Crypto_4_Beginners

When I started looking deeper into stablecoins over the past year. I noticed something that felt obvious in hindsight but rarely gets discussed properly. Stablecoins have already won. With a market size now exceeding $150 billion and annual transaction volumes crossing tens of trillions of dollars. They are no longer an experiment or a niche trading tool. They are becoming a global settlement layer in their own right. Yet almost all of this activity still runs on blockchains that were never designed specifically for payments. Based on my research that mismatch between use case and infrastructure is one of the biggest hidden bottlenecks in crypto today and it is exactly the problem Plasma is trying to solve.
Most Layer 1 blockchains treat stablecoins as passengers rather than the engine. Ethereum, for example remains the dominant settlement layer for USDC and a significant portion of USDT flows but it was built to support everything from NFTs to DeFi to DAOs. When network usage spikes fees rise finality becomes uncertain for everyday users and payments stop feeling like payments. TRON took a different route by optimizing for cheap transfers and it now processes the majority of USDT transactions globally. What surprised me, however is that even TRON is still a general purpose chain first with trade offs in decentralization and long term neutrality that institutions quietly worry about.
Plasma enters this picture with a very different thesis. Instead of asking how stablecoins can fit into an existing blockchain design it asks what a blockchain would look like if stablecoin settlement were the primary objective from day one. Everything about Plasma's architecture flows from that question. It is a Layer 1 built around stablecoin first gas gasless USDT transfers and sub second finality while still remaining fully EVM compatible through Reth. That combination is rare and in my assessment strategically important.
One data point that often gets overlooked is how stablecoins are actually used outside crypto native circles. According to public payments research cross border transfers through traditional rails still cost between 5% and 7% on average and can take multiple days to settle. At the same time stablecoins already move value across borders in minutes often for cents but even "cents" matter at scale especially in high adoption markets where stablecoins are used for remittances, payroll and merchant settlement. Plasma gasless USDT transfers directly address that friction by removing the need for users to hold or manage a separate gas token just to move dollars.
From a developer perspective Plasma full EVM compatibility is another detail that matters more than marketing narratives suggest. I have seen too many payment focused chains struggle because they require developers to learn new tooling or adapt to unfamiliar execution environments. Plasma avoids that trap. Solidity contracts, existing wallets and familiar infrastructure can be deployed without friction. The difference is that once deployed those applications benefit from PlasmaBFT consensus which delivers sub second finality. For payments finality is not a luxury feature. It is the difference between confidence and hesitation.
What really caught my attention, though is Plasma's approach to security and neutrality. Bitcoin anchored security is not a buzzword here. In a world where stablecoin settlement increasingly involves institutions, payment processors and regulated entities neutrality and censorship resistance become non negotiable. Bitcoin stands out as the most politically neutral and battle-tested base layer in crypto. Plasma wants to tap into that reputation by anchoring itself to Bitcoin hoping it will help when institutions start weighing long term settlement challenges.
Now look at Plasma next to something like Circles USDC setup. Circles put together a strong network for issuing and redeeming USDC all closely tied to banks and compliance systems. Still Circle does not really play the same role as a decentralized blockchain infrastructure provider. It relies on existing chains to move USDC. Plasma complements rather than competes with that model by offering a settlement layer where stablecoins can move efficiently without sacrificing decentralization or composability. In my view that makes Plasma more of a neutral highway than a toll road controlled by any single issuer.
Retail adoption is another angle where Plasma's design choices start to make sense. In regions with high stablecoin usage such as parts of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia users care far more about reliability and simplicity than about speculative upside. They want money to arrive quickly predictably and without hidden costs. Gasless transfers and a stablecoin first approach make things simpler for everyone. Users don't need to understand blockspace auctions or fluctuating fees. They just send dollars.
Institutional use cases follow naturally from the same design. Think about payment processors on-chain payroll or managing a treasury. They all need payments to settle on time and in a way you can track. With sub second finality you get almost instant reconciliation. That's a game changer. Plus since it works with the EVM you can build in rules for compliance, reporting or automation right from the start.
From what I have seen Plasma actually hits a sweet spot most other chains just talk about making things easy enough for regular people to use but still offering the kind of reliability big institutions need. Not many pull that off.
Of course no thesis is without challenge. People really do hesitate when it comes to switching. Ethereum and TRON already have a tight grip and those network effects are tough to break. Getting people and developers to move their stablecoins is not just about building something faster or cheaper. It's about proving day after day that the new thing actually works and keeps working and then there is the whole regulatory mess. Sure stablecoins are more accepted now but the rules keep shifting. Any chain focused on settlement has to keep one eye on compliance always ready for the next change.
Plus the competitions heating up. General purpose Layer 1 are racing to improve finality and lower fees and Layer 2 solutions continue to mature. The question Plasma must answer is whether specialization can outperform generalization in the long run. Based on my research I believe the answer depends on scale. Stablecoin volumes keep climbing and honestly. It's getting impossible to ignore how much we need settlement infrastructure that is actually built for the job.
Here is what grabs me about Plasma is it does not pretend to be a one size fits all solution. It sticks to what it does best. It does not chase DeFi hype cycles or narrative driven use cases. Instead it focuses on the most "boring" part of finance is moving money efficiently. History shows that boring infrastructure often captures the most durable value. TCP/IP did not win because it was exciting it won because it worked.
In that sense Plasma feels less like a speculative Layer 1 and more like a bet on where crypto is quietly heading. Stablecoins are becoming the default interface between crypto and the real economy. If that trend continues blockchains purpose built for stablecoin settlement may end up being more important than chains optimized for everything else.
Based on my assessment Plasma chain and PLASMA are positioning themselves at exactly that inflection point. Will Plasma end up leading as a settlement layer? That is going to come down to how well the team executes the partnerships they build and whether people really trust them but the core idea just feels right. As crypto moves past the experimental stage and starts handling real money. We will need infrastructure thatis up to the task. That is probably where the next big wave of adoption comes from.
@Plasma
#Plasma
$XPL

Most Layer 1 blockchains still talk to the same audience is developers crypto native traders and people who already understand wallets gas fees and on-chain mechanics but mass adoption does not happen inside crypto circles alone. It happens when technology quietly fades into the background and people just enjoy the experience.
That's where Vanar takes a noticeably different approach.
Instead of competing in the endless race for higher transactions per second or more complex technical upgrades. Vanar is focused on something much harder and much more valuable is onboarding the next 3 billion users into Web3 through gaming, entertainment, AI driven experiences and real world brand integrations.
This is not just a technical bet. It's a strategic one.
Why Most Web3 Gaming Chains Miss the Bigger Picture?
Web3 gaming is one of the fastest growing narratives in crypto. According to recent industry research blockchain gaming is projected to exceed $10 billion in market value by 2027 while traditional gaming already serves more than 3 billion users globally. Yet only a tiny fraction of those players have touched Web3 games.
Why?
Because most blockchain gaming platforms are still built for crypto users first and players second.
Let's be real mainstream gamers are not going to put up with high fees clunky sign up processes or laggy transactions. They don't care about what's happening under the hood with blockchains or algorithms. What they want is simple is smooth gameplay fair rewards worlds they can get lost in.
Vanar gets that. Their idea? Meet people where they already are.
Vanar is not just another Layer 1 blockchain chasing numbers for the sake of it. It's built for real people especially anyone using apps and games not just finance geeks. Instead of just focusing on pure speed Vanar balances fast transactions low costs scalability and easy to use features.
Here is what stands out is Transaction fees are super low think cents not dollars.
It can handle tens of thousands of transactions every second.
The systems energy efficient so it fits with ESG goals.
Everythings built for the user experience, especially for games, entertainment and big brands.
All this is not just for show. When fees are high in game economies fall apart. If transactions take ages it ruins the whole experience. Vanar's approach actually keeps things running smoothly and energy intensive systems make enterprise partnerships harder in a world increasingly driven by sustainability goals.
Vanar removes these obstacles at the base layer.
Virtua Metaverse Bringing Digital Worlds to Life
One of Vanar's most visible products is Virtua Metaverse a digital environment that blends gaming, social interaction, NFTs and brand experiences into a single model.
Virtua is not just another virtual world. It's a gateway. Here you get to own digital assets that actually do something. Dive into immersive games. Hang out in branded spaces, collect cool stuff and chat with others all without having to learn the ins and outs of crypto.
That's what sets Virtua apart is it's easy to use. You don't need to know how blockchain works. The tech just does its thing in the background. If you have played mainstream games or poked around virtual spaces before you will feel right at home.
This is how crypto goes mainstream. People don't need crypto lessons. They just want fun experiences that work and crypto quietly powers it all behind the scenes.
Now let's talk about the VGN Games Network or Virtual Gaming Network. This is the second big piece of Vanar's gaming plans.
VGN hands developers the tools they need is quick game launches built in token rewards NFT integration that does not require a PhD in blockchain and performance that keeps up with real time play.
Most Web3 gaming platforms chase developers but forget about the players. VGN does both. Studios get freedom but players still get games that are fast, affordable and simple to jump into.
At the end of the day great games pull people in not just fancy infrastructure. Web3 gaming only grows when the content is actually worth playing.
AI as a Core Feature ~ Not an Afterthought
One of Vanar's most underrated strengths is how it integrates AI directly into its network.
Most blockchains treat AI like an afterthought. Developers have to jump through hoops just to add things like personalization, analytics or adaptive gameplay. Vanar flips that on its head it bakes AI right into the core and that changes everything. Now you get is
Personalized experiences for every player
Difficulty that actually adapts as you go
Smarter matchmaking so you are not steamrolled by pros
AI generated content that keeps things fresh
Real time analytics on how people actually play
Modern games live and die by how adaptive they are. Vanar's infrastructure does not just tolerate AI. It's built for it. That means devs can craft worlds that feel alive and responsive all without giving up on decentralization.
Why Brands Matter for Web3 Gaming?
Sure games alone pull in millions but if you want hundreds of millions you need brands in the mix.
Vanar gets this. That's why its infrastructure offers is
Tokenized loyalty programs
NFT powered brand campaigns
Blockchain rewards that actually work for regular people
Tools that let brands engage consumers without turning everything into a technical headache
Big names like Nike and Adidas have already dipped their toes in Web3 but honestly most got tripped up by clunky tech and fuzzy returns. Vanar smooths out those bumps giving brands plug-and-play options that actually fit with how marketing works today and there is the ESG angle. These days brands care about sustainability. Vanar's energy efficient consensus model is a breath of fresh air compared to the old power hungry proof of work blockchains. That's a big deal for companies under pressure to keep things green.
Bottom line is brands are not just a nice to have. When they show up. They bring users, trust and real cultural clout. That's how Web3 gaming goes mainstream.
Let's not sugarcoat it. This is a tough market.
Vanar's up against heavyweights like Immutable X and Ronin. Winning here takes more than a slick pitch. Adoption is slow market cycles are brutal and rules around gaming tokens and NFTs are still messy.
The real test is scale. Going from a few early wins to millions of players? That takes steady content, real partnerships and staying power but here is the thing is Vanar is not starting from scratch. The Virtua Metaverse already has people playing and the VGN Games Network keeps bringing new studios onboard. There is momentum and that counts for a lot. The foundation is there the next phase is execution.
Why Vanar's Approach Feels Different?
What truly sets Vanar apart is its priorities.
Instead of asking "How do we attract more developers?"
Vanar asks "How do we make this usable for normal people?"
Lower fees, AI integration, brand friendly tools and consumer focused design all point in the same direction is real adoption over hype.
Web3 does not need more experimental chains chasing metrics. It needs infrastructure that works quietly, reliably and at scale.
My Final Thoughts
Vanar is taking a big swing but it's the right kind of swing.
By focusing on gaming, metaverse experiences, AI driven personalization and brand integrations. Vanar is positioning itself as a bridge between Web2 familiarity and Web3 ownership. If the team continues executing Vanar could play a meaningful role in bringing millions possibly billions into blockchain without them ever feeling like they "entered crypto."
That's how mainstream adoption actually happens.
I will be watching how this network evolves closely.
@Vanarchain
#vanar
$VANRY

Stablecoins are everywhere now. They are the lifeblood of digital finance moving trillions fueling DeFi making payments feel instant and easy but honestly the tech holding them up just does not always keep pace. I saw it firsthand digging through USDC and USDT transactions. Even fast Layer 1 blockchains got bogged down high fees network traffic jams or just not playing nicely with other systems. That's where Plasma XPL comes in. It's a Layer 1 chain built from the ground up for stablecoin settlement promising sub second finality zero gas transfers and the rock solid security of Bitcoin anchoring. The result? A whole new way for people and institutions to move money.
Why Stablecoins Deserve Their Own Chain?
On the surface you might wonder why not just stick with Ethereum, TRON or even the old school payment networks? The thing is those platforms try to do everything and that comes at a cost. Ethereum gives you programmability sure but it's often slow, unpredictable and pricey pretty big problems when you are dealing with stablecoin transfers where every second and cent counts.
Plasma XPL goes straight for the pain points. PlasmaBFT consensus means transactions clear in milliseconds not minutes. Forget watching your transfer sit "pending" it's done before you can blink. Compare that to Ethereum, where you are lucky to get a transfer through in 15 seconds. TRON is faster but sacrifices some decentralization which brings trust issues. For people moving money overseas or big firms handling global payments, speed and reliability are not extras. They are the baseline.
Designing for stablecoins from the start lets Plasma XPL do things others can't. Gasless USDT transfers for example, mean you don't need to keep a stash of the native token just to send funds. That's a headache with Ethereum having to buy ETH just to move your USDT is a real adoption blocker. Plasma cuts that out entirely making the whole process smoother for everyone.
Bringing Bitcoin's Security to Stablecoins
Here is what really caught my eye: Plasma does not just trust its own validators. It anchors to Bitcoin the most neutral censorship resistant network out there. This is not just a technical detail. It's a big deal for anyone moving serious money. Institutions want guarantees that their transactions can't be tampered with. By anchoring to Bitcoin, Plasma gives them that extra layer of trust.
If you are running a business or a financial institution relying on a single validator set can feel challenge. Bitcoin's massive hash power is a backstop nobody's rewriting history without a fight. In a world where compliance, audits and trust mean everything. This kind of security is not just nice to have it's essential.
How Plasma Stacks Up Against the Old Guard?
Let's be real most stablecoin infrastructure is still patchwork. Take Circle's USDC. Circle built a strong settlement system but it's still centralized and relies on networks like Ethereum. That means fees, congestion and the constant need to double check if your payments really settled.
TRON makes USDT transfers cheap and fast but it's less decentralized which brings up censorship worries. People care about that now especially if they are using stablecoins as a hedge against unstable governments or economies.
Traditional payment systems? SWIFT and ACH are dinosaurs slow expensive and just not built for today's pace. Plasma by contrast makes sending USDT almost frictionless. You get real time settlement at a tiny fraction of the cost.
The stablecoin market is massive over $150 billion with daily volumes in the tens of billions but the support systems are still catching up. Plasma wants to be the stablecoin chain reliable enough for institutions simple enough for everyday users.
Who's Plasma For?
Plasma's design hits two main groups is for everyday users in places where stablecoins really matter think Southeast Asia, Latin America gasless transfers make a world of difference. A worker sending money home does not have to worry about ETH balances or hidden fees. It's just fast, easy and transparent.
For institutions Plasma's sub second finality and Bitcoin powered security mean they can settle trades, pay invoices or move money across borders without headaches and because Plasma is EVM compatible. It slots right into existing workflows.
It's a rare mix speed, security and simplicity tailored to the real needs of the stablecoin world. Plasma XPL is not just another chain. It's a serious upgrade for how digital dollars move.
@Plasma
#Plasma
$XPL

I have been tracking Web3 gaming for months and honestly most Layer 1 blockchains focus too much on transactions per second and not enough on actual adoption. When I compared Vanar with other gaming focused chains. I noticed it might actually solve the core problem is bringing mainstream users into Web3 through gaming, entertainment and real world brand integration.
Vanar is not just another Layer 1 blockchain chasing tech records. It's built for people who actually want to use it. The team knows the world of games, entertainment and big brands so they really get what newcomers need to feel at home. Their goal? They want to bring 3 billion new people into Web3. Not many are even thinking that big.
Their networks got some interesting pieces. There is the Virtua Metaverse which mixes gaming and social stuff with real rewards you can actually use. Then there is Virtual Gaming Network where developers can launch decentralized games set up token rewards and play around with NFTs. Basically Vanar looks at what regular people already love and meets them there. Instead of focusing on just crypto diehards. They are opening the door to everyone else.

Web3 gaming is set to pass $10 billion by 2027 at least that's what Electric Capitals 2025 report says. Regular gaming? Already at 3 billion users worldwide but barely anyone's jumped into blockchain games yet. Vanar's plan is simple is make it easy and cheap. Where Ethereum charges $5 or more for a single transaction. Vanar brings that down to about two cents. It's all about lowering the barriers and letting more people in. Vanar supports up to 50,000 TPS compared to Ronin's 2,000 TPS and Immutable X's 9,000 TPS.
I checked DappRadar's latest reports and it's clear that while competitors focus on developer adoption few chains offer both mainstream usability and scalable gaming infrastructure. When I stacked up Vanar against Immutable X and Ronin, the differences really jumped out. Immutable X sits on Layer 2 for Ethereum and lets you mint without gas fees but it's still tied to whatever traffic jams happen on Ethereum. Ronin works well for Axie Infinity, sure but it does not get much traction outside that game and its transaction speed is not impressive.
Now, Vanar's a different story. It's fast, cheap and covers a lot of ground gaming, the metaverse, AI, brand solutions you name it. Instead of chasing just one number or feature. Vanar builds out a whole infrastructure. That's what sets it apart.
What really grabbed me though is the way Vanar brings AI right into its gaming setup. That's a smart move. Most blockchain gaming platforms ignore AI entirely treating it as a separate concern. Vanar takes a different approach by embedding AI driven analytics content generation and personalized player experiences directly into their network. This matters more than it sounds because modern games rely heavily on adaptive content like dynamic difficulty adjustment personalized rewards and real time matchmaking.
Vanar does things differently. Instead of treating AI like an afterthought. They bake AI analytics content creation and personalized player experiences right into their platform.
Old school blockchains just can't keep up with AI. They were not designed for it so developers end up fighting the tech instead of building cool stuff. Vanar flips that script. Their system actually supports AI from the ground up so game developers can go wild with smarter more interactive games without giving up on decentralization.

Now the brand side is just as interesting. I have seen big names like Nike and Adidas dip their toes into Web3 but honestly most of them hit a wall. The tech is confusing and the learning curve is steep. Vanar makes it simple. They give brands tools for tokenized loyalty programs, NFT campaigns and blockchain powered rewards no need to get a PhD in crypto.
Lets be real is Web3 gaming won't hit the mainstream unless big brands get involved. Brands bring the people, the buzz, the money. Vanar's approach could be exactly what finally gets Fortune 500 companies into blockchain gaming. I also noticed their environmental positioning which matters in today's market. With Environmental, Social and Governance. concerns dominating corporate decision making. Vanar's energy efficient consensus mechanism makes it more attractive to brands facing sustainability pressure. Unlike proof of work chains that consume massive energy. Vanar's infrastructure aligns with modern corporate responsibility standards.
No projects ever risk free and I try to look at things from all angles. From what I have seen, it's still unclear how fast people will actually jump on board getting millions to swap over to a new gaming chain does not happen overnight. Competition is intense with Immutable X, Ronin and upcoming Layer 1 all vying for Web3 gaming dominance. There's also market timing challenge since NFT and game crashes or macroeconomic slowdowns could delay adoption. Regulations another wild card. Gaming tokens and NFTs still get a lot of attention from regulators and that can slow things down or block growth in some markets. I don't see these as deal breakers for Vanar but if you are being real you have to factor them in.
What really caught me off guard is Vanar is not just courting developers. They are actually putting regular players first which almost never happens in Web3. They are looking for ways to make everything smoother for everyday folks not just the tech crowd whether that is cutting down on annoying fees weaving in AI or working with brands. They are hitting a lot of the points that matter if you want people to actually use this stuff outside of crypto Twitter.
Tech specs alone don't win the game. I have watched tons of "game changing" blockchains with great features crash and burn because nobody cared enough to use them. For Vanar the real challenge is landing big name games keeping users coming back and making sure developers stay excited even when the hype dies down. The nice thing is they are not starting from scratch. Virtua Metaverse already has people playing and VGN Games Network is signing up studios but scaling up going from a few thousand to millions takes way more than just good servers. You need killer games, smart partnerships and constant improvements based on what players actually want.
From everything I have dug into Vanar's laying down the kind of base layer that could finally make Web3 gaming work for people who have never touched crypto before. Whether they pull it off comes down to what they do in the next year or two but the groundwork is there. If they nail it Vanar could end up being the bridge that brings millions or even billions into blockchain gaming, NFTs and the metaverse. It's a big swing but honestly this is exactly the kind of move Web3 needs right now.
I will be keeping an eye on VANRY the way their network is shaping up. It just might show us how Web3 finally breaks out of its bubble and goes mainstream.
@Vanarchain
#vanar
$VANRY

Toată lumea vorbește despre viteză și taxe, dar Plasma mizează pe faptul că fiabilitatea plictisitoare este ceea ce are nevoie cu adevărat cripto.
Când am analizat peisajul actual Layer 1, ceva părea în neregulă. Zeci de lanțuri continuă să concureze pe numerele brute TPS, deși cei mai mulți utilizatori reali nu experimentează blockchain-urile prin teste de stres sau tablouri de bord. Ei le experimentează atunci când trimit bani, finalizează tranzacții sau mută stablecoins peste granițe. Plasma mi-a atras atenția pentru că nu pare că urmărește următorul ciclu narativ. Se simte ca și cum se pregătește pentru ceea ce va arăta cripto după ce speculația se maturizează.

Vanar nu caută doar tranzacții mai rapide sau taxe mai mici, ca toată lumea. În schimb, ei se concentrează cu adevărat pe construirea a ceva ce agenții AI și oamenii reali pot folosi, ceva ce contează pe termen lung. Să săpăm în ceea ce fac. Tot revin la faptul că adevărata valoare a VANRY începe cu cât de util este pentru utilizatorii reali, nu doar cu hype sau speculație.

Când am analizat de ce atât de multe lanțuri Layer 1 se confruntă cu dificultăți în a transforma performanța tehnică în adoptare reală, un model a devenit evident. Cele mai multe blockchain-uri au fost concepute într-o eră în care scopul principal era descentralizarea și capacitatea de procesare. Ele nu au fost concepute pentru sisteme inteligente, agenți automatizați sau experiențe utilizator fără întreruperi care să pară invizibile pentru utilizatorul final. În evaluarea mea, acest decalaj este exact locul în care Vanar se poziționează diferit.

Cei mai mulți oameni încă analizează blockchains Layer 1 ca pe mașini de curse, comparând viteza, comisioanele și prințul teoretic. Când am analizat Plasma mai profund, mi-am dat seama că nu încearcă nici măcar să câștige acea cursă. Plasma face ceva mai inconfortabil și mult mai interesant, și anume, își redesign-uiește modul în care stablecoins se mișcă de fapt în lumea reală, mai ales acolo unde mișcarea banilor contează mai mult decât speculația.
Stablecoins reprezintă acum peste 70% din volumul total al tranzacțiilor on-chain conform raportului Visa din 2024 privind decontarea on-chain, totuși ele încă funcționează pe o infrastructură niciodată concepută pentru plățile de zi cu zi. Comisioanele de gaz cresc, confirmările întârzie, iar utilizatorii sunt așteptați să gestioneze tokenuri native doar pentru a trimite dolari digitali. Arhitectura Plasma se simte ca o reacție la acea nepotrivire mai degrabă decât o altă încercare de a depăși Ethereum.

Există mult zgomot în spațiul blockchain, toată lumea urmărind următoarea mare realizare, încercând să fie cea mai rapidă și cea mai strălucitoare, dar Vanar face lucrurile diferit. Nu promovează doar un alt token. Construiesc tipul de infrastructură care permite proiectelor alimentate de AI să funcționeze direct din cutie.
Când am început să explorez Vanar, nu căutam doar TPS sau instrumente pentru dezvoltatori. Încercam să înțeleg de ce unele blockchains au succes cu utilizatori reali, în timp ce altele rămân rețele de testare în așteptare. În evaluarea mea, diferențiatorul este o mentalitate axată pe AI, care proiectează infrastructura încă din prima zi pentru a gestiona în mod nativ raționamentul, memoria, automatizarea și decontarea. Majoritatea lanțurilor de astăzi adaptează AI pe sisteme vechi, creând ineficiențe și afectând experiența utilizatorului în moduri subtile. Când te aprofundezi în VANRY, vezi că este mai mult decât doar ceva de tranzacționat. Este integrat în fundația tehnologiei Vanar. Și se vede. Produse precum myNeutron, Kayon și Flows nu sunt doar idei. Ele sunt deja exemple funcționale ale a ceea ce poate face această configurație. Practic, VANRY face parte dintr-o infrastructură, unde agenții AI și aplicațiile din lumea reală nu sunt doar posibile. Ele se întâmplă deja.