Sabbir Saadat

Dusk is a blockchain layer 1 project that was announced in 2018 and it is allegedly privacy-focused controlled financial infrastructure. Compliant DeFi, privacy and auditability-designed Base Base of institutional-grade financial applications Dusk is the base, a suite of modular architecture based on privacy and auditability.
Trust is considered to be one of the most treasured assets in the world in which the field of finance is being digitalised on a daily basis. Humans desire to be fast, open, and on the other hand, they desire to be safe, confidential, and have a clear system of rules. Most of the blockchains are concerned about freedom and speed whilst others of the blockchains are concerned about control and regulation. The difference that can be established between Dusk and the other films is that it endeavors to strike a balance between these two worlds and make no judgment.
The concept of Dusk was based on the fact that there is no necessity to pit privacy and regulation against one another. Privacy is the norm of traditional finance. You can not show all people your bank balance, your transactions and identity. Simultaneously, financial institutions, and banks have to comply with the laws and provide audits where necessary. It is an equilibrium of nature and it is being transferred to the blockchain world at the time when everything is usually open at the dusk.
Dusk blockchain is layer 1, that is, layer is not on top of another chain. This will enable it to establish privacy and compliance as its basis rather than putting them on the margin. I believe so because it is a significant choice. Privacy The privacy is generally flimsy or half-hearted privacy that has been subsequently added. It is less artificial and credible as a part of the foundation.
The most useful aspect of this product is that it has a modular Dusk detail. This is just another connotation of the fact that the system is constructed as building blocks. The network has different components that execute privacy, smart contracts, and consensus among others. This will facilitate easier upgrading and adapting the blockchain, in the long run. Finance is not static. Technology is changing, markets are changing and laws are changing. The modular design will provide Dusk with the ability to expand without breaking a working one.
Dusk target in particular financial applications, on the institutional front. This does not imply that it is the preserve of the large banks or companies but it implies that it is modeled to its high standards. They require institutions which are well secured and predictable and those that are rule based. There are various open blockchains that are provoking and threatening to institutions by the uncertainties of compliance or total disclosure of information. Dusk attempts to destroy these barriers by transforming obedience to become the natural manner of networking.
The other important concept of Dusk is compliant DeFi. The truth has been illustrated in decentralized finance which exhibit the ability of an open financial system but it has also demonstrated how anarchic entities can join in disorder and stay in disorder. It has been a slap to belief in the shades of hacks, attempts of extortion and regulatory vagueness. Dusk takes a calmer approach. This is not the rejection of DeFi but an opportunity to shape this trend in the form that would be possible to reconcile with the real-life regulations and demands. I guess it is not so visible, but in the long run such strategy is far more sustainable.
The Dusk vision also gives serious attention to real-world assets, which are tokenized. These are equilibrium of stocks, bonds or real estate on blockchain. This should include privacy and auditability. The owners might desire privacy and the regulators must be in such a position that they can have transparency where need be. Dusk has been created to fulfill both of those requirements simultaneously. It is a two-sided design, which is considerably mature than the rest of the projects which do not go beyond the technical innovation but they do not consider the actual application.
Dusk privacy is not the process of concealing things at all times. Selective disclosure is frightening. At the same time the users are able to maintain the confidentiality of the information regarding the sensitive information and demonstrate that they are adhering to the rules. It is a good idea since it takes a reflection of the real world of trust. You do not reveal all your financial details to everyone, but you can prove your genuine nature when it is necessary to do it. This is what the majority of the citizens will be privacy seeking, not to be invisible, but to be respected in my opinion.
It is also important to ensure that the auditability is maintained. There should be the capacity of the institutions and regulators to check the activity without invading the privacy. It is against this balance that Dusk is created on. It does not assign any difference between privacy and auditability but comrades the two. This does not characterize the blockchain business and in my opinion, one of the greatest assets that Dusk holds.
In general, it can be said that Dusk may be defined as a blockchain, but a future-oriented, nevertheless, not hype-oriented one. It is not the easy cash or the radical change. Rather it meekly prefers to work at infrastructure building that can support real finance, real rules and real people. This causes it to not be so catchy but more solemn.
Personally, I believe that Dusk is a movement towards decentralized technology and conventional finance. It commemorates the history of the past and future technology. Dusk opts to be somewhere in the middle-ground whereby there usually is an extreme. And at intervals equilibrium is what long-term invention requires.

@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

Vanar is an L1 blockchain, the justification of which is too conspicuous. It does not involve tailoring to the developers, crypto proffers, etc., but only. The everyday digital life will employ the everyday users, everyday brands and everyday use. The way of empowering ordinary users and letting them enjoy in the application without misconception and strain is the sphere, that Vanar has paid significant attention to since the very moment the application was released.
One of them is Vanar that has a team history. These two behind Vanar are the gaming, entertainment and global brands associations. They know what the mass user is supposed to think, how digital products should arrive at them and feel and the definition of simplicity. As this kind of experience has been conducted, Vanar will not be abstract or experimental. It is dominating, banal, since technology that is expected to be a part and parcel of the modern reality is becoming so.
Vanar will be positioned in a way that it reaches large international customer base of Web3. It will channel this into the creation of the blockchain technology as it has been the case with the internet. The discovery, creating and communicating concept to play does not require the users to undergo some form of training to understand how to use case wallets, gas and other civilized technical processes. It is therefore, due to the blockchain world that this sort of user experience has not been present in me so far.
Vanar ecosystem goes through the board of mainstream industries. Games playing can be rated as one of the most important roles since it is one of the least rigorous methods of introducing people to a new technology. The players are allowed to own the virtual things, have the ability to carry out transactions and share the virtual worlds without being swallowed. The other extended to the metaverse is vanar whose concept is modifying the virtual worlds into a community-forming and identity space a socializing one.
The other sector where Vanar is willing to work is on artificial intelligence. The AI and blockchain will enable Vanar to explore the digital experience smarter and can be guided to both the user and the creator. The ecosystem also puts the eco-friendly programs and brand propositions. This is also a sign that Vanar is not only in one niche, but also is generically large to accept numerous applications in the real life.
His vision is the one which is seen working even of the most known products, which were under construction at the help of Vanar. Virtua metaverse refers to a virtual universe that attains on-demand immersive digital worlds that are made up of mixture of entertainment, ownership and creativity. VGN games network is a network, which will help the developer and the player to be provided with convenience tools in game and game infrastructure and make the blockchain gaming easily accessible and available at low costs. Products are not the expression presentation of the ideas, but realistic graphic representation of how Vanar could be marketed to fit the mass consumer platforms.
The VANRY token is the central node to the network. It is a source of putting the ecosystem alive and transforming coherent users, creators and applications. The token is not a virtual object, but is merely supposed to facilitate the interaction which makes such a world a possibility and are what make up the Vanar world. It is sustainable and healthier as compared to the price based and the hype one.
As an individual, I would consider Vanar to be a good one since it seems that it has ground. It is not considering futures and its unrealistic revolutions. It is also dynamic in technology development which could be bought and enjoyed by the people as an alternative. It may be considered a transition in between the web 2-friendliness knowledge and the web 3-ownership because Vanar has a good technical background and experience in games and entertainment.
It should be a natural phenomenon that it is omnipresent as much as premium blockchain is entertaining, useful. Vanar can move in a direction. Better still than that Web3 does not necessarily need to be complex to be able to execute the functionality of the project and the future of blockchain may not be complex just because it can be made simple and in an organized way because it can be made simple and well structured.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar

Plasma is a flatblock chain and it is aimed at stabilizing the stablecoins. It can move and achieve gas-first stability coin properties, and get sub second finality ( PlasmaBFT)-capable (EVM compatible (Reth)). Bitcoin-based security will embrace the levels of neutrality and opposition against censorship. It has the retail customers of the high-adoption markets and payments and finance institutions.
Plasma is a blockchain that takes thought of what it would want to be. It realizes that it cannot empty all the ills in crypto. Instead, it only possesses one purpose, this is the ability to receive the payments in the form of a stable coin, conveniently and quickly and securely. It is the new breath in the other, more or less the sphere of experimentations and the manifold concepts.
Individuals that are already represented in the form of stablecoins favor such a feature of crypto the most. They have been used as remittances, daily and savings and business activities especially where they are not counted on home currencies and where there are no facilities to access banks. On this, upon which Plasma is attached. It fails to treat the stable coins as the tokens but the main one of the network infrastructure.
The idea of the gasless transfer of the stable coins is regarded as one of the most sought out notions of Plasma. The fact that it would require a user to pay using another volatile token puzzles and frustrates most users. Such frictions are removed in the plasma and contribute to the transactions due to which the stablecoin would be used to pay. This is far more proximate than the fact of the daily situation of the use of electronic payment and less of anti-new-comers feeling.
It perfectly suits with those EVM that enable one to ensure that developers need not be thrown into a fresh system on the ground. They have Ethereium tools, knowledge and reusable contracts. This is important since they do not exhaust time and efforts of the developers. In the meantime, Plasma is the benefit of being quicker and sub-second finality is required by payment. In the great settlements, where the commonplace is condoned, a latitude is not mined out of that business.
The other rationale argued to be implemented is the use of Bitcoin security of anchorage. It is presupposed that bitcoin is the objective and free-of-censorship blockchain. The program is anchored on the authority and stability of the Bitcoin whom it chains its security to it and has no intention of overthrowing it. It is a brilliant attempt to put a bright complication over the fact that the Plasma trusts in long-run and not the short-run boom.
The superiority of Plasma in my subjective opinion is more reasonable. Even it does not venture to the extremities of impressing with fancy work. It is trying to work well. The highly adopted markets are the markets in which the retail users are expected to possess speed, cheap and easy. Institutions require neutrality, potent assumptions of the security and predictability. It seems that plasma will undermine the two parties.
Of course this will depend on the outcome of the implementation. The process of trust is a process that takes a lot of time and is conditional upon the liquidity and the actual utilization. But the trend is reasonable. That he might be a one mind demands that the crypto be endowed with power to contain systems like the Plasma, which is never of an idealistic simplicity, but of useful action in the economic world.
I think this is a small step by Plasma, although the right direction. It shows that through specialization, the blockchain technology can be optimized by focusing on the utility and the final user and not noise. A bid to make the stabilcoins have the interface between the crypto and the real-world will be a fact that plasma will be the one where the bridge of the crypto to the real-life will be given.

@Plasma #Plasma $XPL

Walrus is not merely a protocol, a cover. Personally speaking, I feel that it is a prudent and well-written response to some of the cacophonous panic of the modern Internet culture. Because we live in the age of collecting, storing, selling and abusing information, there may come a time when Walrus can provide an alternative to this, which will be appreciative to the privacy and balance as well as the long term utility. To begin with, Walrus is the project which will help decentralized technology not appearing scary, but becoming possible.
Walrus has its own cryptocurrency (WAL). This key is the Walrus protocol key. WAL was not a trade or a speculative alternative which was to be living and functioning. Instead it is strongly allied to the system practices. It is deployed to interact in governance, to help in staking, and in communicating with (protocol-based) decentralized applications. This renders WAL to appear functional as opposed to being a digital object.
Walrus protocol, in its turn, pays much attention to the secure and private interaction as it is based on blockchain. Privacy concept is not addressed as something that is unknown and suspicious. Instead it is being regarded as one of the basic human needs of the computerized age. The customers can complete their transactions and leave a note without suspecting that the transactions made are being tracked and brought into the limelight. Such an approach is turning Walrus into a hero to the users, unlike most of the sites.
The best aspect is that Walrus possesses a decentralized information storage. The protocol will ensure powerful and efficient maintenance of data and transactions with regard to privacy. It exploits this way of relaying the data in a decentralized network as opposed to central deposit. This makes the censorship a complicated task and contributes to reliability.
Walrus is good in the area of technical basis since the Sui blockchain is housed on the platform. As the one being built around Sui, Walrus can avail the high performance and scalability but not centralization. This alternative alternative reveals that the team of Walrus is certainly long term planning not only of the events that are taking place in the present, but also the events that may take place in the future as the service continues to grow and the growing populations begin using it.
It is this fact that ought to be noticed in storage system used by Walrus. It is based on a combination of a blend of erasure encoding, as well as a combination of storage of blobs. This is merely termed as breaking of massive files into the chunks and then broadcasting them to a vast amount of nodes in the system. None of the participants possesses the whole file. This also minimizes the chances of loss of information as well as has improved security. The information is also viewable even where some sections of the network face an outage.
This form of design leaves Walrus in a perfect position of being a cheap and censorship-insensitive storage. The traditional cloud storage is largely based on huge central companies. These services also involve risks associated with change of policy at a certain time, information or limited access breach at the same convenience. Walrus is a form of confidence to the user and has a decentralized structure with users being empowered.
Personally, I like Walrus due to the effect of harmony. It is not trying too experimental and flamboyant. It is quite concerned with the solutions of practical problems in a tangible and self-evident way. The protocol, as it has been determined, fits the developers in addition to the enterprises not mentioning the individuals who are interested in watching a fact that their data is in a better place. This feeling of belonging is more or less applicable in a perception of the potential scene where the decentralized technology will be expanded to a wider audience.
Walrus is also cognizant of the decentralized applications and this enables the multiplicity of creative and useful applications. Once this time arrives, the developers will be in a position to develop tools and services that utilize decentralized storage without attaching a lot of concern to scale and cost. In the meantime, such applications also enable the users to chat and comprehend that their information is not fixed to the servers of a certain organisation.
The other Walrus maturity area is the government. The protocol creates a feeling of joint responsibility where the individuals participating in the decision making process are free to be delegated by the bearers of the tokens. This makes trust construction over time easy since change is not adopted on the top level but, it is done at a community foundation. This relationship also comes with the added value of rewarding of people who are actively engaged in the process of achieving security and stability of the network.
I believe that Walrus is a lower and, also, more crucial shift in the direction of decentralized finance and storage. It is not trying to provide fast switch of the landscape and unrealizable profits. It is rather entangled with trying to make its infrastructure sustainable, infrastructure which is privacy conscious, infrastructure which is decentralized and infrastructure which is pragmatic in real world. Such a reserved thinking is better suited to the blockchain world.
Walrus does not speak much in the industry but its ideas do speak. To have man centred and future consideration system, it has been embracing the concept of safe storage, personal communications and the concept of effective token economy. Walrus must hurt even a person required to utilize the decentralized alternatives to the conventional cloud-based solutions that technology may be both helpful and deferential.

@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus

Caracteristicile principale ale Vanar Chain
Vanar chain oferă caracteristicile orientate către comunitate ale blockchain-ului și inovația, sustenabilitatea și funcționarea eficientă. Printre factorii care fac ca Vanar să se califice ca un lider pe piață în ceea ce privește blockchain-ul sunt discutați mai jos.
Vanar Chain este dezvoltat în raport cu o viziune foarte bine stabilită. Își dorește să simplifice blockchain-ul și să-l facă practic și accesibil pentru toți oamenii. Numeroase infrastructuri blockchain sunt multinomiale, costisitoare sau greu de înțeles. Vanar Chain încearcă să abordeze aceste probleme nu prin tehnologie, ci prin oameni ca aspect principal de îngrijorare. Cred că acest mod de gândire antropocentric este caracteristica principală a Vanar Chain.

Dusk offers commodity with respect to which one can hardly locate in blockchain as it offers privacy, and receipt transparency. Even sensitive financial information has not come out yet the institutions can still deny the fact that the transactions have been carried out as genuine and in conformity. This appears to be eminent in the world where trust is a priority than privacy. Dusk seems to me the language of persons and corporations, and may be viewed as blockchain that is more realistic and business-like and ready to deploy its decentralized passion into hardcore economic activities.
I believe that this is the equilibrium that the blockchain world has never had. The dairyman appeared to lift his foot sufficiently. On the one hand, there were those ones, who would prefer to have the full privacy, full control and to be unobserved. The cross of the line was objection of institutions, of whose clearness, rules, and evidence should have been safe. Here is a crossroad of these two worlds at the Dusk, known as peaceful.
The privacy has never been that of secrets, which hides evil. In the meantime, transparency does not mean that an individual is obliged to share all the personal facts with other individuals. It is this difference that is presented to Dusk. It encourages secrecy of transactions but verifiable. This does not mean that one blindly trusts but there must be show of demonstration which is palpable and should not be oversteps of the individual.
The fact that such an approach is human was what I have found to be the most significant. In their material existence, the human beings strive to be decently well. They are not prepared to make all in shape of payment, investments and transfers permanent basis. Dusk protects that dignity. In the meantime, it does not forget that the modern finance ought to be in a position to stick by the regulations. The adherence can be manifested and privacy is not infringed in institutions. That is powerful.
This type of construction is an adult stage of thinking in blockchain. It is more than the rebellion in the name of rebellion. It asks a deeper question. And yet what of the actual real laws, actual businesses and actual persons. Dusk gives a very good answer.
The other explanation as to why I believe this would build long term trust is that this style will lead to greater trust. Consumers will feel safe when they know that their information is safe. The institutions feel more confident when they realize that they can get transactions checked. This confidence is accomplished when, the parties feel respected. Duskme could not put itself in a situation of losing to the other side.
The other reason why I prefer Dusk is that it is low profile. It is not grounded on the hype and noise. It is infatuated with a material matter and debate. The outcome of such a concentration is, in most cases, sustainable systems. This is the stability that we are fortunate to live in the fast moving blockchain world.
The decentralization has been lost where it does not exist in the present case. It is refined. Twilight reserves the grand conception, and fashion to it its size. On the one hand, this proves that it might be the fact that, along with decentralization, responsibility goes hand in hand. It is not the sale of values but acquisition of values.
This is one of the solutions, and I think that it will dictate the future of blockchain. Privacy and the respect of trust with the blockchain must be considered by them in the event of the serious financial activity to be followed. Dusk has proven that it is not only possible but it works. It charms an impression of calm down to a scene of violent events.
It is systems by which individuals and institutions gain their reputation that will be eminent in the digital world which is increasingly becoming complex. This is the destiny that Dusk is ready to get. It is eloquent and yet low-pitched. this is, such is what faith demands at times.

@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

Termenul alternativ aplicat în descrierea plasmei este XPL, care este un blockchain ce are o natură ca o gândire. Banii pe internet ar trebui să fie accesibili și portabili și ușor de înțeles. Blockchain-ul ipotetic și speculativ nu este urmat de pașii altor blockchain-uri ipotetice și speculative care se bazează pe preț. A fost creat deoarece este ancorat pe stablecoins. În această lucrare, se va discuta despre rolul tranzacționării între lanțuri ca un component al ecuației, funcționalitatea sa și formatul tokenomics. De asemenea, voi oferi opiniile mele personale despre adecvarea acestui concept.

Walrus este construit pe un concept atrăgător, dar simplu și inteligent. Trebuie să fie ușor de stocat, sigur la stocare, iar costul pe termen lung ar trebui să fie economic. Token-ul acestui sistem este WAL central și este token-ul de plată stocat în protocolul Walrus. Un alt fapt interesant este că WAL este și el un token, iar modul în care a fost construit nu este lipsit de interes.

Nu este un preț dinamic și nici aleatoriu în care un individ stochează informații cu ajutorul Walrus. Sistemul este conceput într-un mod astfel încât costul constant de stocare să fie cazul în lumea reală, chiar și atunci când valoarea token-ului WAL este mare pe termen lung sau nu. Acest lucru se datorează faptului că majoritatea utilizatorilor finali se îngrijorează de ceea ce îi va costa stocarea pe parcursul vieții lor și nu de graficele de prețuri ale token-urilor. Fără încredere nu poate exista stabilitate și stocare de date pe termen lung.

XPL will be one of the applications of plasma, and the usage of which will be its largest token. It would also prefer to ensure that the exchange of the stable coins is not just quick, but also is distressing and pain-free as compared to the transfers carried out through the older blockchains. It does not also use plasma since it is digestible by the gurus. It also cooperates with the stable currencies such as the USDT and attempts to resolve the issue of the lack of speed and high costs and complex procedures.
The Plasma laboratories found the concept of the plasma and rely on the success of other famous names in the financial and crypto industry as Peter Thiel and the Bitfinex. This kind of support will make the project be regarded favorably as far as credibility is concerned and create an impression that they cared about the long term. The image of the Plasma is enormous. It is nervous about the process of transferring the large quantities of the real world value to blockchains, and how the digital currency can be swallowed like the message.
Bitcoin in fact is its spin-off, plasma. One can say, that it is integrated with Bitcoin and it has new properties that one can not call the Bitcoin per se. Bitcoin is regarded to be safe and healthy, it is not intended to be fast and steady. Plasma will also aim at making sure that there is power of the Bitcoin and sell it in a dynamic and quick manner. It is giant weigh as it does not involve any utility and security decision making.
Some of the concepts of Plasma that have the greatest value are referred to as Stablecoins. The Stablecoins are electronic currencies but it is not aptly succeeding in setting up a standardized value. Individuals planning to pay and divide them as a western cheque pay them differently as compared to unstable individuals. The fact that most blockchains allow the redemption of the stablecoins is not only horrible in paying but also time wasting. It is these that are perfected in plasma, thus making it a payment scheme, rather than a grove of conjecture.
Plasma network would have smooth flow and use of XPL. This may serve to simplify the job the network has to accomplish and have the bonuses and assistance system safe and operational. XPL will not be a token, but an element of the ecosystem. Plasma is based on the actual practices in its design.
The other alternative that is appropriate is plasma because it can be implemented along with the uses of EVM. It implies that the developers engaged into working upon the project of already popular smart contracts networks are able to re-deploy the tools and applications to Plasma with minimal effort and do not very well require a clean sheet. This causes the network to develop at a higher rate and reduces the adoption cost. This can be interpreted to mean that they can now enjoy the same wallets and the apps that the consumers are using to be applied in order to make the experience of the same enjoyable.
But the most expressive, though, is the mission of Plasma which is not only short, but narrowed out also, according to my own opinion. The majority of the blockchain projects would be the desire and not doing everything simultaneously. One of these issues is selected by plasma and a hole excavated in the issue. It is a mere thought but this indeed might cause the universe to believe in the effort of the sheer fact of their actual implementation with regards to being able to pass on with the feeling of transferring of the stablecoins freely without any hesitation.
It is an infrastructure, I suppose but not a new trend, Plasma. It is not struggling to bring show-biz shine so that it can be likable and admirable. Instead, it will become a presumption that it is the transmitter of remittances, that money and convert the values that are transpiring internationally in the backdrop. People can use it when it is superior irrespective of how much consideration is given to the underlying technology is actually impossible in cases which are literally myriad that are indeed the gauge of the progress being actually.
The XPL is attaining its attention as it is a solution to the increasing demand. The potentiality of the specific networks of the stablecoins is quite large as there are other individuals and institutions that would desire finding a decent digital currency. Plasma would remain in the position of investigations in future in case of the due clipping and realistic design.
Two of such programs are the plasma and the XPL that involve tracking any person exploring the answer to the stablecoins and interface of the traditional finance and the decentralized one. They bet the profitability to all on a cheque on every a complex thing. This is where the second book of crypto ends, as it appeared to me.

@Plasma #Plasma $XPL

S+ cisrepresented, Safety of Walrus which is WAL tokens delegation and, within my power, the prettiest ideas, too. It makes the security profession of a select few professionals into the one that would have been made by the entire population. It is non-centralized and quite modern network solution.
The delegated staking vision is the vision that fails to provide a higher-order infrastructure to provide assistance in the process of acquiring the network is having the users. The reason is that the buying of the WAL tokens and the decision to visit it allowed becoming a member of the system that will make Walrus one that is trusting and worthy. This has closed the door and banged open the gate of entrance to better serve out people of more diverse types. This has been discovered to have the most probable problem in the fact that sound networks are made not only due to the strounting strength of technology, but extensive and uniform societies.
It has turned it into its competitive area and it is literally so aggressive and candid.
Delegated Staking Delegated Staking is the other security guarantee on regards to the security of Walrus in case there is a security default of WAL tokens. The users are making hosting obligations on network security that it does not even provide a storage facility. The other characteristic that would dictate the kind of data to be transferred to the nodes would be the rivalry among the nodes as far as who would be winning over the other among the users would be concerned when it comes to winning a stake. These acts are rewarded on the part of the analysts who would sell his/her interests to the nodes and that he/she is a node. These will guarantee the overall convergence of these, child token holders, Walrus users and Walrus operators in the coming years as the slashing will become available in Walrus.
The only interesting thing is that even the incentives are also applied as it is also the task of influencing behavior. This is default policy of the nodes i.e. they should be not left with the nodes. They must make them feel that they have gained attraction of stake and they are expected to proceed performing with a lot of confidence. The citizens who cast their vote in the voting are the same citizens on whom they will cast their blame in the voting nodes of which they are again the persons to whom they will ascribe their responsibility of voting and voting where, at which the users will vote their stake. This leads to an evolutionary trend of the opposite of the nodes, which can be trusted to grow even more and the ones, which would not be destroyed at all.
It was what this reward system is not fond of. The fact that good nodes are good is because good is that the patronizing users of good node are good. The second step that would then follow naturally would be cooperation and not aggressiveness. It makes network more human too since success cannot occur in a vacuum. It resembles the common token holders and the operators.
The second layer that will be embraced is the slashing that should be embraced in future. Bad behavior will have to occur in order to result in the dismissal. I do not believe that it is such an issue as a penalty, but one of clarity. Neither does it lack much trouble in believing in bad practice which incur no profits, when it is known that there exists a guarantee that the latter would be full of losses. The end users holding the token and even the operators would want to have the safe, trustful and the honest network.
A disinterested staking such as the one in the case of Walrus is inherently closer to reflective trade off transparency/ accountability. It does not suppose that one must be technically competent and most importantly does not induce the incentives of good behaviour by emphasizing on it and above all throws the net between the way to long term stability by like incentives. It is a good applicable and decentralization architecture in my opinion. This is a facade and is amalgamated with its preannouncements and otherwise is predisposed to having the opinion that the interdependent dedication is receptive of all security.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus