NijamulHoque

Dusk is now live for regulated markets
DuskNetwork is a Layer-1 blockchain built specifically for regulated finance and real-world assets. It supports native issuance, trading, and settlement of compliant financial instruments while keeping sensitive data confidential through zero-knowledge proofs all without sacrificing auditability.
Unlike typical privacy chains that hide everything from everyone, Dusk’s architecture allows confidential data to remain private by default while authorized entities can still verify compliance when required a necessary balance for regulated institutions.

Real partnerships and compliance context
DuskFDN’s positioning is reinforced by integrations with regulated infrastructure, such as Dutch Multilateral Trading Facility (MTF) partners that help support legally compliant tokenized securities issuance and secondary markets. This places dusk closer to institutional workflows, where regulatory frameworks like MiCA (EU Markets in Crypto-Assets) and MiFID II require both privacy and accountability on-chain.

Live network and ecosystem indicators
While precise on-chain activity numbers vary across metrics providers, dusk’s presence across major research and price platforms shows it is actively traded and recognized as a privacy-first regulated Layer 1:
Market cap figures around $86M–$126M range across sources at the latest snapshots.The circulating supply sits near 500,000,000 DUSK tokens, with a maximum of 1,000,000,000 DUSK — indicating tangible ecosystem scale.
This quantifiable data reflects real activity, not just vision statements.
Why this matters now
Traditional public blockchains struggle to satisfy institutional risk, audit, and privacy obligations simultaneously. Dusk’s privacy + compliance design, backed by real partnerships and deployment readiness, makes it relevant where legacy networks can’t easily operate.

DOCUMENTATION
That doesn’t guarantee adoption, but it does mean Dusk is distinct from hype-first chains it is infrastructure built to meet real regulatory requirements rather than narratives alone.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK

Hello Square fam, hope you’re doing well.
Today I want to talk about Plasma in a verifiable, data-backed way not just claims to show what the network is actually doing right now.
Plasma mainnet snapshot (observable data)
According to the Plasma blockchain explorer PlasmaScan:
Total transactions: 143,831,022 recorded on-chain so far a clear indicator of long-running network usage. Latest block height: 12,167,543 blocks processed, with new blocks produced roughly every 1 seconds, confirming active block production. In the last 24 hours alone, ~411,035 transactions occurred, showing real daily activity on the network.
This data is real and measurable from the explorer not claims. 🔥

What this means practically
Numbers are important because a live chain with millions of transactions and continuous blocks is not just promised it’s happening and observable. That places Plasma in a different category from many chains that stay in testnet or announcement mode.
Why transaction count matters
Developers building apps care about actual network usage, not theoretical performance claims.
143 M+ transactions means real state changes on Plasma.
High daily transactions (411k+/24h) means ongoing interaction and not just dormant blocks.
These figures show Plasma’s chain is processing meaningful load, not just sitting idle.

Old narrative vs current reality
Before launch: Plasma was mainly described as a Layer 1 focused on fast, zero-fee stablecoin transfers.
Now (observable): The chain has processed 143 million+ transactions across millions of blocks, with thousands of transactions happening every day verifiable on-chain.
That transition is important. Observable data is far stronger than marketing rhetoric.

Limitations still exist
Numbers don’t tell the whole story. Adoption still depends on:
Ecosystem growth (apps built on Plasma)Developer tooling and documentationReal user retention and usage patterns over time
But the key change is this: Plasma is no longer a theoretical network. It is live, measurable, and producing activity visible to anyone online.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL

Blockchains look strong in early stages. Low fees, fast confirmations, smooth launches. The problems usually appear later, when real users arrive and usage becomes uneven. That is where infrastructure either holds up or starts breaking in subtle ways.
Vanarchain is designed with that later phase in mind. Instead of optimizing only for headline metrics,
Vanarchain focuses on predictable execution and system behavior under real load. Applications do not just need speed. They need consistency. They need to know how the network behaves when traffic spikes, when usage patterns change, and when systems evolve. This matters especially for consumer-facing applications, gaming environments, and interactive platforms where user experience breaks quickly if performance becomes unstable. In those cases, small delays or unexpected behavior create friction that users notice immediately.
Vanarchain’s design approach reflects an understanding that real adoption is messy. Networks must handle uneven demand, changing conditions, and long-term maintenance without forcing developers or users to constantly adapt. That does not guarantee success. Adoption still depends on execution, ecosystem growth, and real usage. But the direction is clear. Vanar is not optimizing for short-term attention. It is optimizing for environments where reliability and user experience matter more than launch-day numbers.
Infrastructure becomes valuable when users stop thinking about it. That is the space Vanar is trying to occupy.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar

Olá, família Square. Desta vez, quero falar sobre o modelo de governança da Dusk, não sobre privacidade ou conformidade.
Em muitos projetos de blockchain, a governança é tratada como uma camada social. Propostas, votos e discussões acontecem, mas muitas vezes estão longe de como o sistema realmente opera dia a dia.
@Dusk aborda isso de forma diferente. A governança na DuskFoundation é projetada para apoiar diretamente como o protocolo funciona, não apenas como as decisões são discutidas. Mudanças de parâmetros, ajustes de regras e evolução do protocolo são partes esperadas do sistema, não eventos excepcionais. Isso é importante porque ambientes regulados e institucionais não podem contar com coordenação informal. As decisões precisam ser rastreáveis. As mudanças precisam ser explicáveis. E as atualizações precisam seguir processos claros em vez de consenso ad-hoc.

Hello Square fam.
আজ Dusk নিয়ে কথা বলবো একদম আলাদা জায়গা থেকে TRANSACTION STRUCTURE নিয়ে।
বেশিরভাগ ব্লকচেইন একটা সিদ্ধান্ত নেয় শুরুতেই। সব transaction public হবে, অথবা সব private হবে।
Dusk-এই binary চিন্তাটাই ভাঙে।Dusk-এ transaction মানে শুধু value transfer না।এটা context অনুযায়ী behaviour।প্রোটোকল দুইটা আলাদা transaction flow রাখে—একটা যেখানে privacy দরকার, আরেকটা যেখানে transparency দরকার।

এর মানে কী?
সব use case একরকম না। কিছু জায়গায় user confidentiality জরুরি। আবার কিছু জায়গায় rules, audits, বা public visibility দরকার।
Dusk-developer-দের বাধ্য করে না একটাই privacy mode ব্যবহার করতে। তারা ঠিক করতে পারে কোন interaction-এ কী level of disclosure লাগবে।
এটা developer experience-এর দিক থেকেও গুরুত্বপূর্ণ। কারণ app logic আর compliance logic আলাদা করা যায়। Privacy পরে জোড়া দেওয়া feature না। Transparency ও default চাপিয়ে দেওয়া হয় না।
এই separation ভবিষ্যতে কাজে আসে যেখানে একই system-এ users, institutions, আর regulators সবাই interact করে। সবাই একই rules-এ খেলছে, কিন্তু সবাইকে একইভাবে expose হতে হচ্ছে না।
এটা flashy headline না। কিন্তু এটা real systems বানানোর জন্য দরকারি design decision।
@Dusk
#dusk $DUSK

As blockchains assumem que os usuários querem total transparência ou total anonimato. Essa suposição se quebra nas finanças regulamentadas.
DuskNetwork é projetado para uma realidade diferente.
Alguns participantes devem seguir regras, auditorias e obrigações legais. @Dusk em habilita a confidencialidade sem remover a responsabilidade. As transações permanecem privadas por padrão, mas a verificação continua sendo possível quando necessário. Não se trata de esconder atividades. Trata-se de tornar os sistemas em cadeia utilizáveis onde a conformidade é inegociável. Essa escolha de design limita o hype. Mas expande onde a blockchain pode realmente operar.

Olá, família Square. Hoje quero falar sobre uma escolha de design que raramente aparece no marketing.
Estabilidade invisível.
Muitos projetos otimizam para o que os usuários podem ver imediatamente. Gráficos de velocidade. Comparações de custo. Números em destaque. Isso é importante no início, mas não define a qualidade da infraestrutura a longo prazo. O Walrus foca no que os usuários não devem notar.

Sem ajustes constantes. Sem mudanças drásticas frequentes. Sem necessidade de aplicativos reagirem a mudanças internas de protocolo.
Quando a infraestrutura funciona bem, os usuários mal pensam nela. Aplicativos rodam. Construtores entregam. Sistemas se comportam de maneira consistente.

Olá, família Square. A velocidade parece impressionante no dia do lançamento. A estabilidade é o que é testado após a chegada de usuários reais.
Muitos sistemas descentralizados priorizam velocidade e custo primeiro. A confiabilidade é frequentemente abordada depois, após o uso real expor fraquezas.
Walrus inverte essa ordem.

Seu design assume que falhas acontecerão. As condições da rede mudam. Picos de carga ocorrem. Componentes se comportam mal. Em vez de fingir que esses problemas são casos extremos, o Walrus os projeta desde o início. Detecção antecipada, comportamento previsível e recuperação controlada estão incorporados ao sistema. O objetivo não é eliminar falhas, mas tornar as falhas não disruptivas.