$ASTER moved exactly in line with the scenario previously outlined and has now reached a resistance zone.
From here, a corrective bounce is a scenario I’m watching. If it plays out, price could later continue higher, an area where previous spot may come into play.
- 29.85% of $ETH supply now staked => healthy participation post-Shanghai - Lido still dominates at 23.4% marketshare, BUT declining (-2% over 6 months) as competition intensifies - Liquid restaking gaining ground: etherfi up 5% (6MA) vs Lido's -2% - CEX share consolidating: @Binance Italy +11% (6MA), while Coinbase dropped -27% - 18.9M ETH net inflow since Shanghai shows sustained confidence in staking
Market is slowly diversifying away from Lido's dominance. The rise of liquid restaking protocols & competition among CEXs suggests stakers are optimizing for yield and decentralization.
Network Performance: @Vanarchain demonstrates solid technical fundamentals with a consistent 3-second block time and over 44 million completed transactions. The infrastructure appears stable and capable of handling regular blockchain operations. Adoption Concerns: While the network has accumulated 88.8K total accounts and 1.68M addresses, the "Active Accounts" chart reveals a troubling trend. Daily active users have dropped dramatically from 600-800 to near zero in recent weeks, suggesting significant user attrition or decreased engagement. Ecosystem Development: With only 334 tokens and 1,195 contracts deployed (97 verified), the ecosystem remains in early stages. Zero new contract deployments today indicates limited developer activity. Growth Trajectory: The account growth chart shows minimal expansion over the past month, essentially flat-lining. Combined with plummeting active accounts, this signals weak organic growth and potential network stagnation. Verdict: While technically functional, $VANRY faces serious adoption challenges. The sharp decline in active users is a red flag that warrants caution for potential investors.
$XPL has seen a significant drop in active addresses compared to early 2025.
Interestingly, the ecosystem’s TVL hasn’t fallen much, suggesting that overall interest remains steady. Early on, airdrop hunters dominated, but now the ecosystem is poised for organic growth.
$LTC moved into a deeper correction than expected and is now trading around the $53 area.
From here, a recovery scenario of up to ~20% is on my radar. I’m viewing this zone as an area of interest and watching how price behaves over the coming weeks.
If price pushes lower, that would further strengthen the accumulation narrative from a spot perspective.
$TAO is trading very cleanly within a descending structure and hasn’t actually broken out of it yet. The small dump below the range looks like a classic stop-hunt.
I’m expecting a move up of around +15%, and going long here looks like a solid idea.
The carnage is real. $BTC -23.65%, $ETH -33.39%, $SOL -35.60%, $XRP-33.75%. Almost nothing escaped the selloff.
This has been one of the most challenging months in crypto history. Fear & Greed Index dropped to around 5, a lvl we've only seen during the Terra collapse.
$ARB rejected from resistance & a large liquidity cluster has formed near the local bottom. A strong upside scenario of around +25–30% is on my radar from here.
I’m closely watching how price reacts at current levels. I also have exposure across several L2 chains.
How is this even possible — and what do we do with liquidations created by the exchange itself?
South Korean crypto exchange Bithimb accidentally credited users with 620,000 $BTC — over $42B at current prices.
According to the exchange, the incident happened during a reward payout for a promotional event and was not related to hacking or a security breach. In total, 695 users received Bitcoin by mistake.
Local media reports that the promotion was supposed to distribute Korean won, but the employee processing the payout selected $BTC as the currency instead.
As users rushed to sell and withdraw funds, Bitcoin’s price on Bithumb briefly dropped by ~20%, triggering liquidations and market chaos — all caused by an internal operational error.
This raises a serious question for the market: How should traders and users deal with liquidations and price moves that are entirely created by an exchange’s own mistake?