GAS WOLF

Sto osservando le stablecoin trasformarsi in qualcosa a cui le persone si rivolgono quando hanno bisogno di calma, non di eccitazione, perché non stanno cercando di vincere un dibattito, stanno cercando di pagare, risparmiare, inviare e regolare. Stiamo vedendo le stablecoin utilizzate come denaro pratico in più luoghi, specialmente dove il sistema locale può essere lento, costoso o imprevedibile, e questo crea una pressione semplice che non può essere ignorata. Se diventa normale per milioni di persone e aziende spostare dollari digitali quotidianamente, allora la blockchain sottostante deve smettere di sembrare un esperimento complicato e iniziare a sembrare un'infrastruttura affidabile. Plasma sta cercando di incontrare quel momento presentandosi come un Layer 1 progettato per il regolamento delle stablecoin, costruito attorno all'idea che i flussi di stablecoin dovrebbero essere la priorità piuttosto che un pensiero secondario, e che l'utente non dovrebbe sentirsi stressato solo per spostare valore.

I’m seeing a simple truth that most people only understand after they lose something important online, because the internet can feel permanent until it suddenly is not, and then you realise that what you built was living on rented ground. A photo library, a video archive, a creative portfolio, a game world, a research dataset, a community history, it all becomes fragile when a single company can change a rule, raise a price, lock an account, or switch off access, and the worst part is not the technical failure, it is the feeling of powerlessness that follows. We’re seeing more people wake up to this, not because they love decentralization as a word, but because they want the basic human comfort of knowing their work and memories will still be there tomorrow.

@Walrus 🦭/acc is built for that emotional reality, and it focuses on something that quietly controls the future of every app, which is storage. Walrus is a decentralized storage network designed for large unstructured data, the heavy files that real products rely on, like images, videos, archives, datasets, and user generated content that grows without limits. Instead of forcing these large files onto a blockchain where storage can become expensive and slow, Walrus treats blob storage as a dedicated system, and it connects that system to Sui so the storage lifecycle can be coordinated with rules that are programmable and verifiable. WAL is the token that powers this network, but the deeper story is not only about a token, it is about whether the internet can stop treating data like something that can be taken away with one decision.

What makes Walrus feel different is that it is designed around survivability, not perfection. Machines fail, drives die, networks drop, operators leave, and a system that expects ideal conditions will eventually betray the people who trusted it. Walrus uses erasure coding, which means a file is split and encoded into many pieces, and those pieces are distributed across multiple storage nodes. The important part is that the original file can still be reconstructed even if some pieces go missing, so the network can tolerate failures without losing the data. If it becomes normal for storage to work this way, users stop living with that quiet anxiety that something can vanish, and builders stop designing products with fear in the background.

Walrus also leans into an idea that feels small but is actually life changing for builders, which is proof instead of promise. By using Sui as a control plane, Walrus can coordinate how blobs are stored, how storage is paid for, and how agreements are tracked, so the system can provide verifiable signals about availability rather than depending on trust in a single operator. If it becomes easy for a developer to store a large file and also have a clear record that the network accepted responsibility for it under defined conditions, storage stops being a vague handshake and starts feeling like a contract. We’re seeing a shift across crypto where builders want infrastructure that can be verified, because verification is how you build confidence that lasts longer than marketing.

WAL exists inside this system to keep the human side of decentralization working. A decentralized storage network is not just software, it is people running machines, keeping uptime, taking risks, and doing work that becomes invisible when it is done well. WAL is used to pay for storage and to support staking and delegation so the network can decide who participates and how incentives and responsibilities are distributed. This matters because incentives shape behaviour, and behaviour shapes reliability. If it becomes profitable to cut corners, reliability collapses. If it becomes impossible to operate honestly, good operators leave. A serious network is one that treats incentives as part of its security, because without aligned incentives, decentralization becomes a story that sounds good until pressure arrives.

The real impact of Walrus shows up in what it can unlock. Decentralized websites need reliable media hosting. Communities need archives that cannot be erased with one takedown request. AI builders need datasets that stay available without being trapped behind one provider. Games and virtual worlds need assets that can persist beyond a single studio’s lifetime. Enterprises need storage that is resilient, auditable, and not dependent on one vendor relationship. We’re seeing these needs grow because the future is data heavy, and every year the internet becomes more dependent on large files, which means every year central storage becomes a bigger point of failure and a bigger point of control.

Privacy also sits in the background of this story, and it deserves honesty. Walrus can help by distributing encoded fragments so no single node needs to hold a full file, and it can be paired with encryption so sensitive content is protected, but privacy is not automatic in any decentralized system. If you need confidentiality, you still encrypt and manage keys responsibly, because decentralization reduces single points of power but it does not remove the need for careful security design. If it becomes easy for everyday users to store encrypted data in a network that remains available even through failures, that is a meaningful change, because it reduces how often people must choose between convenience and control.

I’m drawn to Walrus because it is not trying to sell a fantasy, it is trying to solve a quiet pain that affects creators, builders, and communities. When your data is controlled by someone else, your future feels negotiable. When your data can be priced up, your dreams can be taxed. When your data can be removed, your voice can be softened. Walrus is trying to push back with a network built around distribution, repair, and verifiable coordination, so storage becomes something you can rely on without constantly watching the door.

If it becomes normal to store the heavy parts of our digital lives in a decentralized system that can survive failures and still serve data, then something changes inside people. Creators build with more courage because their work is harder to erase. Communities preserve history with more confidence because memory is not tied to a single platform’s mood. Builders ship products with more integrity because they are not forced to hide behind one provider. We’re seeing the early shape of an internet that learns a deeper lesson, that freedom is not only about moving value, it is also about protecting what you create, protecting what you remember, and protecting the quiet proof that you were here, you built something real, and it deserves to last.

@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL #walrus

I’m watching a serious truth surface across global finance, and it is not a trendy truth, it is a human one, because trust is fragile and money amplifies every fear we already carry. People want progress, they want faster settlement, better access, clearer proof, and fewer middle layers that can fail, yet they also want safety and privacy because exposure can ruin lives, strategies, businesses, and reputations. They’re not asking for secrecy to do harm, they are asking for confidentiality so normal life can stay normal, and if a financial system cannot protect that, it becomes a system that quietly punishes anyone who uses it. We’re seeing more builders accept that public by default ledgers are not automatically mature, and that the next wave of financial infrastructure must learn how to be verifiable without being invasive. Dusk was founded in 2018 with this exact tension in mind, as a Layer 1 blockchain focused on regulated and privacy focused financial infrastructure, built to support institutional grade applications, compliant decentralized finance, and tokenized real world assets, while treating privacy and auditability as core design goals rather than afterthoughts.

If you step into the world @Dusk is aiming for, you see why this mission matters. Institutions cannot simply adopt a chain because it is popular, because they carry obligations that do not disappear when software changes, and they need settlement that feels final, controls that feel real, and privacy that protects clients and counterparties. It becomes clear that regulated finance cannot live on rails that expose every move, because market impact, client confidentiality, and operational security are not optional. At the same time, purely closed systems demand blind trust, and blind trust is exactly what modern finance has been trying to reduce for decades. Dusk tries to sit in the narrow space where both sides can breathe, where the rules can be followed and proven, but sensitive details do not have to be broadcast to the world. They’re building for a future where compliance is not a bolt on burden and privacy is not a suspicious feature, but where both are built into the shape of the network itself.

We’re seeing Dusk lean into a modular architecture because real financial systems are modular by nature, and separation of responsibilities often decides whether a system is resilient or fragile. DuskDS is positioned as the settlement, consensus, and data availability layer at the foundation, designed to provide finality, security, and native bridging for execution environments that sit above it. DuskEVM is presented as an EVM execution layer that lets developers use familiar tooling while relying on DuskDS for settlement and data availability, and the documentation explains that it uses OP Stack architecture but settles directly on DuskDS rather than Ethereum, which is a practical choice meant to keep developer experience strong while keeping the settlement rail aligned with Dusk’s own foundation. If modularity is done well, it becomes easier to evolve the system without breaking the trust it is supposed to carry, and that kind of careful evolution is what institutions look for when they decide whether a network can be more than a experiment.

The emotional center of this project is privacy with accountability, because finance needs both, and most people only feel the pain when one is missing. When privacy is missing, everything starts to feel exposed, and exposure changes behavior, it makes people smaller, quieter, and more afraid to participate. When accountability is missing, trust collapses, and then the system either becomes a black box or a battleground of accusations. Dusk is pushing toward a form of privacy that can still satisfy business compliance criteria, and that is where the newer work around Hedger fits into the story. Hedger is described as a privacy engine built for the EVM execution layer, bringing confidential transactions to DuskEVM by combining homomorphic encryption and zero knowledge proofs, with the intent of enabling compliance ready privacy for real world financial applications. If this works the way it is meant to, it becomes a way to prove correctness and adherence to rules without forcing sensitive financial information into public view, and that is the kind of progress that feels less like hype and more like relief.

Dusk has also crossed the line that separates ideas from infrastructure, and that line matters because responsibility begins the moment a network goes live. In December 2024, Dusk announced its mainnet rollout steps and stated that the mainnet cluster was scheduled to produce its first immutable block on January 7 2025, following early deposits on January 3 and early stakes being on ramped into the genesis state on December 29. If you have ever built anything that real users will rely on, you know why this moment is heavy, because now every promise must survive reality, uptime, security, integration complexity, and the quiet pressure of being a foundation that others will build on. We’re seeing Dusk frame this as the transition into a fully operational network, and that is the point where institutions begin to evaluate not only the vision but the reliability of execution.

In 2025 and into late 2025, we’re seeing Dusk place more emphasis on interoperability and regulated asset movement across ecosystems, because real markets do not live on one island. A November 2025 announcement describes Dusk and NPEX integrating Chainlink CCIP as a canonical cross chain interoperability layer, with the stated goal of allowing tokenized assets issued on DuskEVM to move securely and compliantly between chains. This direction matters because institutions do not want isolated liquidity and isolated settlement, they want controlled connectivity where the same compliance expectations can travel with the asset rather than disappear the moment it crosses a boundary. If interoperability is handled carelessly, it becomes the weakest link, but if it is handled with strong standards and clear controls, it becomes the bridge that turns a private regulated network into part of a larger financial world instead of a separate universe.

Tokenized real world assets are often described like a simple upgrade, but I’m convinced the hardest part is not minting a token, it is respecting the full lifecycle of a regulated instrument, issuance, restrictions, reporting, governance, settlement, and the ability to prove what must be proven without exposing what must be protected. They’re designing DuskDS as a foundation meant to meet institutional demands for compliance, privacy, and performance, and they’re pairing that with an execution environment that developers can actually use to build products that feel familiar. If this combination holds up, it becomes possible to imagine on chain markets that are not built on exposure and spectacle, but on confidentiality with verifiable truth, and we’re seeing more of the industry accept that this is the only path that can realistically carry regulated finance at scale.

I’m not claiming that any single chain will solve everything, but I am saying the direction matters, because the direction tells you what kind of world a project is trying to create. Dusk is trying to create a world where building in regulated finance does not require you to abandon privacy, and where privacy does not require you to abandon oversight. If the network keeps improving its settlement foundation, keeps making the EVM environment more usable, and keeps proving that confidential transactions can coexist with compliance requirements, it becomes more than a technical platform, it becomes a calmer way to participate in finance. We’re seeing an industry that is tired of extremes, tired of systems that are fully exposed or fully closed, and hungry for something that feels adult, something that can hold rules and dignity at the same time, and if Dusk stays disciplined, it can be one of the rails that helps finance finally grow into that shape.

@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK #dusk

I’m going to describe @Dusk in the most human way I can, because behind the technology there is a feeling that many people know too well, the feeling of moving money through systems that ask for your trust while giving you very little clarity, and the feeling of being forced to choose between safety and transparency as if you cannot have both. Dusk exists because regulated finance needs privacy that protects people and positions, and it also needs proof that rules were followed, and those two needs are not enemies, they are partners when the system is designed with care. They’re building a layer one foundation for financial infrastructure where privacy is not treated like a trick and compliance is not treated like a burden, because in real markets privacy is dignity and compliance is stability, and without both, confidence breaks sooner or later.

If you look closely at how financial institutions operate, you see why the usual blockchain approach often fails them. A fully public ledger can turn normal activity into unwanted exposure, and it becomes easier for bad actors to watch, copy, pressure, or manipulate when everything is visible by default. At the same time, a system that hides everything without a credible way to prove compliance creates another kind of fear, because regulators, auditors, and serious counterparties need evidence, they need a reliable story backed by math, not by handshakes and private assurances. Dusk is built around this tension, and it tries to resolve it with a design that can keep sensitive details confidential while still enabling verification and auditability when it is required, so trust does not depend on blind faith and privacy does not depend on breaking the rules.

One reason Dusk feels like infrastructure instead of a single application is the way it is shaped as a modular system. Finance is not one use case, it is issuance, trading, settlement, reporting, and compliance workflows that must work together every day without drama. A modular approach makes room for different execution environments and different application needs while keeping the base settlement layer strong, and that matters because institutions want predictability and developers want flexibility, and users want it all to feel simple. We’re seeing the industry move toward modular stacks because it is the only realistic way to scale complex ecosystems, and Dusk is using that direction to serve a very specific purpose, which is regulated and privacy focused finance rather than general experimentation.

Settlement is where the emotions of markets show up, because settlement is the moment when uncertainty ends. In serious finance, speed is valuable, but certainty is priceless, and it becomes exhausting to operate in systems where finality feels like a probability instead of a promise. Dusk is designed to treat finality and reliable settlement as core values, because when value moves, people need to know it is done, not mostly done, not likely done, but done in a way that lets risk teams relax and lets real businesses run without constant worry. If a network can make settlement feel calm and dependable, it becomes something that institutions can build on, and it becomes something ordinary people can trust without having to understand every technical detail.

Privacy in Dusk is not meant to be a curtain that hides everything, it is meant to be a safeguard that still allows proof. That is the difference that matters, because privacy without accountability eventually becomes suspicion, and accountability without privacy eventually becomes exposure. They’re building toward a world where you can keep confidential information protected while still being able to demonstrate that required rules were followed, that access controls were respected, that transfers happened under the correct conditions, and that auditors can verify what they must verify without forcing the entire market to see what it does not need to see. This is where the project feels deeply practical, because it does not ask finance to stop being finance, it tries to give finance a better engine that matches the reality of regulation and human risk.

When people talk about compliant DeFi and tokenized real world assets, it is easy to get lost in big phrases, but the core is simple. Real assets and real financial products come with responsibilities, restrictions, reporting duties, and legal boundaries, and if those are ignored, the system will not be adopted at scale, no matter how impressive it looks. Dusk aims to make those constraints part of the design so that building on chain does not mean stepping outside the rule set that protects markets and participants. If tokenization is going to become more than a story, it becomes through systems that can handle compliance, privacy, and auditability at the same time, because that is what real issuers, real venues, and real users require when the stakes are not theoretical.

I’m not here to sell a dream, I’m here to describe a direction that feels necessary. We’re seeing more people wake up to the fact that the future of finance cannot be built on exposure and fear, and it cannot be built on secrecy with no proof, because both extremes fail the moment pressure arrives. Dusk is trying to build something quieter and stronger, a place where privacy feels like dignity instead of suspicion, and where proof feels like protection instead of surveillance. If they keep executing on this vision, it becomes a foundation that institutions can respect and ordinary users can finally feel safe on, and that safety is not a small thing, because when money moves, it touches lives, it touches families, it touches the future, and a system that can protect that future while staying honest about the rules is the kind of progress that people do not just notice, they rely on.

@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK #dusk

Sto pensando ai momenti che fanno perdere la fiducia nel mondo digitale, il giorno in cui un link si rompe proprio quando ne hai bisogno, il giorno in cui un file scompare dopo mesi di lavoro, il giorno in cui l'accesso viene limitato e ti rendi conto che il tuo lavoro vive sotto la permessa di qualcun altro, e se hai mai provato quel improvviso senso di oppressione al petto quando qualcosa di importante diventa irraggiungibile, allora capisci già perché @Walrus 🦭/acc ha importanza senza bisogno di spiegazioni complicate. Stanno costruendo Walrus come un sistema di archiviazione decentralizzato e disponibilità dei dati per file di grandi dimensioni, ed è pensato per il contenuto pesante reale su cui si basano le applicazioni moderne, come video, immagini, archivi, set di dati e l'onda crescente di file legati all'intelligenza artificiale che tengono in funzione i prodotti, e la promessa semplice è che i tuoi dati possano essere distribuiti su molte macchine indipendenti in modo da non dipendere da un'unica azienda, da un gruppo di server o da una decisione presa dietro le quinte. Se diventa normale per sviluppatori e utenti archiviare dati critici in una rete che non ha un punto unico di controllo, allora Internet diventa un po' meno fragile, e penso che questo cambiamento sia più profondo di quanto sembri perché la fiducia non è una funzionalità, la fiducia è il terreno su cui ti trovi.

Sto guardando @Dusk come una rete che è iniziata con una domanda insolitamente onesta: come portare la finanza seria sulla blockchain senza costringere le persone a esporre la propria vita e senza chiedere agli organismi di regolamentazione di accettare una fiducia cieca. Dusk è stata fondata nel 2018 con un focus sull'infrastruttura finanziaria regolamentata e centrata sulla privacy, e questo punto di partenza conta perché influisce su ogni scelta di progettazione successiva. Non stanno cercando di essere un'altra blockchain generica che poi spera che le istituzioni si adattino, stanno cercando di diventare il tipo di strato base in cui istituzioni e utenti comuni possano davvero sentirsi al sicuro, perché la sicurezza nella finanza non è un lusso, è la fondazione della fiducia e la fondazione della confidenza.

I’m going to talk about @Walrus 🦭/acc the way people actually experience the internet, not the way whitepapers try to explain it, because the truth is that storage is not a cold technical topic when it touches your work, your memories, your income, and your identity, and we rarely admit how anxious we feel about it until the moment something disappears and we realize we never truly owned the space our data lived in, and that is the quiet fear Walrus is trying to answer, because they’re building a decentralized storage network designed for large files that matter, and it uses the Sui blockchain for coordination so the rules of storage, payment, and accountability can be enforced in code instead of being left to a company policy that can change overnight, and if it becomes normal to store important data in a neutral system that no single gatekeeper controls, then a lot of people will finally stop living with that hidden feeling that everything they create online is temporary.

Walrus is best understood as a home for blobs, which is simply a human way to say big unstructured data like images, videos, documents, archives, training data, and all the heavy files that make an application real and make a digital life feel complete, because most blockchains cannot store large files directly without massive cost, and that is why so many so called decentralized apps still rely on centralized storage behind the scenes, and it becomes a painful contradiction when the front end says freedom but the back end depends on a single provider, and Walrus is trying to remove that weak point by spreading storage across a network of independent nodes while still keeping coordination on chain through Sui, so the system can track who is responsible, what is stored, and how long it should remain available, and I’m emphasizing this because it is the difference between a promise and a structure that can survive stress.

The part that makes Walrus feel different is the way it protects data without pretending it can eliminate risk, because instead of copying full files again and again in the old style, Walrus uses erasure coding and a design often described as Red Stuff to transform a blob into many smaller encoded pieces often called slivers, and those slivers are distributed across storage nodes so the network can reconstruct the original file even when many pieces are missing, and that is more than an engineering trick, it is a philosophy of resilience, because real systems face outages, attacks, churn, and bad actors, and if it becomes possible to recover your data even when the network is hurt, then the fear people carry around storage starts to soften into something like confidence, and we’re seeing more builders look for exactly this kind of durability because the value is increasingly inside the data itself, not only in the interface around it.

Cost matters because storage is not a one time event, it is a long commitment, and I’m not only talking about money, I’m talking about the cost of downtime, the cost of panic, the cost of losing access, the cost of being forced to migrate when a provider changes its rules, and Walrus aims to reduce waste compared to full replication approaches by using encoded storage that can keep overhead lower while still targeting high durability, and if it becomes affordable to store large data in a decentralized way, then decentralization stops being a luxury ideology and starts becoming a practical foundation that real teams can build on, because at that point you are not asking people to sacrifice convenience for principles, you are offering them reliability that holds up under real world conditions.

Walrus also treats time as part of the design, which matters because storage is always a promise across time, and the network is organized into epochs where a committee of storage nodes is responsible for assigned data for that period, and stake changes and responsibility changes are structured to avoid chaotic migrations, because moving large data is not trivial and any serious storage network must plan for change instead of being surprised by it, and this is one of those details that reveals maturity, because they’re acknowledging that nodes will come and go, hardware will fail, and networks will experience turbulence, and so the system needs a way to keep commitments stable while still evolving, and if it becomes normal that decentralized storage can manage churn without collapsing, then the whole category becomes more credible.

One of the most emotionally important parts is that Walrus focuses on proving availability, not only claiming it, because too many users have been trained to accept vague assurances until the day they try to retrieve something and it is gone, and Walrus leans into challenge based checking and proofs of availability that pressure nodes to actually keep data accessible, and I’m not saying any network can guarantee perfection, but I am saying there is a deep difference between a system built around verification and a system built around trust, and when you have lived through losing files, you understand why proof feels like relief, because it replaces blind faith with a framework that can punish failure and reward reliability.

Now the token, WAL, is not just a symbol for trading, it is meant to keep the network alive, because it is used for payments, staking, and governance, and the design frames storage payments in a way that aims to keep costs predictable for users while distributing rewards over time to those providing storage, which matches the truth that storage is a service that continues, not a single moment, and WAL also supports delegated proof of stake where people can delegate stake to operators who run storage nodes, and the system uses incentives and penalties to push the network toward long term reliability, because when a node performs poorly, the consequences should be real, and when a node performs well, the rewards should be sustainable, and if it becomes normal that storage networks are secured by participants who have something to lose when reliability fails, then the strongest operators rise naturally and weak behavior becomes expensive.

Governance and penalties matter because decentralization without discipline becomes a story that breaks the first time incentives get tested, and Walrus includes mechanisms designed to discourage disruptive behavior that can force costly data movements, and it includes slashing for low performance, and some penalties can be burned, which is meant to align the system toward long term health rather than short term games, and I’m not saying this to sound harsh, I’m saying it because storage is intimate, because it holds what people cannot easily replace, and a network that wants to protect that must be willing to punish neglect.

When you step back, Walrus is for builders who need a durable place for big data and for users who want their work to outlive platforms, and it can support applications that rely on persistent media, documents, archives, proofs, AI datasets, and anything where data availability is not optional, and it can also support communities and enterprises that want stronger guarantees than a contract with a centralized provider can realistically deliver under pressure, and we’re seeing demand grow for this because the internet is entering an era where data is the asset and availability is the backbone, and if that backbone is centralized, then everything built on top is fragile in ways people only discover too late.

I’m going to close with the part people feel but rarely say. Data is not cold. Data is your effort made visible. Data is the record of late nights, decisions, drafts, experiments, photos, messages, and work that carries your name. When a file disappears, it does not feel like a technical inconvenience, it feels like loss, and the reason decentralized storage matters is not because it sounds futuristic, it is because it offers a chance to build an internet where what you create is not always one outage or one policy update away from disappearing. They’re trying to build Walrus so that storage can be resilient, verifiable, and independent, and if it becomes real at scale, then the internet becomes a place where your work has a home that does not vanish, and that is not hype, that is a kind of quiet freedom people have been waiting for.

@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus

Perché Walrus Esiste in Primo Luogo
Sto guardando @Walrus 🦭/acc attraverso l'obiettivo di ciò con cui gli sviluppatori si sforzano silenziosamente ogni giorno, perché anche quando una blockchain è veloce e un contratto intelligente è elegante, il momento in cui un prodotto reale deve memorizzare grandi quantità di contenuti come media, set di dati, istantanee dello stato dell'applicazione, file di modelli, registri o qualsiasi altro dato non strutturato pesante, il sistema spesso ricorre a un archiviazione centralizzata che introduce un punto unico di controllo e un punto unico di fallimento, e questo divario non è un semplice dettaglio tecnico, diventa il punto in cui la fiducia esce dallo stack, quindi Walrus cerca di colmare questo divario trattando l'archiviazione decentralizzata come un primitivo fondamentale che può essere utilizzato nello stesso modo serio in cui si utilizza l'archiviazione cloud tradizionale, tranne per il fatto che non dipende da un'azienda, da una giurisdizione o da un cambiamento di politica per mantenere i tuoi dati vivi.

Continuo a tornare alla stessa realtà scomoda sui mercati moderni: la privacy non è una caratteristica estetica, è uno strato fondamentale di sicurezza e dignità, perché quando ogni movimento di valore è permanentemente visibile, le persone non stanno semplicemente effettuando transazioni, ma espongono schemi che possono rivelare strategie, relazioni, ritmi salariali, tempistiche del tesoro e identità per correlazione. Nella maggior parte dei sistemi finanziari reali, la risposta non è rendere tutto visibile a tutti, la risposta è avere regole chiare, controlli rigorosi e confini controllati in modo che le parti interessate possano verificare ciò che conta senza trasformare ogni partecipante in un dataset pubblico. @Dusk was creato per questa tensione, un Layer 1 progettato per portare la finanza regolamentata sulla catena senza costringere istituzioni o utenti quotidiani a una trasparenza radicale come stato predefinito.