BNB breaks through $1000, but how much do you know about BNB?
On September 18, accompanied by the Federal Reserve's 25 basis point interest rate cut, BNB finally broke through the four-digit mark—$1000, reaching another ATH. I, who holds over 90% of my position in BNB, am incredibly excited. Although I reduced my position by 20% when it was around 1000u (saving bullets for lower price entries, for more BNB), I believe that looking ahead to the next 3-5 years, the current 1000u is just the beginning. Today I shared an article in my friend circle about an interview with CZ by Wu's Blockchain regarding RPC Cat Friends Society (Nine Lives Commune). In it, CZ talked about the BNB Chain ecosystem, and then a friend asked me, "Why is it Binance Smart Chain again, along with opBNB and Beacon Chain? It looks a bit confusing." By the way, he has held BNB for over a year, and at 1000u, he can be considered to have made a significant profit. However, from this statement, it's clear that he knows nothing about BNB and merely thinks of it as the exchange's "platform token."
BNB is a cryptocurrency that I have been buying on dips. The first half of the year is undoubtedly the period when BNB shines. Although the entire crypto market has encountered resistance and there is no news about new mines. But I am still optimistic about it and hold it for a long time. $BNB
There is actually only one reason: "Value investment". This sentence may be old-fashioned, but if you think about it carefully, you will find that as a blockchain track, its future development trend is still unclear. In fact, most application scenarios can be realized without blockchain. Although there may be advantages based on blockchain, the resistance comes from the government or other stakeholders.
Looking at all applications, I think the only huge application scenario of blockchain technology is cryptocurrency and its transactions. And Binance is the only leader in this track. In addition to the belief represented by Bitcoin itself (of course, you can deconstruct the value of Bitcoin at will, after all, it is the actual indicator of the cryptocurrency market), I think the actual potential value of BNB is even greater. When all the altcoins are hyping their application scenarios, trading is still the scenario that ranks above all other application scenarios. Other scenarios are destroyed, and other altcoins are reduced to zero, but the trading demand of cryptocurrency itself will never die.
So if you hold BNB, that's great, please keep it. If you don't have BNB, then you really need to buy some on dips. Believe me, BNB still has enough room for growth to make you financially free. $BNB
$BNB Has the cryptocurrency market's turn to rise finally come?
Last week's market was basically in a state of turmoil, neither dead nor alive, and after the weekend it started to decline again, and today it has become somewhat stagnant. The reasons are easy to understand: influenced by geopolitical factors, gold, silver, and copper have all surged, and so has the U.S. stock market. Hot money naturally flows wherever there is profit to be made, and high-volatility, high-risk assets like cryptocurrencies have inevitably been affected, as last week's market indicated.
However, gold and silver have consistently been in a rising state, and the more they rise, the greater the expectation of a potential peak risk. Therefore, smart money will eventually focus on some targets with relatively low market capitalizations— the cryptocurrency market is one of those choices.
In my subjective judgment, the bull run in precious metals may continue, but we must consider the risk of hitting a peak, and it’s time for cryptocurrencies to rise as well.
It is impossible to be favorable... the first to be impacted will be CEX.
Crypto-爱币斯坦
·
--
CZ said that the New York Stock Exchange's launch of a tokenized platform is good for cryptocurrencies and crypto trading platforms.
He said this, and Bitcoin fell; this is a fact, at least proving that in the short term it is negative, it has already fallen, how can it be good!
In the long term, I also think it is negative, as investors can trade US stocks around the clock, funds will inevitably flow out of the crypto space. As for whether it is good for crypto trading platforms, if it is successfully launched, it will be known whether it is good or bad.
#纽交所24小时交易 This is definitely a bearish signal. If it really goes online, all the funds will run to the New York Stock Exchange platform. This is absolutely a devastating blow to the already insufficient liquidity of the cryptocurrency market. From the perspective of making money, I thought about it, and in the end, except for Bitcoin, all altcoin markets will be hit. Unless there is something absolutely irreplaceable from the application perspective of blockchain, public chains like Ethereum still have hope.
This is just after I posted on Moments that I found I couldn't send it, not because this image was banned in real time. The reason description clearly indicates it was caused by content posted before; only he knows what he posted before.
马雨
·
--
What a terrible country? Posting like this on social media gets you banned
$BNB BNB short-term still looks bullish, expected to return above 1000 USD
In the past few days, mainstream coins like BTC, ETH, and BNB have shown good upward momentum, and the market has had a good start in the new year. I carefully thought about the trend of BNB in the coming days, and in the short term (mid-January), I am definitely bullish:
First, let's talk about BNB itself:
1. The 34th BNB destruction is just around the corner, expected around mid to late January. The quantity of the 33rd destruction was about 1.44 million coins, with about 6.2 million coins destroyed in total for the year 2025 across 4 times.
2. BNB Chain (BSC mainnet) plans to carry out a significant hard fork upgrade named "Fermi" on January 14, 2026, with the core goal of improving network speed and efficiency.
The former belongs to the regular destruction's deflationary model, further solidifying BNB's price. The latter will reduce delays and slippage risks when transferring or trading NFTs on the BSC mainnet in DeFi applications, and the improvement in network performance will help consolidate BNB Chain's position in the competition among high-performance public chains.
Then it all depends on whether Bitcoin can continue to rise or stabilize, after all, Bitcoin's fluctuations are a key indicator of the cryptocurrency market. At least looking forward to before mid-January:
1. The funding situation is improving, with European and American institutional funds returning in the new year, and the spot Bitcoin ETF has resumed net inflows, providing continuous purchasing power to the market.
2. Technical breakthroughs, with Bitcoin's price breaking through key moving average resistance, forming a bullish structure of "higher highs," and market sentiment turning optimistic.
I believe these are enough to be bullish on BNB before mid-January, and if there is a pullback, it could be a bold opportunity to enter.
$BNB Struggling for more than three months, still need 1000u to recover the liquidation loss of 1011. Tired, luckily the contract position is small, otherwise my mindset would have broken down long ago.
I support paying taxes, no problem. But the prerequisite for paying taxes is that you must ensure the safety of deposits and withdrawals. I pay taxes to the state, so you can't just freeze bank cards in the name of receiving black money. Obligations are mutual, so this matter will definitely be very complicated to implement. For mainland China, I think this issue is unlikely to be realized in the short term.
Merrick MG
·
--
What does it mean, will I have to pay taxes on profits from trading on Binance in the future?
Those who watched ZEC yesterday can come in and chat, don't hold it in and hurt yourself. Doesn't it feel like you've eaten fly poop 💩, wanting to curse a bit but still having to think twice? 😅
0x胖达老爹
·
--
$ZEC ZCash This move not only has a bad appearance but is also disgusting!
ZEC dropped by 20% at one point, and this dramatic storyline appeared early this morning. The gist is that the ZCash team disagrees with their parent governance body, believing the latter's philosophy contradicts ZCash's original mission and values, so they're starting anew.
I wonder what everyone else thinks after reading this article. Anyway, the price of ZEC is now in ruins. From my understanding, due to the recent hype around privacy coins, ZEC's price has been rising steadily—from around $70 in October last year to $750, a tenfold increase. The spot market is relatively better, but many investors who opened long contracts are now severely damaged.
The team's argument sounds very convincing, as if they've suffered greatly. But in reality, they're no different from a hypocritical opportunist or even a scammer who just ran away with the funds. Sudden sharp reversal after such a strong upward trend makes it hard not to suspect a coordinated long/short squeeze by the team.
As a team, you have countless ways to negotiate with the parent organization or quietly part ways while still upholding your mission and values. There's absolutely no need for such a dramatic public split. This clearly looks like a 'bombshell' dropped after the price rose significantly—making it hard not to suspect a short squeeze followed by another round of profit-taking. (Who knows? Maybe we'll see a peaceful resolution with the parent body later.)
This move is not only unseemly but also disgusting. Whether the ZCash team maintains the original protocol or forks into a new coin, I suggest staying away from it.
*Earlier this year I just added ZCash to my watchlist, thankfully I didn't take any action—better stick with my BNB.
$ZEC ZCash This move not only has a bad appearance but is also disgusting!
ZEC dropped by 20% at one point, and this dramatic storyline appeared early this morning. The gist is that the ZCash team disagrees with their parent governance body, believing the latter's philosophy contradicts ZCash's original mission and values, so they're starting anew.
I wonder what everyone else thinks after reading this article. Anyway, the price of ZEC is now in ruins. From my understanding, due to the recent hype around privacy coins, ZEC's price has been rising steadily—from around $70 in October last year to $750, a tenfold increase. The spot market is relatively better, but many investors who opened long contracts are now severely damaged.
The team's argument sounds very convincing, as if they've suffered greatly. But in reality, they're no different from a hypocritical opportunist or even a scammer who just ran away with the funds. Sudden sharp reversal after such a strong upward trend makes it hard not to suspect a coordinated long/short squeeze by the team.
As a team, you have countless ways to negotiate with the parent organization or quietly part ways while still upholding your mission and values. There's absolutely no need for such a dramatic public split. This clearly looks like a 'bombshell' dropped after the price rose significantly—making it hard not to suspect a short squeeze followed by another round of profit-taking. (Who knows? Maybe we'll see a peaceful resolution with the parent body later.)
This move is not only unseemly but also disgusting. Whether the ZCash team maintains the original protocol or forks into a new coin, I suggest staying away from it.
*Earlier this year I just added ZCash to my watchlist, thankfully I didn't take any action—better stick with my BNB.
#斩杀线 牢A. Without surprise, he's on track to become the next up with ten million followers. Listening to his story is like American industrial Cthulhu, causing a massive SAN loss; you'd need to read several issues of Yilin to recover.
$BTC #永恒牛市 Musk's 'Singularity' reminds me of Sihai's 'Bitcoin Singularity' and 'Eternal Bull Market' from N years ago
Musk predicted on January 4th: We are already in the 'technological singularity,' where AI and robotics are unstoppable. Musk's 'singularity' refers to artificial intelligence and robots, but the term 'singularity' immediately brings to mind Sihai's prediction about the 'Bitcoin singularity' around 2019 (probably). (At that time, his Weibo username was TumbleBit, and he still uses it on X.) Back then, I even discussed this topic with friends on a crypto radio show I hosted.
His main idea was this — when Bitcoin's annual inflation rate falls below that of the US dollar, the Bitcoin singularity will trigger, and an eternal bull market will begin.
The core of singularity theory lies in comparing inflation rates. Sihai believed that Bitcoin's halving mechanism would reduce its inflation rate. After the halving in May 2020, the inflation rate dropped to 1.8%, lower than the US inflation rate at the time (around 2.4%), marking the arrival of the singularity and the beginning of the eternal bull market. This theory is based on Hayek's monetary theory, suggesting that Bitcoin, as a deflationary asset, will eventually surpass fiat currencies in long-term value.
The characteristics of an eternal bull market are sustained upward trends and wealth redistribution. It's not short-term speculation, but a shift from 'short bull, long bear' to 'long bull, short bear.' After the singularity, Bitcoin's price shows a steady upward trend, with wealth shifting toward holders.
Sihai categorized wealth levels as follows: C level (above 0.21 BTC), B level (above 2.1 BTC), A level (above 21 BTC), S level (above 210 BTC), S+ (2100 BTC or more), etc.
Among these, the A level ensures basic living standards, and after the singularity, the ranking becomes fixed, making it difficult for ordinary users to reach the B level threshold.
His original statements had a distinctly academic-style pyramid scheme tone (much more sophisticated than Bao Er Ye's shouting style), and naturally, this view has drawn criticism, such as 'No market only goes up and never down?' — these arguments are valid, of course. But given the current price, it's truly fortunate that Bitcoin has such a preacher. By the way, when he first proposed this idea, Bitcoin's price was roughly around $6,000.