Sophie_DeeBTC

Quando eu me sento com a história do Walrus, estou realmente pensando em como nossas vidas digitais podem ser frágeis. A cada dia, empurramos mais de nós mesmos para o mundo online: nossas fotos de família, nosso trabalho, nossas ideias da noite, nossas economias e nossas conversas, e a maior parte disso desaparece em máquinas que nunca veremos, operadas por empresas que nunca conheceremos. Dizemos a nós mesmos que estará tudo bem, mas uma pequena parte de nós sabe que se uma política mudar, se um servidor falhar, se um negócio morrer, algo precioso pode desaparecer e não teríamos uma maneira real de parar isso. As pessoas que projetaram o Walrus começaram a partir dessa mesma verdade desconfortável. Saindo do ecossistema Sui e de uma pesquisa profunda sobre armazenamento moderno, eles perguntaram por que as blockchains nos estavam dando propriedade real de dinheiro e ativos, enquanto os dados pesados por trás de tudo ainda estavam presos em sistemas centrais antigos. Walrus foi a resposta deles: um armazenamento de blob descentralizado e uma rede de disponibilidade de dados construída sobre o Sui, projetada desde o início para arquivos grandes e aplicações ricas, como bibliotecas de mídia, conjuntos de dados de inteligência artificial e arquivos de blockchain, em vez de apenas pequenos registros de transações.

Quando me sento com a história do Dusk, não estou apenas pensando em uma cadeia inteligente, estou pensando em um pequeno grupo de pessoas em 2018 que olhou para blockchains públicas e sentiu que algo estava profundamente errado para as finanças reais e vidas reais. As primeiras redes estavam orgulhosas de que cada saldo e cada transação permanecessem visíveis para sempre, e por um tempo essa abertura radical parecia uma virtude. Mas se você imaginar seu próprio salário, suas ações da empresa, suas economias para seus filhos, todas permanentemente expostas a qualquer um que se preocupe em rastreá-las, essa empolgação lentamente se transforma em ansiedade. Os fundadores do Dusk não ignoraram esse sentimento. Eles perguntaram como bancos, bolsas e fundos sérios poderiam mover ativos regulamentados na cadeia se o direito básico à privacidade financeira não fosse respeitado, e como os reguladores poderiam fazer seu trabalho sem transformar cada pessoa em um ponto de dados sob os holofotes. Dessa tensão, o Dusk tomou forma como uma blockchain pública sem permissão de camada 1 para finanças regulamentadas e focadas em privacidade, com uma missão clara de desbloquear a inclusão econômica ao trazer ativos de nível institucional para carteiras de custódia própria, mantendo a privacidade e a auditabilidade lado a lado em vez de forçar as pessoas a escolher entre uma ou outra.

Quando penso em Plasma, não vejo apenas servidores e código. Vejo pessoas que estão cansadas de se sentir inseguras com seu próprio dinheiro. Imagino alguém em um país onde os preços sobem a cada mês e sua moeda local perde valor, enquanto o dólar digital em seu telefone parece o único chão firme. Imagino um trabalhador que envia parte de cada pagamento para casa e assiste bancos e serviços de remessa levarem uma parte dolorosa a cada vez. Imagino um pequeno vendedor online que quer aceitar stablecoins, mas se sente perdido no momento em que uma carteira pede um token de gás separado que nunca ouviu falar. Todo esse estresse reside em um simples desejo. Eu só quero que meu dinheiro se mova de forma segura, clara e rápida. Plasma nasceu desse desejo humano. É uma blockchain de Camada 1 feita para a liquidação de stablecoins, e essa única escolha molda tudo. Em vez de perseguir todos os casos de uso possíveis ao mesmo tempo, o Plasma escolhe ser um lar para o valor digital estável, um lugar onde as stablecoins não são hóspedes, mas família. Quando deixo isso entrar, não estou apenas olhando para um projeto. Estou olhando para uma tentativa de tornar a vida financeira cotidiana mais suave para pessoas que carregaram grandes preocupações por muito tempo.

Vanar feels like a project that was born more from watching people than from staring at code. I imagine the core team sitting with game studios entertainment partners and global brands and seeing the same problem again and again. Players pour years into building characters and collections yet nothing truly belongs to them once the server shuts down. Fans stay loyal to brands but all they carry away are emails and screenshots. At the same time most blockchains still speak the language of traders not the language of normal users who just want things to be simple and fair. Vanar stepped into that gap as a Layer 1 chain designed from the first day for real world adoption with a clear focus on gaming entertainment artificial intelligence eco projects and brand solutions. Recent analyses describe Vanar as a Layer 1 infrastructure built explicitly to onboard the next three billion users by meeting them where they already are in games metaverse spaces and consumer apps rather than forcing them to start with complex wallets and arcane terms. That intention gives the whole project a different emotional tone. It is not trying to drag people into crypto. It is trying to make Web3 feel like a natural extension of the digital lives they already live.

Underneath that simple promise sits a surprisingly sophisticated architecture. Vanar is a modular Layer 1 EVM chain so developers can work with tools they already know while gaining a high throughput environment tuned for artificial intelligence and financial workloads. The official description calls it the chain that thinks because it is built to compress data store logic and verify truth directly inside the network instead of pushing important work off chain. One of the most striking choices is the fixed transaction fee model where typical transactions are priced around a tiny fraction of a cent roughly zero point triple zero five United States dollars and the system runs over very fast networking infrastructure. That means a game or application can fire thousands of micro actions without punishing players or brands with unpredictable costs. As I look at this design I am seeing a network that is not just fast for its own sake. It is fast and affordable because the team already knows what it feels like when a game stutters or a user is hit with a painful fee at the worst possible moment.

The deeper intelligence of Vanar comes from its layered stack. Above the core chain sits Neutron the semantic memory layer that reimagines what on chain data can be. Instead of treating information as dead files Neutron compresses and restructures it into small verifiable objects called Seeds that live directly on the chain. A single file of twenty five megabytes can be reduced to about fifty kilobytes using a blend of semantic heuristic and algorithmic techniques while staying cryptographically provable. Those Seeds represent knowledge that artificial intelligence models and applications can actually query and understand whether that knowledge is a property deed a contract a game history or a trail of user interactions. On top of that sits Kayon the reasoning layer which provides natural language intelligence for Neutron the blockchain and even enterprise backends. Kayon lets agents and smart contracts ask questions in a human style and apply business rules compliance checks and complex logic on top of the data stored in Neutron Seeds in real time. When you see this whole stack together Vanar stops looking like just another programmable network. It becomes an environment where data can be remembered with meaning and where on chain intelligence can act with context instead of guessing.

These abstract ideas turn into something you can feel through the products that already live on Vanar. The chain powers Virtua Metaverse and the VGN games network two live examples that show how gaming entertainment and blockchain can blend without overwhelming users. In Virtua players explore richly designed virtual worlds own land and collectibles and join events where their actions leave lasting traces. In the VGN network they earn rewards across multiple games with the VANRY token acting as the common thread between experiences. I imagine a player winning a rare item during a limited event. Instead of that item being a fragile entry in a private database it becomes an asset recorded in Neutron Seeds and secured by Vanar so it can be recognized by other applications in the ecosystem. Microtransactions during these sessions rely on Vanar’s high speed low cost execution so buying upgrading and trading never feels like a financial chore. We are seeing here how a well designed Layer 1 does not have to shout. It can simply make the fun smoother and the ownership real.

At the center of all this movement is the VANRY token which acts like the bloodstream of the ecosystem. VANRY is the native gas and utility token for Vanar. It pays for network fees fuels smart contracts and is used for staking governance and increasingly for artificial intelligence subscriptions as Neutron tools move toward a usage based revenue model. Current market data shows a circulating supply of a little more than two point two three billion VANRY with a hard cap at two point four billion and a market capitalization near seventeen million United States dollars at recent prices around zero point double zero seven five. That gives the project room to grow while keeping supply clearly defined. What really stands out to me is how the tokenomics are tied into real activity. A portion of revenue from artificial intelligence subscriptions on Neutron and related tools is used to buy back VANRY on the open market and send it to long term burns reducing circulating supply over time. This is not just a cosmetic burn event. It is a structure that uses actual ecosystem demand to gradually tighten supply so that if usage grows the token naturally carries more weight without needing hype to prop it up.

The human side of Vanar shows up in its ecosystem and community tools. The official site highlights products like Vanar Hub Vanar Staking the Vanar Explorer and My Neutron along with learning spaces such as Vanar Academy and detailed documentation for developers. Validators across many proof of stake networks are already involved in securing the chain using non custodial staking services that bring professional grade infrastructure to normal token holders. For developers the five core design pillars of Vanar focus on high speed scale low cost user acquisition go to market support and a strong community so teams can launch applications with both technical and marketing backing rather than struggling alone. I’m noticing that this structure speaks directly to the main objective of Vanar which is to be not just a clever protocol but a place where games brands and artificial intelligence developers can realistically build and ship products for mainstream audiences.

Beyond the immediate ecosystem the roadmap and recent commentary show where Vanar wants to go next. The chain is firmly positioned as a native infrastructure for artificial intelligence and data with upcoming work focused on deepening automation expanding the subscription based economy for Neutron and Kayon and increasing cross industry integration in areas like PayFi and tokenized real world assets. At the same time there are visible efforts like the Vanar AI Excellence Program in Pakistan aimed at nurturing the next generation of artificial intelligence talent directly around the ecosystem which hints at how seriously the team takes its role in education and adoption beyond pure technology. If they continue along this path keeping fees tiny preserving environmental awareness through renewable powered infrastructure and making sure user experience stays simple then Vanar’s ambition to bring hundreds of millions of normal people into Web3 does not feel like a slogan. It starts to look like a long patient journey that is already underway.

When I step back from all the data and architecture I see Vanar as an emotional answer to a problem many of us have felt but could not name. We are tired of digital spaces that forget us as soon as a business model changes. We are tired of games that take everything back and brands that leave us with nothing but inbox clutter. Vanar’s main objective is to turn those fragile moments into lasting digital stories backed by a chain that can remember with intelligence and act with honesty. Its modular Layer 1 core gives it the strength to support demanding workloads. Neutron and Kayon give it the mind to understand and reason about data. Virtua Metaverse and VGN show how this power can serve joy and creativity. VANRY ties activity to value so that the network and its community rise together if the stack is truly used. We are seeing the early chapters of this story in live products market structure and technical launches not in empty promises. If Vanar continues to listen to players builders and partners while staying true to its core principles of speed affordability and intelligence it becomes more than a promising project. It becomes a calm foundation for the next generation of digital life a place where effort is remembered and ownership finally feels real.

@Vanarchain
$VANRY
#vanar

Quando penso na Dusk Network, sinto que estou pensando nas pessoas primeiro e na tecnologia em segundo lugar. Imagino os primeiros dias em 2018, quando os fundadores estavam observando o crescimento acelerado e barulhento das criptomoedas, enquanto um problema mais silencioso continuava a incomodá-los. As cadeias públicas se orgulhavam de que tudo era visível o tempo todo. Cada saldo, cada negociação, cada movimento ficava registrado para sempre. Isso soa corajoso na superfície, mas no fundo pode parecer frio. Imagine seu salário, suas economias, suas ações da empresa, seus planos de longo prazo, todos em um lugar onde qualquer um pode olhar para eles e analisar sua vida. A equipe por trás da Dusk se perguntou como bancos, exchanges licenciadas, fundos e até mesmo pessoas normais poderiam confiar nesse tipo de mundo. Eles se perguntaram como mercados financeiros sérios poderiam operar em blockchain sem violar leis de privacidade ou o conforto humano básico. Tenho certeza de que essa questão não os deixou em paz. Dessa tensão, a Dusk Network nasceu como uma blockchain de camada 1 que coloca a finança regulamentada e focada em privacidade em seu centro. Ela é projetada para que aplicações de grau institucional, DeFi compatível e ativos do mundo real tokenizados possam viver em uma rede pública, enquanto dados privados permanecem protegidos e toda atividade ainda pode ser auditada quando realmente importa.

Plasma begins with a feeling more than a feature. I think of people who wake up every day and worry that the money they hold will not keep its value. I imagine a worker in a crowded city who saves in stablecoins because they trust a digital dollar more than their own currency. I see someone standing in a small shop trying to pay with crypto and getting lost in strange fees and tokens they never asked for. That quiet stress is where Plasma makes the most sense to me. Plasma is a Layer one blockchain that is created especially for stablecoin settlement, so it does not treat stablecoins as a side option. It treats them as the main story. Instead of trying to do everything at once, Plasma focuses on making digital dollars move in a way that feels calm, clear and safe. When I look at it this way, I do not just see a network of computers. I see an attempt to give people a softer experience with their own money.

Plasma is built on a strong technical base, but the way it is designed always seems to point back to the person using it. The chain is fully compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine through an engine called Reth, so builders who know how to write smart contracts for Ethereum can come here without starting from nothing. That familiar ground means more useful apps and services can reach everyday users more quickly. At the same time Plasma uses a consensus method called PlasmaBFT that gives sub second finality, which is a complex way of saying that when you send money it is confirmed almost right away and stays that way. There is no long wait where you stare at the screen hoping it does not fail. If you are paying a friend back for lunch or sending support to family far away, that instant sense of completion feels like a deep breath of relief. It becomes a payment experience that is closer to a normal conversation than a technical process.

The most touching part for me is how Plasma handles stablecoins themselves. On many blockchains you must hold a separate gas token just to move your stablecoins, and this makes people feel like they need a small lesson in a new language just to send their own money. Plasma changes that feeling. Simple USDT transfers on Plasma can be gasless through a system that sponsors those transfers, so the person sending money only has to think about the amount they want to share, not about fees. For more advanced actions, Plasma uses a stablecoin first gas idea, where fees can be taken directly in assets like USDT or through smooth swaps, so users stay inside the stable value they trust. I am moved by how kind that is to someone who is new to crypto. They are not pushed to juggle several tokens. They are held gently inside one clear form of value. We are seeing a design that respects the emotional side of money, not just the technical side.

Underneath this soft experience there is serious security work holding everything in place. Plasma regularly anchors its state to Bitcoin, which is known for its strong neutrality and resistance to censorship. By tying its history to Bitcoin, Plasma tries to make sure that no single party can easily change or block what has already happened on the chain. At the same time the EVM layer keeps everything flexible so developers can create lending markets, payment tools and other financial services that still feel familiar to anyone who has used Ethereum before. If you think about a financial institution or a payment company looking at Plasma, this combination is powerful. Fast settlement, a familiar smart contract environment and a link to the most battle tested network in the world create a sense of steady ground under their feet. It becomes easier to imagine serious payment flows moving through Plasma without fear that the rail will crack under pressure.

The native token XPL lives quietly at the center of this system. It keeps the network honest and alive. Over time validators and their backers use XPL to secure the chain and take part in consensus, earning rewards when they act in good faith and risking loss if they do not. XPL also supports more complex gas usage, deepens liquidity in defi pools and helps guide decisions about how the ecosystem should grow. I am comforted by the fact that XPL is tied to real activity rather than only to speculation. If more people use Plasma for real payments, real savings and real applications, then the demand for the block space and services it provides flows naturally into the role of XPL. They are building a circle where honest use of the network supports the token, and the token in turn supports the safety and growth of the network. That circle feels healthy and grounded.

When I imagine real people using Plasma, the story becomes very personal. I see a nurse in an overworked hospital who sends part of her paycheck in USDT to family in another country and watches it arrive in seconds, with no surprise fee cutting into it. I see a young developer in a small town using Plasma to build a simple payment app for local shops, because they know their users will not have to learn about separate gas tokens or handle painful fee spikes. I see a regional payment company that chooses Plasma as its settlement layer, because it wants fast confirmation and a trust story it can explain to regulators and partners with a straight face. In each of these small scenes Plasma does not need to shout. It simply does its work quietly in the background, allowing people to focus on their lives instead of on the wires carrying their money.

None of this would matter without the people who believe in the project and give it a soul. The Plasma community is made of builders who stay up late reading code and documentation, users who share their first gasless transfers with friends, partners who bring stablecoin liquidity, and supporters who simply feel that money should not feel so heavy. They are the ones asking questions in chats, suggesting improvements, testing early features and giving real feedback when something feels confusing. I am touched by that kind of slow honest participation. If a network is only machines, it feels cold. If it is filled with people who genuinely care about making money movement more fair and clear, it becomes something living. We are seeing Plasma move in that direction step by step, not through loud promises but through steady work and real connections.

When I step back and look at the whole picture, Plasma feels like hope wrapped in simple code. It tells a quiet story that money can move with less fear, that stablecoins can feel like ordinary safe money in the hands of ordinary people, and that a blockchain can be built around human comfort instead of pure complexity. If this journey continues, I think many of us will look back and remember the first time we sent value on Plasma and felt how light it was. It becomes a gentle reminder that technology can still be kind when we choose to build it that way, and that our finances do not always have to be a source of stress. I am grateful to watch this story unfold with @Plasma and to see how far $XPL can carry this vision into the lives of people who need it most #Plasma

Vanar é um desses projetos que me atraem porque claramente começou com pessoas e uso real em mente, não apenas com código. A equipe por trás do Vanar passou anos trabalhando com entretenimento de jogos e marcas globais, observando em primeira mão como milhões de usuários comuns se movem através de espaços digitais e quanta pouca paciência eles têm para carteiras complexas ou etapas confusas. Eles viram que a maioria das pessoas nunca diz que quer uma blockchain, elas dizem que querem jogos divertidos, recompensas justas, pagamentos simples e coisas digitais que parecem verdadeiramente pertencer a elas. A partir dessa experiência, eles moldaram o Vanar como uma blockchain L1 projetada desde o início para adoção no mundo real, aproveitando sua experiência em entretenimento de jogos e marcas para se concentrar em trazer os próximos três bilhões de usuários para o Web3 através das experiências que já amam. Eles são muito abertos que o Vanar está destinado a estar no cruzamento de projetos de metaverso de jogos, inteligência artificial e soluções de marcas, para que possa servir a muitos tipos de vida em uma única cadeia em vez de ser limitado a um caso de uso restrito.

When I think about Walrus I’m not just thinking about another token on a list or another clever protocol design. I think about the silent fear that many of us carry whenever we upload something important and simply hope it will stay safe. Photos of people we love, work that took months, private documents and even traces of our financial life all disappear into servers that belong to someone else. The founders of Walrus came from deep experience in modern blockchains and they felt that tension very clearly. They could see that new networks were giving people control over value, over smart contracts and over digital identity, but the heavy side of the story, the large files that sit behind apps and services, were still stored in central clouds. The main objective of Walrus is to fix that by giving the new internet a storage backbone that is decentralized, verifiable and still practical to use. Built on Sui, it connects secure and private interactions with a powerful data layer so that applications and users do not have to choose between control and convenience.

At a technical level Walrus is a blob storage and data availability protocol designed specifically for large content. A blob in this system can be an image, a video, a bundle of app code, an archive of historical chain data or a dataset for artificial intelligence. When a blob is published, the protocol does not simply place it on a single server. Instead the data is divided into smaller chunks and fed into an advanced two dimensional erasure coding scheme, often described by the team as a RedStuff style design. These coded fragments are then distributed across a committee of independent storage nodes. No single node holds enough information to reconstruct the entire file alone, but a sufficient subset of them always can. This gives the network strong durability even if many nodes go offline or leave. Each blob also has a representation on Sui in the form of an object that records its identity, size, encoding scheme and pointers to the committee. Smart contracts can read and update these objects, so storage becomes programmable, not just a black box. They’re using Sui as the coordination brain, while the storage nodes act as the resilient body that actually holds the data.

One of the most expert level features of Walrus is the way it manages committees and proofs of availability over time. The network runs in epochs, and for each epoch a selected committee of nodes is responsible for a portion of the encoded fragments. As time passes and committees rotate, the protocol has to make sure that data does not slip through the cracks. To handle this, Walrus uses a multi stage epoch change process where data can be re encoded or reassigned so availability stays intact even in the face of heavy churn. Nodes are regularly challenged to prove they are still holding their assigned fragments by answering small random audits. The results of these audits are recorded on Sui as cryptographically signed evidence. If a node repeatedly fails to respond or behaves dishonestly, it can be removed from the committee and replaced with another that has more stake and better reliability. If you look at it closely, it becomes clear that this is not just a naive idea of scattering files around. It is a carefully engineered system where mathematics, cryptography and incentives work together so that data is always “there” in a way that can be checked from the outside.

At the heart of this system lives the WAL token, and this is where the logic of incentives is tightly aligned with the main objectives of the project. WAL is the native asset that users spend to store data, and it is also what storage providers and stakers earn when they keep the network honest and efficient. The token has a defined maximum supply in the billions, with the ability to burn part of the circulation over time so that long term usage, not pure inflation, becomes the main driver of value. When someone pays to store a blob, the fee is denominated in WAL but effectively tied to a target price in ordinary money so that storage costs remain predictable even if markets move. The fee is not consumed all at once. Instead it is streamed slowly across the full storage period to the nodes that hold the fragments and to the stakers who delegated their WAL to those nodes. This streaming model is important because it mirrors the reality that storage is a service over time, not a one time event. Nodes are required to stake WAL to join active committees, and We’re seeing delegated stake matter a lot, because token holders can choose which operators they trust. If a node does its job, it collects rewards epoch after epoch. If it fails or cheats, upcoming versions of the protocol can slash part of its stake. I’m struck by how this turns good behaviour into rational behaviour rather than just a moral hope.

When we look at real usage the project becomes even more grounded. Developers building on Sui can store their frontends, game textures, configuration bundles and media directly as blobs, and then reference them from smart contracts. If an app is deployed this way, a temporary outage or a shutdown of a single server does not make the interface disappear from the world. Collections of digital art can store their images and metadata on Walrus, so the tokens always point to data that is backed by a resilient encoding scheme rather than a fragile link. Data heavy projects are starting to use Walrus as a backing store for large historical records and for training sets that fuel artificial intelligence tools. In these cases it becomes a lot more than a nice idea. It becomes the difference between trusting a central provider with all your data and trusting an open protocol that is checked constantly and secured by economic stake. Expert analysis from across the ecosystem has already noted that Walrus, because of its erasure coding and committee design, can offer effective replication factors of around four to five while maintaining recovery guarantees that older networks needed ten or more full copies to achieve, which translates into substantial cost reductions for serious workloads. That kind of gain is exactly what a storage network needs if it wants to be more than a concept and actually carry hundreds of terabytes or more.

The human side of Walrus is just as important as the technology. The Walrus Foundation exists to guide protocol upgrades, security reviews and ecosystem growth, and it has attracted significant backing from major digital asset funds so that the project can invest in long range research instead of chasing quick attention. Around that organisation there is a wider community of node operators, builders and users who push the protocol forward in quieter ways. They share dashboards that show live blob counts and capacity, they test gateways, they discuss committee rotation schedules and they propose parameter changes that could keep storage prices low while still making the network attractive for providers. If you read those discussions closely, you see that they are not driven only by speculation. They are driven by a shared belief that data should not be a hostage of central systems. If exchanges like Binance list WAL and host detailed articles, that simply becomes one more doorway through which people can enter the ecosystem. The real substance still sits in the network itself and in the people who choose to build on it.

If we step back and look at the long term, the main objectives of Walrus become very clear. The project wants to be the default storage and data availability backbone for the next generation of applications, especially in areas like decentralized finance, digital collectibles, gaming and artificial intelligence, where large volumes of data must be stored for years and verified from the outside. They are not trying to replace every form of storage in the world. They are focused on the parts of the digital stack where trust, auditability and resilience really matter. If they succeed, we will live in a world where new apps no longer have to sign themselves over to a single cloud provider just to get started, where collections on chain are backed by storage that is just as durable as the ledger they live on, and where people can be more confident that their digital work is not one outage away from being lost. We’re seeing the early pieces of that future already in the number of blobs stored, the capacity online and the projects that are choosing Walrus quietly as their storage layer.

In the end, what makes Walrus feel special to me is not only that it uses smart coding or that it runs on an advanced blockchain. It is the way all those expert choices connect back to simple human needs. People want to feel that their digital life is not fragile. They want to know that the photos, documents, art and code they care about will still be there in the morning, even If a company changes its mind or a data center has a bad day. Walrus offers a path toward that feeling, by spreading trust across many nodes, aligning incentives with long term service and grounding everything in verifiable proofs. It becomes a quiet foundation under the apps and markets we see on the surface, and as that foundation grows stronger, the whole digital world above it can become a little more honest and a little less frightening.
@Walrus 🦭/acc
#walrus
$WAL

Quando me sento com a história da Dusk Network, sinto algo muito humano por trás de toda a tecnologia. Esta não é apenas mais uma cadeia que apareceu para perseguir barulho. Começou em dois mil e dezoito com um sentimento simples, mas pesado, de que a forma como estávamos construindo blockchains públicas não era segura para pessoas reais. Tudo era visível todo o tempo. Cada saldo, cada movimento, cada negociação estava aberto na tela para sempre. Isso pode parecer emocionante do lado de fora, mas por dentro pode parecer frio e assustador se seu salário, suas economias ou suas ações da empresa fizerem parte dessa imagem. Tenho certeza de que as pessoas que começaram a Dusk se perguntaram uma questão suave, mas séria. Como os bancos, as bolsas e os fundos sérios poderão mover ativos reais na cadeia se não puderem proteger seus clientes e ainda seguir regras rigorosas? A partir dessa pergunta, a Dusk nasceu como uma blockchain de camada um criada para infraestrutura financeira regulamentada e focada em privacidade, um lugar onde finanças de grau institucional, defi compatível e ativos do mundo real tokenizados podem coexistir com privacidade e auditabilidade incorporadas ao protocolo, em vez de serem uma reflexão tardia.