Kitten 月

The blockchain sector has reached a weird stage. New Layer-1 are continually being launched, with larger TPS, smaller fees and even faster finality. However, adoption is still incomplete, and the majority of such chains are unable to develop long-term relevance. The answer to this question in the era of AI is becoming obvious: the base infrastructure is no longer a bottleneck.
What Web3 Has Already Solved
Web3 has mostly resolved its underlying challenges in the past couple of years. We have quick consensus protocols, performance execution platforms, modular architecture, and rollups. The ability to move value, settle transactions and run smart contracts in large scale no longer constitutes new accomplishments. These are capabilities that are table stakes.
Introducing a new L1 with a slightly higher speed or lower cost does not make much sense to what developers or users can construct.
The reason why base infrastructure is no longer the heart of the issue.
It is not throughput or gas efficiency that is limiting in the real world. It's capability. The classic blockchains were deterministic stateless execution. The AI systems are however probabilistic, stateful, and adaptive. They need memory, reason and automation that is more than mere execution of transactions.
These requirements were never intended to be considered in most of these chains.
What Still Lacks Despite Hundreds of Chains.
The availability of blockchains is an obvious mismatch, yet the gap that remains is an obvious native AI compatibility. Making AI retrofit on existing legacy chains results in weak systems that are based on off-chain computation, centralized coordination, and opaque execution paths. This disobeys trust, composability and verifiability.
AI requires infrastructure that has knowledge of it at a base level.
What It Really Means to Be in the AI-Era Differentiation.
Differentiation in an AI age is no longer based on blockspace. It's about products. Winning chains will be the ones which allow AI systems to run on-chain to full effect- with memory, reasoning, execution, and settlement verifiable and composable.
In the absence of actual products that prove these abilities,AI-ready is a buzzword.
The Reason Why Products Matter More than New Blockspace.
Products prove intent. They demonstrate the support of actual loads in a chain and not some ideal values. The products of the AI era should show:
Persistent on-chain memory
Open-minded thought processes.
Safe, automated execution
Trustless settlement
It is in this regard that most L1s fail.
What AI Preparedness Proof Looks Like.
The opinion of AI preparedness is not a promise on a route. It's observable behavior. A chain makes AI ready when AI systems have capabilities to:
Natively store and recalls.
Explain decisions on-chain
Carry out activities without a centralized control.
Resolve results distrustfully.
This is evidenced today by Vanar.
The way Vanar Prepares AI Readiness into Practice.
Vanar is not branding itself as the other general-purpose chain. It is developing infrastructure in a manner that is directly in line with AI systems needs.
myNeutron illustrates the native memory. AI agents are able to maintain state on-chain, consult historical context and develop over time without off-chain databases.
On-chain explainability and reasoning is proven by Kayon. Decisions are not black boxes, there can be logic inspection, audit and verification on-chain.
Execution can be safely and automatically executed through flows. AI agents are capable of instigating actions, aligning processes and performing outcomes without any supervision and being transparent and controllable.
These features in combination are not individual features. They are known as unified AI stack.
The place of $VANRY in this Model.
VANRY is not established as player in idle blockspace. It is directly related to the use of systems. By creating demand through the token, AI agents consume network resources and execute flows as they store memory, reason and execute flows.
The usage in all myNeutron, Kayon and Flows flows into the economic layer.
Sub Saharan to Sub Utility.
This is the key difference. Vanar does not create a new L1 and expect developers to show up, but rather creates products that are AI-native and lets infrastructure demand grow organically.
In the AI-led world, the chains that will not be able to implement intelligent systems on the protocol level will become irrelevant. The approach proposed by Vanar implies a variation of it, where AI preparedness is not asserted, but demonstrated.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar

The blockchain technology has passed through several stages, which include initial testing experiments to massive adoption efforts. Still, there is one big problem that has not been solved with numerous networks: the vast majority of blockchains is not designed to be used in practice, but to operate in theory. Plasma is also tackling this by looking at the challenge in another dimension by emphasizing infrastructure that is more usable, scalable and sustainable in the long term and less a short term hype.
The discrepancy between the performance assertions and the real user experience is one of the largest issues of the current blockchain ecosystem. Most networks boast of high throughput and enhanced characteristics, yet developers and users continue to experience congestion, unreliable costing and cumbersome tooling. Plasma is playing an effort to minimise this discrepancy by developing infrastructure that functions dependably in the actual conditions, not in the benchmarks or controlled settings.
Scalability is usually confused with the simple enhancement of speed of transactions. As a matter of fact, scalability also implies the capacity to accommodate increasing ecosystems of apps, programmers and users without the creation of friction. Plasma is created to be scalable to ensure stability and in a flexible manner. This enables applications to continue to expand rather than being inhibited by the network capacity as more people utilize it.
The experience of developers is another major area of concern at Plasma. The developers should have efficient, reliable, and user-friendly environments in order to make Web3 more widespread. Tools fragmentation and multifaceted deployment delays the innovation process. Plasma aims at streamlining these processes in an attempt to help the developers to have more time to create meaningful applications instead of dealing with infrastructure challenges.
On the user side, it is also critical with regards to usability. Regular consumers have no interest in considering the mechanics of the gas, or network congestion, or transaction failure. Plasma acknowledges that to ensure real adoption, there should be smooth interaction. The network focuses on making blockchain applications appear more like the traditional digital platforms with predictable performance and efficient execution and maintains the benefits of decentralization.
Reliability and security are also the major factor. Infrastructure needs to be stable as additional value and activity goes on-chain. The strategy of plasma has a focus on consistency and strength and mitigates the threats of hasty design choices or experimental features that are implemented prematurely. This renders the network more appropriate to use in applications where trust and long term stability are needed.
Plasma also has another significant attribute paying emphasis on future ready infrastructure. Blockchain has stopped being just a transfer or even a basic smart contract. The new applications are complex in terms of logic, automation and integration with other technologies. With these changing needs, plasma is moving to accommodate these needs without compelling developers to overuse off-chain workarounds.
In the ecosystem sense, this infrastructure-first way of thinking assists in the establishment of sustainable growth. Plasma does not follow personal trends but instead it is concerned with establishing a foundation that can be utilized across the applications in the long term. This strategy is appealing to developers and projects that are not interested in short term experimentation but long term deployment.
Engaging in this infrastructure-based vision will be manifested in the exposure of exposure to $XPL . The value proposition is not connected only with speculation but with the fact that the network can be used to support real applications and active use. The underlying infrastructure is becoming more relevant as the usage increases and more projects are created on Plasma.
Plasma has a focus on real usability and practical design in an environment filled with promises. Plasma is moving towards an infrastructure that is capable of sustaining the next stage of adoption of blockchain without having to sacrifice on core principles by prioritizing scalability, developer experience, user simplicity, and long-term reliability.
@Plasma $XPL #Plasma

O termo blockchain pronto para IA pode ser ouvido em todos os lugares, mas poucas pessoas se preocupam em perguntar o que esse termo significa. Na maioria das instâncias, tem sido uma abreviação de marketing, mas não um fato técnico. Várias cadeias alegam ser prontas para IA, uma vez que ferramentas de IA podem ser desenvolvidas em sua estrutura. Isso é, na verdade, um mito na realidade. A preparação para IA não é uma atividade posterior à incorporação da IA, mas sim se a infraestrutura subjacente foi inicialmente desenvolvida para executar sistemas inteligentes em escala.
O maior mito no mundo atual é que um blockchain rápido ou um blockchain de alta TPS é imediatamente adequado para trabalhar com cargas de IA. Essa suposição se baseia na época em que os blockchains eram principalmente utilizados para fazer transferências e DeFi. No entanto, os sistemas de IA atuam de maneira oposta. Eles operam com grandes quantidades de dados, respondem à continuidade da memória, dependem de tomada de decisão automatizada e exigem processamento previsível. Essas necessidades não são resolvidas com velocidade.

Os Jogos, Web 3 e Entretenimento Digital do Futuro rodando em uma Blockchain.
A única maneira de que a adoção da blockchain aumente é quando a tecnologia se tornar invisível para o consumidor final. Esta é a visão com a qual a Vanar Chain está sendo construída. Em vez de fornecer utilidades centradas em finanças, a Vanar foi projetada para dar suporte a ecossistemas centrados em entretenimento, como jogos, experiências de metaverso, NFTs como distribuição de mídia digital, etc., que exigem velocidade, estabilidade e escalabilidade.

A implementação da blockchain está aumentando a um ritmo rápido, mas ainda há um grande desafio na escalabilidade. Quanto mais rápidos os usuários e aplicativos, menor a velocidade das transações e maior o custo. Através do uso de plasma, esta questão pretende ser resolvida, permitindo criar uma infraestrutura de blockchain escalável e eficiente sem a necessidade de focar na segurança. O plasma possui uma arquitetura de cadeia filha e cadeia principal. A maioria das transações é realizada off-chain por essas cadeias filhas, melhorando o throughput e reduzindo a congestão.

A não descentralização da tecnologia blockchain é boa kar isaaur saldam, no entanto, kika-kika usuários e aplicações grahti rahi, a escalabilidade é uma grande dificuldade gurai. Altas taxas, lentidão nas transações em congestionamentos de rede ne developers aur users dono ko affect kiya hai. Plasma ek strong aaur par aur bahmani aaga ke taur par samne aaya.
Escalando o Framework O Plasma asal mein ek scaling é o framework que usa a blockchain principal como uma cadeia filha. Em par zyada child chains Hoti hai par zyada off-chain process, jab ke main chain si tantan III, dados essenciais aure principais provas de segurança listiya hai, lidam karti hai. Is aap se a carga da rede é reduzida e as transações são rápidas, eficientes e de baixo custo.

Com a tecnologia de blockchain em constante evolução, há uma questão que permanece a mesma: escalabilidade sem comprometer a usabilidade. A maioria das redes será inovadora e falhará em funcionar quando usuários reais e demanda real entram em jogo. O plasma visa abordar esse problema fundamental por meio do desenvolvimento de sua infraestrutura destinada a desempenhar, ser eficiente e ser adotada a longo prazo, em oposição ao experimentalismo a curto prazo.
As abordagens do plasma para blockchain adotam uma abordagem prática para escalabilidade. Não é uma adição de complexidade à situação, mas sim uma concentração na otimização da interação entre os dados, transações e camadas de execução. Isso se traduz em menos interrupções de desempenho, menos atritos por parte do desenvolvedor e uma experiência aprimorada para os usuários finais. Um sistema escalável não significa simplesmente que será capaz de lidar com o volume, mas também que permanecerá consistente e confiável à medida que a carga aumenta.