yggplaye

YGG and the Quiet Revolution of Player Reputation:
Why Your Actions Are Becoming More Valuable Than Your Assets

One of the biggest transformations in Web3 gaming isn’t happening in the spotlight — it’s happening underneath, in the way identity is being redefined. For years, the conversation revolved around who owned the rarest NFT or who could buy into early game economies. But the real shift now is that your reputation is starting to matter more than your wallet, and YGG is one of the first communities turning that idea into an actual system.

Traditional games lock your progress inside a single world. Your achievements, hours, and commitment never travel with you. But the Web3 model flips that — your identity moves with you. And YGG is building the rails that make that identity verifiable, portable, and trusted wherever you go.

Inside the YGG ecosystem, everything you do becomes part of a growing record of who you are as a player:

▸ the quests you finish,
▸ the guilds you’ve helped strengthen,
▸ the events, AMAs, and summits you consistently show up for,
▸ even the social contributions you’ve made to the community.

These aren’t just activities — they’re proof points. They become the foundation of a living reputation that can’t be faked or copy-pasted. Game studios can instantly see who’s genuinely invested versus who’s only around to chase incentives. And that single dynamic is becoming one of the strongest filters for building real, healthy communities.

The beauty of this is what it unlocks.

A strong YGG reputation can become your badge when you apply for early access to a new world, a spot in a playtest, a lore-crafting role, a content creator partnership — even future digital work opportunities. Instead of filling out forms or building portfolios, your onchain history becomes your resume. Your gameplay becomes your credibility.

For studios, it’s a defense system against bots and low-effort farming.
For players, it’s a way to make your time matter across dozens of future experiences — not just the one you’re currently grinding.

YGG is pushing the industry toward a future where play becomes identity, identity becomes trust, and trust unlocks opportunity. A future where your journey builds an onchain reputation as real as a credit score — but based on what you’ve contributed, not what you can afford.

If there’s any signal that Web3 gaming is maturing, this is it.

@Yield Guild Games $YGG #YGGPlaye Playe

Yield Guild Games is a major Web3 gaming collective that connects players, NFTs, and virtual economies into one powerful ecosystem. It works as a Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO), meaning the community drives decisions, growth, and development. YGG focuses on investing in high-value NFTs used in blockchain games and metaverse worlds, so players can access assets they might not afford on their own. This model helps more people join play-to-earn games, earn rewards, and build experience without needing heavy upfront investment.
YGG’s structure is built around two core pillars: the main YGG Vaults and its expanding network of SubDAOs. YGG Vaults allow users to stake the YGG token and receive rewards generated by guild activities, partnerships, and NFT utilization across multiple games. These vaults make it simple for anyone holding YGG to benefit from the entire ecosystem’s performance. SubDAOs act like specialized regional or game-focused units, each managing assets, players, and strategies for a specific game or community. This layered system makes YGG scalable, flexible, and able to grow with the global gaming market.
The YGG token is the heart of the guild. Users can stake it in vaults, use it for yield farming, pay for certain network activities, and participate in governance. Governance gives token holders voting power over proposals, future game partnerships, treasury allocations, and the overall direction of the guild. YGG’s model is designed to empower real community ownership, so growth benefits everyone involved rather than a small team of developers.
YGG partners with leading blockchain games, supports eSports-style competitive gaming, invests in high-demand NFTs, and trains players for different play-to-earn strategies. This approach creates opportunities for players, investors, and developers at the same time. As blockchain gaming expands, YGG continues to build an ecosystem where virtual economies can function like real ones—transparent, accessible, and community-powered.
@Yield Guild Games #YGGPlaye $YGG

Yield Guild Games began as a simple, human-sized idea that rode the early wave of blockchain gaming and then stretched outward until it became something more like an experiment in building a new kind of digital commons. In 2018 Gabby Dizon, a Philippines-based game industry veteran, started lending his own NFTs to players who could not afford them so those players could participate in play-to-earn games; that ad hoc practice, joined shortly by Beryl Li and a pseudonymous developer known as “Owl of Moistness,” crystallized into a formal guild in 2020 and later into the DAO most people now recognize as YGG. The founding story matters because it explains both the guild’s social texture—peer mentorship, regional organizers, and scholarship relationships—and its economic logic: pooled capital buys scarce digital assets, those assets are put to work by players, and the returns are shared across the community.
What made YGG distinctive from the beginning was that it translated the familiar structures of offline guilds and cooperatives into blockchain-native architecture. Instead of a single company owning all decisions, YGG organized itself as a Decentralized Autonomous Organization that held a treasury of NFTs and tokens, created smaller sub-communities focused on specific games or regions (SubDAOs), and layered incentives so contributors at many levels—scholars playing the games, community managers, asset managers, and token holders—could capture a portion of the upside. SubDAOs were not merely Discord channels; they were designed as semi-autonomous economic units with governance over the game-specific assets they stewarded and rules adapted to local needs, which let YGG scale across languages, time zones and game economies without flattening every decision into a single distant authority.
The scholarship model is the social engine that made the guild operational. YGG raised capital to acquire in-game NFTs—items that in some games are gatekeepers to earning opportunities—and then loaned those assets to “scholars,” players who lacked upfront capital but could provide time and skill. Earnings were split according to prearranged terms so the scholar received immediate income and the guild retained a share for treasury growth and future purchases. Over time the scholarship program formalized: onboarding, training, account and asset management, compliance checks, and community support became routine, and YGG’s playbooks for operations were shared through guides and public posts so the model could be replicated or audited by the community. That same scholar-centric design is what turned an idea into international operations spanning regions such as Southeast Asia, Latin America and beyond.
Economically YGG blended a few different DeFi primitives into its governance and membership mechanics. The project proposed and implemented staking and vault mechanisms that allow token holders to direct capital toward specific objectives—game-focused reward vaults, utility vaults and broader treasury vaults—so that staking could both earn protocol rewards and grant members privileged access or voting power in game initiatives. The whitepaper and subsequent product pages describe vaults as configurable instruments: some vaults funnel rewards from a single game, giving stakers exposure to that game’s token streams; others aggregate returns from multiple activities and distribute them pro rata. In practice this modular vault architecture was intended to align token holder incentives with the operational teams running scholarships, asset acquisitions, and partnerships.
Behind the scenes of scholarship payouts and vault yields sits the treasury and token design. YGG issued a governance token that serves both as a utility (for staking and access) and as a weight in on-chain governance proposals. Early funding rounds—seed and strategic investments from major backers—seeded the treasury and helped YGG purchase the initial pools of NFTs. Over the years the DAO has managed on-chain and off-chain allocations, periodic token deployments and treasury moves meant to support liquidity, ecosystem incentives, and product development; those actions have at times provoked market attention because they directly affect circulating supply and available liquidity, but they are structurally consistent with a guild that must balance short-term operational needs (paying scholars, hiring community leads) with long-term asset accumulation. The tradeoffs are real: holding NFTs for yield and market exposure can be profitable if the underlying game economies thrive, but the model is exposed to game design changes, token inflation inside games, and the vagaries of demand for specific NFT assets.
As the broader Web3 and game markets evolved, YGG’s strategic posture shifted more than once. What began as a pure scholarship and asset-management guild broadened into a multi-pronged infrastructure effort: building play-to-earn onboarding funnels, investing in game studios, formalizing SubDAOs into semi-autonomous entities, and experimenting with publishing and distribution—what YGG later framed as “YGG Play” or a playlaunch infrastructure designed to help onboard players and seed community engagement for new projects. Independent research and recent analysis note this transition from a guild that primarily rented assets to one that increasingly acts as an infrastructure and distribution layer for Web3 games, signaling a desire to capture value not only by owning NFTs but by owning parts of the game stack itself: distribution channels, player communities, and developer relationships. This evolution reflects both market necessity and strategic judgment: as pure play-to-earn token returns became more volatile, diversifying into publishing, partnerships and tooling provided alternative, potentially steadier revenue streams.
Operationally there are pragmatic details worth noting. SubDAOs run localized operations: recruiting scholars, moderating community channels, managing in-game strategies and liquidity, and sometimes deciding which NFTs to buy or retire. On the governance side the DAO has experimented with on-chain proposals and off-chain coordination; governance forums, snapshot votes, and working groups have been used to steer major decisions while day-to-day asset management often rests with elected or hired stewards who have operational authority. The vault and staking products create a bridge between token holders who want exposure to gaming returns and the teams running active operations, but they also raise questions about risk allocation—who bears the downside when a game’s economy collapses, when an NFT’s rarity evaporates, or when a blockchain migration changes asset registries. YGG has tried to mitigate these risks with diversified asset acquisitions, close community monitoring of partner games, and periodic public disclosures about treasury strategy.
YGG’s story cannot be told without acknowledging the critiques and the wider context that shaped them. Critics have argued that play-to-earn guilds can create exploitative labor dynamics when scholars become dependent on game incomes that are unstable, when revenue splits are opaque, or when the on-chain incentives encourage short-term grinding rather than sustainable game engagement. Journalists and academics have also pointed out how the play-to-earn model can mirror extractive economic relations: capital owners buy assets, outsource labor, and capture value in ways that can reproduce inequalities rather than resolve them. YGG’s response has been to formalize onboarding, increase transparency in scholarship agreements, and evolve business lines away from purely renting NFTs toward creating owned experiences and distribution channels; nonetheless, the moral economy of P2E remains contested and is part of the reason YGG doubled down on broader infrastructure rather than relying only on rental yields.
Recent years have also been a test of scale and adaptability. Macro effects—crypto market drawdowns, shifting investor sentiment about NFTs, and waves of consolidation or layoffs in the gaming industry—have pressured yield streams that were once predictable during token booms. YGG’s financial engineering (treasury deployments, token repurchases, strategic financing rounds) reflects those pressures: the DAO and its backers have rebalanced exposure and sought new business models, including investing earlier in studios and productizing onboarding so that the guild can monetize services rather than only asset appreciation. Analysts who follow YGG now frame it less as a speculative guild and more as a player-network/market-making organization that builds community, liquidity and distribution for Web3-native game experiences.
For people who want to understand YGG today, the practical takeaway is this: the guild is both social and financial. It runs programs that look like social welfare—scholarships and training—that are financed by market bets on NFT assets and game economies. It organizes governance and product primitives—SubDAOs, vaults, staking—that try to align token holder incentives with operational teams. And it is actively changing, moving from owning and renting NFTs toward owning pieces of the gaming value chain itself. That mixture of cooperative social practices, venture funding, on-chain mechanics and product bets makes YGG an instructive case study for how Web3 experiments attempt to scale community governance while also participating in high-risk digital markets. If you want the technical or legal specificswhitepaper mechanics for vaults and staking, or the exact terms of past funding rounds and token allocations the project’s published documents and historical Medium posts provide more granular line items; the whitepaper and the project documentation remain the best canonical sources for vault mechanics and token rules, while independent research and recent industry reports are useful for interpreting YGG’s strategic shifts and market posture.
@Yield Guild Games #YGGPlaye $YGG

Yield Guild Games, znane jako YGG, to nie tylko projekt gier i nie tylko DAO kryptowalutowe. To żywy eksperyment w tym, jak ludzie mogą pracować, zarabiać i posiadać razem w wirtualnych światach. YGG to Zdecentralizowana Organizacja Autonomiczna stworzona w celu inwestowania w NFT, które są używane w grach blockchain i platformach metawersum, a następnie przekształcania tych aktywów w wspólny dochód dla globalnej społeczności.

Zamiast jednego gracza posiadającego wszystko, a wszyscy inni tylko grający, YGG odwraca tę strukturę. Gildia wspólnie posiada aktywa. Gracze z nich korzystają. Wartość wraca do społeczności. Ta prosta zmiana zmienia to, co oznacza gra w cyfrowym świecie.

:
ارتفعت Yield Guild Games (YGG) إلى صدارة ألعاب Web3 ليس بسبب التعقيد الفني وحده، ولكن بسبب التزامها الفريد تجاه الناس. بينما تركز الكثير من صناعة البلوكشين على البنية التحتية وآليات الرموز، تأسست YGG على التعاطف والوصول والاعتقاد بأن الاقتصاديات الرقمية يجب أن ترفع من مستوى الأفراد. في عصر الألعاب القائم على الربح المبكر، أراد الآلاف من اللاعبين الانضمام ولكنهم تم استبعادهم بسبب الرموز غير القابلة للاستبدال المكلفة. بدلاً من قبول هذا الحاجز، قام مؤسسو YGG بإقراض أصول NFT الخاصة بهم للاعبين الذين يفتقرون إلى الوسائل. وضعت هذه الإيماءة البسيطة الأساس لأكثر النقابات تأثيراً في عالم الألعاب اللامركزية.
من ذلك الفعل المبكر للشمولية، طورت YGG نموذج المنحة الرائد، الذي يمكّن اللاعبين من استخدام أصول NFT دون أي استثمار مسبق. في المقابل، يشاركون جزءًا من المكافآت المكتسبة في اللعبة. حولت هذه الطريقة ألعاب البلوكشين إلى مسار اقتصادي يمكن الوصول إليه للناس حول العالم، خصوصاً في المجتمعات التي يمكن أن يكون لتدفقات الدخل الجديدة تأثير يغير الحياة. بالنسبة للكثيرين، كانت YGG أكثر من مجرد نقابة - أصبحت مصدرًا للاستقرار المالي الحقيقي، والثقة الشخصية، وبوابة إلى اقتصاد الألعاب NFT الذي ينمو بسرعة.
مع توسع YGG، اعتمدت النقابة إطار عمل للحوكمة اللامركزية من خلال DAO الخاص بها. يضمن ذلك أن تعكس القرارات أصوات المجتمع بدلاً من فريق قيادة مركزي. لتوسيع نطاقها بشكل فعال عبر المناطق وأنظمة الألعاب، قدمت YGG SubDAOs، مجموعات أصغر تركز على مواقع واهتمامات أو ألعاب محددة. يسمح هذا الهيكل لـ YGG بالنمو عالمياً مع الحفاظ على الثقافة الداعمة والمجتمعية التي تحدد النقابة.
في مركز هذا النظام البيئي يوجد رمز YGG، الذي يدعم الحوكمة والمكافآت والمشاركة المجتمعية. ترتبط فائدته مباشرة بأنشطة النقابة على السلسلة، مما يميزه عن الرموز المضاربية ذات الصلة المحدودة بالعالم الحقيقي. مع توفر رمز YGG في البورصات الكبرى، عمق ذلك من وصول النقابة العالمي وثبت موقعها في مشهد Web3 والألعاب القائمة على البلوكشين.
مع مرور الوقت، تطورت YGG إلى ما هو أبعد من آليات الربح من اللعب. تعمل الآن كمركز للتعليم الرقمي، مزودة الأعضاء بالمهارات في محو الأمية البلوكشين، وتطوير الرياضات الإلكترونية، وإنشاء المحتوى، وبناء مسيرتهم المهنية في Web3. من خلال الشراكات وبرامج التدريب والمبادرات التي يقودها المجتمع، تمكن YGG اللاعبين من التقدم من المبتدئين إلى المشاركين المهرة في الاقتصاد الأوسع للميتافيرس. ينتقل العديد من الأعضاء إلى أدوار كمنشئين أو منظمين أو استراتيجيين أو مساهمين عبر نظام Web3 البيئي.
مع نضوج ألعاب البلوكشين، تصبح مهمة YGG ذات صلة متزايدة. يتحرك مجال Web3 نحو اقتصاديات رقمية أكثر استدامة، وتبرز تأكيدات YGG على الشمولية والتعليم ومرونة المجتمع وسط الضوضاء. تجسد النقابة مستقبلاً حيث ت anchor الملكية الرقمية والحكم اللامركزي وتمكين اللاعبين الجيل التالي من المجتمعات عبر الإنترنت والاقتصاديات الافتراضية.
اليوم، تعتبر Yield Guild Games أكثر بكثير من مجرد مجموعة ألعاب - إنها حركة عالمية تدعم العدالة والتعاون والفرص عبر العوالم الرقمية. تقدم للاعبين من جميع الخلفيات مساراً منظماً وداعماً إلى اقتصاديات ألعاب Web3، مما يمنحهم فرصة للتعلم والكسب والنمو. مع تسارع اعتماد Web3 وظهور الملكية الرقمية، تظل YGG قوة توجيهية - ترفع الأفراد والمجتمعات مع توسع النظام البيئي للألعاب اللامركزية.
@Yield Guild Games#YGGPlaye lay $YGG

Większość ludzi zakłada, że odpowiedzialność gildii wynika z przywództwa—surowe zasady, przypomnienia, listy kontrolne, przydziały ról i zwykła struktura, którą widzisz w zorganizowanych grupach. Ale każdy, kto obserwuje gildię Web3 działającą na Protokole Gildii wystarczająco długo, zaczyna zauważać coś bardzo innego. Prawdziwa odpowiedzialność wcale nie pochodzi od liderów. Pochodzi z samej społeczności. Rośnie naturalnie, gdy członkowie mogą dostrzegać własny wkład—gdy rozumieją, że ich działania nie znikają w powietrzu. Nawet ktoś taki jak Dr Nohawn, który zazwyczaj ma sceptyczne podejście do systemów, raz zauważył, że gildie stają się „samoobalansujące, gdy wszyscy widzą prawdę”, i nie przesadzał.

Yield Guild Games began as a simple but powerful idea: lower the barrier to entry for people who wanted to earn inside blockchain games by pooling capital to buy expensive in-game assets and lending them to players who could turn play into income. From its early whitepaper days the project described itself not merely as a guild or a community but as a decentralized autonomous organization that acquires NFTs — from utility avatars to land plots and yield-generating items — and manages those assets on behalf of token holders, scholars, and partner communities. That whitepaper laid out the mechanics clearly: YGG would act as a capital aggregator and operator, create specialized pods of activity, and align incentives through token-based governance and reward programs.
Operationally, the model that made YGG visible to the world was the scholarship system. The guild buys the starter NFTs needed to participate in many of the early play-to-earn economies and loans those NFTs to players, known as scholars, who do the day-to-day gameplay. Scholars earn tokens and items in the game and share those earnings with the guild according to prearranged splits; the guild benefits because it can scale access to games across many regions by shouldering upfront NFT costs and providing training and community support. What began as a way to onboard players in one or two games matured into a standardized playbook: acquisition, lending, support, tracking, and profit distribution. Over time that operational playbook evolved into an institutionalized, on-chain structure where the guild’s decisions, treasury movements, and incentive programs are increasingly mediated by smart contracts and token-holder governance.
As YGG grew, its internal organization shifted away from a single monolith toward a network of specialized cells. SubDAOs — autonomous sub-communities focused on particular games, geographies, or strategies — became the way to scale both decision making and asset specialization. A SubDAO focused on a particular virtual world aggregates assets from that universe, builds operational expertise, recruits and trains scholars that thrive in those specific rulesets, and feeds returns back into the broader guild economy. This modular approach lowers risk concentration: different SubDAOs can hold complementary assets, operate different monetization strategies (rentals, yield farming, active trading), and react independently as game updates or token economies shift. Over time the SubDAO layer also opened the door to more granular governance and token models, with some SubDAOs experimenting with their own token mechanics or incentive programs that interact with the main YGG treasury.
To turn illiquid NFTs into predictable, investable exposure, YGG developed vaults. Vaults pool assets — sometimes across SubDAOs or concentrated within a single game world — and expose tokenized reward streams to people who want to participate financially without managing scholars or game accounts. Rather than offering fixed interest rates as DeFi lending platforms do, YGG’s vaults represent revenue-share or rewards programs: token holders lock YGG into a vault and receive distributions derived from specific underlying activities, whether that’s rental income, game token rewards, or NFT rotation strategies. Vault design matters: a well-constructed vault blends high-frequency active yield (for example, play rewards from scholars) with low-volatility, slow-drip assets (like land or utility items) so the overall return curve is smoothed and resilient to patch-driven shocks within any single game. Those vaults are an interface between the operational guild and passive capital providers, giving broader participants exposure to the guild’s on-chain operations.
The YGG token itself has been central to governance, staking, and aligning incentives. Initially designed to represent a claim on the guild’s growth and to incentivize community participation, the token has been used across staking programs, reward vaults, and governance votes. In 2025 the guild completed a notable transition, repositioning the token toward a pure revenue-share asset: treasury income began to be used for systematic buybacks and distributions to stakers, creating a tighter link between operational cash flow and token economics. That shift represented a maturation of the treasury strategy — from early accumulation and growth toward an asset that returns value directly to token holders based on real revenue generated by the guild’s activities. This approach has implications for market dynamics, treasury management, and how long-term holders think about staking versus active participation in governance.
Treasury and tokenomics have been a focal point for both supporters and critics. On one hand, the treasury enabled rapid scaling: YGG could buy into new games, build land positions, fund partnerships, and seed SubDAOs without repeatedly asking the community for capital infusions. On the other hand, the community has had to navigate supply schedules, unlock cliffs, and the optics of token allocations. Recent on-chain analyses show that most of YGG’s supply has unlocked and that vesting schedules for team and investor allocations were a material factor in liquidity planning and market behavior. The guild’s shift to using treasury income for buybacks and distributions is a design choice intended to minimize dilution and to create more direct long-term value capture for holders, but it also requires steady operational revenue to be sustainable.
The day-to-day of running a decentralized guild exposes it to a unique set of operational challenges. Game updates can devalue prized items overnight; token utility changes can alter incentive flows; geographic regulatory pressure and local fiat on-ramps affect how scholars convert earnings into livelihood; and new entrants and competing guilds change the market for talent. YGG has responded by diversifying across games and strategies, codifying best practices for scholar onboarding and support, and incrementally moving more of its operational bookkeeping on-chain so decisions are auditable and governance proposals reflect economic realities. The guild has also experimented with product pivots — for instance, moving from seasonal GAP programs to integrated questing frameworks that aim to broaden participation and introduce cross-game achievement systems — a reflection of the tension between sustaining legacy communities and chasing broader, more mainstream engagement.
Partnerships, community programs, and local guilds have been vital. YGG has formed alliances with game studios, on-chain marketplaces, and payment partners to lower friction for scholars and create joint incentive programs. The guild’s community reach — measured in tens or hundreds of thousands of scholars and a network of local organizers — became both a competitive advantage and a product: studios appreciate a ready base of trained players who can jumpstart an economy, and investors value the growth engine that the guild’s community provides. At scale, that community becomes a distribution channel for onboarding new players into Web3 gaming and a feedback loop for product teams building blockchain games.
Looking forward, the guild’s evolution will be shaped by broader trends in blockchain gaming: how mainstream studios incorporate on-chain items, whether mobile and AAA games embrace tokenized economies, how regulators treat in-game earnings, and the technical evolution of NFT standards and cross-chain tooling. YGG’s strategy — diversify assets, modularize through SubDAOs, expose revenue via vaults, and align token economics toward revenue share — positions it as an institutionalized bridge between capital and players. But the path remains contingent: success depends on steady revenue generation from underlying activities, thoughtful treasury stewardship, and the ability to retain and grow a global scholar network even as games and economic models shift. For anyone trying to understand YGG today, the story is less about a single product and more about an experiment in scaling an operational, on-chain investment vehicle that sits at the intersection of gaming, community, and decentralized finance.
@Yield Guild Games #YGGPlaye $YGG

Yield Guild Games, znana jako YGG, to globalna społeczność gier Web3 stworzona, aby pomóc graczom zarabiać, uczyć się i rozwijać w światach blockchain. To DAO, które zbiera NFT z najlepszych gier Web3 i przekazuje je graczom, aby mogli grać i zarabiać bez potrzeby posiadania dużych pieniędzy na start.

Gildia kupuje postacie, ziemię, narzędzia i inne NFT związane z grami. Gracze wykorzystują te zasoby do realizacji misji, zdobywania nagród i budowania postępu. Większość nagród trafia bezpośrednio do gracza. Mała część wraca do skarbu gildii, aby społeczność mogła się jeszcze bardziej rozwijać. Tworzy to cykl, w którym więcej graczy dołącza, więcej NFT jest dodawanych, a więcej gier staje się częścią ekosystemu.

@Yield Guild Games przypomina światło, które pojawiło się w cyfrowym świecie w momencie, gdy ludzie potrzebowali go najbardziej. To nie tylko DAO zbudowane na kodzie. To społeczność zbudowana na nadziei. Miejsce, gdzie gracze, którzy kiedyś czuli się ograniczeni przez bariery finansowe, w końcu dostają szansę, aby pewnie wkroczyć w wirtualne światy. YGG łączy ludzi w sposób, który wydaje się ciepły, naturalny i głęboko ludzki. Zostało stworzone, aby pomóc graczom uzyskać dostęp do NFT w grach blockchain, ale to, w co się przekształciło, jest znacznie większe. Stało się ruchem, który otwiera drzwi dla tysięcy osób, które marzą o przekształceniu swojej pasji do gier w nagrody w prawdziwym życiu.

Jeśli patrzysz na YGG jak na kolejny wskaźnik na wykresie, już tracisz sens.
To nigdy nie chodziło o cenę. Nie dla ludzi, którzy naprawdę to używali.
Chodzi o dostęp.
Dla większości graczy dostęp zawsze był murem. Chcesz grać? W porządku. Kup sprzęt. Kup postać. Kup ziemię. Wydaj najpierw, może później się ciesz. A jeśli nie masz pieniędzy? Trudno. Patrz z boku.
YGG pojawiło się i powiedziało: „Co jeśli ten mur nie istnieje?”
Jak ludzie naprawdę to używają

__Jest rytm w tym, jak działa YGG teraz__
Wybuchy uwagi, które towarzyszyły wczesnej fali play-to-earn, zniknęły...
To, co pozostaje, jest wolniejsze, cichsze, rodzajem pracy, która odbywa się między społecznościami starającymi się pozostać wypłacalne i zorganizowane.
Liderzy gildii nie mówią już tak dużo o cenach tokenów.
Mówią o budżetach, cyklach szkoleniowych i stabilnych źródłach dochodu.
DAO wciąż jest globalne, ale jego energia znajduje się w lokalnych zespołach, które decydują, jak utrzymać wszystko w ruchu.
Finansowanie, które zaczyna się od małych rzeczy

Karta UPay wdraża silne środki bezpieczeństwa w celu ochrony informacji użytkowników i funduszy. Jest w pełni zgodna z głównymi organami regulacyjnymi, w tym FCA, licencjami MSB w Kanadzie i USA oraz przepisami MSO w Hongkongu. Bezpieczeństwo podczas transmisji danych zapewnia szyfrowanie SSL 256-bitowe, a zakupy online są dodatkowo chronione technologią 3D Secure, która wykorzystuje weryfikację OTP. Protokoły KYC i AML są ściśle przestrzegane, co zmniejsza ryzyko oszustwa. Platforma zawiera również monitoring antyfraudowy, aby śledzić podejrzane działania w czasie rzeczywistym. Dodatkowo, każda karta zawiera kod CVC2 do bezpiecznych transakcji, a w przypadku zgubienia karty użytkownicy mogą łatwo ją zablokować za pomocą aplikacji UPay w celu natychmiastowej ochrony.