Z O E ETH

Walrus (WAL) is basically trying to solve one of the most annoying “unspoken problems” in crypto: blockchains are great at tracking ownership and transactions, but they’re terrible at handling real-world sized data like videos, images, app files, datasets, game assets, and AI outputs. So even when a project claims to be decentralized, the actual content often ends up sitting on Web2 storage (cloud buckets, CDNs, private servers), which brings back the same old risks links break, data gets removed, platforms can censor, and you’re forced to trust a middleman. Walrus is built to close that gap by acting as a decentralized blob storage network designed for large files, using the Sui blockchain as its coordination and programmability layer. In simple terms, instead of trying to shove big files directly onchain, Walrus stores them across a network of storage providers in a way that’s meant to be durable, censorship-resistant, and verifiable, while still letting apps interact with that storage like a real onchain resource.
The way Walrus does this is by taking a file (a “blob”) and splitting it into many smaller pieces, then adding smart redundancy through erasure coding kind of like using math-based backups instead of making full copies everywhere. Those pieces get distributed across different nodes, so the network can still reconstruct the original file even if some nodes go offline or fail. This matters because real decentralized networks aren’t stable nodes come and go so Walrus designs around churn instead of pretending it won’t happen. On top of that, Walrus uses proof and challenge-style mechanisms to reduce the chance that storage providers can cheat by claiming they stored data when they didn’t. The result is a storage layer that aims to feel reliable enough for real apps while still staying decentralized, and because it’s connected to Sui, developers can build workflows where storage and smart contracts work together rather than feeling like two separate worlds.
WAL is the token that powers the economics and security of the system, and it’s not supposed to be “just a coin” for speculation. You use WAL to pay for storage, and the network distributes those payments over time to the storage providers and participants who help secure the system. WAL is also used for staking meaning storage operators (and people who delegate to them) lock tokens to participate, earn rewards, and face penalties if they perform poorly or act dishonestly. On top of that, WAL is tied to governance, so token holders can help steer protocol-level parameters like incentives and penalties. In many storage networks, the token model is the whole make-or-break factor because the tech can be solid, but if the incentives are off, reliability collapsesneither providers leave because it’s not worth it, or the token inflates too aggressively and creates constant sell pressure.
Where Walrus gets really interesting is the direction it’s leaning into: not just “store files,” but make storage actually usable in modern categories like AI, identity, and enterprise data. In AI, the bottleneck is often data training sets, inference logs, model artifacts, and agent memory and a decentralized storage layer becomes valuable if it can keep data durable and verifiable while supporting privacy through encryption and controlled access. In identity systems, credential blobs need to be portable, long-lasting, and tamper-resistant, which decentralized storage can support if the UX is smooth. In gaming and creator economies, you’re dealing with massive libraries of media and user-generated content, where decentralization only matters if retrieval is fast and the system feels as simple as Web2. That’s why Walrus’ growth potential isn’t really about hype it’s about whether it can become the default answer to a practical builder question: “Where do we put the big files so they don’t disappear, and so the app stays truly decentralized?”
At the same time, the risks are real and worth taking seriously. Storage is a brutal market because Web2 providers are cheap, fast, and extremely convenient, and decentralized networks compete not only with each other but also with the reality that most users don’t care about decentralization if performance is worse. Walrus also has to keep its incentive model balanced rewards need to be enough to keep storage providers online and honest, but not so inflationary that the token becomes constant sell pressure. Privacy adds another layer of complexity too, because encryption and access control are only as strong as the key management and developer tooling around them. Finally, like every decentralized network, Walrus has to fight centralization creep over time if too much stake or storage power consolidates into a few operators, the decentralization story weakens. But if Walrus can nail reliability, cost, developer experience, and privacy-friendly workflows, it has a real shot at becoming something that isn’t just a “project,” but infrastructure quiet, boring, and essential, the kind of layer people use every day without even thinking about it.

#Walrus @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL

Dusk Network is basically built for a part of crypto that most chains don’t really serve well: regulated finance. If you think about it, the biggest issue with normal public blockchains is that they expose everything balances, transfers, trading moves, even strategy patterns and that’s fine for open experimentation, but it becomes a real problem when you’re talking about institutions, tokenized securities, funds, and real-world assets. In real markets, privacy isn’t a luxury; it’s the default. But at the same time, regulated markets also need compliance, reporting, and auditability. Dusk is trying to sit right in that middle ground by designing a Layer 1 where privacy is built in by design, but disclosure and accountability can still exist when they’re legally required. Instead of treating privacy like an optional add-on or a separate “privacy pool,” Dusk’s whole philosophy is that financial activity should be able to stay confidential without turning the system into a black box that regulators can’t work with.
Under the hood, Dusk takes a modular approach, which is a fancy way of saying it separates the “base settlement layer” from the “execution environments” where apps actually run. The base layer focuses on consensus and settlement, with an emphasis on predictable finality because if you’re settling financial products, “final” needs to mean final, not “final unless a reorg happens.” On top of that foundation, Dusk supports different execution paths so developers can build in the way that makes sense for their use case. One of the big practical moves is EVM support, because it lowers friction: teams can use familiar Ethereum tooling and Solidity instead of learning an entirely new stack just to ship. At the same time, Dusk’s broader design points toward deeper privacy-first execution for applications that need confidentiality at the core, especially for financial mechanics where exposing everything publicly would be unacceptable.
What makes Dusk especially interesting is the type of privacy it’s aiming for. It’s not pushing the old-school “hide everything from everyone forever” narrative. It’s more like: keep normal financial behavior private—balances, transfers, trading intent—so users and institutions aren’t forced to operate in public, but still preserve paths for verification and audit when required. That’s a hard balance to get right, because you don’t want a system that’s so private it becomes unusable for compliance, and you also don’t want “auditability” to become a polite word for backdoors. But if Dusk pulls it off, it fits exactly what regulated finance needs: confidentiality for participants with accountability for the system.
On the economic side, the DUSK token plays the expected Layer 1 roles: it’s used for staking to secure the network, paying transaction fees, and powering network-level services and incentives. The real long-term question, like with any L1, is whether the token’s demand becomes usage-driven meaning fees, settlement volume, and ecosystem activity create natural demand or whether it stays mostly narrative-driven. Dusk’s goal is clearly the first: to become a settlement and execution layer for regulated assets and institutional-grade financial applications, where real activity generates real economic gravity for the network.
In terms of ecosystem and adoption, Dusk’s “win condition” isn’t just having a lot of apps it’s having the right kind of apps and integrations. The chain’s direction naturally attracts projects like compliant exchanges, tokenized asset platforms, privacy-aware DeFi protocols, settlement rails, identity and permissioning systems, and the infrastructure tools that support them. Partnerships matter a lot more in this niche than they do for typical retail-focused chains, because regulated finance runs on integrations, licensing pathways, compliance frameworks, and institutional distribution. So for Dusk, progress should be judged less by hype and more by practical milestones: network stability, privacy features working in production, developer tooling that’s actually usable, and regulated asset issuance or settlement flows moving from pilots into real usage.
The upside case for Dusk is pretty straightforward: if tokenized real-world assets keep expanding and institutions keep warming up to blockchain infrastructure, then chains that can offer privacy plus compliance without awkward compromises become extremely relevant. Dusk is betting that the next era of crypto isn’t only about open, fully transparent markets it’s also about building rails for real regulated value at scale. The risks are also real and worth saying plainly: regulated adoption is slow, the privacy-plus-auditability balance is technically and politically difficult, modular architectures add complexity, competition in the RWA space is intense, and token value over time depends on genuine usage rather than just speculation. But if Dusk executes well, it has a chance to become the kind of “boring but essential” infrastructure that quietly powers serious financial activity exactly the type of role where long-term networks are made.

#Dusk @Dusk $DUSK

Plasma is a Layer 1 blockchain built with one very specific mission: make stablecoin payments especially USDT feel as simple and normal as sending a message. If you’ve ever tried onboarding someone into crypto, you know the classic frustration: they have USDT, but they can’t send it because they don’t have the chain’s gas token. Plasma exists to remove that awkward step. It’s designed for stablecoin settlement first, not as a side feature, and it leans into stablecoin-native UX like gasless USDT transfers and “stablecoin-first gas,” where fees can be paid in stablecoins instead of forcing users to buy a volatile token just to move dollars. Public descriptions of Plasma consistently frame it around three pillars: full EVM compatibility, fast finality through a BFT-style consensus called PlasmaBFT, and stablecoin-centric features that reduce friction for everyday users and businesses.
Under the hood, Plasma’s technical direction is meant to be familiar to Ethereum builders while behaving like a payments network for everyone else. Because it’s EVM-compatible, existing Solidity contracts, developer tooling, and wallet infrastructure can carry over more easily than on chains that require new languages or new mental models. The consensus design is presented as a fast-finality BFT approach (PlasmaBFT), which is important for payments because people expect transfers to be final quickly no one wants to wait around wondering if their money “really arrived.” But Plasma doesn’t stop at speed; it tries to upgrade the payment experience at the protocol level through features like gasless USDT transfers, which if implemented with solid abuse protection can dramatically improve onboarding and day-to-day use by removing gas-token confusion entirely. Plasma also pushes the idea of stablecoin-first gas, a quietly powerful concept because it makes fees predictable and keeps the user experience denominated in the same unit people actually care about: dollars.
Plasma also talks about neutrality and censorship resistance in a way that ties into Bitcoin. In public coverage, Plasma has been described as building something like a Bitcoin-anchored settlement network with Ethereum-like programmability, leaning on Bitcoin’s brand and properties as part of its “neutral money infrastructure” story. In its own materials, Plasma has outlined a Bitcoin bridge design that uses a verifier network concept intended to decentralize over time, which would allow BTC-related activity to connect into Plasma’s stablecoin-centered world. This Bitcoin angle is meant to strengthen the chain’s credibility as a settlement layer, but it’s also where real risk lives, because bridges are historically among the most attacked and most fragile pieces of crypto infrastructure. The idea can be compelling, but the implementation and trust assumptions matter a lot more than the narrative, so anyone watching Plasma should pay close attention to how the bridge is built, secured, and governed as it evolves.
On tokenomics, Plasma’s documentation states that XPL launched with an initial supply of 10 billion tokens at mainnet beta, with a split that looks like many major L1 launches: 10% allocated to the public sale, 40% to ecosystem and growth, 25% to the team, and 25% to investors. That ecosystem and growth bucket is the “go-to-market fuel,” typically used for liquidity programs, incentives, integrations, and adoption campaigns basically everything you need to bootstrap activity and attract users, developers, and partners. XPL’s utility follows the common pattern for a Proof-of-Stake style network asset: it helps secure the network through staking/validator economics, supports the fee model for general smart contract activity, and powers ecosystem incentives so the chain can compete for liquidity and usage in a crowded market. In a stablecoin-first world, XPL is less about being the currency people spend day-to-day and more about coordinating the network’s security and economic engine in the background while stablecoins do the visible “money movement.”
Where Plasma’s strategy gets interesting is that it doesn’t talk only about being a chain; it also pushes a product-like distribution story through initiatives like Plasma One, which is positioned as an all-in-one stablecoin money experience with spending and earning features and card-style utility. This matters because payments is a distribution game: the best tech doesn’t win automatically if nobody touches it. If Plasma can drive real user adoption through consumer-friendly surfaces, it can create a feedback loop where stablecoin activity grows naturally, liquidity deepens, and developers have more reason to build. Public reporting has also noted major fundraising around this stablecoin settlement vision, which signals that serious capital sees an opportunity in building specialized rails for stablecoins rather than general-purpose “do everything” chains.
In terms of real-world use cases, Plasma’s sweet spot is anywhere stablecoins already act like practical money: everyday transfers in high-adoption markets, remittances, merchant payments, payroll, and business settlement. Gasless transfers and stablecoin-first fees directly target the biggest friction in these scenarios—onboarding and predictability—because real people and real businesses don’t want to manage multiple tokens just to do basic financial actions. The growth potential is straightforward in theory: if stablecoin usage keeps expanding globally, a chain that makes stablecoin UX feel instant and effortless could become a default settlement layer for a lot of that activity. The strengths are also clear: the focus is sharp, the developer environment is familiar, and the UX features are aimed at real pain points instead of abstract benchmarks. But the challenges are just as real: gasless systems must defend against spam and abuse, bridge systems must be engineered with extreme caution, and the competition is intense from networks that already dominate stablecoin flows like Tron, or that offer fast, cheap transfers with strong ecosystems like Solana and Ethereum L2s. Add in the fact that stablecoin infrastructure lives in the real world of regulation and issuer policies, and Plasma’s long-term success will depend not just on technology, but on execution, resilience, partner adoption, and the ability to sustain real usage beyond incentives.

#plasma @Plasma $XPL

Vanar Chain is a Layer 1 blockchain powered by the VANRY token, and the simplest way to understand it is this: it’s trying to make Web3 feel normal for real people. A lot of blockchains are built for crypto-native users first people who already understand wallets, gas fees, bridges, and signing popups while mainstream users just want an experience that works without friction. Vanar’s team comes from gaming, entertainment, and brand worlds, so their mindset leans more “consumer product” than “pure protocol,” and that shows in the way the project positions itself around onboarding the next billions of users through familiar verticals like games, metaverse experiences, and brand campaigns. Under the hood, Vanar is EVM-compatible, which means it fits the Ethereum-style development model and makes it easier for builders to deploy smart contracts using familiar tools, but Vanar’s bigger goal isn’t to be the most experimental chain it’s to be the chain that makes sense when you’re building for large audiences who don’t want to learn crypto before they can participate. A major part of that philosophy is cost and UX predictability: mainstream users and businesses hate surprise fees and confusing transaction failures, so Vanar emphasizes keeping everyday actions cheap and consistent, because if a gamer clicks “buy,” “mint,” or “claim,” that click has to feel as effortless as it would in any Web2 app. That’s also why the ecosystem matters so much here, because Vanar isn’t only saying “come build on our chain” it’s also pointing to products and networks that can bring users in, like Virtua, which is focused on metaverse-style experiences and digital collectibles tied to entertainment and brand communities, and VGN, which pushes the idea that gamers should be able to enter Web3 without feeling like they’re doing crypto homework, ideally through onboarding flows that feel closer to normal sign-in and gameplay than wallet-first processes. If you zoom out, the VANRY token sits at the center of this loop: it’s used to pay for activity on the network, it plays a role in staking and network security, and it can support ecosystem incentives that naturally fit consumer apps things like rewards, quests, loyalty mechanics, and creator or community programs because gaming and brand ecosystems thrive on engagement loops. Vanar has also been leaning into an AI-and-data narrative, where the chain isn’t just a place to store transactions, but part of a wider stack meant to make data more usable and “intelligent” for applications and automation, which could open the door to more serious workflows beyond gaming and collectibles if it actually translates into tools developers and businesses adopt. The real-world use cases Vanar is clearly aiming at include player-owned gaming assets and marketplaces, brand drops and loyalty campaigns that feel more like culture than finance, and potentially more advanced workflows where verified data and automation matter, but the big “if” is execution: it’s ambitious to build an L1, grow an ecosystem, ship consumer products, and deliver AI/data layers at the same time, and the market is crowded with chains chasing gaming and mainstream adoption. There are also the usual trust questions that any newer network faces how decentralization evolves over time, how partnerships convert into consistent user activity rather than headline announcements, and whether token demand is driven by real usage rather than speculation. Still, the core bet is easy to understand: the chains that win the next wave won’t feel like chains at all they’ll feel like games, communities, and experiences where blockchain is simply the invisible engine underneath, and Vanar is trying to position itself right at that intersection of consumer UX, gaming distribution, and brand-friendly Web3.

#Vanar @Vanarchain $VANRY

Walrus (WAL) về cơ bản đang cố gắng giải quyết một trong những vấn đề bị bỏ qua nhưng lại quan trọng nhất trong crypto: nơi mà "đồ thật" sống. Các blockchain rất tốt trong việc theo dõi quyền sở hữu và chứng minh những gì đã xảy ra, nhưng chúng không được xây dựng để lưu trữ các tệp lớn như video, hình ảnh, tài sản trò chơi, tài liệu, tập dữ liệu AI, tải lên ứng dụng, hoặc bất kỳ dữ liệu phi cấu trúc nặng nào. Hầu hết các dự án lặng lẽ quay trở lại các nhà cung cấp đám mây trung tâm như AWS cho phần này, điều đó có nghĩa là ứng dụng có thể "trên chuỗi" theo lý thuyết, nhưng vẫn phụ thuộc vào một công ty duy nhất trong thực tế. Walrus tồn tại để thay đổi điều đó. Đây là một giao thức lưu trữ phi tập trung được xây dựng cho hệ sinh thái Sui, được thiết kế để lưu trữ các khối dữ liệu lớn trên một mạng lưới các nhà điều hành độc lập trong khi sử dụng Sui làm lớp phối hợp cho các quy tắc, thanh toán, quyền sở hữu và khả năng lập trình. WAL là token cung cấp năng lượng cho nền kinh tế đó được sử dụng để trả tiền cho việc lưu trữ, hỗ trợ mạng thông qua staking/ủy quyền, và tham gia vào quản trị.

Dusk is a Layer 1 blockchain that’s basically built for a world most blockchains weren’t designed for: regulated finance. If you think about how crypto normally works, everything is public by default—wallet balances, transfers, counterparties, and transaction history are all out in the open. That openness is great for transparency, but it’s a terrible fit for real financial markets, where privacy is mandatory, compliance is unavoidable, and audits are part of life. Dusk’s whole mission is to make blockchain infrastructure that feels realistic for institutions and regulated assets, not just for crypto-native users. Founded in 2018, it positions itself as a foundation for things like institutional-grade financial apps, compliant DeFi, and tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), with privacy and auditability built into the design rather than slapped on later. In simple terms, Dusk is trying to answer a very specific question: how do you bring real-world financial activity on-chain without exposing everyone’s sensitive data, while still allowing verification when it’s legally required?
The way Dusk approaches this is by treating privacy and regulation as features that have to coexist, not compete. Instead of forcing every transaction to be fully public or fully hidden forever, Dusk is built around the idea of controlled confidentiality. The network supports different transaction styles depending on the situation—some flows can remain public when transparency is needed, while others can be shielded when confidentiality is essential. The point isn’t to create a “privacy coin” where nobody can verify anything; the point is to allow transactions and financial positions to stay private under normal conditions while still enabling selective disclosure for auditors, regulators, or authorized parties. That’s a big deal in regulated markets, because institutions don’t want total anonymity, but they also can’t operate in a system where every trade, balance, and strategy is publicly visible.
On the technology side, Dusk leans into a modular architecture, which is a fancy way of saying it separates responsibilities across layers so the whole system can evolve without breaking itself. The base layer handles the heavy work of settlement and network security, while execution environments above it support application logic. One important practical detail is that Dusk supports an EVM environment, which lowers friction for developers because it keeps the door open for Solidity-style tooling and familiar smart contract workflows. That’s part of Dusk’s strategy: make it easier to build applications, while keeping the underlying settlement layer designed for privacy-aware, compliance-friendly financial behavior. In other words, Dusk wants to be flexible enough for modern developers, but structured enough to satisfy serious financial requirements.
Tokenomics-wise, Dusk uses its native token, DUSK, the way most Proof-of-Stake networks do: it’s used to pay transaction fees, it’s staked to secure the network, and it’s distributed as rewards to validators and other network participants. The real long-term argument for the token isn’t just “it has staking,” because everyone has staking it’s that if Dusk actually becomes a place where tokenized securities, compliant market activity, and regulated financial apps operate, then token demand and fee activity could be driven by real usage rather than purely speculation. In that scenario, DUSK is not just “gas,” it becomes the fuel behind issuance, settlement, trading workflows, and ongoing network security. The token’s utility is directly tied to whether Dusk succeeds in becoming infrastructure for real financial activity, not whether it wins a short-term hype cycle.
When you zoom out to the ecosystem and real-world use cases, Dusk’s direction is pretty clear: it’s targeting the plumbing that makes tokenized markets possible. That includes issuance of regulated assets like equity and bonds, on-chain trading venues that can enforce eligibility and compliance rules, settlement systems that can operate with privacy controls, and even regulated payment flows if stable-value instruments and compliant payment rails become part of the network’s day-to-day activity. These aren’t “fun” crypto use cases in the meme-coin sense, but they’re exactly the kinds of use cases that move large amounts of capital in traditional finance. That’s why partnerships and integrations matter a lot in Dusk’s world: the only partnerships that really count are the ones that connect the chain to custody, regulated venues, payment infrastructure, interoperability, and legal pathways—because adoption in regulated finance depends on that operational and regulatory reality.
In terms of roadmap and growth potential, Dusk is playing a slower, heavier game than most L1s. Regulated markets don’t move fast, and they don’t adopt new infrastructure just because it’s cool they adopt when it’s compliant, reliable, and integrated into existing workflows. That slow pace is both the biggest challenge and the biggest opportunity. If Dusk succeeds, it can grow into something more durable than a typical retail-driven chain, because usage could come from ongoing financial activity that doesn’t disappear when market sentiment turns. But the risks are also real: institutional adoption cycles take time, regulatory environments shift, building privacy plus auditability is technically complex, and competition in RWAs/compliance-focused infrastructure is getting intense. Dusk’s strengths are its clear niche, its privacy-with-auditability philosophy, and its infrastructure-first mindset, while its biggest test will be proving that serious regulated assets and markets actually want to run on it at scale. If that proof arrives, Dusk can become one of those “quiet infrastructure” networks that matters more over time; if it doesn’t, it risks being a well-designed system that never gets the institutional flywheel spinning.

#Dusk k @Dusk $DUSK

Plasma là một blockchain Layer 1 được xây dựng với một ý tưởng rõ ràng: stablecoin, đặc biệt là USDT, nên di chuyển như tiền thật, không phải như một "giao dịch tiền điện tử" buộc người dùng phải suy nghĩ về token gas, sự tăng phí ngẫu nhiên, và tính cuối cùng gây nhầm lẫn. Ở nhiều thị trường có sự chấp nhận cao, stablecoin đã là điều gần gũi nhất mà mọi người có được với một đô la kỹ thuật số đáng tin cậy. Chúng được sử dụng để tiết kiệm, chuyển tiền, thanh toán cho nhà cung cấp, và di chuyển giá trị khi ngân hàng chậm, tốn kém, hoặc hạn chế. Plasma cơ bản đang nhìn vào thực tế đó và nói rằng, "Nếu stablecoin đã thực hiện công việc của tiền, thì blockchain bên dưới chúng nên được thiết kế cho tiền ngay từ ngày đầu." Đó là lý do tại sao dự án tập trung rất nhiều vào việc thanh toán stablecoin: nó muốn các giao dịch cảm thấy nhanh chóng, có thể dự đoán, và đủ đơn giản để người dùng hàng ngày và doanh nghiệp không cần phải trở thành chuyên gia crypto để sử dụng nó.

Vanar là một blockchain Layer 1 được xây dựng với tư duy “thế giới thực trước tiên”, và thật sự đó là cách dễ nhất để hiểu nó. Thay vì thiết kế dành cho những người dùng crypto hardcore, Vanar đang cố gắng thiết kế cho những người bình thường có thể tham gia thông qua trò chơi, giải trí, cộng đồng người hâm mộ và thương hiệu. Thông điệp của đội ngũ cơ bản là: nếu chúng ta muốn hàng tỷ người dùng thực sự sử dụng Web3, trải nghiệm phải cảm thấy mượt mà và quen thuộc hơn như đăng nhập vào một trò chơi hoặc tham gia vào một cộng đồng trực tuyến, và ít hơn như học một hệ thống tài chính hoàn toàn mới. Đó là lý do tại sao Vanar nghiêng về các lĩnh vực chính thống như trò chơi, trải nghiệm metaverse, công cụ AI, sáng kiến sinh thái, và giải pháp thương hiệu, với các sản phẩm và mảnh ghép hệ sinh thái thường được thảo luận xung quanh những thứ như Virtua và một hướng mạng lưới trò chơi rộng lớn hơn.

Dusk là một trong những dự án có cảm giác yên tĩnh ngay từ đầu, nhưng càng hiểu vấn đề mà nó giải quyết, bạn càng thấy nó trở nên hợp lý hơn. Hầu hết các blockchain được xây dựng như một quảng trường công cộng mở, nơi mọi thứ đều có thể nhìn thấy được - lịch sử ví của bạn, số dư, chuyển khoản và thậm chí là các mẫu hành vi. Sự minh bạch đó là tốt cho nhiều trường hợp sử dụng liên quan đến crypto, nhưng trở thành một vấn đề thực sự ngay khi bạn bước vào tài chính được quản lý. Trong thế giới thực, các ngân hàng, tổ chức, môi giới, quỹ và các nền tảng được quản lý không thể chi trả để phát sóng các hoạt động nhạy cảm ra toàn bộ internet, nhưng họ cũng không thể hoạt động trong bóng tối hoàn toàn vì các nhà quản lý cần giám sát và việc kiểm toán là quan trọng. Dusk được thiết kế cho vùng trung gian đó: quyền riêng tư nơi nó là bình thường và cần thiết, với khả năng chứng minh tính chính xác và duy trì tuân thủ khi cần thiết.