28-32%. Most traders are now betting on a strike-down, which has led to a cautious "sell the news" atmosphere for trade-sensitive stocks. • India & China: Exporters in New Delhi and Beijing are watching the clock. In India, the Nifty 50 has remained under pressure as investors wait for clarity on the 50% total tariffs currently hitting Indian goods. 📅 WHAT TO WATCH FOR NEXT While June is the "worst-case" timeline for those seeking a quick resolution, the Court could still release an opinion on any scheduled Monday or Wednesday morning at 10:00 AM ET $FHE $BDXN $DASH
🚨 BREAKING 🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱 Iran has warned that if the United States attacks, it could retaliate against both U.S. military bases in the region and Israeli targets — escalating the geopolitical risk picture. 
📍 Key Updates: • Tehran told neighboring governments that U.S. bases in the Middle East could be legitimate targets if Washington carries out strikes.  • Iran’s officials also made public warnings that Israel could be struck in response to foreign attacks on Iran.  • The comments come amid heightened tensions following protests inside Iran and talk of possible U.S. action tied to those events.  • Iran’s leadership stresses this stance as a deterrent to military escalation, not as confirmation that an attack has already begun. 
⚠️ Important disclaimer: These are warnings and threats of retaliation — not confirmed reports of actual strikes occurring right now.
🕊️ THE RUSSIA CHANNEL: THE DE-ESCALATION DEAL While public rhetoric remains hostile, high-level messages relayed through Moscow suggest both regional powers are desperate to avoid a direct, unprovoked war. Key Details of the Agreement: • Israel’s Stance: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly asked Vladimir Putin to inform Tehran that Israel will not launch strikes against Iran if it is not attacked first. Israel’s priority is currently its military campaign against Hezbollah in Lebanon, not a second direct front with Iran. • Iran’s Response: Iranian officials responded through the same Russian channel, stating they will also refrain from a preemptive strike. Iran is currently crippled by nationwide protests and an economic collapse, making a war with Israel strategically impossible. • The "Preemptive" Fear: The deal was sparked by fears in Tel Aviv that Iran, sensing an "inevitable" U.S. or Israeli strike during its domestic crisis, might lash out first to unite its people. This message from Netanyahu was designed to remove that "use it or lose it" pressure. 🏛️ THE U.S. WILD CARD While Israel and Iran are communicating via Russia, the Trump Administration remains a separate, highly aggressive factor: • The Tariff Hammer: Earlier this week (Jan 12), Trump threatened 25% tariffs on any country doing business with Iran—a move designed to finish the regime's economic isolation. • Strike Options: Trump has been briefed on "non-military" and "kinetic" options to support the Iranian protesters, but he has not yet authorized an attack. • Starlink & Freedom: The U.S. continues to push Starlink into Iran to bypass the regime's internet blackout, which the administration views as a "digital intervention" rather than a traditional act of war. $BERA $GUN $DASH
$PENGU is showing signs of downward pressure, making this a short-term bearish opportunity. Traders can consider entering at $0.0130, with proper risk management.
🚨COINBASE: "WE’D RATHER HAVE NO BILL THAN A BAD BILL"
Brian Armstrong says Coinbase cannot support the Senate Banking Committee’s draft crypto market structure bill in its current form after reviewing the proposal.
🚨 JUST IN: Binance Founder @CZ Predicts Bitcoin $200K
💬 “Reaching $200,000 is the most obvious thing in the world.”
CZ highlights Bitcoin’s long-term potential, scarcity, and growing adoption. With institutions entering, global awareness rising, and market infrastructure improving, he believes a $200K BTC isn’t just possible — it’s expected.
📈 Traders and investors should watch momentum, market cycles, and key support/resistance levels as BTC continues its path toward historic highs.
🚨 BREAKING 🇺🇸🇮🇷 | Iran Warns It Could Strike U.S. Bases
Iran has warned neighboring countries hosting American troops that it would target U.S. military bases in the region if Washington carries out military intervention in Iran’s ongoing internal unrest, according to Reuters. Tehran conveyed this warning to states including Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Turkey. 
📍 Key points: • The warning came amid U.S. talk of possible intervention in the protests and warnings from President Trump.  • Some U.S. personnel have been advised to leave the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar as tensions escalate, though there is no confirmed order for full military action within 24 hours.  • Tehran’s message to regional governments stresses that bases in their countries could be targeted if Washington strikes Iran. 
⚠️ Important nuance: This is a warning and threat of retaliation, not a confirmed imminent attack order by Iran. There is no verified Reuters report stating that U.S. military action is definitely starting in the next 24 hours — and no confirmed launch of strikes by Iran. 
⸻
📌 Balanced Summary You Can Post:
🚨 UPDATE 🇺🇸🇮🇷 | Iran Warns U.S. Bases Could Be Targeted
According to Reuters, Tehran has told regional partners that U.S. military bases in the Middle East could be attacked if Washington launches military action against Iran amid rising tensions over nationwide protests. Some U.S. personnel at bases like Al Udeid in Qatar have been advised to leave as a precaution — but no confirmed U.S. attack or Iranian strike has occurred yet.