Z O E ETH

Walrus (and its token, WAL) is one of those crypto projects that sounds simple on the surface but is actually aiming at a huge problem most blockchains quietly avoid: real-world data is big, and blockchains are not built to store big data. Chains are amazing at tracking ownership, transactions, and state, but the moment you try to store videos, images, game assets, AI datasets, or app files directly on-chain, costs blow up and performance gets ugly. That’s why so many “decentralized” apps still end up depending on Web2 storage like AWS or centralized CDNs in the background. Walrus is trying to fix that by acting like a decentralized “blob storage” layer—basically a network designed to store large chunks of data—while still feeling native to Web3 instead of being a separate system bolted on afterward. The key idea is that Walrus uses Sui as the coordination and programmability layer, while Walrus itself handles the heavy lifting of storing the actual data across a decentralized set of storage nodes, and WAL is the token that pays for storage, secures the network through staking, and enables governance over network parameters.
When you store data on Walrus, you’re not just uploading a file to one server. The system treats your file as a “blob,” then splits and encodes it into smaller redundant pieces called slivers, which are distributed across many storage nodes so the network can tolerate node failures or downtime without losing the data. This is where Walrus’s engineering identity shows up: it uses an erasure-coding approach called Red Stuff, described as a two-dimensional scheme with primary and secondary slivers designed to make recovery efficient and allow the network to “self-heal” availability over time. In normal human terms, the goal is to avoid the expensive “copy the whole file everywhere” model while still making sure the data can be reconstructed even if some nodes disappear or misbehave. Walrus documentation also frames its storage overhead as roughly around five times the raw blob size, positioning it as more cost-efficient than naive full replication while still being robust. Another practical feature is that Walrus is content-addressable: blob IDs can be derived from the content, which supports reuse and deduplication when the same data is uploaded multiple times—a big cost and efficiency win for real applications.
Privacy is another area where it’s important to be precise. Walrus isn’t automatically a “private blockchain,” but it is a storage network that can support privacy-preserving apps through encryption and access control, and Walrus highlights tools like Seal to enable programmable data access so developers can define who is allowed to access or decrypt stored content. That means privacy becomes a design choice apps can implement cleanly, instead of forcing everything to be public by default, but it also means users should understand that “private data” usually means “encrypted data with controlled access,” not necessarily complete invisibility of all metadata.
WAL’s tokenomics are designed around this storage economy rather than being a decorative token. Walrus’s official token info lists a max supply of 5,000,000,000 WAL and an initial circulating supply of 1,250,000,000 WAL, with allocation buckets including a large community reserve plus a user drop and subsidies alongside allocations for core contributors and investors. The project also states that it aims to keep storage pricing stable in fiat terms to reduce the pain of token volatility for users, with storage payments made upfront for a fixed period and then distributed over time to storage nodes and stakers. WAL is used to pay for storage, stake and delegate to nodes to secure the network and earn rewards, and govern protocol parameters; it also includes deflationary mechanics tied to network health, such as burning a portion of penalty fees related to short-term stake shifting and slashing-related burning once slashing is enabled. The point of these mechanisms isn’t “burn for hype,” but to discourage behaviors that destabilize the network or increase operational costs (like excessive stake hopping that forces expensive data migration).
On ecosystem and traction, Walrus’s own year-in-review notes a mainnet launch in March 2025 and highlights ecosystem building around tooling and adoption, including features like Quilt (bundling many small files together), Upload Relay (improving upload reliability and UX), and Seal (access control), which are exactly the kind of “boring but critical” improvements that help infrastructure get used in the real world. For real-world examples, Walrus has publicly discussed an integration where Pudgy Penguins uses Walrus (via Tusky) to store and manage digital media like stickers and GIFs, starting at around 1TB and aiming to scale further, which is a very believable use case because major media-heavy collections can’t afford broken links or centralized dependency risk. Walrus has also announced integrations and partnerships that point toward performance and enterprise/edge-adjacent directions, such as an integration with Pipe Network for bandwidth/latency improvements, a Veea announcement framing Walrus in an edge infrastructure context, and a Chainbase agreement described around a data lake and accessibility layer for large-scale data ingestion and verification. Separately, Fortune reported a Walrus Foundation token sale of $140 million and described Mysten Labs as the developer behind Walrus, which helps contextualize the project’s funding and institutional backing.
Looking ahead, Walrus’s roadmap signals are less about flashy promises and more about making the system easier and safer to use at scale: improving UX so storage feels Web2-smooth, pushing privacy and verifiable access control deeper into the default developer experience, and integrating tighter into the broader Sui stack, alongside ecosystem funding programs designed to attract builders and real applications. The growth potential is straightforward in a way that infrastructure usually is: if Sui adoption expands and more apps need a reliable place to store big data without centralization risk, Walrus can become a default primitive that quietly compounds usage over time, and because WAL is directly used for storage payments, staking security, and governance, the token’s utility is tied to genuine network activity rather than purely speculative narratives. That said, the risks are real: decentralized storage is a competitive arena, tight dependence on Sui is both an advantage and a constraint, privacy can be misunderstood if apps oversell what’s actually private, token supply optics and unlock schedules can create market pressure, and operationally, running a high-quality storage network in the real world is hard because uptime, bandwidth variability, churn, and retrieval performance don’t behave like neat theory. In the simplest creator-friendly summary, Walrus is trying to become the decentralized “big file layer” that Web3 apps actually need—where data can live off-chain without becoming centralized again, and where smart contracts can still treat that data like a programmable, verifiable primitive—and WAL is the token that powers, secures, and governs that whole machine.

#Dusk @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL

Dusk (frequentemente chamado de Dusk Network) é uma blockchain de Camada 1 construída para uma versão de finanças on-chain que realmente funciona no mundo real—onde a privacidade importa, regras existem, e instituições não podem simplesmente "enviar e rezar." Se você pensar sobre isso, a maioria das blockchains públicas é basicamente como fazer finanças em uma transmissão ao vivo: cada transferência, contraparte, montante e tempo é visível para qualquer um que esteja assistindo. Essa transparência é ótima para comunidades abertas e aplicativos nativos de cripto, mas se torna um fator decisivo no momento em que você fala sobre produtos financeiros regulamentados, como valores mobiliários tokenizados, crédito privado, negociação institucional ou fluxos de tesouraria corporativa. A razão de Dusk existir é resolver essa tensão: seu objetivo é oferecer privacidade por padrão, enquanto ainda permite auditabilidade através da divulgação seletiva, para que as partes certas possam verificar o que precisa ser verificado sem expor tudo para toda a internet. Essa ideia de “divulgação seletiva” é o coração do design do Dusk—privacidade que é compatível com a conformidade em vez de privacidade que luta contra a conformidade.

Plasma is a Layer 1 blockchain built with one very specific goal: make stablecoins—especially USD₮—feel like actual everyday money. Instead of being a “general-purpose chain that can do everything,” Plasma is designed like a settlement rail, where the main experience is sending and using stablecoins quickly, cheaply, and with as little friction as possible. The problem it’s trying to solve is something most people feel the moment they try using stablecoins outside trading: even if you just want to send $10 in USDT, many networks force you to first buy a separate gas token, deal with unpredictable fees, and wait for confirmations that don’t feel “payment-fast.” Plasma’s pitch is basically to delete those pain points by designing the chain around stablecoin behavior from the start, not as an afterthought.
Under the hood, Plasma combines two major ideas: keep Ethereum’s developer experience, but upgrade the speed and payment UX beneath it. It does this by staying fully EVM compatible through a Reth-based execution layer (so Solidity contracts and familiar tooling can carry over), while using a fast finality consensus design called PlasmaBFT, described as inspired by Fast HotStuff, to target sub-second finality so payments feel immediate and decisive rather than “maybe confirmed soon.” That structure matters because it lets Plasma feel familiar to builders while still being optimized for the kind of quick certainty payments need.
Where Plasma tries to feel genuinely different is in its stablecoin-first features. One of the headline ideas is gasless USD₮ transfers—so a user can send USDT without needing to hold the chain’s native token just to pay fees—which is a big deal if you care about onboarding normal people or scaling payments in high-adoption markets. The broader theme is stablecoin-first gas, meaning users can pay transaction costs in stablecoins rather than being forced into a separate gas token workflow. These kinds of features sound small until you’ve watched real users bounce off crypto because “I just wanted to send dollars, why am I buying another coin?” Plasma is aiming to make stablecoin transfers feel as simple as sending money in an app, not like a mini crypto tutorial.
On the security and neutrality side, Plasma also leans into a Bitcoin-anchored direction, and its docs describe a Bitcoin bridge architecture where BTC can be represented via a pBTC design, with withdrawals relying on verifiers and a threshold signature scheme rather than a single key holder. The practical takeaway is that Plasma wants to borrow some of Bitcoin’s “neutral settlement” energy over time, but it’s also important to stay grounded: bridges are historically one of the riskiest parts of crypto infrastructure, so this is an area where execution, auditing, and real-world resilience matter far more than branding.
Plasma’s tokenomics revolve around XPL. The docs state a total supply of 10 billion XPL at mainnet beta launch, with an allocation that includes 10% for a public sale, 40% for ecosystem and growth, and 25% each for team and investors, plus a meaningful portion unlocking at mainnet beta to support early incentives, liquidity, and integrations. What’s especially interesting about Plasma’s model is that, because the chain is designed so users can move stablecoins without necessarily holding XPL for gas, the token’s value story leans more toward validator security, staking economics, and protocol-level incentives rather than “everyone must buy the token just to use the network.” That can still work, but it raises a real design challenge: the network must make XPL essential for security and long-term alignment even if end-users rarely touch it.
For ecosystem and adoption, Plasma has publicly framed its launch around deep stablecoin liquidity and broad DeFi support, including a claim of $2B in stablecoins active from day one across 100+ DeFi partners, naming examples like Aave, Ethena, Fluid, and Euler. If that liquidity is real and sticks, it matters because stablecoin settlement becomes far more useful when users can also do “stablecoin finance” behind the scenes—earning, borrowing, swapping, and managing treasury flows—without leaving the environment. In the real world, stablecoin payments and stablecoin liquidity are connected; deep markets make payments smoother, conversions easier, and balances more productive.
In terms of real-world use cases, Plasma’s design lines up naturally with remittances, cross-border transfers, merchant checkout, payroll and contractor payouts, and fintech-style payment rails where the chain is basically invisible to the user. The strengths are clear: a focused mission, EVM compatibility for developers, fast finality for payment certainty, and stablecoin-native UX features that remove the biggest onboarding friction. The risks are just as real: anything subsidized (like gasless transfers) attracts spam and abuse and must be economically sustainable, bridges remain a high-stakes security surface no matter how well designed, competition from existing chains and L2s is intense, and the long-term token value capture has to be strong if most users can live entirely in stablecoins. The real “make or break” for Plasma won’t be whether it sounds good on paper—it’ll be whether the network can turn those stablecoin-first design choices into actual daily transaction flow, integrations, and trust at scale.

#palsma @Plasma $XPL

O Plasma é basicamente construído em torno de uma ideia simples e muito real: stablecoins já estão sendo usadas como dinheiro por milhões de pessoas, então a blockchain que as movimenta deve se sentir como uma rede de pagamentos em primeiro lugar, não como um "parque de diversões cripto" que acontece de suportar USDT. Se você já tentou enviar stablecoins e foi atingido pela fricção usual que precisa de um token de gás separado, lidando com taxas confusas, esperando mais do que o esperado, você já entende o problema que o Plasma está tentando resolver. Ele quer que as transferências de stablecoins se sintam normais, como enviar dinheiro por meio de um aplicativo, não como realizar um ritual técnico. É por isso que o Plasma é projetado como uma Camada 1 adaptada para liquidação de stablecoins, com compatibilidade no estilo Ethereum para que os construtores possam implantar contratos inteligentes e ferramentas familiares, mas com a própria blockchain se inclinando fortemente para uma experiência de usuário focada em pagamentos, velocidade e liquidação previsível.

Dusk Network, founded in 2018, is a Layer 1 blockchain built for a very specific future: one where serious financial products move on-chain without turning every trade, balance, and business relationship into public data. Most blockchains are designed around open transparency, which sounds great until you remember how real finance works companies protect strategies, institutions protect client activity, and regulated markets have rules that don’t disappear just because you’re using crypto. Dusk is trying to bridge that gap by designing a chain where privacy and compliance can coexist, meaning users and businesses can keep sensitive information confidential while the system still remains verifiable and auditable through cryptography. The reason this matters is simple: if tokenized securities, compliant DeFi, and real-world assets are going to become mainstream, then privacy can’t be an optional “extra,” and compliance can’t be an afterthought. Full transparency can lead to front-running, leaked positions, exposed treasury movements, and unnecessary surveillance; full secrecy can break audit requirements and trust. Dusk’s philosophy leans toward selective disclosure private by default, but provable when the rules demand proof so you can confirm that requirements were met without broadcasting everything to the entire internet. Under the hood, Dusk has been evolving into a modular design where a financial-grade settlement and security foundation supports different execution environments on top, making the network more adaptable over time. That base layer focuses on consensus, staking, and finality things that matter deeply in finance because “final” needs to really mean final while execution layers help developers build applications more easily, including an EVM-compatible environment so builders who already know Ethereum tooling can ship without learning an entirely new universe. That’s a practical move because developer adoption often decides whether a chain becomes useful or stays theoretical. On the technology side, Dusk leans into privacy-preserving cryptography concepts to support confidential transactions and compliance-friendly proofs, aiming to replace the outdated choice between “everything exposed” and “nothing verifiable” with a more realistic middle path: you don’t have to reveal private details to prove correctness. The native token, DUSK, powers the network’s security and operations, mainly through staking and fees, meaning it’s not just a ticker symbol it’s meant to be functional infrastructure that keeps validators incentivized and the chain running. A particularly interesting direction in Dusk’s ecosystem is the idea of making staking more programmable, so it can be integrated into applications rather than remaining a purely manual, infrastructure-only activity; that opens room for smarter staking products, automated pools, and more flexible economic designs that can fit different user types. In terms of ecosystem and real-world use cases, Dusk points toward regulated markets where rules matter: tokenized securities that require transfer restrictions and eligibility checks, compliant DeFi that enforces conditions instead of allowing anyone to do anything at any time, privacy-aware identity verification where users can prove they’re eligible without exposing unnecessary personal information, and payment and settlement rails where speed matters but compliance is non-negotiable. Dusk has also highlighted partnerships and collaborations around regulated finance infrastructure, custody, payments, and identity tech, but the most honest way to judge any blockchain partnership is not by logos it’s by what ships, what stays live, and whether real volume consistently moves through it. The roadmap direction is essentially about strengthening the settlement foundation, improving modular execution so builders can deploy faster (especially with EVM familiarity), and expanding privacy-compliance tooling so institutions can actually use on-chain systems without breaking either regulations or common-sense confidentiality. The growth potential, if things go right, comes from a very clear bet: as tokenization becomes more than a buzzword and regulated on-chain markets mature, networks designed specifically for that world could become more valuable than general-purpose chains that try to serve every narrative at once. At the same time, the risks are real: regulated finance moves slowly, integrations and approvals take time, and building privacy plus compliance plus modular architecture is complex; competition in the RWA and “institutional crypto” space is intense, and interoperability always introduces extra security and operational considerations. Still, if Dusk executes well, it could become the kind of project that doesn’t chase hype but quietly becomes infrastructure built for the moment when on-chain finance stops being a dream and starts being a regulated, real-world system people actually rely on.

#Dusk @Dusk $DUSK

Walrus (WAL) está basicamente tentando resolver um dos maiores “problemas silenciosos” no Web3: armazenamento. Ficamos realmente bons em mover dinheiro e executar contratos inteligentes, mas no momento em que você pergunta onde os arquivos reais estão — como imagens, vídeos, conjuntos de dados, frontends de sites, ativos de jogos ou até mesmo arquivos de modelos de IA — a maioria dos projetos ainda recorre a servidores centralizados. Isso cria um ponto fraco, porque mesmo que o lado da blockchain seja descentralizado, o aplicativo ainda pode ser censurado, derrubado ou ter seu preço elevado se um único provedor controlar os dados. Walrus entra como uma rede de armazenamento de blobs descentralizada construída para manter grandes arquivos do mundo real de uma maneira que seja resiliente, mais barata do que a replicação completa e projetada para se integrar ao ecossistema Sui. A ideia é simples: Sui atua como a camada de coordenação para regras, pagamentos, staking e governança, enquanto Walrus cuida do trabalho pesado de armazenar grandes dados e servi-los de volta quando necessário.

Walrus is one of those projects that makes you pause and think, “Okay… this is solving a real problem.” Because blockchains are great at keeping small, valuable bits of truth safe—like ownership, balances, and smart contract rules—but the moment you try to store anything heavy like videos, images, PDFs, datasets, game assets, or AI model files, the chain becomes the wrong tool for the job. That’s why most crypto projects quietly fall back on normal Web2 cloud storage and only keep a link on-chain, and that’s where the weakness lives: links can break, servers can go down, hosting providers can remove content, and suddenly something that looked “decentralized” is actually held together by one centralized point. Walrus is built to remove that weak link by creating a decentralized storage network focused specifically on large files (blobs), where the data is spread across many storage nodes, and the “proof” that the data is truly being held is coordinated on-chain through Sui. The simple idea is this: instead of copying the same huge file to many places and calling it redundancy, Walrus uses erasure coding to break the file into encoded pieces so the original can be reconstructed from enough pieces even if some nodes disappear, and it goes further with a two-dimensional coding approach designed to stay strong under real-world churn where nodes can drop in and out. Once those pieces are distributed, Walrus creates something like a verified receipt—often described as proof of availability—where enough storage nodes acknowledge they’re holding their required pieces, and that certificate can be posted on-chain, so it’s not “trust me, your file is stored,” it’s “here’s a public, verifiable signal that the network has accepted responsibility for this data.” This makes Walrus feel less like a storage app and more like a storage primitive, because storage becomes programmable: apps can treat blobs and storage capacity like managed resources with lifecycles, which is exactly what’s been missing for data-heavy onchain products. WAL, the token, sits in the middle of this incentive engine and isn’t just there to exist; it supports delegated staking so the network can stay secure and honest without a single central operator, it supports governance so stakeholders can shape key network parameters over time, and it can support subsidy-style growth programs that help bootstrap adoption early while the network finds its natural pricing equilibrium. Where Walrus really starts to shine is in use cases that actually need reliable decentralized data: NFT media that doesn’t turn into a broken image link, creator content that isn’t dependent on one platform’s servers, gaming assets that must stay available, and especially AI-related use cases like agent memory, datasets, and large model artifacts where availability, integrity, and provenance matter more than hype. The upside is clear if you believe the next phase of crypto is less about spinning up another token and more about building full applications—AI apps, media apps, data markets, games, and real products—because those apps don’t run on slogans, they run on storage that works. At the same time, the risks are real too: decentralized storage infrastructure is hard engineering, adoption depends on developer experience and smooth tooling, the storage space is competitive, and token incentives have to stay balanced so nodes remain profitable without making storage unaffordable for users. But if Walrus executes well, its story is simple and powerful: stop treating data as “something stored somewhere else,” and make it a decentralized resource that can be proven, managed, and built on—so the onchain world can finally handle the heavy, real stuff that modern apps actually need.

#Walrus @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL

Plasma is basically built for one kind of person: someone who wants stablecoins to work like real money, not like a complicated crypto hobby. Because the moment a normal user hears “you need a gas token first,” the whole idea of fast digital dollars breaks. Plasma is trying to remove that friction and make stablecoin settlement feel simple, direct, and everyday, like sending money should feel in 2026.
At its core, Plasma is a stablecoin-first Layer 1 blockchain designed for settlement. Instead of treating stablecoins as “just another token,” it treats them like the main reason the chain exists. That’s why it combines Ethereum-style compatibility (so developers can build with familiar tools), a fast BFT-style consensus called PlasmaBFT (to finalize transactions quickly), and stablecoin-native features like gasless USDT transfers and fees that can be paid in stablecoins for broader activity. The chain’s bigger vision also includes Bitcoin-anchored security over time, aiming to strengthen neutrality and censorship resistance as the network matures.
The real reason Plasma matters is simple: stablecoins are already being used like money across the world. People use them to protect savings, get paid online, send remittances, pay freelancers, settle cross-border trade, and move business funds faster than traditional banking. But the experience still often feels clunky because most chains were designed for crypto-native users, not everyday payments. On many networks you can hold USDT and still be unable to send it because you don’t have the gas token, and then you get dragged into swapping, bridging, topping up, and troubleshooting. Plasma is basically saying: if stablecoins are money, sending them shouldn’t require a mini course in blockchain operations.
Plasma’s most “human” feature is gasless USDT transfers for simple sending. In practical terms, basic USDT transfers can be sponsored through a protocol-managed relayer/paymaster style system, so a user can send USDT without holding an extra token first. That sounds small until you realize it changes onboarding completely: instead of “buy gas token, swap, then send,” it becomes “I have USDT, I send USDT.” Plasma isn’t claiming everything should be free forever—more complex transactions still pay fees because validators need incentives—but it gives the most common action, stablecoin sending, a smoother lane designed for real people.
Beyond simple transfers, Plasma also pushes the idea of stablecoin-first gas, which is a bigger deal than it sounds. For apps, smart contract interactions, swaps, and other non-basic activity, Plasma supports paying fees using stablecoins or other approved assets rather than forcing every user or business to rely on a volatile native token for operational costs. For retail, this reduces confusion. For businesses and fintech builders, it’s about predictability: if your revenue, accounting, and customer balances are in dollars, paying network fees in dollars is just cleaner.
Under the hood, you can think of Plasma as three systems working together. The execution layer aims to be fully EVM compatible, which means developers can build using the Ethereum stack without reinventing everything. The consensus layer, PlasmaBFT, is designed for fast finality, which matters because payments don’t just need speed—they need settlement confidence. And then the “payment UX layer” is where Plasma’s personality shows up: gasless stablecoin transfers, stablecoin-first gas mechanics, and a roadmap that treats stablecoin movement as the core product, not a side feature.
Plasma’s Bitcoin-anchored security direction is part philosophy and part strategy. Bitcoin is widely viewed as the most neutral and battle-tested base layer, so anchoring state or checkpoints to Bitcoin over time is meant to increase long-term trust and censorship resistance. This is also one of the most challenging parts to execute because Bitcoin bridging and anchoring require extreme security discipline, and bridges historically are one of the most attacked parts of crypto. If Plasma gets this right, it strengthens its “serious settlement rail” identity; if it gets it wrong, it becomes a major risk area, so the quality of execution and rollout discipline really matters.
On the token side, Plasma uses XPL as its native token, mainly for validator incentives, staking, governance, and general network economics. Even if Plasma tries to make stablecoin sending feel gasless or stablecoin-first, the chain still needs a base token to coordinate security and reward the infrastructure that keeps the network running. Public tokenomics summaries describe a large genesis supply in the billions, allocations across public sale, ecosystem growth, team, and investors, and an inflation model that supports validator rewards, especially once broader validator participation goes live. The important point is that Plasma wants stablecoin users to experience simplicity while XPL handles the economic engine in the background.
Where Plasma becomes truly interesting is in real-world usage. If it succeeds, it isn’t because it’s trendy—it’s because it becomes boring and reliable, like good financial infrastructure should be. Remittances become smoother because users can send stablecoins without needing to manage gas tokens. Merchant payments and micropayments become more realistic when basic transfers are frictionless. Global payroll and freelancer payouts become easier because settlement is fast and costs can be paid in stablecoin terms. And for institutions and larger payment corridors, fast finality plus a long-term neutrality/security narrative is exactly the kind of mix that makes stablecoin settlement feel more credible.
The ecosystem and partnerships matter here, but only in one way: do they create real flow. A settlement chain wins when wallets integrate it cleanly, on-ramps and off-ramps bring users in, payment apps build real products, liquidity is deep enough to handle volume, and compliance tooling exists for larger players. Plasma’s direction is clearly aligned with that infrastructure mindset, which is good, because stablecoin rails don’t win by hype—they win by distribution and reliability.
Plasma’s strengths come from focus and product thinking. It’s not trying to be everything; it’s trying to be the place where stablecoin settlement feels natural. Gasless USDT transfers and stablecoin-first gas are the kind of features that reduce friction for real people. EVM compatibility lowers adoption barriers for builders. Fast finality fits the settlement use case. And the Bitcoin-anchoring direction gives it a longer-term trust narrative that could matter a lot if it’s executed safely.
At the same time, the risks are real and worth saying plainly. Any gasless pathway attracts spam and abuse attempts, so Plasma has to keep that lane safe without ruining the UX. Bridging and Bitcoin integration can be high-risk if security isn’t top tier. A stablecoin-first chain is exposed to stablecoin market and regulatory shifts. Competition is intense because many networks want stablecoin flows. And the network’s credibility as a settlement rail will depend not just on features, but on uptime, decentralization progression, and how it performs under stress.
If you zoom out, Plasma’s whole story is a response to one reality: stablecoins already act like global digital dollars, but the rails still feel too “crypto.” Plasma wants to be the chain where stablecoins stop feeling like a token you move inside a technical system and start feeling like money you can actually use. If the team executes the security roadmap carefully, builds strong integrations, and keeps the stablecoin UX clean at scale, Plasma has a real shot at becoming infrastructure rather than just another name on a list.

#palsma @Plasma $XPL

O Dusk é um desses projetos que começa a fazer sentido no momento em que você para de ver criptomoeda como um cassino e começa a vê-la como uma verdadeira infraestrutura financeira. A maioria das blockchains hoje são construídas como diários públicos—cada transferência, cada padrão de carteira, cada movimento é visível para qualquer um que queira observar. Esse tipo de transparência é ótimo para verificação, mas se torna um sério problema quando você envolve instituições, ativos regulamentados e a realidade dos negócios do dia a dia, porque no mundo real ninguém quer que seus saldos, estratégias, contrapartes e posições sejam divulgados para toda a internet. Essa é a lacuna que o Dusk foi criado para preencher. Fundado em 2018, o Dusk é uma blockchain de Camada-1 projetada para finanças regulamentadas e focadas em privacidade, onde a privacidade não se trata de desaparecer ou fazer transações de “dinheiro misterioso”, mas sim de proteger dados financeiros sensíveis enquanto ainda permite conformidade e auditabilidade quando necessário. Em termos simples, o Dusk está tentando criar uma blockchain que pode suportar títulos tokenizados, DeFi compatível e ativos do mundo real de uma maneira que pareça normal para as finanças—confidencial por padrão, mas responsável por design.