RISKK TAKER
RISK TAKER, Technical Analyst, Trader, My post NFA
Öppna handel
21 dagar
1 Följer
9 Följare
131 Gilla-markeringar
0 Delade
Inlägg
Portfölj
Alla
Offerter
$OP at a 1H Decision Zone as Liquidity Builds Above
On the 1H timeframe, $OP has recovered from the 0.125 base and is now trading around 0.133, compressing beneath a defined resistance band at 0.134–0.138. The recent rebound established higher lows, indicating short-term accumulation. However, the larger structure remains cautious until resistance is reclaimed.
Liquidity is clearly resting above equal highs, increasing the probability of a sweep into the 0.138 region. A confirmed breakout with sustained acceptance above that level would signal structural shift and open room for continuation.
If rejection occurs, downside rotation toward 0.126 and potentially 0.125 remains technically valid.
#OP
On the 1H timeframe, $OP has recovered from the 0.125 base and is now trading around 0.133, compressing beneath a defined resistance band at 0.134–0.138. The recent rebound established higher lows, indicating short-term accumulation. However, the larger structure remains cautious until resistance is reclaimed.
Liquidity is clearly resting above equal highs, increasing the probability of a sweep into the 0.138 region. A confirmed breakout with sustained acceptance above that level would signal structural shift and open room for continuation.
If rejection occurs, downside rotation toward 0.126 and potentially 0.125 remains technically valid.
#OP
On the 4H chart, $DOT has rebounded strongly from the 1.25 base, forming a sequence of higher lows and reclaiming mid-range structure. Price is currently trading near 1.38 and advancing toward a significant supply zone between 1.48 and 1.55, where prior distribution initiated a steep selloff.
The broader structure remains a consolidation range, with clear liquidity resting above 1.55 and below 1.25. The current bullish leg reflects accumulation and short-term strength, but confirmation requires a sustained break and hold above 1.55.
Failure to clear supply would likely trigger a rotation back into the range, targeting 1.30 first and potentially retesting 1.25 demand. A decisive breakout, however, would invalidate the range narrative and open the path for continuation.
$DOT is compressing beneath resistance. Expansion is near.
#dot
The broader structure remains a consolidation range, with clear liquidity resting above 1.55 and below 1.25. The current bullish leg reflects accumulation and short-term strength, but confirmation requires a sustained break and hold above 1.55.
Failure to clear supply would likely trigger a rotation back into the range, targeting 1.30 first and potentially retesting 1.25 demand. A decisive breakout, however, would invalidate the range narrative and open the path for continuation.
$DOT is compressing beneath resistance. Expansion is near.
#dot
ATOMUSDT Stabilizing Beneath Resistance After Impulse
$ATOM recently produced a strong expansion leg into the 2.50 resistance area, followed by controlled consolidation around 2.39. The pullbacks since the high have remained shallow and continue to respect the 2.24–2.27 demand block, preserving a clear higher-low structure on the 4H timeframe.
This behavior typically reflects bullish continuation conditions rather than distribution. If buyers maintain acceptance above mid-range support, price is likely to revisit and challenge the 2.48–2.52 resistance zone. Only a sustained breakdown below demand would weaken the current structure.
For now, ATOM remains technically bullish, with consolidation beneath resistance suggesting preparation for another upward expansion phase.
#ATOM
$ATOM recently produced a strong expansion leg into the 2.50 resistance area, followed by controlled consolidation around 2.39. The pullbacks since the high have remained shallow and continue to respect the 2.24–2.27 demand block, preserving a clear higher-low structure on the 4H timeframe.
This behavior typically reflects bullish continuation conditions rather than distribution. If buyers maintain acceptance above mid-range support, price is likely to revisit and challenge the 2.48–2.52 resistance zone. Only a sustained breakdown below demand would weaken the current structure.
For now, ATOM remains technically bullish, with consolidation beneath resistance suggesting preparation for another upward expansion phase.
#ATOM
TRXUSDT Returns to Resistance After Demand Reaction
$TRX recently reacted strongly from the 0.278 demand region, forming a clear higher-low structure and driving price back into the upper consolidation boundary near 0.286. This recovery indicates renewed buying interest following the prior liquidity sweep. Price now tests range resistance that has capped multiple previous advances.
A confirmed breakout and acceptance above this level would likely open continuation toward the 0.287–0.289 zone. Conversely, rejection from resistance could send TRX back toward the 0.279–0.281 support block, maintaining the broader range environment.
Current structure favors buyers in the short term, but confirmation above resistance remains the key signal for sustained upside continuation.
#TRX
$TRX recently reacted strongly from the 0.278 demand region, forming a clear higher-low structure and driving price back into the upper consolidation boundary near 0.286. This recovery indicates renewed buying interest following the prior liquidity sweep. Price now tests range resistance that has capped multiple previous advances.
A confirmed breakout and acceptance above this level would likely open continuation toward the 0.287–0.289 zone. Conversely, rejection from resistance could send TRX back toward the 0.279–0.281 support block, maintaining the broader range environment.
Current structure favors buyers in the short term, but confirmation above resistance remains the key signal for sustained upside continuation.
#TRX
ARBUSDT Shows Weak Recovery After Range Loss
$ARB recently lost its consolidation support near 0.105 and expanded downward into the 0.095 liquidity zone, confirming a structural breakdown. The current upward movement appears to be a corrective rebound into former support, which now acts as resistance. Overhead supply remains concentrated between 0.118 and 0.122, capping bullish attempts.
Unless price can reclaim and hold above this region, technical structure continues to favor downside continuation and potential retest of recent lows. The transition from range to downtrend is characterized by lower highs and increased bearish momentum.
Only a decisive recovery back into the prior range would negate the bearish scenario currently implied by price action.
#ARB
$ARB recently lost its consolidation support near 0.105 and expanded downward into the 0.095 liquidity zone, confirming a structural breakdown. The current upward movement appears to be a corrective rebound into former support, which now acts as resistance. Overhead supply remains concentrated between 0.118 and 0.122, capping bullish attempts.
Unless price can reclaim and hold above this region, technical structure continues to favor downside continuation and potential retest of recent lows. The transition from range to downtrend is characterized by lower highs and increased bearish momentum.
Only a decisive recovery back into the prior range would negate the bearish scenario currently implied by price action.
#ARB
$NEIRO Shows Weak Recovery Inside Bearish Range
NEIROUSDT remains confined within a corrective range beneath the 0.000085–0.00009 supply zone, with price failing to sustain any breakout attempts. The sequence of lower highs and repeated rejections near internal resistance suggests distribution is forming rather than accumulation.
Current positioning below 0.00008 keeps short-term structure bearish and supports continuation probability toward the 0.00007 liquidity region. If selling pressure persists, extension toward the 0.000065 higher-timeframe support becomes the next technical objective.
Only a strong reclaim and acceptance above range highs would negate the bearish scenario. Until that occurs, NEIRO structure favors downside resolution from this consolidation phase.
#StrategyBTCPurchase
NEIROUSDT remains confined within a corrective range beneath the 0.000085–0.00009 supply zone, with price failing to sustain any breakout attempts. The sequence of lower highs and repeated rejections near internal resistance suggests distribution is forming rather than accumulation.
Current positioning below 0.00008 keeps short-term structure bearish and supports continuation probability toward the 0.00007 liquidity region. If selling pressure persists, extension toward the 0.000065 higher-timeframe support becomes the next technical objective.
Only a strong reclaim and acceptance above range highs would negate the bearish scenario. Until that occurs, NEIRO structure favors downside resolution from this consolidation phase.
#StrategyBTCPurchase
$WLFI Tests Distribution After Vertical Expansion
WLFIUSDT has surged from the 0.10 accumulation region with strong bullish momentum, reclaiming key structure and approaching the higher-timeframe distribution zone around 0.13–0.135. The sharp displacement indicates buyers have taken short-term control, but price is now interacting with an area where previous supply capped upside.
Sustained acceptance above 0.125 would confirm the breakout and support continuation toward higher resistance. Rejection inside the distribution zone could produce a corrective move back toward 0.11–0.105, which aligns with prior consolidation support.
While the broader shift favors bulls after the impulsive rally, this supply test represents a pivotal inflection point for the next directional phase.
#WorldLibertyFinanciaI
WLFIUSDT has surged from the 0.10 accumulation region with strong bullish momentum, reclaiming key structure and approaching the higher-timeframe distribution zone around 0.13–0.135. The sharp displacement indicates buyers have taken short-term control, but price is now interacting with an area where previous supply capped upside.
Sustained acceptance above 0.125 would confirm the breakout and support continuation toward higher resistance. Rejection inside the distribution zone could produce a corrective move back toward 0.11–0.105, which aligns with prior consolidation support.
While the broader shift favors bulls after the impulsive rally, this supply test represents a pivotal inflection point for the next directional phase.
#WorldLibertyFinanciaI
Bitcoin’s Worst First Quarter in Eight Years
Bitcoin began 2026 with the kind of quiet confidence that comes after a strong year. It opened January near $87,700, still riding the tailwinds of 2025’s institutional adoption, ETF inflows, and a general sense that the post-halving cycle had real legs. By mid-February, that optimism had evaporated. The price had fallen to the $68,000–$68,700 zone, down 22–24% for the year so far. Unless March delivers a dramatic turnaround, 2026 will record Bitcoin’s weakest first quarter since the brutal bear market of 2018, when it lost nearly 50% in the opening three months.
This wasn’t a sudden crash triggered by a single scandal or black-swan event. It was a slow, grinding decline built on layers of real-world pressure that fed on one another until the market simply ran out of buyers willing to stand in the way.The most visible catalyst was the partial U.S. government shutdown that began on January 31, 2026, after Congress failed to pass a funding bill. For several days federal operations were paralyzed. The SEC and CFTC could not process routine filings or approvals. Economic data releases—including the critical January jobs report, were delayed, creating what traders called a “data vacuum.”
Without fresh numbers to guide expectations, uncertainty filled the gap. Prediction markets had priced in a high probability of disruption, and when it materialized, risk appetite collapsed. Bitcoin slid toward $83,000 as the shutdown took hold, then kept sliding as the political stalemate dragged on. Even after a temporary funding deal was signed in early February, the damage was done: the episode reminded everyone how quickly Washington dysfunction can ripple into every corner of the financial world, including assets that once prided themselves on being independent of it.
Layered on top of the shutdown was the nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve Chair. Announced in late January, the move sent a clear signal to markets: the era of ultra-loose policy might be ending sooner than hoped. Warsh, a former Fed governor known for favoring a smaller balance sheet and greater caution on liquidity, was interpreted as a more hawkish choice than many in the crypto community had anticipated. The reaction was immediate and brutal. Bitcoin, already under pressure, dropped sharply alongside gold and silver (the latter suffering its worst single-day loss since 1980).
The message was simple: if the Fed is likely to keep rates higher for longer and shrink its footprint, the flood of cheap money that had supported risk assets could slow to a trickle. Even though Warsh has spoken positively about Bitcoin in the past, calling it “your new gold” for anyone under 40, his policy leanings spooked traders far more than his personal views reassured them.At the same time, the market was undergoing a painful internal adjustment. Spot Bitcoin ETFs, which had been a steady source of demand throughout 2025, flipped to consistent net outflows in the new year, totaling several billion dollars in just weeks.
This removed a major structural bid at the worst possible moment. Meanwhile, leveraged positions in futures markets were being unwound aggressively. Open interest fell roughly 20% in a short period, and liquidations topped $1–2 billion in several 24-hour windows. It wasn’t chaotic panic selling; it was orderly but relentless deleveraging. Lower prices triggered margin calls, which forced more selling, which thinned liquidity and made the next drop even sharper. On-chain data showed pockets of long-term holders finally taking profits or cutting losses, classic signs that the market was flushing out the weakest hands after a long run-up.
These forces did not operate in isolation. Broader macro caution was already in the air: brief spikes in dollar strength, lingering inflation worries, and a general rotation away from high-beta assets all weighed on crypto. When traditional markets wobbled, Bitcoin, still viewed by many as a leveraged play on risk appetite, felt the impact more acutely.
The result is a first quarter that feels heavier than the raw percentage drop suggests. Investors who entered 2026 expecting continuation of the 2025 rally have instead been reminded that Bitcoin, even in bull cycles, can deliver 20–30% drawdowns without warning. The pain has been compounded by the narrative shift: what began as “healthy consolidation” quickly morphed into questions about whether the bull market itself was intact.
Yet history offers perspective. Severe early-year weakness is not new, and it has not always dictated the full-year outcome. The -49.7% Q1 of 2018 led into a long bear market, but milder negative starts, like -10.8% in 2020 or -11.8% in 2025—were followed by strong recoveries once the dust settled. The current drawdown feels closer to those corrective phases than to a structural breakdown. Leverage has been meaningfully reduced, ETF selling appears to be slowing in spots, and the core long-term drivers, spot ETFs, corporate and sovereign adoption, clearer U.S. regulatory framing, and Bitcoin’s fixed supply, remain in place.
The first quarter of 2026 has been a harsh reminder that politics, policy expectations, and market mechanics can still dominate even the strongest fundamental stories. The U.S. government shutdown created immediate uncertainty and a data blackout. The Warsh nomination shifted the liquidity narrative in a less favorable direction. ETF outflows and deleveraging turned that uncertainty into real selling pressure. Together they produced one of Bitcoin’s roughest starts on record.
Whether this proves to be the low point or merely a pause before deeper testing depends on how quickly the macro backdrop stabilizes and whether support around $65,000–$68,000 holds. For now, the market is doing what it has always done in difficult periods: it is repricing risk, clearing excess leverage, and waiting to see which narrative regains control. The pain is real, the lessons are old, and the cycle, bruised but still intact, continues.
$BTC $ETH #MarketRebound
This wasn’t a sudden crash triggered by a single scandal or black-swan event. It was a slow, grinding decline built on layers of real-world pressure that fed on one another until the market simply ran out of buyers willing to stand in the way.The most visible catalyst was the partial U.S. government shutdown that began on January 31, 2026, after Congress failed to pass a funding bill. For several days federal operations were paralyzed. The SEC and CFTC could not process routine filings or approvals. Economic data releases—including the critical January jobs report, were delayed, creating what traders called a “data vacuum.”
Without fresh numbers to guide expectations, uncertainty filled the gap. Prediction markets had priced in a high probability of disruption, and when it materialized, risk appetite collapsed. Bitcoin slid toward $83,000 as the shutdown took hold, then kept sliding as the political stalemate dragged on. Even after a temporary funding deal was signed in early February, the damage was done: the episode reminded everyone how quickly Washington dysfunction can ripple into every corner of the financial world, including assets that once prided themselves on being independent of it.
Layered on top of the shutdown was the nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve Chair. Announced in late January, the move sent a clear signal to markets: the era of ultra-loose policy might be ending sooner than hoped. Warsh, a former Fed governor known for favoring a smaller balance sheet and greater caution on liquidity, was interpreted as a more hawkish choice than many in the crypto community had anticipated. The reaction was immediate and brutal. Bitcoin, already under pressure, dropped sharply alongside gold and silver (the latter suffering its worst single-day loss since 1980).
The message was simple: if the Fed is likely to keep rates higher for longer and shrink its footprint, the flood of cheap money that had supported risk assets could slow to a trickle. Even though Warsh has spoken positively about Bitcoin in the past, calling it “your new gold” for anyone under 40, his policy leanings spooked traders far more than his personal views reassured them.At the same time, the market was undergoing a painful internal adjustment. Spot Bitcoin ETFs, which had been a steady source of demand throughout 2025, flipped to consistent net outflows in the new year, totaling several billion dollars in just weeks.
This removed a major structural bid at the worst possible moment. Meanwhile, leveraged positions in futures markets were being unwound aggressively. Open interest fell roughly 20% in a short period, and liquidations topped $1–2 billion in several 24-hour windows. It wasn’t chaotic panic selling; it was orderly but relentless deleveraging. Lower prices triggered margin calls, which forced more selling, which thinned liquidity and made the next drop even sharper. On-chain data showed pockets of long-term holders finally taking profits or cutting losses, classic signs that the market was flushing out the weakest hands after a long run-up.
These forces did not operate in isolation. Broader macro caution was already in the air: brief spikes in dollar strength, lingering inflation worries, and a general rotation away from high-beta assets all weighed on crypto. When traditional markets wobbled, Bitcoin, still viewed by many as a leveraged play on risk appetite, felt the impact more acutely.
The result is a first quarter that feels heavier than the raw percentage drop suggests. Investors who entered 2026 expecting continuation of the 2025 rally have instead been reminded that Bitcoin, even in bull cycles, can deliver 20–30% drawdowns without warning. The pain has been compounded by the narrative shift: what began as “healthy consolidation” quickly morphed into questions about whether the bull market itself was intact.
Yet history offers perspective. Severe early-year weakness is not new, and it has not always dictated the full-year outcome. The -49.7% Q1 of 2018 led into a long bear market, but milder negative starts, like -10.8% in 2020 or -11.8% in 2025—were followed by strong recoveries once the dust settled. The current drawdown feels closer to those corrective phases than to a structural breakdown. Leverage has been meaningfully reduced, ETF selling appears to be slowing in spots, and the core long-term drivers, spot ETFs, corporate and sovereign adoption, clearer U.S. regulatory framing, and Bitcoin’s fixed supply, remain in place.
The first quarter of 2026 has been a harsh reminder that politics, policy expectations, and market mechanics can still dominate even the strongest fundamental stories. The U.S. government shutdown created immediate uncertainty and a data blackout. The Warsh nomination shifted the liquidity narrative in a less favorable direction. ETF outflows and deleveraging turned that uncertainty into real selling pressure. Together they produced one of Bitcoin’s roughest starts on record.
Whether this proves to be the low point or merely a pause before deeper testing depends on how quickly the macro backdrop stabilizes and whether support around $65,000–$68,000 holds. For now, the market is doing what it has always done in difficult periods: it is repricing risk, clearing excess leverage, and waiting to see which narrative regains control. The pain is real, the lessons are old, and the cycle, bruised but still intact, continues.
$BTC $ETH #MarketRebound
Bitcoin’s Worst First Quarter in Eight Years
Bitcoin began 2026 with the kind of quiet confidence that comes after a strong year. It opened January near $87,700, still riding the tailwinds of 2025’s institutional adoption, ETF inflows, and a general sense that the post-halving cycle had real legs. By mid-February, that optimism had evaporated. The price had fallen to the $68,000–$68,700 zone, down 22–24% for the year so far. Unless March delivers a dramatic turnaround, 2026 will record Bitcoin’s weakest first quarter since the brutal bear market of 2018, when it lost nearly 50% in the opening three months.
This wasn’t a sudden crash triggered by a single scandal or black-swan event. It was a slow, grinding decline built on layers of real-world pressure that fed on one another until the market simply ran out of buyers willing to stand in the way.The most visible catalyst was the partial U.S. government shutdown that began on January 31, 2026, after Congress failed to pass a funding bill. For several days federal operations were paralyzed. The SEC and CFTC could not process routine filings or approvals. Economic data releases—including the critical January jobs report, were delayed, creating what traders called a “data vacuum.”
Without fresh numbers to guide expectations, uncertainty filled the gap. Prediction markets had priced in a high probability of disruption, and when it materialized, risk appetite collapsed. Bitcoin slid toward $83,000 as the shutdown took hold, then kept sliding as the political stalemate dragged on. Even after a temporary funding deal was signed in early February, the damage was done: the episode reminded everyone how quickly Washington dysfunction can ripple into every corner of the financial world, including assets that once prided themselves on being independent of it.
Layered on top of the shutdown was the nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve Chair. Announced in late January, the move sent a clear signal to markets: the era of ultra-loose policy might be ending sooner than hoped. Warsh, a former Fed governor known for favoring a smaller balance sheet and greater caution on liquidity, was interpreted as a more hawkish choice than many in the crypto community had anticipated. The reaction was immediate and brutal. Bitcoin, already under pressure, dropped sharply alongside gold and silver (the latter suffering its worst single-day loss since 1980).
The message was simple: if the Fed is likely to keep rates higher for longer and shrink its footprint, the flood of cheap money that had supported risk assets could slow to a trickle. Even though Warsh has spoken positively about Bitcoin in the past, calling it “your new gold” for anyone under 40, his policy leanings spooked traders far more than his personal views reassured them.At the same time, the market was undergoing a painful internal adjustment. Spot Bitcoin ETFs, which had been a steady source of demand throughout 2025, flipped to consistent net outflows in the new year, totaling several billion dollars in just weeks.
This removed a major structural bid at the worst possible moment. Meanwhile, leveraged positions in futures markets were being unwound aggressively. Open interest fell roughly 20% in a short period, and liquidations topped $1–2 billion in several 24-hour windows. It wasn’t chaotic panic selling; it was orderly but relentless deleveraging. Lower prices triggered margin calls, which forced more selling, which thinned liquidity and made the next drop even sharper. On-chain data showed pockets of long-term holders finally taking profits or cutting losses, classic signs that the market was flushing out the weakest hands after a long run-up.
These forces did not operate in isolation. Broader macro caution was already in the air: brief spikes in dollar strength, lingering inflation worries, and a general rotation away from high-beta assets all weighed on crypto. When traditional markets wobbled, Bitcoin, still viewed by many as a leveraged play on risk appetite, felt the impact more acutely.
The result is a first quarter that feels heavier than the raw percentage drop suggests. Investors who entered 2026 expecting continuation of the 2025 rally have instead been reminded that Bitcoin, even in bull cycles, can deliver 20–30% drawdowns without warning. The pain has been compounded by the narrative shift: what began as “healthy consolidation” quickly morphed into questions about whether the bull market itself was intact.
Yet history offers perspective. Severe early-year weakness is not new, and it has not always dictated the full-year outcome. The -49.7% Q1 of 2018 led into a long bear market, but milder negative starts, like -10.8% in 2020 or -11.8% in 2025—were followed by strong recoveries once the dust settled. The current drawdown feels closer to those corrective phases than to a structural breakdown. Leverage has been meaningfully reduced, ETF selling appears to be slowing in spots, and the core long-term drivers, spot ETFs, corporate and sovereign adoption, clearer U.S. regulatory framing, and Bitcoin’s fixed supply, remain in place.
The first quarter of 2026 has been a harsh reminder that politics, policy expectations, and market mechanics can still dominate even the strongest fundamental stories. The U.S. government shutdown created immediate uncertainty and a data blackout. The Warsh nomination shifted the liquidity narrative in a less favorable direction. ETF outflows and deleveraging turned that uncertainty into real selling pressure. Together they produced one of Bitcoin’s roughest starts on record.
Whether this proves to be the low point or merely a pause before deeper testing depends on how quickly the macro backdrop stabilizes and whether support around $65,000–$68,000 holds. For now, the market is doing what it has always done in difficult periods: it is repricing risk, clearing excess leverage, and waiting to see which narrative regains control. The pain is real, the lessons are old, and the cycle, bruised but still intact, continues.
$BTC $ETH #MarketRebound
This wasn’t a sudden crash triggered by a single scandal or black-swan event. It was a slow, grinding decline built on layers of real-world pressure that fed on one another until the market simply ran out of buyers willing to stand in the way.The most visible catalyst was the partial U.S. government shutdown that began on January 31, 2026, after Congress failed to pass a funding bill. For several days federal operations were paralyzed. The SEC and CFTC could not process routine filings or approvals. Economic data releases—including the critical January jobs report, were delayed, creating what traders called a “data vacuum.”
Without fresh numbers to guide expectations, uncertainty filled the gap. Prediction markets had priced in a high probability of disruption, and when it materialized, risk appetite collapsed. Bitcoin slid toward $83,000 as the shutdown took hold, then kept sliding as the political stalemate dragged on. Even after a temporary funding deal was signed in early February, the damage was done: the episode reminded everyone how quickly Washington dysfunction can ripple into every corner of the financial world, including assets that once prided themselves on being independent of it.
Layered on top of the shutdown was the nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve Chair. Announced in late January, the move sent a clear signal to markets: the era of ultra-loose policy might be ending sooner than hoped. Warsh, a former Fed governor known for favoring a smaller balance sheet and greater caution on liquidity, was interpreted as a more hawkish choice than many in the crypto community had anticipated. The reaction was immediate and brutal. Bitcoin, already under pressure, dropped sharply alongside gold and silver (the latter suffering its worst single-day loss since 1980).
The message was simple: if the Fed is likely to keep rates higher for longer and shrink its footprint, the flood of cheap money that had supported risk assets could slow to a trickle. Even though Warsh has spoken positively about Bitcoin in the past, calling it “your new gold” for anyone under 40, his policy leanings spooked traders far more than his personal views reassured them.At the same time, the market was undergoing a painful internal adjustment. Spot Bitcoin ETFs, which had been a steady source of demand throughout 2025, flipped to consistent net outflows in the new year, totaling several billion dollars in just weeks.
This removed a major structural bid at the worst possible moment. Meanwhile, leveraged positions in futures markets were being unwound aggressively. Open interest fell roughly 20% in a short period, and liquidations topped $1–2 billion in several 24-hour windows. It wasn’t chaotic panic selling; it was orderly but relentless deleveraging. Lower prices triggered margin calls, which forced more selling, which thinned liquidity and made the next drop even sharper. On-chain data showed pockets of long-term holders finally taking profits or cutting losses, classic signs that the market was flushing out the weakest hands after a long run-up.
These forces did not operate in isolation. Broader macro caution was already in the air: brief spikes in dollar strength, lingering inflation worries, and a general rotation away from high-beta assets all weighed on crypto. When traditional markets wobbled, Bitcoin, still viewed by many as a leveraged play on risk appetite, felt the impact more acutely.
The result is a first quarter that feels heavier than the raw percentage drop suggests. Investors who entered 2026 expecting continuation of the 2025 rally have instead been reminded that Bitcoin, even in bull cycles, can deliver 20–30% drawdowns without warning. The pain has been compounded by the narrative shift: what began as “healthy consolidation” quickly morphed into questions about whether the bull market itself was intact.
Yet history offers perspective. Severe early-year weakness is not new, and it has not always dictated the full-year outcome. The -49.7% Q1 of 2018 led into a long bear market, but milder negative starts, like -10.8% in 2020 or -11.8% in 2025—were followed by strong recoveries once the dust settled. The current drawdown feels closer to those corrective phases than to a structural breakdown. Leverage has been meaningfully reduced, ETF selling appears to be slowing in spots, and the core long-term drivers, spot ETFs, corporate and sovereign adoption, clearer U.S. regulatory framing, and Bitcoin’s fixed supply, remain in place.
The first quarter of 2026 has been a harsh reminder that politics, policy expectations, and market mechanics can still dominate even the strongest fundamental stories. The U.S. government shutdown created immediate uncertainty and a data blackout. The Warsh nomination shifted the liquidity narrative in a less favorable direction. ETF outflows and deleveraging turned that uncertainty into real selling pressure. Together they produced one of Bitcoin’s roughest starts on record.
Whether this proves to be the low point or merely a pause before deeper testing depends on how quickly the macro backdrop stabilizes and whether support around $65,000–$68,000 holds. For now, the market is doing what it has always done in difficult periods: it is repricing risk, clearing excess leverage, and waiting to see which narrative regains control. The pain is real, the lessons are old, and the cycle, bruised but still intact, continues.
$BTC $ETH #MarketRebound
ORCAUSDT Tests HTF Resistance After Breakout
$ORCA has surged aggressively from the lower accumulation region, reclaiming the 1.014 structural pivot and rapidly approaching the higher-timeframe resistance zone near 1.25–1.30. The strength of the impulse confirms strong buyer participation and a shift in short-term market control.
However, price is now testing a region where previous supply entered the market, making this a key decision area. Sustained acceptance above 1.25 would open continuation toward new highs. Rejection here could produce a corrective rotation back toward 1.014, which now acts as primary support.
As long as price holds above the reclaimed breakout level, the broader structure remains bullish despite potential consolidation.
#ORCA
$ORCA has surged aggressively from the lower accumulation region, reclaiming the 1.014 structural pivot and rapidly approaching the higher-timeframe resistance zone near 1.25–1.30. The strength of the impulse confirms strong buyer participation and a shift in short-term market control.
However, price is now testing a region where previous supply entered the market, making this a key decision area. Sustained acceptance above 1.25 would open continuation toward new highs. Rejection here could produce a corrective rotation back toward 1.014, which now acts as primary support.
As long as price holds above the reclaimed breakout level, the broader structure remains bullish despite potential consolidation.
#ORCA
🚨 Whale Activity Alert
The Whale Inflow Ratio on Binance has surged from 0.40 to 0.62, showing a sharp rise in large $BTC deposits as the market correction deepens.
This often signals that big holders may be preparing to sell, increase liquidity, or reposition ahead of major price moves.
Historically, spikes like this can lead to higher volatility in the short term.
Is this smart profit-taking… or a setup for the next move?
#MarketRebound
The Whale Inflow Ratio on Binance has surged from 0.40 to 0.62, showing a sharp rise in large $BTC deposits as the market correction deepens.
This often signals that big holders may be preparing to sell, increase liquidity, or reposition ahead of major price moves.
Historically, spikes like this can lead to higher volatility in the short term.
Is this smart profit-taking… or a setup for the next move?
#MarketRebound
The final hurdle for crypto payments isn’t speed or fees, it’s privacy.
Until we build “invisible rails” that protect users while staying compliant, mass adoption won’t happen.
Most blockchains are already fast and cheap.
But without strong privacy, many people still don’t feel safe using crypto for daily payments - CZ
#cz $BNB
Until we build “invisible rails” that protect users while staying compliant, mass adoption won’t happen.
Most blockchains are already fast and cheap.
But without strong privacy, many people still don’t feel safe using crypto for daily payments - CZ
#cz $BNB
At this moment buying and HODLing memecoins and shitcouns like $PEPE is a very good decision
Stakikg up more memecoins now
The mega bull run is coming soon🔥
#PEPEBrokeThroughDowntrendLine
Stakikg up more memecoins now
The mega bull run is coming soon🔥
#PEPEBrokeThroughDowntrendLine
From today i will buy 1 million $PEPE everyday 🤑
I will aquire 10 Billion $PEPE , Soo when $PEPE touch 0.0001$ , I will get a billion dollar 💰
Good idea ???
I will aquire 10 Billion $PEPE , Soo when $PEPE touch 0.0001$ , I will get a billion dollar 💰
Good idea ???
Key Economic Events This Week:
Monday - US markets closed for Presidents' Day
Wednesday - December Durable Goods Orders data, Fed Meeting Minutes release
Friday - December PCE Inflation data
Plus: 10 Fed speaker events throughout the week, ~15% of S&P 500 companies report earnings.
What will move markets most this week?
#BTCFellBelow$69,000Again $XRP
Monday - US markets closed for Presidents' Day
Wednesday - December Durable Goods Orders data, Fed Meeting Minutes release
Friday - December PCE Inflation data
Plus: 10 Fed speaker events throughout the week, ~15% of S&P 500 companies report earnings.
What will move markets most this week?
#BTCFellBelow$69,000Again $XRP
$POL Faces Supply Pressure on 4H Chart
POLUSDT has entered a major 4H supply region after rebounding sharply from the lower support base. The rejection visible near 0.115–0.120 indicates sellers defending the zone, suggesting the recent upward move was corrective within a broader downtrend. Price is now slipping below the 0.110 mid-level pivot, which often acts as a directional decision point in consolidation structures.
Continued weakness may drive POL back toward the 0.085–0.090 demand region, where previous buying interest emerged. Until price reclaims and holds above the supply zone, the structure remains bearish-leaning.
Traders are watching for either renewed downside continuation toward support or a breakout that would signal a meaningful shift in market control.
#POL
POLUSDT has entered a major 4H supply region after rebounding sharply from the lower support base. The rejection visible near 0.115–0.120 indicates sellers defending the zone, suggesting the recent upward move was corrective within a broader downtrend. Price is now slipping below the 0.110 mid-level pivot, which often acts as a directional decision point in consolidation structures.
Continued weakness may drive POL back toward the 0.085–0.090 demand region, where previous buying interest emerged. Until price reclaims and holds above the supply zone, the structure remains bearish-leaning.
Traders are watching for either renewed downside continuation toward support or a breakout that would signal a meaningful shift in market control.
#POL
$DASH 2H Structure at Inflection — Bounce or Bull Trap?
The recent move from $33 to $41 was impulsive and likely driven by liquidity absorption after a sharp downside sweep. That type of reaction often signals temporary strength. However, price has now rejected cleanly from the $41–$42 resistance band, which previously acted as support before breaking down.
This rejection suggests that sellers are defending prior structure and that the broader 2H trend remains under pressure. The current pullback toward $37 is testing whether the rally had real structural backing or was simply a relief move inside a bearish market phase.
If $DASH fails to reclaim $41 soon, continuation toward $34 and potentially $32 becomes the higher-probability scenario. A sustained breakout above $42 would invalidate the bearish continuation thesis and shift momentum toward $44–$45.
At this stage, the chart reflects distribution at resistance rather than confirmed reversal.
#PEPEBrokeThroughDowntrendLine
The recent move from $33 to $41 was impulsive and likely driven by liquidity absorption after a sharp downside sweep. That type of reaction often signals temporary strength. However, price has now rejected cleanly from the $41–$42 resistance band, which previously acted as support before breaking down.
This rejection suggests that sellers are defending prior structure and that the broader 2H trend remains under pressure. The current pullback toward $37 is testing whether the rally had real structural backing or was simply a relief move inside a bearish market phase.
If $DASH fails to reclaim $41 soon, continuation toward $34 and potentially $32 becomes the higher-probability scenario. A sustained breakout above $42 would invalidate the bearish continuation thesis and shift momentum toward $44–$45.
At this stage, the chart reflects distribution at resistance rather than confirmed reversal.
#PEPEBrokeThroughDowntrendLine
Logga in för att utforska mer innehåll