pitambar bhandari42

Molte persone entrano nel mercato finanziario con un presupposto implicito:
Basta che io sia abbastanza intelligente, lavori sodo e impari abbastanza, riuscirò sicuramente a guadagnare di più degli altri.

Ma la realtà spesso è opposta:

Persone con alta istruzione, forte logica e capacità analitica eccellente,
spesso perdi di più rispetto a un "comune individuo".

Perché accade così?

I. I tre principali vantaggi letali degli intelligenti

1. L'analisi eccessiva = paralisi dell'azione

Il punto forte degli intelligenti è trovare sempre delle scuse.
• Siamo rialzisti in questa posizione, ma l'analisi macro è ribassista
• Segnale d'oro, ma volume insufficiente
• Notizia positiva sulle notizie, ma flusso di fondi generico

The Federal Reserve has been stabbed in the back by its own people from within. In 2026, the first monetary civil war in the United States broke out in Wyoming: a state government openly issued its own digital dollar.
This is not innovation — it is a digital declaration of independence from the Federal Reserve’s monopoly on currency issuance.
On January 7, 2026, history was rewritten. Wyoming launched FRNT, the first (and so far only) stablecoin in the United States — and the world’s first — fully backed by state government credit.
What makes it fundamentally different from all private stablecoins? The issuer is not a corporation, but a sovereign state government. This digital dollar carries the official seal of the state.
Why is it a nuclear bomb?
First, the benefits belong to the public: the interest generated from reserves does not go to capitalists — it flows directly into education funding and tax relief in Wyoming. Its credibility is exceptional — backed 102%+ by U.S. dollars and Treasuries, with trillion-dollar institutional giants like Franklin Templeton managing the reserves, giving it credit quality that completely crushes private institutions.
Second (the original text skipped “第二” but continued with “第三”), cost massacre: compared to sky-high credit card fees, on-chain transfers cost only about 1 cent — a true dimensionality reduction assault on traditional payments.
Its ambition is global from day one: deployed across multiple blockchains at launch, and connected to the real world through Visa.
This has ignited an interstate race — North Dakota has already announced it will follow suit.
Even deeper is the constitutional game: new federal laws can’t control it, because a state government is not a “person” and enjoys sovereign immunity.
This ultimate showdown over who has the right to issue money has officially begun — the interstate digital currency war is on.
Whoever can provide cheaper, more transparent digital finance will win the future’s talent and capital.
The Fed’s monopoly is being torn open, and the terrifying chain of reasoning has started:
If all 50 states issue their own digital dollars — New York Coin, California Coin — becoming the norm, are we witnessing the birth of a Digital United States of America?
Will a monetary federalism hollow out the Federal Reserve?
When payment costs approach zero, and land, water, and resources are shared through new mechanisms, the financial world we know will be completely rewritten by code.
100 years ago, Wyoming panned for gold. Today, it is mining digital sovereignty.
When the state government steps in to protect land taxes and lets the people enjoy the interest, who is the real central bank?
Wyoming has already pulled the trigger.
This bullet is flying straight toward Washington D.C., and it also envisions a new global financial order.
This is not merely a technological victory — it is a profound institutional revolution: monetary power is flowing from the center to the localities, from closed to open.
Follow us to clearly see the trajectory of this transformation.
Which side are you betting on? The high-walled Federal Reserve, or the digital federation formed by the states?
Drop your judgment in the comments.
聊天室交流群

$雪球
{alpha}(560x36f2fd027f5f27c59b8c6d64df64bcc8e8c97777)