THEY’RE KEEPING THIS SECRET, BUT I’M MAKING IT PUBLIC.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #walrus $WAL What you’re looking at in this image is how the game is actually played.
Big money doesn’t care about RSI, MACD, or whatever indicator is trending this week.
They care about where liquidity sits, who’s trapped, and how to force reactions.
Retail looks at a chart and sees chaos, but institutions see the same setups repeating over and over.
– QML setups – Fakeouts & liquidity grabs – Demand/Supply flips – Compression → Expansion – Stop hunts disguised as breakouts – Flag limits – Reversal structures that happen over and over again
None of this is accidental.
Every pattern on that chart exists for one reason:
to move price into areas where orders are stacked.
Once you understand that, a lot of things stop hurting you.
You stop chasing green candles, you stop panic-selling red ones and you stop getting liquidated on moves that came out of nowhere.
Because they didn’t come out of nowhere, they came from structure.
This is why most traders lose… they react to price instead of understanding why price is moving.
The people who last in this market spend years studying charts like this until they finally understood it.
After that, the market feels slower, clearer and less emotional.
Save this image. Actually study it.
If you can learn to read what institutions are doing instead of guessing what comes next, you’re already ahead of 99% of people here.
I’ve been in this game for 20+ years, and I’ve called the last 3 market top and bottom publicly.
If you want to see my next move (coming soon), you just need to be following me with notifications.
If you still haven’t followed, well, you’ll regret it. Just watch
#walrus $WAL When I see whales consistently buying while retail flow stays hesitant, I don’t read that as distribution. I read it as patience.
This kind of divergence usually shows up when smart money is building positions quietly, not chasing momentum. Price isn’t collapsing, but sentiment hasn’t flipped bullish either that’s the key part most people miss.
Retail typically waits for confirmation. Whales don’t. They buy uncertainty and sell confidence.
This doesn’t guarantee upside tomorrow, but historically these phases are where positioning happens before the next real move shows itself on price.
That’s why this setup feels boring… and why it matters. @Walrus 🦭/acc
#walrus $WAL 🇺🇸 Brian Armstrong says he’s ready to “come back to the table” on the Bitcoin & crypto market structure bill.
Why this matters: - Coinbase stepping back in reopens negotiations with lawmakers - Signals the bill isn’t dead it’s being renegotiated - Industry leaders pushing for rules that don’t favor banks over crypto - Regulatory clarity is still on the table, just with revisions
#walrus $WAL BELGIUM’S 2ND LARGEST BANK OPENS $BTC ACCESS
Belgium’s second-largest bank, KBC, will allow customers to buy and sell Bitcoin and Ether starting mid-February 2026.
The service will be offered to retail investors via Bolero, KBC’s online investment platform ; marking the first time a major Belgian bank integrates crypto trading directly into its core services.
This move follows rising demand from Belgian investors who previously relied on foreign exchanges or digital banking apps. @Walrus 🦭/acc
#walrus $WAL BITCOIN & ETHEREUM VS INDICES, HISTORY RHYMING
Look at the charts: S&P, Russell… new ATHs.
Now check Bitcoin and Ethereum: are we seeing a divergence? Or is $BTC and $ETH just lagging?
History shows this pattern: • Risk assets move first then liquidity rotates in • Bitcoin & Ethereum follow with force and often catching up to new highs • Lagging here doesn’t mean weakness, it signals the next leg
If the script holds: → BTC & ETH could be next to set new all-time highs → Structure, momentum, and liquidity all align
Believe it or not, the data doesn’t lie. This is the quiet before the move that everyone will notice too late. @Walrus 🦭/acc
#plasma $XPL wall Street dreht durch – und keiner merkt es
Während #Bitcoin unter $96K dümpelt, passiert im Hintergrund etwas Historisches.
JPMorgan – ja, DIE JPMorgan – veröffentlicht diese Woche einen Report der es in sich hat:
$130 Milliarden sind 2025 in Krypto geflossen. Rekord. +33% mehr als 2024.
Und jetzt kommts: Für 2026 erwarten sie noch mehr.
Der Twist?
Über 50% dieser Zuflüsse – etwa $68 Milliarden – kamen von Corporate Treasury-Firmen. Strategy allein hat $23 Milliarden in #Bitcoin gepumpt. Andere DATs haben von $8 Mrd. (2024) auf $45 Mrd. (2025) beschleunigt.
Aber das ist nur eine Bank. Hier das komplette Bild:
→ JPMorgan: $170K Kursziel, Stablecoin-Markt auf $500-750 Mrd. → Standard Chartered: $150K → Bernstein: $150K (2026), $200K (2027) → Fundstrat (Tom Lee): $200K-$250K → Morgan Stanley: Eigenen Bitcoin ETF eingereicht → Goldman Sachs, Citi, Deutsche Bank: Arbeiten an Stablecoin-Launches
Das sind keine Krypto-Influencer. Das sind Institutionen mit Billionen unter Verwaltung
Markets just dumped after President Trump commented on the Fed and Kevin Hassett.
Trump said: "Fed officials don’t talk much. Hassett is good at talking. He was good on TV, I want to keep him where he is." @Cellula Re-poster #dusk $DUSK Hassett was being seen as a potential candidate for the next Fed Chair and is known as a pro-liquidity, rate-cut friendly figure.
So when Trump hinted that Hassett would stay in his current role and not move toward the Fed, expectations for easier monetary policy weakened.
The “Safe” 15%-18% Yield: The Covered Call Risks Greg Discovered
Greg had a problem most people would kill to have: he was sitting on 50 Bitcoin, and it was boring him to death. @Cellula Re-poster skor three months, price had been stuck in a narrow channel between $92,000 and $98,000. While the rest of crypto chased meme coins and DeFi yields, Greg’s portfolio, worth nearly $4.7 million, was effectively dead money.
Then he saw the strategy that promised to fix it.
“Generate ~15–18% annualized yield on your Bitcoin,” the newsletter read. “Low risk. No leverage. Just selling upside you probably won’t need.”
It was called the Covered Call Strategy.
The pitch was seductive: you hold your Bitcoin. You sell a contract giving someone else the right to buy it at $100,000 next month. In exchange, they pay you cash today.
Greg ran the numbers. Selling calls would net him roughly $70,000 per month. Nearly $840,000 a year. Just for waiting.
“It’s like collecting rent on a house,” he told his friends. “I’m getting paid to hold.”
He didn’t realize he had just agreed to pick up nickels in front of a steamroller.
The Hidden Cost: Selling Your Convexity (Upside) What the newsletter didn’t explain was Bitcoin’s first principle: Positive Upside (or convexity for nerds).
Bitcoin is asymmetric by design. It can go down 100%, but it can go up 1,000%, 10,000%, or more. You tolerate volatility because the right tail pays for everything.
By selling call options, Greg surgically removed that right tail.
Upside: Capped at $100,000 Downside: Fully intact
He engineered Negative upside (Convexity). The “yield” wasn’t income. It was an insurance premium. Greg had become the volatility seller in a market that exists to punish volatility sellers.
The Trap: The Hedge (Gamma) Flip ($93,640) The trap sprang on a Tuesday morning. Greg’s dashboard flashed a warning he didn’t fully understand:
Gamma Flip: $93,640
This was the structural line in the sand for dealers.
Above $93,640: Dealers are "Long Gamma" and buy dips. Below $93,640: Dealers flip "Short Gamma" and sell into weakness.
That morning, adverse regulatory headlines hit. Bitcoin slipped to $93,100. Once price crossed $93,640, the stabilizers vanished.
$93,100 became $91,000. $91,000 became $86,000. $86,000 became $82,000.
In six hours, Greg watched roughly $600,000 of mark-to-market value evaporate.
“At least I have the premium,” he thought.
He had collected $70,000 for the month. But the “safe yield” was a two-inch airbag in a 100-mph crash.
The Second Steamroller: The Recovery The true tragedy of covered calls isn’t the drawdown. It’s the recovery.
Two weeks later, the panic proved temporary. Bitcoin didn’t just bounce it ripped. $85,000. $95,000. $105,000. $120,000.
This was the moment Greg had waited years for. The God Candle.
But he didn’t really own 50 Bitcoin anymore. He had sold the right to buy his coins at $100,000. When price hit $120,000, the calls were exercised.
Greg kept his $70,000 premium. The call buyer kept the upside and the Lamborghini.
The Lesson Greg learned too late that Yield is not Income. Yield is Risk in disguise.
Selling covered calls on Bitcoin is a bet that nothing interesting will happen. Bitcoin exists precisely because interesting things happen.
Greg is still in the market, but he no longer sells calls. In an asset engineered for exponential moves, capping your upside for a monthly paycheck is the most expensive mistake you can make.
He stopped trying to be a landlord collecting rent, and went back to being an owner building wealth. #dusk $DUSK
INSTITUTIONAL MONEY DIDN’T DISAPPEAR -- IT ROTATED
While $BTC has chopped below $100K, gold ripped +61%, its biggest annual move since the late 1970s. #Bitcoin? Down ~11% over the same window.
That’s not a rejection of Bitcoin, that’s just risk management. @Cellula Re-poster #dusk $DUSK With a cautious Fed, sticky inflation, and geopolitical noise, institutions parked capital in the cleanest hedge first. Gold did its job. Fast.
You can even see it on-chain. Tokenized gold flows are concentrated in $PAXG and $XAUT, now dominating most of the tokenized commodity space. That’s where capital went while it waited.
This isn’t structural, it’s just tactical.
Institutions didn’t rotate out of Bitcoin forever. They rotated ahead of clarity. When the risk-off bid fades and macro pressure eases, that capital doesn’t stay in gold.
It looks for asymmetry. Gold is where capital hides, and Bitcoin is where it goes when it wants upside. This divergence feels less like the end of a cycle and more like the setup before rotation back.
January 10th, 11 PM UTC. Someone lost $282M in Bitcoin and Litecoin through a hardware wallet social engineering scam. 1,459 BTC and 2.05 million LTC were stolen in a single attack. @Walrus 🦭/acc #walrus $WAL usere's why this matters for price action over the next few days.
The attacker is already moving funds aggressively.
Converting stolen LTC and BTC to Monero through multiple instant exchanges.
That selling pressure spiked $XMR prices temporarily as they absorbed massive buy orders.
They're also bridging BTC to Ethereum, Ripple, and Litecoin via Thorchain.
Diversifying across chains to make tracking harder and prepare for exit liquidity.
This isn't someone holding stolen coins long-term.
This is an active conversion and distribution happening right now.
$282M in selling pressure doesn't just disappear.
Even if they're converting through DEXs and instant exchanges, that creates downward pressure on BTC as they dump into liquidity pools and OTC desks.
The problem is timing.
Markets are already fragile with the Supreme Court tariff ruling and Fed speakers.
Now add nearly $300M in potentially forced selling from a hacker trying to exit positions before exchanges freeze wallets.
Bitcoin could see downward pressure for the next few days as this plays out.
Not because of fundamentals or macro. Just pure supply hitting the market from someone who needs to convert stolen assets fast.
Hackers don't wait for optimal prices. They sell into whatever liquidity is available because time is their enemy.
Every hour that passes is another hour for exchanges to blacklist addresses and freeze funds.
This means the market sells, not limit orders. Aggressive dumping into bid side to exit quickly.
$282M isn't economy-moving, but it's enough to impact price action short-term, especially in already volatile conditions.
If you're positioned long, just be aware this selling pressure exists and could show up randomly over next 48-72 hours as the attacker continues converting and moving funds.
Not predicting a crash.
Just flagging that nearly $300M in likely selling pressure from a motivated seller is overhead supply that wasn't there last week
#Bitcoin hat heute wieder gezeigt, wer hier wirklich die Kontrolle hat. Und es sind nicht die Trader. Der Ablauf war chirurgisch präzise: → 90 Minuten: -$1.800 → Longs im Wert von $80M liquidiert → Retail-Panik setzt ein → 15 Minuten später: +$1.400 → $20M Shorts werden vaporisiert
In weniger als zwei Stunden wurden $100 Millionen an gehebelten Positionen vom Markt gefegt. Beide Seiten. Erst die Bullen, dann die Bären.
Das ist kein Crash. Das ist kein Pump.
Das ist eine koordinierte Säuberung.
Ich nenne es den "Double Tap" – und ich sehe dieses Pattern immer häufiger. Der Markt bewegt sich nicht zufällig. Er bewegt sich dorthin, wo die Liquidität liegt.
Und die Liquidität liegt bei den gehebelten Positionen.
Was mich dabei wirklich beschäftigt: Die Geschwindigkeit der Erholung. 15 Minuten für $1.400 nach oben – das ist keine organische Käufer-Rally. Das sind Market Maker, die nach den Liquidierungen den Reset-Knopf drücken.
Für jeden der denkt, er könnte mit 10x oder 20x Leverage den Markt schlagen – dieser Chart ist deine Realität. Du bist nicht der Spieler. Du bist der Einsatz. @Walrus 🦭/acc #walrus $WAL Ich bleibe im Spot. Die Haie jagen Leverage
#Bitcoin testet gerade ein Level das in der gesamten Krypto-Geschichte noch nie gelogen hat. Der Weekly MA50 – aktuell bei $101.400. In Bärenmärkten wurde die6ser Moving Average nie wieder zurückerobert. Nicht 2018. Nicht 2022. Nie. @Plasma #Plasma $XPL Wer darunter schließt und unten bleibt, bestätigt den Bärenmarkt. Wer ihn zurückerobert und hält, startet die nächste Rallye.
Und genau da stehen wir jetzt.
#Bitcoin steht bei ~$95.500. Weniger als 6% vom kritischsten Level des gesamten Zyklus entfernt.
Was ich beobachte: Letzte Woche sind wir kurz drüber gebrochen, wurden aber direkt wieder abverkauft. Das war der erste Test. Die Reaktion zeigt, dass hier massive Orders liegen – auf beiden Seiten.
Warum das für euch wichtig ist: Dieses Level ist kein Indikator unter vielen. Es ist DAS Level. Wenn wir den Weekly Close über $101K schaffen, sind wir historisch betrachtet nicht mehr in Bärenmarkt-Territorium.
Die nächsten Wochen werden zeigen, ob die Bären die Kontrolle behalten – oder ob wir einen der wichtigsten Reclaims der Bitcoin-Geschichte sehen.
Ich halte dieses Level jetzt auf meinem Radar. Jede Weekly Candle zählt